Slashdot Mirror


Internet Gambling CEO Arrested by FBI

tightpoker writes to mention the news that several key individuals associated with online gambling site BetonSports have been indicted in a Missouri courtroom. Founder Stephen Kaplan, CEO David Carruthers, 9 other people and four corporations have been charged with crimes ranging from racketeering to fraud. The Sunday Time reports on the story as well, addressing fears this may be a prelude to a crackdown on all online gambling by U.S. law enforcement. From the article: "Nigel Parson, leisure analyst at Williams de Broë, said the move would 'throw online gambling stocks into a spin,' adding: 'David Carruthers is a prominent advocate of online gambling. The fear that this is an escalation of the anti-lobby will trouble markets.' Greg Harris, an analyst at Cannacord, said: 'It is too early to say if this is part of a broader strategy on prevention of internet gambling in the U.S. or if it is the Department of Justice flexing their muscles and trying to influence legislation.'"

50 of 298 comments (clear)

  1. Oy ve... by hrieke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So all of this does, outside of keeping all Gambling Web site owners out of the country, is?

    --
    III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    1. Re:Oy ve... by TubeSteak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A lot of things.

      It rachets up the pressure on the Senate to pass a bill outlawing internet gambling in the United States of America.

      It suggests to the Average-internet-gambling-Joe that 'he might be next'

      It fscks up the stock prices of these online gambling companies.

      As always, if you've got the time, hit up Google News
      http://news.google.com/news?q=gambling+arrest
      Some random snippets
      "The Justice Department is seeking the forfeiture of $4.5 billion, cars and computers from the defendants, including Betonsports PLC and three other companies."

      "Several of the defendants live outside the United States, which will make them hard to catch, said U.S. Attorney Catherine Hanaway in St. Louis."

      "Last week, the House passed a bill that would make it illegal for American banks and credit card issuers to make payments to online gambling sites. The bill's fate in the Senate is uncertain, in part because of exemptions granted for horse racing and state lotteries."

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
    2. Re:Oy ve... by HiVizDiver · · Score: 2, Insightful
      1. So internet gambling is illegal in the USA, great, so that no effect on this guy's company that's based in Costa Rica, and incorporated in England.

      What worries me about this, is that it could be the first steps towards the government regulating and controlling content on what has been, up to this point, a relatively free and open Internet here in the United States.
  2. Hey Authorities... by William+Robinson · · Score: 3, Funny

    I bet 200 bucks, that there will be dupe of this stroy within 2 days.

  3. Watch the share price fall by jonv · · Score: 4, Informative
  4. It's only a matter of time by vijayiyer · · Score: 4, Insightful

    internet gambling does not allow the government to take their cut and is therefore in direct competition with them. Expect many more such crackdowns soon.

    1. Re:It's only a matter of time by M-G · · Score: 5, Funny

      That, and those poker chips block the Internet's tubes....

      Also, with midterm elections looming, it doesn't hurt for the Republicans to crack down on some 'immoral' activity to appease their 'values' voters.

    2. Re:It's only a matter of time by Jtheletter · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If by values voters you mean Indian casinos contributing to campaign coffers. It's interesting to note that many of the reps against online gambling seem to have no problem at all supporting local tribal casinos. It's all about who's greasing palms and playing nice with the government (ala taxes).

      --
      -- I'm not a pessimist, I'm a realist. It's not my fault that life sucks so much. --
    3. Re:It's only a matter of time by UglyTool · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Also, with midterm elections looming, it doesn't hurt for the Republicans to crack down on some 'immoral' activity to appease their 'values' voters.

      Completely off topic, but out of curiosity...

      Where, in the bible, does it say anything about the morality or immorality of gambling? It speaks out against adultery, incest, rape (especially where it says the rapist has to marry the girl), but I must have missed the meeting where they added anything about gambling.

    4. Re:It's only a matter of time by gowen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      True, but "Voted least crazy religion" is not a great selling point on your advertising literature.

      They'd be better off sticking with the tried and true "Sole chance of avoiding everlasting damnation", or failing that, "We allow up to 7 wives".

