Shuttle to Launch Despite Objections
sam0ht writes "NASA has just named July 1st as the launch date for the space shuttle Discovery, a year after the last shuttle mission. Last July's mission was the first since the break-up of Columbia in 2003, but after foam again broke away from the main tank, the shuttle fleet was grounded. More foam has been removed from the main tank, but NASA staff are divided over whether this is enough to ensure the flight's safety, with some reporting that both the lead engineer and top safety official are against launching again so soon. Managers want to make only one major change at a time, and plan that if damage does occur, the crew would be able to stay in the International Space Station, to which they are delivering supplies, rather than trying to land a damaged shuttle."
Ignoring engineers hasn't got the Shuttle very far in the past. From the Challenger Wikipedia article:
Good. About friking time I had a new wallpaper for my 3840 x 1024 desktop.
Each time the shuttle goes to the ISS I get new wallpaper.
That might be just about the best thing to come out of the ISS program. *sigh*
How many escape pods are there? "NONE,SIR!" You counted them? "TWICE, SIR!"
Where has 'acceleration' been 'lately'?
Probably "hiding" between a pair of "apostrophes".
which means the only solution is this: terrorists in space.
11 was a racehorse
12 was 12
1111 Race
12112
I don't know about that. Most shuttle trips are pretty short: They start at one of the Kennedy Space Center's launch pads, and they disembark just a couple of miles away at the shuttle's runway.
Comparing them to any kind of car is pretty pointless.
You must be new here. This is slashdot, where car analogies are king.
It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.