Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Supreme Court to Rule on 'Obvious' Patents

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the fluent-in-loopholeanese dept.

davidwr writes "News.com reports the U.S. Supreme Court will take up KSR v. Teleflex, a patent case in which the defense is arguing the patent is obvious and should be thrown out. The case hinges on a 1952 provision of patent law. Interestingly, several major IT firms are supporting the defense."

2 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Very narrow ruling by jmitchel!jmitchel.co · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    OH! You've "went to law school". You do realize that on Slashdot, claiming IAAL and a couple bux might buy you a cup of bad coffee. But GOD! they might throw in a doughnut for 70 cents if it weren't for idiots like him who forget to admit they're not lawyers until the end of their Slashdot posts!

  2. Re:Very narrow ruling by Khyber · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I am anal is redundant. If you're going to be a lawyer you could at least understand redundancy in acronyms and wording of legal phrases, it's what you're trained in for crying otu loud! (I'm typing this with a lawyar nagging behind my ear, forgive me!) Hell, we learned that in Latin class in high school. Ecce! Canis liberi ed comedit! Come on!

    --
    Still waiting on Serviscope_minor to wake up to fucking reality and realize that Jessica Price isn't going to fuck him.