Slashdot Mirror


Work Begins on Arctic Seed Vault

Aryabhata writes "BBC reports that Norway is starting construction on a 'doomsday vault' in the Arctic which is designed to house all known varieties of the world's crops. The vault's purpose is to ensure survival of crop diversity in the event of plant epidemics, nuclear war, natural disasters or climate change; and to offer the world a chance to restart growth of food crops that may have been wiped out. 'More than 100 countries have backed the vault, which will store seeds, packaged in foil, at sub-zero temperatures. ... Norway's Agriculture Minister Terje Riis-Johansen has called the vault a "Noah's Ark on Svalbard."'"

89 comments

  1. My experiences with seed storage by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    The sad part comes when in 50 years this vault is eagerly opened and found to only contain many many dead weevils.

    1. Re:My experiences with seed storage by sexyrexy · · Score: 1

      Is that really your personal experience with Arctic seed storages?

      --

      Rex is 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    2. Re:My experiences with seed storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just assumed that, since I have in the past stored oatmeal in a dark cupboard only to have it eaten by weevils, my input would be invaluable.

    3. Re:My experiences with seed storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From my experience of finding weevils in a bag of peas is that they are an excellent source of extra protein in pea soup.

    4. Re:My experiences with seed storage by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > > The sad part comes when in 50 years this vault is eagerly opened and found to only contain many many dead weevils.
      >
      > Is that really your personal experience with Arctic seed storages?

      Weevils sense his power and they seek the life essence. He, uh... he does not avoid weevils, Slashdotter... but he does deny them his essence.

    5. Re:My experiences with seed storage by DCowern · · Score: 4, Funny

      The sad part comes when in 50 years this vault is eagerly opened and found to only contain many many dead weevils.

      To be honest, if I had to choose between a barren wasteland with no hope of regenerating plant life for millions of years and the potential for some surviving seeds, I'm going to have to go with the lesser of the two weevils.

    6. Re:My experiences with seed storage by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 3, Funny

      The solution is to strategically locate containers of lutefisk around the vault. There are some things even weevils, cockroaches and rats cannot stand to eat, and mankind will be the better for it. Y'all ever been to Minnesota?

    7. Re:My experiences with seed storage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be the notoriously insipid Arctic Weevil?

    8. Re:My experiences with seed storage by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Our family was firm believers in the maxim, "if mold won't grow on it neither will you"

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    9. Re:My experiences with seed storage by 16384 · · Score: 1

      I hope they don't forget to include a spare water chip...

    10. Re:My experiences with seed storage by wwest4 · · Score: 1

      As such, we can no longer sit back and allow weevil infiltration, weevil indoctrination, weevil perversion and the international weevil conspiracy to sap and impurify our precious seed storages.

  2. Vault 13 by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 5, Funny

    General "Buck" Turgidson: Doctor, you mentioned the ratio of ten women to each man. Now, wouldn't that necessitate the abandonment of the so-called monogamous sexual relationship, I mean, as far as men were concerned?

    Dr. Strangelove: Regrettably, yes. But it is, you know, a sacrifice required for the future of the human race. I hasten to add that since each man will be required to do prodigious... service along these lines, the women will have to be selected for their sexual characteristics which will have to be of a highly stimulating nature

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

    1. Re:Vault 13 by Recneps · · Score: 1

      "but they will see the big board!"

  3. I hate to have a jaded eye... by Chabil+Ha' · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but it would really be ironic if, sometime in the distant future, the vault is broken open and actually causes the destruction of future life because of ecosystem incompatibilities. I say live and let die. The Earth seems quite adept at recovering and moving on over its billions of years. We weren't the first ones here, nor the last. We are not even a fraction of a blink of an eye to the Earth.

    --
    We're all hypocrites. We all have hidden parts, it's the contrast between them that make us more a hypocrite than others
    1. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by RsG · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Uh, these are crop seeds. They aren't trying to preserve wild organisms or anything like that.

