Slashdot Mirror


Is Distributed Computing Being Distributed Badly?

Carl Bialik from WSJ writes "Distributed computing could help researchers studying climate change or Alzheimer's, but SETI@home's search for extra-terrestrial intelligence continues to dominate. Wall Street Journal columnist Lee Gomes says that's a big waste, especially because SETI doesn't seem likely to yield results: 'This continued fascination with living-room SETI comes as professional setiologists concede that early assumptions about the search for intelligent life -- notably those popularized by astronomer Carl Sagan -- have proven naively optimistic. For instance, it's now conceded there is little chance of detecting the "leaking" transmissions of another planet -- its version of "I Love Lucy" broadcasts. Those signals are too weak to stand out from the universe's background noise.' Gomes also traces the origins of SETI@home to Berkeley computer scientist David P. Anderson, and explains that users stuck with the ET search rather than medical investigations in part because of nationalistic competition. Yet Anderson no longer runs SETI@home. 'Instead, he donates his spare computer power to a global warming project. But he doesn't presume to tell others what they ought to be doing with their CPU cycles.'"

12 of 341 comments (clear)

  1. Global warming project? by janekp · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fighting fire with fire?

  2. Wastes of time by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    You know what's a waste of time? Gardening. You spend all this time and energy just to raise a few tomatoes that could have been bought at the store for cheap.

    People should stop gardening and focus their time and energy on solving global warming, but I don't presume to tell anyone what they should be doing with their time.

    1. Re:Wastes of time by Fezmid · · Score: 3, Funny

      Or enslave us and use us as a food source.

      I, for one, welcome our alien overlords with open arms. Eat me last.

  3. Global warming by TripMaster+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny


    Instead, he donates his spare computer power to a global warming project.

    Funny....I think that all the Slashdot gaming rigs out there are contributing quite a bit to global warming, but you don't hear us bragging about it... ^_^

    --
    ____

    ~ |rip/\/\aster /\/\onkey

  4. The REAL cause of global warming! by Caspian · · Score: 5, Funny
    Instead, he donates his spare computer power to a global warming project.
    Well, yeah. Running your computer at 100% CPU use is a great way to contribute to global warming. ;)
    --
    With spending like this, exactly what are "conservatives" conserving?
  5. Re:More than one by Lord+Kano · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do you realize that Carl Sagan has been dead for nearly a decade?

    LK

    --
    "Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano
  6. It's not their fault! by Orange+Crush · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm sure there are lots of people who would support using thier idle PCs for alzheimers research. They just forgot.

  7. Re:Useful CPU cycles use by fbjon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah! Anyone running on a P4 is contributing to a global warming project.

    --
    True confidence comes not from realising you are as good as your peers, but that your peers are as bad as you are.
  8. Someone needs to.. by ReidMaynard · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone needs to set up a Yeti@HOME

    --
    -- www.globaltics.net

    Political discussion for a new world

  9. Re:Crunching for their lives by Qzukk · · Score: 2, Funny

    B. They can get more benefit by spending their money elsewhere

    Hey, somebody has to pay people to climb to the tops of mountains and scream the name of their drug.

    --
    If I have been able to see further than others, it is because I bought a pair of binoculars.
  10. Re:Just like donations to charities by DoctorHibbert · · Score: 2, Funny

    When's the last time a dog gave you a blowjob? Wait, don't answer that.

    --
    Arbitrary sig
  11. Re:More than one by Software · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm not an expert in statistics, but I'm pretty sure that a sample size of 1 is not usually considered enough. Best to get 2 or 3 samples.