Slashdot Mirror


U.S. Joins Hollywood in War on Piracy

Section_Ei8ht writes to mention a Washington Post article about a new joint initiative between the U.S. government and the entertainment industry. The government will now be aiding efforts abroad to stop copyright infringement. They cite the recent Pirate Bay fiasco, as well as the problems Russia is having with the WTO as a result of their thriving IP black market. From the article: "The intellectual property industry and law enforcement officials estimate U.S. companies lose as much as $250 billion per year to Internet pirates, who swap digital copies of 'The DaVinci Code,' Chamillionaire's new album and the latest Grand Theft Auto video game for free."

28 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Stupidity in action by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is dumb for two reasons. One is that it is the US meddling in other nations purely internal affairs. The other is that it is yet another war on an abstract idea. (joining the war on terror and the war on poverty) Bad news, you can't win against an idea, only against a group of people (terrorists, pirates, the poor?). And yes there are too many pirates to even think about "winning" against them. They probably make up more than 50% of the population.

    1. Re:Stupidity in action by dgatwood · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think we need a war on politics, personally. Might actually have some benefits for the public in the long term.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Stupidity in action by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > This is dumb for two reasons. One is that it is the US meddling in other nations purely internal affairs. The other is that it is yet another war on an abstract idea. (joining the war on terror and the war on poverty) Bad news, you can't win against an idea, only against a group of people (terrorists, pirates, the poor?). And yes there are too many pirates to even think about "winning" against them. They probably make up more than 50% of the population.

      Did you really think that we want those laws to be observed?" said Dr. Ferris. "We want them broken. You'd better get it straight that it's not a bunch of boy scouts you're up against - then you'll know that this is not the age for beautiful gestures. We're after power and we mean it. You fellows were pikers, but we know the real trick, and you'd better get wise to it. There's no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals. Well, when there aren't enough criminals, one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws. Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens' What's there in that for anyone? But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced nor objectively interpreted - and you create a nation of law-breakers - and then you cash in on guilt. Now that's the system, Mr. Rearden, that's the game, and once you understand it, you'll be much easier to deal with."

      - Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged, 1957.

      In other words, This is smart for two reasons. One is that it is the US meddling in other nations' purely internal affairs. The other is that it is yet another war on an abstract idea. (joining the war on terror and the war on poverty and the war on some drugs, which that other guy forgot.)

      Good news, you can't win against an idea, only against a group of people (terrorists, pirates, the poor?). And yes there are too many pirates to even think about "winning" against them. They probably make up more than 50% of the population, meaning that there's about a 50/50 chance that when we need to put someone in prison, or just sue them into the stone age, we'll be able to do so.

      All we need now is a war on pr0n, and we'll have around 70% of the population as criminals. Then we turn power over to the Democrats, they can declare the Christian fundies that make up our voting base as McVeigh militia whackjobs, and we'll have absolute power over everybody.

      Power corrupts. Absolute power is pretty cool.

    3. Re:Stupidity in action by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But we have reports that those countries have weapons of mass distribution!

    4. Re:Stupidity in action by anicca · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Since the war on drugs has made drugs cheap, pure and ubiquitous, the war on terror is doing the same for terrorists, do you really want more politics? While everyone is rushing to war on one another, the fox is in the henhouse.

      --
      A people that values its privileges above its principles soon loses both. Dwight D. Eisenhower
    5. Re:Stupidity in action by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 4, Funny

      So ... we should have a war on Fox? Now I'm really confused.

    6. Re:Stupidity in action by kfg · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Get out and shout and vote until it's legal again. The US government . . .

      . . .is not a democracy.

      KFG

    7. Re:Stupidity in action by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It's pretty stupid to claim that if we had a war on porn, then 70% of the population would be criminals. If 70% of the population supported porn in a democracy that criminalized porn, then they would be a shining example of stupidity in action.

      Think about alcohol Prohibition. Before and after Prohibition, a majority of adult Americans drank alcohol at least occasionally. (Perhaps even during it, though we'll never know.) Yet the idea was popular enough to get passed via constitutional amendment, requiring the approval of two thirds of both houses of Congress AND all the state legislatures. Not that it wasn't stupid, it was *so* stupid that 13 years later it became the only amendment ever repealed.