      Domesticated crops can't even handle your average weed all that well. They aren't part of any natural ecosystem (some can't even breed without human help). They're essentially dependant on us to survive, which is exactly why we need to have a backup stored, in case we fuck up our existing stocks. How exactly would this "cause the destruction of future life"? Attack of the killer tomatos maybe?

      And as for the earth adapting, who cares? The earth isn't in any danger, and never has been. There are plenty of events that would be disasterous for our species, and plenty of other events that would be equally disasterous for other species, but as you rightly say, life would adapt and continue. However, we might not be around to see it.

      This vault has nothing to do with helping the earth adapt and everything to do with helping future humans adapt/recover.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by SQLGuru · · Score: 0

      "Attack of the killer tomatos maybe?"

      All it takes is one stray cosmic ray to ruin the hole lot.....mutated crops lead to death of human kind.

      Layne

    3. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by oni · · Score: 5, Funny

      2145. It was after the gene wars. Mankind huddled in the dark on baron continents, fighting each other for tiny scraps of meat. But there was a hero; one with a memory of the before time and the scrapers, and the courage to make the dangerous journey to the artica where, the ancient scrolls hinted, the salvation of mankind might be found.

      For over a decade, he and his brave knights fought against danger and fortune to make their way to the artica. Many died. Much was lost. But one day, our intrepid hero arrived home, in his tiny, all-but-dead village. He carried in his hand, a single vile.

      "this is all that has survived of my trip" he explained. "though the artica contained many wonders, our journey was hard, and most of our cargo was lost. We managed to save this one plant. It shall be the foundation of a new human culture. We shall plant it and tend it, and we shall teach our children to cherish it. This plant is a gift from our distant ancestors. It's name" (he turns the vile on its side so that he can read the inscription) "is, Kudzu"

    4. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by Surt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Kudzu is real good for feeding to cows. It's just a hassle that it kills everything else, but in your dark future it might actually be quite a godsend.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    5. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by treeves · · Score: 1

      of course, on the baron continents, most everyone has his own fortified compound, complete with armies of loyal thugs to protect their master's stores of wealth, including frozen seeds.

      --
      ...the future crusty old bastards are already drinking the Kool-Aid.
    6. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      "For over a decade, he and his brave knights fought against danger and fortune"

      Perhaps fighting against fortune wasn't the best strategy?
    7. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by Inda · · Score: 1

      I'll only watch it if Kevin Costner has the star role.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    8. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by JSC · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sorry but I just gotta...

      "Mankind huddled in the dark on baron continents..." Are you sure they're not huddling on duke continents or maybe count continents? Or did you mean "barren" continents.

      And then there's "He carried in his hand, a single vile." A single vile what? What vile thing does he later turn on its side so he can read the inscription? Or did you perchance mean "vial"?

      The sad thing is that, based on the grammar and spelling, I'm guessing that you're American. Since I'm also American, you'll understand why I find posts like yours so humiliating and embarrassing. (If you're not an American, I humbly apologize. I doubt that I would do as well in your native language.)

      Please learn the damn language before you write in it.

      --
      Time's fun when you're having flies. - Kermit the Frog
    9. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by networkBoy · · Score: 1

      just to be pedantic the vile thing is the kudzu.
      -nB

      --
      whois gawk date unzip strip find touch finger mount join nice man top fsck grep eject more yes exit umount sleep dump
    10. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by 4D6963 · · Score: 1

      We are not even a fraction of a blink of an eye to the Earth.

      What do you do with us causing the 6th massive extinction? A blink of an eye? More like a bullet to the head.

      --
      You just got troll'd!
    11. Re:I hate to have a jaded eye... by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Domesticated crops can't even handle your average weed all that well.

      Actually, most commercial crops are highly competitive.

      > They aren't part of any natural ecosystem...

      Natural, smatural. We and they are part of the same ecosystem.

      > some can't even breed without human help.

