Slashdot Mirror


Supreme Court to Rule on 'Obvious' Patents

davidwr writes "News.com reports the U.S. Supreme Court will take up KSR v. Teleflex, a patent case in which the defense is arguing the patent is obvious and should be thrown out. The case hinges on a 1952 provision of patent law. Interestingly, several major IT firms are supporting the defense."

18 of 242 comments (clear)

  1. Goddman it by Gleenie · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've already patented the use of obvious patents. Does that mean that my fellow cynics can have my patent struck down in an ironic twist of fate?

    --
    -- Your mother uses Emacs.
    1. Re:Goddman it by x2A · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I, more cleverly (therefore less obviously), patented unobvious patents, which means that all patents must pay royalties to me, or else be struck down in an moronic twist of fate :-p

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
    2. Re:Goddman it by Tablizer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mr. Edison took the egg and crushed the pointy end of the eggshell down on the bench, where he easily stood it on its end.

      My toddler once did that to an entire carton of eggs. Does that make him smarter than the judges? (Although it wasn't quite the tip, but about half the egg.)

    3. Re:Goddman it by mlush · · Score: 3, Funny

      For some reason that story puts me in mind of the current issue of The Order of the Stick

  2. Re:"Not surprisingly" by plasmacutter · · Score: 2, Funny

    huh?

    theyre comming in on the side of the defense.. which is being attacked by plaintiffs who have obvious patents..

    Oo.. I believe you misinterpreted?

    --
    VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
  3. Re:"Not surprisingly" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Surprise! You're wrong! The IT firms are against patenting of "obvious" ideas.

  4. Re:Unsurprising. by x2A · · Score: 4, Funny

    "they need to eat too"

    You've obviously never properly got to know any lawyers. They only pretend to eat so we believe they're human ;-)

    --
    The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  5. Re:"Not surprisingly" by bradkittenbrink · · Score: 2, Funny

    HOLY SHIT! Someone correctly parsed both the article summary and the post they were replying to! This is a red letter day for slashdot.

  6. Re:Very narrow ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Please start your posts with IANAL instead of ending it with IANAL.

    And please start your posts with "I am anal" so we know we can avoid trolling.

  7. SCOTUS? by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ugh. What a horrible acronym. It sounds like some nasty disease:

    Doctor: So, what seems to be the problem?
    Patient: Well, I have this persistent burning sensation, um, "down there".
    Doctor: I see. Do you also feel as if a hundred tiny spiders are crawling up your anus?
    Patient: Wtf!? How did you know that!?
    Doctor: Uh-huh. Sounds like SCOTUS. You'd better drop your pants. I'll get the probe ...

    --
    Soylent Green is peoplicious!
    1. Re:SCOTUS? by phonicsmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny
      Doctor: I see. Do you also feel as if a hundred tiny spiders are crawling up your anus?
      Patient: Wtf!? How did you know that!?
      Doctor: I ANAL.
  8. Re:Very narrow ruling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    All the Supremes can do is rule on this particular case

    Meanwhile, Diana Ross, Smokey Robinson, and the Miracles all dissented.

  9. Re:Very narrow ruling by mikiN · · Score: 5, Funny

    I asume that every posting starts with IANA*

    Of course every posting starts with IANA. How else would your computer know what parameters to pass in the various protocols it uses when posting to Slashdot? Who else makes sure the '.org' TLD isn't taken over by the porn industry or Scientology? Who else assigns the IP ranges to the Regional Internet Registries that Slashdot's ISP uses?

    Yep, cheers to IANA for keeping all that organized.

    --
    The Hacker's Guide To The Kernel: Don't panic()!
  10. Re:Unsurprising. by DoctorPepper · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually they do eat. I've seen them. They slither around on the floor a restaurants and pick up droppings. You know how those bottom-feeders are.

    -----------------
    Q: What's the difference between a catfish and a lawyer?
    A: One's a scum-sucking bottom-feeder, the other one's a fish

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
  11. Even more SCOTUS? by Jesus_666 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think it sounds more like some kind of ammunition.

    "I don't care whether they have the bigger guns. We're using APDU rounds; I want to see them try to trump that!"
    "Well, sir, they're using SCOTUS rounds."
    "Okay, we're fucked, then."


    Alternatively, SCO might have decided to go international and call their main branch the Santa Cruz Operation of The United States.

    --
    USE HOT GRITS WITH STATUE OF NATALIE PORTMAN (NAKED AND PETRIFIED)
  12. Re:Very narrow ruling by 'nother+poster · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ok, young man. You just take that logic and go to your room. I don't want to hear any more of that public domain is a good thing talk. Who do you think you are siding with those viscious, heartless monsters who wrote the constitution rather than the warm, loving coprporations who are just trying to scrape out a meager living making a few hundred million with the sweat of their lawyers brows.

  13. Re:Very narrow ruling by MarkGriz · · Score: 3, Funny

    "I'm not a Supreme Court expert (I'm not even an American)..."

    but you *did* stay in a Holiday Inn Express last night, right?

    --
    Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
  14. Re:What? by Abreu · · Score: 2, Funny

    A developer comes and presents a plan that would dramatically change the prospects of that city. A strong core of residential and commercial locations; new growth - a chance for the city to be reborn, to be vibrate again.

    And a monorail, dont forget the monorail!

    --
    No sig for the moment.