      Never underestimate the ability of the American electorate to be precisely that stupid.

      --
      Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  2. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...who swap digital copies of 'The DaVinci Code,' Chamillionaire's new album and the latest Grand Theft Auto video game for free

    Gee, you should be PAYING THEM to download that crap. Eew.

  3. Something I'd like to see: by daeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd like to see a study that looks at if people that pirate software and other copyrighted materials would pay for them to begin with. I'd also like to see a study of the commercial gains from piracy. For instance, downloading an MP3 from a friend of a song. The downloader likes the song, so he buys the entire album from iTunes. He now kmow about the band and enjoy them and will likely purchase more. All I see are press releases from the record and movie industry claiming they "lost" money.

    1. Re:Something I'd like to see: by blibbler · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The problem with studies into things like that is the effect of piracy is very nebulous. While it is unlikely Adobe loses a sale if a 13 year old "software collector" downloads photoshop, there is a reasonable chance that they lost a sale to a 30 year old hobbiest photographerwho does the same. The music situation is similarly difficult to pin down. While I have bought many CDs of artists that I have first been introduced from downloads, there are many albums that I have been content to have downloaded MP3s of. Would I have bought them otherwise? Maybe, maybe not. In the hight of the original napster, CD sales were very large and "pirates" argued that the CD sales were being fed by the napster downloads. Music downloads have continued to rise, while CD sales have collapsed, however today "pirates" claim that the low CD sales are caused by the labels not releasing any good music. It doesn't take much of a brain to see the problem with that argument.

      The other problem with such studies are their credibility. Would you believe the results of a study that was funded by the RIAA (or even a copyright friendly government.) A study conducted by a group like downhillbattle.org or the FSF would have the same level of credibility (remember the adage 'Just because you agree with a statement, does not make it true). Ultimately, any study conducted would be hailed by interest groups that agreed with the outcome and ignored by interest groups that did not. Leaving everyone right back where they started, just angrier.

  4. $250 Billion? With a B? by Pedrito · · Score: 4, Funny

    The intellectual property industry and law enforcement officials estimate U.S. companies lose as much as $250 billion per year to Internet pirates, who swap digital copies of "The DaVinci Code," Chamillionaire's new album and the latest Grand Theft Auto video game for free.

    These 3 products have a value of as much as $250 billion? Wow, these guys really are making too much money. Guess I better go download some more movies.

    1. Re:$250 Billion? With a B? by optimus2861 · · Score: 4, Informative
      They calculate the figure the same way they've always calculated it -- pulling it out of their ass. That figure is higher than the gross domestic product for 35 of the 50 states. It's fully one-quarter of the Canadian gross domestic product. Do they really expect anyone to believe that they're losing as much money as the sum of all economic activity in any of Maryland ($227b), Indiana ($227b), Minnesota ($223b), or Tennessee ($217b), every single year?

      Little wonder nobody gives a damn about what they have to say on the issue.

    2. Re:$250 Billion? With a B? by Wildclaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      RIAA/MIAA isn't losing $250 billion every year. The real truth is that society is gaining $250 billion/year because of file sharing. In other words, filesharing is very good for society. Without it, society would be a lot poorer.

  5. Grand Theft Auto by nEoN+nOoDlE · · Score: 5, Funny

    So first the government wants to ban the legal sales of Grand Theft Auto here in the US and now they want to ban the illegal download of Grand Theft Auto overseas? Are they for or against the game? Or do they just not want anyone to have it?

    --
    Don't trust a bull's horn, a doberman's tooth, a runaway horse or me.
  6. Democracy by LainTouko · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Ah, the democratic will of the people in action. At last the US government is listening to the cries of its people to punish those Swedish guys who make free stuff available and aren't breaking any local laws. Oh, wait...

  7. Is there anything left to say on this topic? by Screwy1138 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's unfortunate, but this is just more of the same.

