Linux/Mac/Windows File Name Friction
lessthan0 writes "In 1995, Microsoft added long file name support to Windows, allowing more descriptive names than the limited 8.3 DOS format. Mac users scoffed, having had long file names for a decade and because Windows still stored a DOS file name in the background. Linux was born with long file name support four years before it showed up in Windows. Today, long file names are well supported by all three operating systems though key differences remain. "
Long filenames aren't all they are cracked up to be. I got made fun of once for using one. I can remember it so clearly now, we were in music theory class in high school and we had to use Finale on a Mac (OS 7 at the time) for our composition projects. I named one of my projects something like "Suso's Music Theory assignment number 4 for Mr. Becker 1993-9-24.mus" and saved it. A week later I was on the same Mac and noticed a file that wasn't mine called "Making fun of people who use really long filenames for their music theory assignments.mus". Nobody was admit to doing it but I knew who it was. I was devastated and never felt comfortable again in that class.
Now I'm scarred for life. I should have listened to my parents and gone with 8.3.
I've just heard that all 3 Operating Systems support reading CDRoms? Is this true, can anyone confirm this revelation?
Of course - this is a feature, not a bug.
Henderson_Presentation_2005.doc is HENDER~1.doc,
Henderson_Presentation_2006.doc is HENDER~2.doc,
Henderson_Presentation_2006 (unedited).doc is HENDER~3.doc.
Clearly, we are reaping the benefits of a well-thought-out platform here.
Using only 8.3 filena~1 restri~1 is not that big a deal. Even if we had to write ordina~1 english that way_ it would still be compre~1.
In honor of DOS_ or maybe CP_M_ we should have an 8.3 day. All posts must be MS-DOS 8.3 filena~1 compli~1. Maybe someon~1 could write a filter for slashc~1_
C:ONGRTLNS.W95
If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
rm /home/someuser/-file
Or even
rm ./-file.
Ideology: A tool used primarily to avoid the bother of thinking.
*nix is much longer and able to go much deeper in the path.
I know there's a joke in there somewhere...
Here we go again!
Windows supports them, but you'll get frustrated and eventually give up trying to use a CD due to the annoying Autorun 'feature.' MacOS supports them, but calls them iCD-Roms, and only allows the reading of U2 CDs purchased from iTunes. And yes, for chrissake, Linux supports them; all you have to do is write your own driver... didn't you RTFM at http://forums.linuxcdroms.com/cgi-bin/form.php?cat =drivers&topic=writingcdromdriversforn00bs?!
LegendMUD
I proclaim the parent shall languish in obscurity! How dare you point out flaws in Linux?! Begone, blasphemer!
My favorite shell-expansion moment: when I was a new Unix user long, long ago (freshly coming over from VMS), I wanted to remove one funny-named file in a directory. I discovered that rm had this cool switch "-i" that would prompt for removal on each file. Great! I'd just say "yes" to the file named *, or whatever I'd accidentally created. So, being a VMS user (and thus used to switches that went anywhere on the command line), I typed this:
$ rm * -i
Have you read my blog lately?
Bring on the modding, my karma can take it.
Ah the magic words for +5
Sweet, 10.4 is much better than the old 8.3 that DOS used. MACs really are cooler all around.
Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.