Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Stem Cells Cure Paralyzed Rats

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the grow-your-own-spine dept.

An anonymous reader writes "According to an article on Forbes as well as other sources, 'Scientists have used [embryonic] stem cells and a soup of nerve-friendly chemicals to not just bridge a damaged spinal cord but actually regrow the circuitry needed to move a muscle, helping partially paralyzed rats walk.'"

7 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. Reconnecting Nerves is like hand soldering by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Insightful

    a Surface mount chip.
    Its always going to be messy and you will likely fuse the wrong things together.
    But having some movement/sensation is good so Thumbs (and index finger) up to this research.

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
  2. This is what we're talking about by Cleon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Really, this exemplifies the sort of research we've been talking about when it comes to stem cells. Unfortunately, the actual scientific possibilities were overshadowed by a bunch of political bullshit.

    Stem cells, biology (evolution!), global warming...The subjection of science to political considerations has to stop.

    --
    Gifts for Geeks - Stuff that really matters!
    1. Re:This is what we're talking about by CRCulver · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, the actual scientific possibilities were overshadowed by a bunch of political bullshit.

      One could just as easily say "Ach, mein Fuerher, too bad the actual scientific possibilities of eugenics were overshadowed by a bunch of moral concerns." Part of subscribing to a moral code is realizing that its requirements are overriding. If embryos are considered human beings, which at least according to statistics of religious affiliation (add up the number of Roman Catholics, Orthodox, and non-mainline Protestants) is a belief held by the vast majority of the Western world, then one simply cannot experiment on embryos no matter how much one desires to see the results.

      It seems like a lot of Slashdot posters think that the best thing human beings could do is just junk whatever moral notions they have about the dignity of the human person, and just do a lot of crazy whizbang scientific experiments just because they are there.

    2. Re:This is what we're talking about by Alinabi · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Part of subscribing to a moral code is realizing that its requirements are overriding.

      Here is the thing about moral codes: individuals subscribe to them according to their own beliefs. The government has no business legislating them. If christians of various flavors have a problem with stem cell research, they are free to refuse treatments based on it.

      --
      "You can't allow somebody to commit the crime before you detain them." [Condoleezza Rice]
    3. Re:This is what we're talking about by CRCulver · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is the thing about moral codes: individuals subscribe to them according to their own beliefs. The government has no business legislating them. If christians of various flavors have a problem with stem cell research, they are free to refuse treatments based on it.

      Many moral codes require that one do one's utmost to save innocent human life. One is not permitted to simply look over the taking of human life, as you suggest when you say that "they can just refuse treatment". Now, legislative power is a means to protect life in this case, therefore it is entirely sensible that it be used for such a purpose.

      You obviously disagree with the viewpoint against the use of embryonic stem cells. Fine. But don't try to pretend that that viewpoint simply doesn't exist. It does exist, and those who hold it have certain responsibilities toward it. Surely in order to obtain a university degree you did the obligatory Ethics course.

    4. Re:This is what we're talking about by hasbeard · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Here is the thing about moral codes: individuals subscribe to them according to their own beliefs. The government has no business legislating them. If christians of various flavors have a problem with stem cell research, they are free to refuse treatments based on it.
      Do you really believe "The government has no business legislating [moral codes]"? Does that mean that you won't care if someone kidnaps your children, hacks into your back accounts and empties them out, steals your car, and backs a moving van up to your home and empties it? Some people believe that the government's job is to help protect its people--all its people, including the unborn. Abortion and creating embryos (human lives) for the purpose of using their parts are morally wrong and the government would be remiss in not prohibiting them.
  3. This could be crucial to the stem cell debate by 99luftballon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If they can get a similar process in place for humans it'll cut the legs out from under the luddites opposing stem cell research (no pun intended). It's amazing how many people will decide the ethics of stem cell research aren't that much of a problem when they have the chance to see loved ones walk again, or recover from illnesses like Alzheimer's or Parkinson's.