      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    5. Re:It's only a matter of time by Tx · · Score: 4, Informative

      Searching google for "bible gambling", the first hit gives us this:

      Question: "What does the Bible say about gambling? Is gambling a sin?"

      Answer: Gambling can be defined as "risking money in an attempt to multiply the money on something that is against the odds." The Bible does not specifically condemn gambling, betting, or the lottery. The Bible does warn us, however, to stay away from the love of money (1 Timothy 6:10; Hebrews 13:5). Scripture also encourages us to stay away from attempts to "get rich quick" (Proverbs 13:11; 23:5; Ecclesiastes 5:10). Gambling most definitely is focused on the love of money and undeniably tempts people with the promise of quick and easy riches.

      --
      Oh no... it's the future.
    6. Re:It's only a matter of time by Usagi_yo · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The U.S just arrested a CEO of a foreign Corporation for doing internet business that was contrary to U.S law. Next time we complain about Google or Yahoo bending over backwards to adhere to Chinese law, we should take into account our own policies.

    7. Re:It's only a matter of time by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      That's how ALL gambling laws are determined. How many states have lotteries, but outlaw all other forms of gambling? Hardly any government official is against gambling as long as they get a cut.

    8. Re:It's only a matter of time by rainman_bc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's ultimately unfair, but mostly unavoidable if you care at all about people with poor self control (gamblers and other addicts). Social problems never have easy solutions.

      Under that premise, we should outlaw:

      Buffets -> ever seen the size of the fat bastards at a Buffet? Those poor fat bastards are doomed if they continue to eat at that rate.
      Candy -> sure it's okay once in a while, but causes tooth decay
      Alcohol -> it's the scourge of society - too much alcoholism
      Casino Gambling -> wtf is the difference between gambling online and gambling in a casino? Only difference I see is the greedy govt doesn't get a cut. Tough shit for them for not legalizing internet gambling IMO.
      Sex -> too many pervs out there that can't control themselves. We should sterlize everyone.

      I realize that I'm drawing a slippery slope, but I'm just doing it to prove a point. Truth is, some people just can't control themselves with anything, and we shouldn't outlaw choice. /me works for an internet gambling company in a round about way.

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    9. Re:It's only a matter of time by UglyTool · · Score: 2, Funny
      Didn't Moses freak out when he came down from the mountain, and found his people "casting lots"?

      I just read that as making clay models of the guy saved from Sodom...

    10. Re:It's only a matter of time by cmdr_beeftaco · · Score: 2, Funny

      i thought it was about free drinks, what does the bible say about free drinks?

    11. Re:It's only a matter of time by bradr98 · · Score: 4, Informative

      David is not, was not, never has been a US Citizen. He is a UK Citizen. Others named in the Indictment are US citizens

  5. Of course they lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The government gets a healthy cut from the earnings in Las Vegas and Atlantic City. Politicians get hefty contributions due to the earnings from Native American casinos. And lotteries like Powerball are the government's own game.

    So it's no wonder that online gambling sites lose, and will continue to lose in court. You've got to pony up to the bosses if you want to work in this town. (Preferably, both Democrats and Republicans.)

    1. Re:Of course they lost by oahazmatt · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Actually, it's not just online gambling.

      There are numerous "cashless" casinos in my area. There was a surge of them. You bought a monthly membership, vouchers, however each one chose to set up, and you would compete for material prizes such as televisions, event tickets, and so on. Most of these casinos also donated 10% of their monthly earnings to charities.

      The problem came about first when the local government realized they weren't getting anything special from these gambling halls, and when a small, small, small yet vocal group protested them, saying how their significant others were throwing away large amounts of money to be part of these casinos. This group launched a campaign and instead of seeking help for their loved ones, just wanted the places shut down. Not getting a lot of incentive from the casinos themselves, pressure was put on. I believe only two of the "game rooms" are still in business now.

      --
      Those who believe the Internet is private,
      find their privates are on the Internet.
  6. My question... by KingSkippus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Before I jump to conclusions, my question is this: Are they really guilty of fraud and racketeering (very serious crimes that should be severely punished), or is this just an excuse to try to stop online gambling? I would be interested in seeing and hearing the evidence that gets presented before making up my mind.

