Why Apple Backed out from India?
rmunaval writes "BusinessWeek reports an interesting article on why Apple might have backed out from India. The prime reason being, India has grown at a much more rapid rate than expected and is no longer the cheap destination for the companies. It grew at an astonishing rate of 9.3% last quarter."
We have to pay them close to a living wage?
That wasn't part of the deal.
Forget it, we're out of here. . .
Funny, back when there was so much lather over outsourcing everything but the CEO to India, a few folk mentioned that this might happen and were replied to that with 2 billion people it won't happen in our lifetimes. Hope you are all doing ok!
Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
Now India will feel the pain as jobs are outsourced to Asia and Eastern Europe where rates are cheaper! Pretty soon, people in Zimbabwe will be coding :)
http://psychicfreaks.com/The most likely reason that comes into my mind is a power struggle of some sort between management of that company. I bet someone was sold on an idea that moving jobs to India would cut costs, but then someone else was in the opposite camp and we just saw the result of that battle. Was any manager fired from the company within the past month?
You can't handle the truth.
Apple is a publicly traded company and as such here's what's important to them.....
Making money for their stockholders.
That means sweatshops for iPods and doing things like heading down the dangerous path of closing off the Darwin source for development so that OSS geeks can't find a way to make OS X work on commodity boxes.
Apple is going to do what is best in their corporate interest. Surprised? Don't be. It's business
Am I the only one who sees this as utterly fascinating?
In a way US corporation going to India stimulated this growth. It is interesting to me that India has changed because of outside investment but the way they have changed has made them less appealing to those same investors.
Globalization is bitch, isn't it?
I don't give a damn for a man that can only spell a word one way.
Mark Twain
Is it only me that gets frustrated when my calls are piped over to India? I'm all for globalisation and outsourcing but when basic customer service suffers it serves only to frustrate customers, or me at least.
I've lost count of the number of times I've literal just given up and hung up while trying to do simple tasks over the phone like notify change of address or query a bill.
The 3 companies I've had particular problems with are Amex, Dell and Apple.
"The turnover is high, and the competition for good people is strong."
My company is currently using Indian developers to augment our in-house staff. Every time the offshore company presents someone to us that cuts the mustard, we end up having to rotate someone else on after that person bolts for another company in India three months later. We keep getting told that demand is so high for QUALITY Indian developers that no one can keep them. They keep bouncing from outfit to outfit, getting salary bumps with each move. It's second hand information obviously, but it certainly does synch with what we've experienced.
Not Apple Records, silly!
Post-rock/Ambient/Drone and other noise.
Not sure how the subscription model for time.com works, but I have been able to access all stories in the Cover article without a subscription:
Bombay's boom
Hooray for Bollywood
India Awakens
My lost world
Worth a read.
An Indian-American Hindu committed to non-violent thought/speech/action alarmed by the global explosion of radical Islam
Doesn't the part of knowing when to cut and run imply that it was the right decision? The way I've always looked at outsourcing as an engineer is that you want to have people of varying backgrounds in any large organization. I think that India and China are part of this along with the US and others. Other countries will come into the fold as well, but I think that it'll be for the better of the company to have multiple groups with different backgrounds and experiences.
Now, it sounded like this venture was purely for help desk, which I think is being performed at a commodity level nowadays (in the sense that all service seems to suck, given that good service costs money). In that case, moving to wherever it is cheapest is probably a good move. Though maybe they'll just add to the number of workers woring 15-hour days in China.
-dave
/., where "Apple and Google provide Iran with nukes" will be refuted with "But Microsoft is a convicted monopolist"
Homer taught all the Indians about paid vacations and golden parachutes and casual fridays and health plans, just a couple of weeks ago.
Actually, that episode was good social commentary... It's basically what's happening. The Indian labour force is developing the sense of entitlement so near and dear to our hearts.
I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
I gotta wonder if the person who submitted this article worked as a translator for Zero Wing...
"All your base are belong to us."
"India has grown at a much rapid rate."
Yeah, seems like the same guy...
What we are at this point seeing are the first steps in a cycle of balance.
India has been in a horrible financial condition. It's got large amounts of debt and it's trying to work it's way out of them. This comes with financial assistance from the international community. You have many of these poorer nations not able to afford the subsidies anymore for farmers , which means more people migrating to the cities for the promises of these fantastic tech jobs.
Problem is the cities aren't ready to handle all these people, and the government isn't ready to handle all this displaced workforce. Result? SLUM TOWN!