      Many plants can't breed without the help of some animal. For crop plants, that animal happens to be us. The strategy has been very successful.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  4. The Moon by mr_stinky_britches · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How about putting the vault somewhere on the moon? If there was a major nuclear disaster...couldn't the effects screw up the poles of the earth too?

    --
    Censorship is obscene. Patriotism is bigotry. Faith is a vice. Slashdot 2.0 sucks.
    1. Re:The Moon by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If we're clawing our way out of the muck after doomsday, we're going to have a hard enough time getting to the Arctic, much less the Moon.

    2. Re:The Moon by RsG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Think smaller than that.

      Anything that renders the human race extinct, by definitiion also renders these seed vaults irrelevant. This means that we mostly consider dangers arising from either war, plauge or natural disaster.

      War won't affect the poles as much as it will the rest of the world. There are no strategically signifigant targets nearby to worry about. Plague that wipes out crops won't affect frozen seeds in hard to reach places. And the only natural disasters I can think of that would matter here are things like global warming and asteroid impacts - and as long as you don't build somewhere that'll flood, you should be safe from those.

      The moon is much harder to get to. If we have a war, or mass starvation due to crop failure, we'd be better off with the seeds close to hand. And asteroid impacts are a much larger issue on the moon (no atmosphere to block them), as is radiation (which would sterilize the seeds), so it's not like they'd be a whole lot safer there than here.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:The Moon by Surt · · Score: 4, Insightful

      War won't affect the poles as much as it will the rest of the world. There are no strategically signifigant targets nearby to worry about.

      Except for the seed vault. Can't have our surviving enemies getting their hands on that. Better nuke it.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    4. Re:The Moon by halcyon1234 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I'd much rather see some sort of fail-safe built into this vault. Humans have to periodically check in on the vault and press the button. If they don't press it after, say, 1,000 years, the vault goes into "reseed" mode. It assumes that:

      a) Humans are dead, dying, or incapable of reaching the vault

      b) Whatever knocked down the humans has dissapated over the last 1000 years, so it is safe for "human friendly" life.

      Of course, the 1000 years is arbitrary. I'd let a team of nuke'n'germ warfare folks come up with a number that was greater than the life expectency of thier most powerful kabooms. You could also hook up a Geiger counter to the release switch for an extra layer of protection.

      So, after the 1000 years is up, the vault springs into action. It barfs out whatever bacteria is needed to fertilize the land. The it starts shooting seeds-and-spores-and-stuff deployment packages across the globe. The SSS packages burst over land, raining seeds. This may have to be done in stages. Seed the keystone species of plants first, then once those have grown, fire off the strawberries and lilacs.

      The objective is to load up the vault with enough human-friendly stuff as possible. Plants that put out oxygen. Trees that have leaves, fruit, roots that are edible by human. Environmental engineer species. If humans are alive, life will get better for them. If humans have been wiped out, the packages should recreate an environment condusive to human life once more. Sure, humans might not be a dominant species for hundreds or hundreds of thousands of years, but the scales would be tipped in their favour.

      Heck, while we're at it, we might as well put as much data into the vault as possible. The complete history of humans in as many languages as possible (including all the screw-ups that lead to extinction). Put in as many Rosetta Stones as possible. Put frozen humans in there, too, so future generations (hopefully) don't think aliens seeded the planet.

    5. Re:The Moon by Forbman · · Score: 1

      Don't forget the exposure to cosmic radiation on the Moon that would eventually sterilize most of the seeds anyways over time.

    6. Re:The Moon by khallow · · Score: 1

      My thoughts exactly. If we build a single special vault for preserving some important resource, then it becomes a target. During the Cold War, there were enough nuclear weapons going around that even obscure bridges and dams were considered nuclear targets in case of full blown nuclear war. I seem to recall hearing that allies or just powerful neutral countries faced some chance of being nuked too. After all, Russia or the US wouldn't want to be colonized by a untouched China, for example. In this environment, a seed vault would stand a very good chance of becoming a nuclear target.