    Of course, both sides are going to claim what will support their viewpoint.

    On the one hand, the DoJ has been itching for any excuse to go after these folks for a long time, which doesn't help the perception of them. If they had remained legally neutral to the matter and just stuck to what the law says, I sure would be more comfortable that they actually have our best interest at heart and that they're not just pandering to right-wing nutcases.

    On the other, the online gambling industry is one that is notoriously rife with fraud, and it's entirely possible that these guys are scum that have been doing what they're accused of or worse. For the sake of their industry, I hope that they have realized the scrutiny that they've been under and have made very diligent efforts to stay clean and legitimate and can prove so in court. Otherwise, these two may very well have doomed their entire industry, even the players that are 100% honest and that just want to provide an entertainment service.

    I think that the most telling sign of what the truth is is whether the DoJ starts chasing down all online gambling houses for "fraud" and "racketeering." At any rate, it will be interesting to see how it all turns out.

    1. Re:My question... by jfengel · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The article says that they had "not paid federal wagering taxes on $3.3 billion on wagers taken by the firm". At a guess, if the house is taking a 2% cut, at a 30% tax rate, that's almost $20 million that they owe. That's enough money to justify arresting somebody and having them extradited.

      (There's a whole big deal going on between the US and Britain with respect to extradition, having to do with levels of proof, but I'll assume for the moment that they've got some proof on this guy. It's a separate argument.)

      I've never been exactly sure what "racketeering" is. It's kind of the US-white collar equivalent of what the Soviets used to call "hooliganism": a generic crime applied to people doing scuzzy stuff in bulk where you don't want to (or can't) pin any individual crimes on them.

      The charge makes me nervous, because its vagueness makes it subject to abuse. But tax evasion is a crime I an understand. There's also the fraud charges, which is a more specific crime but I don't see specific allegations in the article. Presumably they're in the indictment. It lets them avoid having to test their dubious bans against internet gambling directly.

  7. Amazing by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What part of "bread and circuses" does this latest incarnation of fuedalism not understand?

  8. YRO by LunaticTippy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I see it like this: Some people think they should have the right to gamble online. Other people think they shouldn't. Other people yet might think gambling online should be legal, but taxed and regulated.

    Right now, there is no such thing as legal online gambling in the US. Because of that, all online gambling businesses are breaking the law. This particular case might be cut and dry, but the larger issue of our rights online can still be debated.

    I think gambling is a tax on people who are bad at math, and should be 100% legal.

    --
    Man, you really need that seminar!
    1. Re:YRO by Zzesers92 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Right now, there is no such thing as legal online gambling in the US. Because of that, all online gambling businesses are breaking the law.

      wait one minute there.... the absence of a law legalizing online gambling does not, in fact, make the activity illegal. There's no law legalizing mowing your yard (oh God, at least I hope there's not!), but it is legal to do so. IMO, gambling is something should remain regulated at the state level regardless.

      On the other hand, I'm not a lawyer. Maybe the Federal government has a law criminalizing online gambling. But it seems like these guys are (like most of the "gambling bad guys" from yesteryear) getting hit with TAX law. That doesn't make online gambling illegal, the Feds have just make it impossible to run an online casino AND pay federal wager taxes on the income. Who's the real crook? Note they're dragging years of non-online gambling into this story as well, trying to make a case against online gambling by throwing traditional bookmaking in the mix.

      For me, if they get these guys for not paying US wager taxes on gambling wages placed by US citizens, then any online retailer who only collects Sales Tax for the state their entity exists in should be charged with racketeering too.

    2. Re:YRO by gowen · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That said, I still think it should be legal, but gambling addiction should be confronted as a problem in our society.
      Right. Alcoholics and nicotine addicts can get help. Gamblers and crackheads are stigmatised as criminals, and help is not nearly so easy to come by.
      --
      Athletic Scholarships to universities make as much sense as academic scholarships to sports teams.
    3. Re:YRO by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The purpose of YRO is to post sensational stories that get a reaction out of the Slashdot tin-foil-hat crowd. When Slashbots gather by the thousands to post comments and trolls, OSDN gets more ad revenue. Following the money trail should adequately explain the purpose of YRO.