    But what are we going to do? Intervene more in the politics of other nations? Yeah they love that. We can go to war to get all our copies of Grand Theft Auto back (right before we ban them for being obscene).

    Sooner or later India and China will have a larger say in global economics, and their positions on these topics will carry more weight. I wonder what things will be like when other countries don't bend so easily to the will of the U.S.

  8. Since the war on terror worked out so well by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    It sounds like they're going to be moving to the war on piracy. I expect we'll be carpet bombing Stockholm before the elections.

  9. I love contributor links... by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ...such a this one. I used it to send a letter to the author of the linked article. This letter is enclosed below. If it contains factual errors, let me know; I may have listened to the wrong slashbots.

    In "U.S. Joins Industry in Piracy War" you seem to allude to the shutdown of The Pirate Bay early on when you say mention an "illegal file-sharing Web site" in Sweden. Numerous Swedes have been working to set people straight on this - The website "The Pirate Bay" was in no way illegal under Swedish law because it does not itself contain any copyrighted materials, only links to the same. Your assertion that their site is illegal is libelous at best, since Swedish law does not prohibit such a site. In fact, their law only prohibits the exchange of copyrighted material - having it unshared on your hard disk is not a crime.

    Copyright law in the US was intended to protect our cultural heritage, not to provide profit to copyright holders in perpetuity. It is now little more than a shield that megacorporations can hide behind so that they have no need to innovate and bring us something NEW. The two acts which extended copyright were far from being in the interest of the American people.

    The seizure of TPB's servers illustrates that fascism is alive and well, and spreading throughout the world. The police in fact seized numerous servers that did not even belong to TPB as an apparent scare tactic to bring ISPs in line with their wishes, even though they were not backed up by law - if you harbor those who are practicing their legal rights, you may in fact lose business because we will interfere with it, deliberately and without cause.

    By referring to TPB's actions as illegal, you are helping to perpetuate a fraud against the entire planet.

    Hopefully I was correct about all this, but the claims I have made above were made in many long-standing high-score comments in the last discussion about this subject, and not refuted, so hopefully peer review will have made me sound like I know what I'm talking about.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  10. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  11. SO how much by geekoid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    is the industry giong to pay for our government to do this? oh wait, taxpayers will.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  12. There's No Business Like Show Business by Nefarious+Wheel · · Score: 5, Funny

    Politics is show business for ugly people.

    --
    Do not mock my vision of impractical footwear
  13. Double standard? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US picks and chooses which of its laws it will enforce in other countries -- the general trend seems to be that if there is a belief that some US corporation can profit from the law being enforced, it will be; otherwise, the US government couldn't give a shit. Consider the laws here in the states (and recognized by several international groups) regarding chemical factories. Does the US start meddling with other countries when a US chemical company decides to open up a plant somewhere and blatantly breaks the laws it would be required to follow here in America? No. Labor laws? No. But turn it around,so that the company is producing its products here in the states and selling them overseas, and suddenly, the US is interested in enforcing American laws outside of America. Double standard?

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  14. A corollary quote... by QRDeNameland · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Eventually it was discovered
    That God
    Did not want us to be
    All the same

    This was
    Bad News
    For the Governments of The World
    As it seemed contrary
    To the doctrine of
    Portion Controlled Servings

    Mankind must be made more uniformly
    If
    The Future
    Was going to work

    Various ways were sought
    To bind us all together
    But, alas
    Same-ness was unenforcable

    It was about this time
    That someone
    Came up with the idea of
    Total Criminalization

    Based on the principle that
    If we were All crooks
    We could at least be uniform
    To some degree
    In the eyes of
    The Law

    Shrewdly our legislators calculated
    That most people were
    Too lazy to perform a
    Real Crime
    So new laws were manufactored
    Making it possible for anyone
    To violate them any time of the day or night,
    And
    Once we had all broken some kind of law
    We'd all be in the same big happy club
    Right up there with the President
    The most excalted industrialists,
    And the clerical big shots
    Of all your favorite religions

    Total Criminalization
    Was the greatest idea of its time
    And was vastly popular
    Except with those people
    Who didn't want to be crooks or outlaws,

    So, of course, they had to be
    Tricked Into It ...
    Which is one of the reasons why
    Music
    Was eventually made
    Illegal.