      The solution is, as others have mentioned, to maintain a number of these vaults so that there's no military advantage to taking them out.
  5. More than likely... by DaSenator · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the seed vault would probably end up being destroyed in the nuclear war.

    I can just see it now...

    "SoyLent Food Company - Good people making good food. Now in Green flavor!"

    --
    Entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem.
  6. Manditory Master and Commander Quote: by dubmun · · Score: 3, Funny

    Which one would YOU choose?
    ...
    You must always choose the lesser of two weevils!

    --
    (end of post)
    1. Re:Manditory Master and Commander Quote: by aminorex · · Score: 1

      Personally, I'd nuke the Ark first, then go on to the rest of the planet.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
  7. ALL known varieties? by xxxJonBoyxxx · · Score: 1
    "...which is designed to house all known varieties of the world's crops."

    I wonder if Monsanto would believe that line?

    1. Re:ALL known varieties? by FirienFirien · · Score: 1

      Well, Monsanto's crops are designed so the plants produced by their seeds are sterile, i.e. bad choice for the seed bank anyway. That's giving a man his proverbial fish.

      --
      Browsing with +2 to insightful posts and a higher threshold makes the average post seen seem a lot more ingenious
  8. after considering all the facts by FudRucker · · Score: 1

    considering the dark side of human nature and what geneitic manipulation corperations like Monsanto are doing i applaud Norway for doing this...

    --
    Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    1. Re:after considering all the facts by dreamchaser · · Score: 1

      Odds are good that GM seeds are included in this vault. These are crop seeds, not seeds of naturally occuring plants.

    2. Re:after considering all the facts by RsG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, if you really want to get technical about it, all our crop seeds are genetically altered. Domesticated plants and animals have been bred for specific purposes for thousands of years, and artifcial selection has altered the gene pool.

      In fact, half the danger to our current crops is due to genetic "monoculture", whereby the plants are all too genetically similar to each other. When you have field after field of practically identical plants, the possibility for a disease or parasite finding a niche is very high. Look at the Irish potatoe famine as an example of this.

      Hence the need for backups like this. Monsanto isn't the source of the problem, though they've certainly made it worse.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    3. Re:after considering all the facts by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if you really want to get technical about it, all our crop seeds are genetically altered.

      Interestingly, another way to look at it is that we, as species, have co-evolved with our crop varieties, to the mutual benefit of each other. After all, human-cultivated crops are massively successful, from an evolutionary standpoint, and those same crops have ensured our own survival. The same can be said for the huge number of domesticated animal species out there.

    4. Re:after considering all the facts by FudRucker · · Score: 1

      exactly my sentiments, i trust natural selection over a profit driven corperation any day...

      --
      Politics is Treachery, Religion is Brainwashing
    5. Re:after considering all the facts by giorgiofr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      do you also trust common, curable diseases (natural selection) killing your children over medication (a profit driven corporation) saving them? oh i am sorry that would be a corpEration and those are quite vicious beasts all right.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    6. Re:after considering all the facts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newsflash: corporations did not invent medicine. Although now that they've taken it over, an awful lot of people are dying unnessecarily.

    7. Re:after considering all the facts by shaitand · · Score: 2, Funny

      YES. This is exactly why I support raising domesticated sex slave females. Selective breeding will insure that they are extremely successful from an evolutionary standpoint.

  9. Um, stupid place to put it... by kabocox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Um, I don't know about you, but I'd want several of these all over the global. They may need to re-think their idea though. If major planet disease/bioterror strike wiped out all our food sources and we really needed this to reseed the global food sources, what are the odds of no one being able to get there to unlock it? Or better yet we've nuked our selves back and we know that their is the vault and close to where it is, but unforunately it's being guarded by polar bears that are hungry... O.k. long term I'd put my money on the nuclearly mutanted savages rather than the polar bear, but why not several of these on each major land mass near major crop lands? Heck, why stop at stock piling seeds? Why not stockpile tractors and fertilizer and enough resources that you could feed a major city within a year from a single stock pile?