  9. Re:offtopic? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Informative
    Of course, I did not read the article, but it seems as though these guys were bad guys and got caught for it. So, my thoughts are, gambling is bad m'kay. Getting arrested by the FBI when your being bad is bad m'kay. My rights do not appear to be violated and this does not seem like a controversial YRO article m'kay.
    I personally don't much like gambling, but as I see it this does apply to your rights online in that the crackdown on online gambling is defining a couple of rights you do or don't have. Is it or is it not illegal to run a gambling site out of this country? Is it or is it not illegal to use one, even if it's based somewhere that has no problem with it? If gambling is legal in Las Vegas, should I be able to set up a server there and run web casinos off it? Or can I patronize an offshore gambling site if I'm sitting at my PC in Atlantic City? Decisions are being made and precedents are being set which further delineate just what rights we do have online.
  10. "Harm legitimate business"? by dbc001 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "Misuse of the Internet to violate the law can ultimately only serve to harm legitimate businesses."

    I don't see how Internet Gambling could harm legitimate business...

    1. Re:"Harm legitimate business"? by badfish99 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It is a legitimate business. At least, it is here in the UK, and in most other countries.

      The US makes laws that criminalize activities by non-US citizens that take place entirely outside the US. How else could David Carruthers have been arrested, when his business is based in Costa Rica?

    2. Re:"Harm legitimate business"? by TubeSteak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      David Carruthers is a U.S. citizen.

      He used to be a New York bookie, until he got arrested for something or other gambling related and decided to leave the country.

      --
      [Fuck Beta]
      o0t!
  11. Re:Why was he in the US? by ptbarnett · · Score: 4, Informative
    I thought most executives of gambling sites lived outside of the U.S. to avoid this very problem.

    RTFA (and the moderator that marked your posting insightful should do the same).

    Carruthers was arrested by FBI agents in Dallas on Sunday afternoon as he was returning to his home in Costa Rica from a trip to the United Kingdom.

  12. Yeah. right. by farker+haiku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    "Illegal commercial gambling across state and international borders is a crime," said U.S Attorney Catherine Hanaway of the Eastern District of Missouri in a press release. "Misuse of the Internet to violate the law can ultimately only serve to harm legitimate businesses.

    I'm from Missouri, and I know who those legitimate businesses are. Harrahs, Ameristar, The Casino Queen, and The President. And I bet (pardon the pun) that I know who they donate to. I'm looking at you, Catherine Hanaway.

    --
    Your sig(k) has been stolen. There is a puff of smoke!
  13. The problem is this... by Churla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First they go after big fish in the online gambling market who are operating within the US.
    Then they run out of those.
    Next they go after big fish in the online gambling market who are operating outside the US.
    Other governments tell US to go DIAF
    US sees the only other way to address problems as going after the gamblers instead.
    US uses this as a reason to further OK tracking all internet traffic.
    We know where that goes.

    There's no good outcome from this path. But greed will drive politicians to it.

    --
    I'm a fiscal conservative, it's a pity we don't have a political party anymore
  14. They're terrorists I tell you! by Chasqui · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Ok, so the US is fighting a couple of wars, holding people indefinitely in GITMO, probably being sucked into another conflict in the middle-east, etc. and THIS is what we spend our time on?
    Gambling?
    Something is afoot. Methinks it is time to re-enlicit support from the conservative base... elections are around the corner. And we all know that these rich 'moblike' online casino owners are probably funding terrorism, right? Its the perfect issue. You have the 'moral high-ground' and a non-US resident at which to finger-point! Wow. You have to hand it to the Republican party. Machiavelli could have learned a trick or two.

    --
    my cube has a window...
  15. Re:Stupid Logic by badfish99 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So was repealing prohibition a bad idea because everone still goes to speakeasies and drinks hooch? Or are you perhaps mistaken?

  16. Re:Why was he in the US? by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You are most certainly on US soil if you're at a US airport getting connecting flights. You may be thinking of embassies.

