Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Keeping Time with a Mercury Atom

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the nice-watch dept.

Roland Piquepaille writes "The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) has announced that a new experimental atomic clock based on a single mercury atom is now at least five times more precise than NIST-F1, the U.S. standard clock. This mercury atomic clock 'would neither gain nor lose a second in about 400 million years' while it would take 'only' 70 million years to NIST-F1, based on a 'fountain' of cesium atoms, to gain or lose a second. But even if this new kind of optical atomic clock is more accurate than cesium microwave clocks, it will take a while before such a design can be accepted as an international standard. A ZDNet summary contains pictures and more details about the world's most precise clock."

7 of 153 comments (clear)

  1. unfortunately by legallyillegal · · Score: 5, Funny

    syncing to time.singlemercuryatom.nist.gov doesn't work yet.

    --
    ?giS
    1. Re:unfortunately by uglydog · · Score: 5, Funny

      maybe it's been /.ed?

  2. Great news for D-Link by GreggBz · · Score: 5, Funny

    Great news for those mission critical D-Link routers!

  3. Only problem is... by mrjb · · Score: 5, Funny

    They're treating time as if it were something absolute.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
    1. Re:Only problem is... by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Relativity doesn't make clocks less useful, in fact it makes them more useful (because you can use them to figure out how fast you are going as well). And assuming that the clock remains under constant acceleration there is no reason to believe that relativity would make it less accurate.

      --

      Philosophy.
  4. The only problem arises... by viking2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...from the Heisenberg uncertainly principle:

    The more precisely
    the MOMENTUM is determined,
    the less precisely
    the POSITION is known

    So this clock is unfortunately missing. And when it is found, it is not so accurate anymore.

    --
    "Fix it"
  5. Re:I Know I'm Missing Something Here... by oskay · · Score: 5, Informative
    The trick is that the second is defined to be the frequency of an unperturbed cesium atom, which is about as real as that "frictionless plane" that you might have had in high-school physics.

    An example of the problem is this: for technical reasons, a small magnetic field is needed inside a cesium clock. Magnetic fields change the spacing between all atomic energy levels to some degree. For cesium, the relevant change is very small, but it is still there. What you need to do is measure the magnetic field, calculate how much it affects the frequency of the atomic transition, and correct your output frequency by the required amount. What ultimately sets the accuracy level of a given clock is how well the magnetic field shift (and dozens of others) can be corrected for.

    The same is true for the mercury clock. The difference is that the systematic frequency shifts that can affect accuracy of the clock are now understood, and controllable, at a higher level of precision.