    1. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Putting it somewhere easy to get to means it'd quite possibly get looted or otherwise somehow destroyed either through the normal course of society "seed bank? fuck that, we're building a golf course!" or as part of its collapse "mmm, seeds".
      You could post guards, of course, but this has problems of cost and isn't necessarily that effective in the long term.

      Having more than one bank is obviously a smart thing to do. But I don't see why it's just Norway who should be building them - write to your local representative, monarch, worker's commitee chairman...

    2. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by Frozen+Void · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Forward-thinking in case of doomsday events is likely absent.Its judged alarmist.Of course,The judging people who just don't care or willing to die anyway in such an event.
      Now,plant crops are most valuable thing we have now in this ecosystem(though its considered as basic as having water).You can't reinvent them from nothing(domesticating leftover post-doomsday event plants will take ages).Coal,water,uranium,iron ore don't disappear.

    3. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by daranz · · Score: 1

      The point of the vault is to store a couple (thousand) of samples, not to be a terraforming resource. The concern here is that after a major disaster, some types of crops might become totally extinct; the vault is there to allow people to reintroduce the particular crops back into the envirnoment. Creating such a vault takes less resources than creating a vault with crops and other resources that would allow to support a large population. Hell, such resources would probably be better spent by helping areas which lack food right now, instead of being buried underground, waiting for apocalypse.

      --
      This is a sig. It is appended to the end of comments I post.
    4. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by Jenga717 · · Score: 1

      Why not stockpile tractors and fertilizer and enough resources that you could feed a major city within a year from a single stock pile?

      I think before we attempt to stockpile tractors and food (which is perishable, and would therefore need to be re-stocked every few years) and fertilizer and such to feed people in a major city for an entire year in case of a major disaster, we should perhaps focus first on feeding the starving people found all over the world.

      Regarding the stockpiling of seeds, I believe it is a very good idea. Seeds are small and do not perish easily; therefore they are efficient to store over long periods of time. These seeds are crops that people have been growing for a long time, so they will know how to grow them even after a major disaster. Although not every life would be saved by these seeds, many could be saved.
      I also believe it would be important to keep updating the seed supply, so if a country phases out one sort of crop in favor of a more efficient crop, only the crop that many people know how to grow will be stored at Svalbard (unless of course there is enough room in the storage facility to continue to store the phased-out crop's seeds.)

    5. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by RalphSleigh · · Score: 1

      Its quite simple really, the vault will emit radio waves that when properly decoded will form a 3d model of a length of human DNA with one base pair missing, when the missing base pair is encoded and transmitted back to the vault the door will open....

      --
      Come as you are, do what you must, be who you will.
    6. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      almost every city that was around in the 50's has several fall out shelters. Some are still public while some have been sold off for private use. In these public falout shelters there should be enough canned food to feed and water around 200 people for three to four weeks. Businesses used to keep and maintain these fallout shelters as a public service too. Food vaults might already exist in some fasion.

      In my home town (central ohio area), i know of three that still exist reletivly close to downtown and at least 3 more that exist in the subburbs wich are now surounded by parks. It wouldn't be too surprising to find that there are places like this around almost every town. It probably would take a nuke attack before these resources if still being stored, would be released to the public though.

      Something i would be worried about with a single vault might be some waring factions attempting to control access to it and it only being usefull to ceretain people. Multiple seed vaults might make more sence to limit this. Also, with multiple vaults, the likleyhood of some terrorist group gaining control of it and then waging bioterrorism and wipping out the free worlds food supply. This type of protection could be used to enact the exact type of catastrophy it is designed to protect. Maybe we should develope seed storage kits that would make it easy for private citizens in any area to store some seeds just in case of something like this. Of course they wouldn't last as long as in the artic but 50lbs of seed stashed in 500 homes over something like every 100 square miles being replaced every five years shouldn't be too much of an investment. It could be verry effective if ever needed.

