Slashdot Mirror
FBI Planning New Net-Tapping Push
Section_Ei8ht writes to tell us CNet is reporting that the FBI is pushing for legislation to allow law enforcement officials free access to networking gear via built in backdoors for eavesdropping. From the article: "Jim Harper, a policy analyst at the free-market Cato Institute and member of a Homeland Security advisory board, said the proposal would 'have a negative impact on Internet users' privacy. People expect their information to be private unless the government meets certain legal standards,' Harper said. 'Right now the Department of Justice is pushing the wrong way on all this.'"
I would agree with you, but add one critical caveat - CALEA back doors need better security, including audit systems that make judicial oversight possible. Anyone experienced with the current implementation of CALEA will cringe if you ask them how well guarded those unaudited doors are. National security is reasonable justification to tap backbones, ISP peering links, and more, but it isn't much more difficult to protect privacy at the same time. The NSA used to care about this, the FBI rarely does. You can "protect the children" and national infrastructure without letting politicians troll the system...
People have been working on that for 10 years or so, but it's tricky to actually make it work. For example, opportunistic IPSec has gone through several revisions, all of which seem to have various flaws that make it unusable in practice. Or if you want to encrypt all traffic at the application level you end up having to modify every protocol and then every implementation, and then waiting for people to adopt it...
Back in 2004 some of the highest-ranking politicians and other most influential people in Greece had their cell phone conversations surreptitiously recorded by an unknown organization for a period of months.
The job could not have been pulled off without the presence of automated wire-tapping functionality built into the Ericsson switches in Greece. What makes the "greek experience" relevant here is that Greece didn't even purchase the wire-tapping "option" to their switches, it would have cost millions more and they decided to save the money and thought that by not purchasing the extra software and hardware they didn't even have to worry about the issue. They were very wrong.
If ever there was proof that wire-tapping features built into systems for law-enforcement use can and will be exploited by unauthorized users, this is it. It really does not get more clean-cut than this - except for the speculation as to who exactly these unauthorized wire-tappers were - the leading candidate is the CIA. Which would lead even just a mildly paranoid person to wonder if perhaps the FBI is jealous of the CIA's latitude in foreign operations and they just want the same, easily-abused by themselves, features within their own jurisdiction.
When information is power, privacy is freedom.
This is an interesting read, a historical perspective of a police state during the reign of Elisabeth I (in 16th century). It is often only with many years of hindsight that you can really understand what was going on. This has happened before, let history be your guide.
Great Firewall Of China was created with THIS EXACT HARDWARE by such freedom loving companies as CISCO, IBM and MICROSOFT, if memory serves. Yeah, This is how China polices their internet so fast. How soon do you think our "employment issue" will be solved by creating the Great Firewall of America??
goto www.spp.gov and do some thought.
" What luck for rulers that men do not think" - Adolf Hitler
Fascism did not start in Germany. Fascism started in Hungary and Italy. It didn't really care much about Jews until Hitler came into power. Furthermore, terrorism has only killed maybe ten thousand people. Fascist and authoritarian governments have killed over ten million.
Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
Nope, it's conveniently located right outside your front door if you're American.
Hmm, so what you're saying is that you vote for the politician that does his best in scaring the hell out of you, right?
Now pray tell us, what was your position after the first bombing of the WTC, and what did you do in order to advance it?
Face it -- you were traumatized by watching two giant building crumble on live TV. You probably had no more than an emotional reaction when the WTC was bombed in 1993 (6 dead), or when the Oklahoma City bombing occured in 1995 (167 dead). However, the events of 9/11 truly left an imprint on you, and shrewd politicians have taken advantage of it and are playing on your fears.
One example: I am sure you have heard of the a device called a dirty bomb; Bush mentioned it in his speeches, and the media jumped on it to promote the scarefest. You probably think that a dirty bomb is significantly more dangerous than a conventional bomb by some orders of magnitude. However, that is not the case, as even the US Nuclear Regulatory Commission says that "A dirty bomb is in no way similar to a nuclear weapon. The presumed purpose of its use would be therefore not as a Weapon of Mass Destruction but rather as a Weapon of Mass Disruption." A true leader would be one who would calm the population, and explain what the deal is; not scare everybody to death in order to promote compliance.
You see, I also used to think that a dirty bomb is truly a horrible device, but after watching The Power of Nightmares I found out that it is not much different than a conventional bomb; so, if you survive the initial blast, you just gotta get the hell out of the area, and you should be ok. Now, have you seen Dick, Rumsfeld, or Rice appear on TV and tell us that a dirty bomb isn't all what it's hyped to be? No sir; what we get is lame shows like 24 with a single hero who does miracles in saving us from the bad guys (one of which, ironically enough, turns out to be the president).
You can invoke 9/11 as much as you want, but while you are in your little bubble, scared to death of the next attack, instead of seeing a shrink, politicians are conducting a power-grab and dividing lots of pork among themselves.
Get a WRT54 - GL or whatever they're calling it. It's a great router.
e k_wiretappi.html
Put openwrt on it. http://openwrt.org/
Don't wait. http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2006/06/gre
I'm going to repeat it again--much like the Republicans, maybe if I repeat it enough it will get through to you: We had all the information necessary to stop the 9/11 Attacks.
Unfortunately, some of the information was at the CIA. Some of the information was at the FBI. Some of the information was at the NSA. None of the groups shared their information. In some cases, they couldn't because it was illegal--the CIA is forbidden from "domestic spying", while the FBI is forbidden from "foreign spying." Some of it is turf--why give the FBI information so they can make the arrest and get all the credit? So while the CIA thought these guys were bad news, they didn't tell the FBI. The FBI thought these guys were bad news but they didn't have enough evidence to convince the higher-ups to devote the resources to watching them. The NSA had the evidence that these guys were bad news, but telling the FBI or CIA would have meant divulging national security capabilities.
But I will repeat this again, so it will hopefully get through: We had all the information necessary to stop the 9/11 Attacks.
That's why I get incensed when people bring up 9/11 in this context. 9/11 was not an issue where we didn't have enough information. 9/11 was an organizational problem. There was no reasonable way to make sure that information about dangerous people would get to the appropriate people where they could be watched and/or arrested. So the argument that we need "more information" to "prevent another 9/11" is wrong. What we need to do is do a better job of managing the information we have.
You see, this is why we had an investigation into 9/11--much to the President's chagrin--so we could find out what went wrong and try to fix the problem so it wouldn't happen again.
Eventually they're going to try and make it illegal to encrypt your communication with an algorithm lacking an integrated government decryption key. Stop 'em now.
If you are really serious about trying to do something NOW before it is too late, you may want to check out anoNet. It is a vast departure from Freenet or TOR.
It is a complete IP network built with VPNs and Quagga for routing. It puts the power back in the hands of the individual.
I have been a part of that network for over a year now and while it is not perfect, it is certainly a step in the right direction.
Entrench your freedom NOW, before they can take it from you.
In a FREE COUNTRY, My *FREEDOM* trumps your false sense of 'security'.
Draw your own conclusions about whether the US of A is 'Free'.
Technology -- No Place For Wimps! Grateful Dead and Jerry Garcia Chatroom -- http://www.wemissjerry.org