Uh Oh, now the international community is on nations to provide a base level of support for their people. They don't want sweat shops and shanty towns of workers paid pennies on the dollar of what others get. India has to rely for a good deal on it's own people to solve this problem for themselves because they don't have the money to. If they want to they have to start taxing these companies more, which means.... costs go up. On an individual level? How to get out of the slum, you have to get paid more so you can afford to live there, you demand more pay.. they demand more for your contracting.. Costs rise...
Suddenly all those cost benefits from outsourcing start evaporating.
From my personal perspective.. yay. This is far more effective a way to "keep jobs here" than trying to legislate some mandate for companies to do so. In this case, the "free market economy" is actually doing it's job.
I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
India is going through a tech boom similar to the U.S. tech boom in the 90's. Qualified computer-related experts are demanding higher and higher salaries and jumping to whatever company is the current high bidder. As the wages go up, the rest of India's economy booms. India is beginning to take on many of the good and bad aspects of the U.S. economy. With most of its over 1 billion people in povberty, China can out compete India easily on wages. Training just 1% of that number with technial support produces a 10,000,000 strong workforce. The process of U.S. jobs migrating to India will happen to Indian jobs over the next 5-10 years as China becomes the outsourcing destination of choice.
Obviously, Slashdot is outsourcing its editor jobs...
"Slashdot. News is for the nerds. Stuff that is the matter."
Just junk food for thought...
First, the BW article speculates... the author doesn't really know. So was it high wages? Was it something else? "We" don't know yet.
However, there are several issues with setting up in India that probably make it less attractive for Apple.
1) Worker loyalty: while all tech workers probably seem like mercenaries these days, it is even more so in India's white hot tech areas. The workers will leave for what we, in the U.S., would consider miniscule salary differences.
2) Worker training: Indian workers are often broad brush trained in "popular" technologies - finding software engineers trained in non-Windows, non-Oracle, non-SAP, or non-J2EE tech is probably much harder to find at a cost effective salary. Again, this is an issue in the U.S. too, but more pronounced in India and many other non-U.S. technology boom areas.
3) Best of the best: Apple is small (workforce numbers) and tends to follow the hire the best of the best (even if they don't give them the best of the best resources to work with). Those that are really good are probably already working in the U.S., or would not find it all that hard to make it into the U.S. The number left of the best of the best in India probably aren't much cheaper these days (one would often have to be 4:1 to 8:1 cheaper to outweigh the below).
4) Big costs (not just money): Apple doesn't have huge projects that require a thousand or thousands of engineers on a single project that might be able to amortize the costs/issues of temporal and geographical displacement. Apple has most of its software engineering done in Cupertino, and it would take a big shift to deal with significant outsourcing or remote development.
5) Core strength: software engineering is Apple's bread and butter, it is what differentiates the hardware, it is its own profit center. Messing with this too much is not a good idea. Apple can't treat this as a commodity item on a balance sheet.
6) Expansion deals went through in CA: Apple bought a large data center and has plans to build another campus in CA - and the review of those deals going through probably meant that this Indian effort doesn't make sense for Apple right now.
None of this particularly means anything with respect to India, India's tech boom, IBM in India, outsourcing to India, etc. This is merely Apple's evaluation on whether or not it makes sense for Apple. These issues have been there, will continue to be there. It is strange that Apple started and effort but then pulled out, but that is better that they are contantly critically re-evaluating rather than what we've seen from some other U.S. companies that have staked huge efforts on "hot trends" that some CIO/CFO/CEO reads in a trade mag, rather than doing true critical analysis. Going to India may make sense for lots of companies, but certainly not to the level we've seen it lately.
Painstakingly.
Typos.
Insert "and" just before "came".
Indeed.
1) That's disappearing.
2) It-apostrophe-s is a contraction for "it is". "Its", on the other hand, is possessive. Counterintuitive, but that's English for you.
So to recap, you should have written "disappearing up its own asshole.". Have a nice day.
Hail Eris, full of mischief...
E pluribus sanguinem
How much is a living wage? Is it different if I'm single and live with 3 roommates? How about if I have 12 children (6 with "special needs")?
Should I expect to have to provide my employer with more work (or more valuable work) for the higher "living wage" I need for my family situation?
Because I thought I was supposed to get a "working wage" -- based on the value of my work.
Just shows, how lack of proper details about a situation can manifest itself into prejudice. Caste system in India is a non-entity in the way it used to be. The reserved castes (earlier called lower castes) now get active affirmative with as much as 70% of some colleges purely earmarked for them. Publicly distinguishing people based on caste can get you to jail
The caste system does not violate human rights, and commenting on an issue without understanding it just makes people look asinine.