    7. Re:Um, stupid place to put it... by Hotawa+Hawk-eye · · Score: 1

      Don't stop at seeds and farm equipment. Those would be useful for the short-term recovery of the local population, but you also need to plan for long-term recovery of the civilization. Put in a few generators, a couple of computers, spare parts for both, and both hard copy and DVDs containing technical and cultural data such as great works of literature; blueprints for the farm equipment, generator, computers, etc. that are included in the "goodie hut"; and instructions for how to construct various useful pieces of equipment that could not, for whatever reason, be included in the cache.

  10. Isolating seeds by Spy+der+Mann · · Score: 1

    Why not putting the seeds in carbon fibre capsules, so that the damage is minimized?

  11. All the worlds eggs in one basket by bano · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think it would be more prudent to have redundancy in this system.
    Maybe one in the arctic, one in antarctic, one in maybe the Sahara or Gobi, or maybe under a mountain somewhere.
    Thus ruling out some sort of catastrophy taking out the entire seed vault.
    You would also rule out one country being in charge of the system.

    1. Re:All the worlds eggs in one basket by amliebsch · · Score: 3, Funny
      or maybe under a mountain somewhere.

      I know of the perfect place! A huge, secure facility bored into a mountain that is designed to hold its contents unperturbed for extremely long periods of time. It's under a mountain, like you say...Yucca Mountain, I think it's called...

      --
      If you don't know where you are going, you will wind up somewhere else.
    2. Re:All the worlds eggs in one basket by sumdumass · · Score: 2, Interesting

      catastrophy? just wait until some rebels take control of the vault and then wipe all the other crop seeds out with some bioterrorism. Then everyone will have to pay them to replant or starve.

      Redundancy might be a must.,

    3. Re:All the worlds eggs in one basket by Misagon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seed banks are nothing new. There have been seed banks in every western country for at least a hundred years, and there still are, so there is a lot of redundancy right there.
      This seed bank is a little bit bigger, that's the only difference.

      Seed banks need to replenish their stocks every few years by planting, because seeds will eventually degenerate even when stored in sub-zero temperatures.

      --
      "We mustn't be caught by surprise by our own advancing technology" -- Aldous Huxley
  12. hey man, ========~~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    don't forget the weed, man.

    1. Re:hey man, ========~~~ by type40 · · Score: 1

      Dude, we already have a seed bank for weed. It's called a collage campus.

      --
      "You can see I know very little about pimp policy." George McGovern.
    2. Re:hey man, ========~~~ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you say that jokingly...

  13. just make sure you get the right ones by magwm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hope for them that the seeds stored are not like those nice monsanto F1 hybrids that freak out (become sterile) after one generation.. wouldn't do mucht to restore much on a global scale..

    Actually, it would be wiser to hibernate some of the more 'weedlike' or 'wild' crops, those that are not yet GM'ed to the final product, so that a fast start can be made to produce lots of initial raw material. (the 'wilder' the plant, the faster it multiplies, mostly.. and the offspring can be crossed with many a cultivated type of crop)

    Then, i have some very interesting seed of my own here, not exactly plantlike but it does conserve well frozen.. just in case there happens to be a male-only extinction...

  14. nice business plan... by pxuongl · · Score: 1

    to offer the world a chance to restart growth of food crops that may have been wiped out

    .... for a price

    1. create vault of all food crops in world
    2. incide thermonuclear war
    3. PROFIT!

  15. Excellent! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    After the Day of Lavos, the people of Arris Dome will have plenty of food!

    1. Re:Excellent! by espinafre · · Score: 1

      Do I get a candy if I say what this alludes to?

  16. Global Warming? by dpaton.net · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Even if all cooling systems failed, explained Mr Riis-Johansen, the temperature in the frozen mountain would never rise above freezing due to the permafrost on the mountainside."

