Slashdot Mirror


AOL Tries New Tactic to Keep Customers

Jhon writes "AOL customer Vincent Ferrari tried to cancel his account, but a phone rep wouldn't let him do it. What he got when he tried to cancel his account was a lot of frustration. Now that's customer support!"

12 of 799 comments (clear)

  1. stop paying? by LSanchez · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Couldn't he just stop paying the bill? Wouldn't that cancel the account? Or is there something that I'm not aware of?

  2. Re:Post megapack by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful
    so be gentle with the poor bastard's bandwidth.
    There was a reason I didn't include a link to his site when I submitted the article. Oh well.
  3. Easy solution by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hang up.

    Call your credit card company.

    Tell the credit card company to no longer accept charges from AOL because they refuse to cancel your account.

    If you really want to play it safe then write a letter to your credit card company after the call that reiterates the request and the reason for it.

  4. Re:Post megapack by linvir · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I might say the same to you.
    the service stopped.

    It's not just niceness, its economics. Chargebacks are more expensive than fairly and reasonably handling cancellation requests.

    Economics? Chargebacks? What the fuck does any of that have to do with customers? What happened to the customer being right?
  5. Re:Vincent was probably following procedure, but by Jhon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You haven't listened to the entire audio. "John" was over the line as a CSR. Vincent expressed he wasn't interested in any offers or anything and just wanted a quick resolution to the call and to cancel the account to which "John" said: "If you want me to cancel this account, you going to let me speak ... but you are going to listen to me if you want this turned off". He was more than a bit sarcastic.

  6. Re:Vincent was probably following procedure, but by badasscat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Vincent was a little unreasonable- 4 minutes isn't so terrible either. Vincent needed to be more patient, but has a right to cancel the account.

    Vincent wasn't unreasonable at all. He answered John's first four or five questions. After that, he basically said "you're not going to convince me, so just cancel the account." At that point, the conversation is over.

    Maybe John just isn't a good listener, or maybe it's corporate policy. I think it's a little of both; it seems obvious that AOL CS reps either get rewarded for customer retentions or punished for customer losses. So first you have a corporate policy that encourages annoying behavior on the part of CS reps, and then you have this particular CS rep who just does. not. listen.

    I mean by about the third minute of the call, he's just going over and over the same ground. His entire routine seemed to be that Vincent uses the account more than he thinks he does. This is his sales tactic - "sir, would you believe it if I told you that you used this account for THREE DAYS STRAIGHT last week? Do you STILL want to cancel??"

    But after the first time Vincent said "I don't care, cancel the account", that's it. You can't just keep saying "no, but seriously, do you have ANY IDEA how much you use this account?? No, really!" Because then not only are you being a stubborn ass, you're on the borderline of doing something illegal, which is charging somebody for an unwanted and unsolicited service.

    It sounds to me like you're dangerously close to saying companies have a right to harrass you into backing out of a cancellation. They certainly have a right to OFFER customers something not to cancel, but they don't have a right to either guilt you into not cancelling or to otherwise harangue you about it. It's the customer's money, and it's the customer's credit card. In the absence of a contractual agreement, they have the right and expectation to be able to call and cancel at any time without getting any guff about it.

    As far as I'm concerned, only one "cancel the account" should have been sufficient to get the job done.

  7. Re:Post megapack by A+Nun+Must+Cow+Herd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That's all well and good, as long as this can still happen:

    Customer: I want to cancel my account

    CSR: OK, can I ask why

    Customer: No, I just want to cancel my account. I know what I'm doing, and I'm certain I don't want it.

    CSR: No problem, it's done. Thanks. Bye.

  8. Re:Why would you not reformat the drive? by Arker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The trend of putting the "recovery" files in a hidden partition makes it a bit of a nuisance. My last laptop included no media at all, and didn't come with anything allowing you to do a clean install of XP. It's all rather frustrating. You'd think the manufacturers focus would be on clean, fast, easy to use systems, rather than on near-useless extras that make their hardware seem slow.

    You're obviously under the misapprehension that the manufacturer considers you the customer. They don't. You're the commodity. Their customers are the other big corporations that pay them to install their crap on the machine.

    --
    =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
    Friends don't let friends enable ecmascript.
  9. Why did the OP use the _telephone_? by cprior · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't know about the english speaking part of the world, but in my country the phone is not part of the legally enforceable mean of contracting.

    If they refuse to cancel by phone, write a letter and that's it. If in doubt, send it with registered mail. And yes, fellow Geeks, it doesn't even matter if you use a template in MS Word or KOMA-script with LaTeX!

    I find the advice to---again---call the fraud dept. of the institution that handles payment for you potentially dangerous. If I had a contrct with AOL I'd sure know how to EOL that---the correct way.

    But again, your legal system might differ... Mod me down then!

  10. Re:No different than Dell/McAfee by Flendon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Just because you don't see it doesn't mean you aren't infected. Many viruses are invisible to the end user as they collect your personal info, use your box as a proxy for higher profit targets or just act as a zombie in a DDoS botnet. I laugh everytime someone says "I don't use AV and I've never had a virus." It's like a blind man saying "I've never seen it so it doesn't exist."

    --
    chown -R us ./base
  11. Wrong approach by Anonumous+Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Vincent's own terminology put him in the trap. Telling the rep "cancel my account" implies that the rep can argue. The right approach is this: "I have now informed you that I'm cancelling. That's all I have to do according to my contract. I am no longer bound by the contract no matter what you say and no matter whether you put the cancellation in your systems or not. I'm not in a mood for argument, so I'm going to hang up. Have a nice day and remember, if you charge me next month you'll be committing credit card fraud. [click]"

  12. Re:No different than Dell/McAfee by Pentavirate · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I hadn't run an anti-virus for years. Finally a couple of years ago I broke down and got it just for the off chance I miss something. The first time it scanned, it didn't find a thing. No Firewall. Nothing.

    It's easy. Don't open executables in e-mails. Don't view attachments from people you don't know. Don't go to shady sites.