    --Frank Zappa (from the booklet of Joe's Garage, Acts II & III - 1979)

    --
    Momentarily, the need for the construction of new light will no longer exist.
  15. TFA consists of no research whatsoever by Facekhan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article repeats the falsehoods that The Pirate Bay and the AllOfMP3.com are illegal file sharing websites. One is a legal under Swedish law and is a torrent site that does not host any copyrighted material. The Russian site, AllofMP3.com sells mp3 tracks legally by a quirk of Russian copyright law. The reason the RIAA is pissed is for 2 reasons, the first is that the songs are sold cheaply to both Russians and foreigners who go to the site which screws with their regional price fixing system, and the other is that they are not collecting the royalties to which they are owed because of those who are supposedly representing foreign copyright holders in Russia pocket the money themselves or they simply choose not to make the effort to get their share from those entities. This also infringes on the RIAA's patented business model which is mostly based on cheating artists out of royalties. If the writer did even a scrap of research beyond the press releases from the RIAA then at the very least the word "allegedly" illegal file sharing might be used instead.

  16. Ah fantasy accounting by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The intellectual property industry and law enforcement officials estimate U.S. companies lose as much as $250 billion per year to Internet pirates,

    Think for a moment about this sentence. No not about the amount or how they arrived at it. Think about that sentence and and the saying, "you can't spend a penny twice".

    That amount X is perhaps lost to the content owners BUT it is not somehow evaporating into thin air, that amount saved is being spend on other things.

    So if the content industry gets the amount X then other industries will lose an amount X. Put simpler, that kid who has a allowance who just got a movie for free will now spend that money on his cellular phone, fast food, clothes etc etc.

    It is the real problem with the content industry. They used to have to contend only with clothes for young kids pocket money. Now there is games and the phone to contend with. If you ever worked for a phone company you will know how many people get into trouble with their mobile phone bill. That is money they can't spend on music/movies/games. You can't pirate cell phone minutes but you can pirate content.

    The industry world wide isn't being hurt by pirating, just the industries that are being pirated.

    As to the amount, well you then have to simply ask, where the hell would the economy come up with a spare 250 billion dollars. Since that amount of money is unlikely to be stuffed behind the couch, even Bill Gates, the figure is meaningless. You may as well make it a gazillion for all the relevance.

    If piracy was eleminated today the only thing that would happen is that you would see a shift in spending patterns. Perhaps the fashion industry needs to get in on the side of the pirates, cause if everyone has to pay for every bit of content they used to get for free, they will have a lot less money to spend on clothes.

    The economy is not a infinite idea, there is X money and you can't just wish up an extra amount. That 250 billion just doesn't exist.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  17. "War on" == already lost by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "War on drugs", "war on poverty",....

    As some political commentator once said, once the feds declare war on anything the cause is already lost. How is a "war on piracy" going to actually accomplish anything? All it will do is provide an arena for posturing and bribery^h^h^h^hlobbying.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  18. The true Costs of Piracy! by dognuts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There's a huge difference between perceived loses & real loses.
    They appear to be taking a page out BSA's book to reach such conclusions.

    Using the entertainment industry's analogy, every P2P download represents a lost sale,
    & it sounds & looks good to the average Politician!

    Now if we use an example the flaw will become apparent.

    Example: If Photoshop's latest version get's downloaded via P2P 100,000 times does
    that mean they lost those sale's?

    Answer: At $649 US a pop I very mush doubt it!

    Being generous I'd guess only 1% to 2% of those 100,000 people would truly pay
    $649 US for Photoshop if that was the only way they could get it.

    I think it would be safe to say the true cost of Piracy isn't $250 billion, but closer to the
    $2.5 to 5 billion mark anually.
    In all likelyhood the U.S. government will spend more than that amount each year hence
    forth in fighting Piracy, thanks to the lobby groups mystical figures.