    Hmm..their backup/failsafe cooling system is permafrost. Cue the global warming inducted failure discussion.

    /flamesuit on

    --
    This is not a sig. this is a duck. quack.
  17. sure, but... by chasingporsches · · Score: 1

    i don't think the island will be there if the glaciers melt.

  18. They Made a Movie About This by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Silent Running, http://imdb.com/title/tt0067756/

    In the end they all die except the stupid little robot.

  19. Not sure about this plan... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 3, Funny

    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: So the seeds are buried somewhere round here
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: But where exactly?
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: Well I have the GPS coordinates here but they're a bit useless seeing as the GPS satellites were first to go in the War
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: So how are we going to find them?
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: Well I have a picture of the site.
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: Cool, what does it look like?
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: Well it's a patch of white snow surrounded by lots of white snow.
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: Don't you have a map or something?
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: Yeah, I can see exactly where it is relative to a bunch of features...
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: Cool!
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: ...but those features appear to be buried under a hundred feet of snow and we no longer have the technology to map the land that far down.
    Post-apocalyptic Human 2: So what are we going to do?
    Post-apocalyptic Human 1: Screw it! Seeds are just hippie food anyway.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  20. The Future of Food by DigitalRaptor · · Score: 1

    I ~highly~ recommend everyone watch "The Future of Food", documenting the inner workings of Monsanto, the goal of which is to quite literally one day control the entire food supply of planet earth.

    After watching the documentary, I have to say, the don't have far to go...

    --
    Lose Weight and Feel Great with Isagenix
  21. those exist.... by zogger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..many people now maintain their own long term "sealed in a can" seed storage, myself included. I always keep quite a bit of various garden seed packed away, a lot of them are in number #10 enameled cans just for this exact purpose like in the article.

        Google for "heirloom seens, long term storage", you can find companies that sell seeds packed into cans for long shelf life. You can do it yourself too, it's not that hard to make sealed containers with like CO2 flooded in there, etc. It's a common technique in the survival/preparedness communities.

    1. Re:those exist.... by Magada · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Medieval (and earlier) people used covered-up holes in the ground (usually clay) to store their cereal. Many of these were found to have charred sides (but not bottom, which was covered in largish rocks) and bits of partly-burnt hay were found on occasion. An archeological mistery, but perhaps what these people did was to "pad" the walls of their pit with smallish amounts of hay, fill it, set the hay on fire and finally cover the lot to extinguish the fire. It is my educated guess that the hay would burn quicky and go out quickly, before being able to make a significant amount of "popcorn". Low-tech CO2-flooded seed storage, anybody?

      Ah. Where's an experimental archeologist when you need one?

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  22. Who exactly is going to use this? by Zadaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If there's a "global catastrophe" big enough to wipe out a significant portion of plant species on the planet, wouldn't either:

    A) Human be pretty freaking dead also?

    B) If there were survivors, wouldn't they starve to death by the time they: 1) Went to the north pole and back, 2) found arable land to plant these seeds in the middle of a worldwide catastrophe, 3) Raised a successful crop?

    Besides, what do zombies need with seeds? They eat brains.

    1. Re:Who exactly is going to use this? by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      And these brains they grow on trees, unfortunatly for the zombies they will have to cultivate food crops to feed their brainys just as a huge portion of human agriculure fees poultry, pigs, and cattle.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:Who exactly is going to use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The purpose of the vault is not ensure survival of man, but survival of the crop:
      "The vault's purpose is to ensure survival of crop diversity"

    3. Re:Who exactly is going to use this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If mankind doesn't survive, I don't think seeds burried under the arctic are going to survive either.

  23. Good. Now assuming. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    that everything you learned in school is seriously flawed, and that high-tech, global civilizations have been and gone several times before ours, (there's plenty of evidence of this), how often do you think some bright spark thought to set up a seed-bank or similar on the eve of destruction?

    Right. Now. . . How good a sci-fi novel would it be to set about searching for one such time capsule from a previous world-spanning empire? Atlantis, Lemuria, or something prior. . .

    Or have such things already been found and plumbed?

    Hm.


    -FL

  24. Re:Good. Now assuming. . . by Turbofish · · Score: 1

    Been done.

    See H.P. Lovecraft's At the Mountains of Madness. http://sprg.ssl.berkeley.edu/~wcoburn/hpl/mountain s.html

  25. insects? by zogger · · Score: 1

    Maybe that technique was useful to quickly kill off insect infestations, but keep the grains still viable.

    1. Re:insects? by Magada · · Score: 1

      It was long-term storage, but probably could wipe out some of the less hardy pests as well.

      --
      Something bad is coming when people are suddenly anxious to tell the truth.
  26. One point of failure by weeboo0104 · · Score: 0

    It might survive disasters that happen in other parts of the world, but what if it was struck by a meteorite?

    --
    It is easier to build strong children than to repair broken men. -Frederick Douglass
  27. MOD PARRENT UP!!!!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Theirs know raisin four you're vial spelling.

    Oh, BTW, kuzdu r00lz!

  28. Thank you Dr. Falken... by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1
    The earth isn't in any danger, and never has been. There are plenty of events that would be disasterous for our species, and plenty of other events that would be equally disasterous for other species, but as you rightly say, life would adapt and continue. However, we might not be around to see it.

    Ya, ya, maybe the War Games will bring about the time of the Bumble Bee...
    Thanks Dad,

    - Joshua

    --
    It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
  29. Bad spelling pun alert. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    of course, on the baron continents, most everyone has his own fortified compound, complete with armies of loyal thugs to protect their master's stores of wealth, including frozen seeds.

    Well, of course everyone has a castle and warriors!
    Why else would you call it a baron continent?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  30. *Smacks forehead.* Never mind. by Valdrax · · Score: 1

    I just saw the typo in the original post and realized you were already mocking it.

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
  31. 4 Point Plan by kiwipom · · Score: 0

    Create Seed vault Wait for apocalypse ????? Profit!

    --
    Dum spiro spero
  32. Why not the starving people? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 1
    I think before we attempt to stockpile tractors and food (which is perishable, and would therefore need to be re-stocked every few years) and fertilizer and such to feed people in a major city for an entire year in case of a major disaster, we should perhaps focus first on feeding the starving people found all over the world.
    Why? Let me play the Devil's Advocate for a second: saving starving people in Africa now doesn't help preserve the culture of the people who are considering the seed storage. Ultimately, there's an aspect of cultural as well as species survival in here.

    People are going to do whatever it takes to make sure that they themselves (and their families) survive, before they do anything for their neighbors. They're going to do whatever they can to help their neighbors and other people that they know personally survive, before they do anything for people they don't know. And they're going to do whatever they can to ensure that people who look like them, speak the same language as them, and have basically the same set of beliefs as them survive, before they do anything about people who are a different color, language, culture, and religion. It's a hierarchy of social and physical closeness, and one's own culture is always going to take precedence over another's. (I have no doubt that if the situation were reversed, the Zaireians would be building bunkers for doomsday, even if it meant diverting funds away from those starving sops in the Americas -- it's mostly luck and geography that things ended up the way they are. I am certainly not making an argument of any inherent cultural superiority either way. Everyone protects their own when the shit hits the fan.)

    People are always going to ensure the surivival of themselves, their families, and their own culture -- for as long as they can possibly envision -- before they move on to helping other people who they don't have any connection to right now. That's why people in developed countries build bunkers for a nuclear holocaust that might never happen, rather than send food to other places. Building the bunkers is a justifiable, even necessary expense, because it ensures the preservation of your own culture.

    Just as our biological programming drives us to pass on our genes through procreation and protecting our offspring, our social programming drives us to protect our society and culture, even when that comes at the expense of other people -- who, since we don't know them, are just abstract concepts.
    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."