  17. Re:Stupid Logic by jandrese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    By that logic, who would pay taxes for _anything_ since it should be easy as pie to sell Twinkies, screwdrivers, or anything else under the table? Also, why would a seller risk his neck avoiding some 5 or 10% tax (that his customers are paying)? If it were legalized the illicit production would mostly dry up because it's much much easier to operate inside of the law than out. Given the choice, I doubt few dealers would choose a life in the worst part of town hounded by the police and thrown in jail every so often. Even the cushy suburban dealers would be estatic not to have to deal with Central American paramilitary cartels as their primary supplier. The concept that legalizing drugs will increase illegal production seems highly counterintuitive to me.

    Not to mention that the government will have a much easier time tracking users and abusers if they don't feel that they have to hide from the cops.

    On the other hand, I'm rather libertarian about what people do with their lives. As long as it doesn't harm other people, I don't think it should be illegal. I do think lots of stuff should be regulated however, to prevent people from becoming a completely unproductive junkie, but I don't think making the activity illegal is the proper answer. In other words, I don't want anybody stepping in until it's clear that what they're doing is interfering with their life in a substantal way.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
  18. Very sad by darjen · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What this amounts to is that Americans have no concept of freedom or property rights such as they claim. If I have $10 and wish to wager it on the outcome of an event that has a certain chance of success or failure, I am not hurting anyone other than myself. The irony is that if they would have paid taxes (which I consider to be nothing more than extortion) on their earnings to the federal government it sounds like they would have been allowed to survive unmolested. It just goes to show the lengths to which our government will go to stomp on our natural rights. The only moral right we have as humans is to proceed with the course of our action as long as it doesn't forcibly harm anyone else. We are denied this every day in multiple ways. I fear that we have been conditioned to accept this as a legitimate cost of being in society. All the while, the fat cats in charge are laughing at how easy it is for them to earn a living at others expense.

  19. missing the point? by dm0527 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A lot of the comments revolve around the obligatory "here goes the government again" comments.

    Perhaps I'm a bit naive, but it seems obvious to me that jumping on some website hosted in some third-world country and giving them my credit card so I can play poker through some system controlled by the website against God-knows-who just seems like an invitation to get ripped off.

    I'm just not surprised in the least bit to hear some online gambling site shut down or involved parties being arrested for fraud or whatever. Frankly, I'm surprised it's taken this long for some government somewhere to actually look at these sites and realize that there is no way at all to stop the owners thereof from ripping off customers coming and going (aside from the massive amounts of money they make simply from the actual gambling itself).

    I've got one of the smallest lists of "things I love that our government has its fingers in", but you should also realize that along with the money the government collects around legalized gambling in the US, they also regulate it massivly and crack down fast and hard on places that are ripping people off (above the fact that gambling itself is a ripoff).

    - dm
    --
    - dm - The two most common elements in the universe are Hydrogen and stupidity.
    1. Re:missing the point? by Brickwall · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why do you assume these people are guilty of credit card or other fraud? They have been in operation for a number of years; if there were significant complaints about them, the credit card companies would stop honouring their charges. And the gamblers, who are not as significantly stupid as you assume, would avoid the site in droves. The New Yorker had an article some time ago about on-line poker sites. They put a lot of software effort into tracking betting patterns, to ensure that two or three players at one table are not colluding to rip off the other players. Why do they do this? Because they're aware that if their customers perceived the games as rigged, they wouldn't come back. Their own self-interest keeps them honest.

      --
      What was once true, is no longer so
    2. Re:missing the point? by sahala · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The machines in the US are heavily regulated and while they are "settable" for payout there is considerable oversight as to how they are set. Why would you assume you are getting a fair shake on games like that?

      I'm a little confused. Those games ARE already rigged. Casino players playing player-vs-house table games and slot machines are always getting the worse odds. Those games are clearly and openly in favor of the house, whether it's a 1% edge or 48% (and there are games with that high of a house edge). Why would you assume that players are getting a fair shake in these games anywhere, whether in brick-and-mortar or online? People clearly play these games for the thrill and entertainment value, not for purposes of making money, so they should be allowed to dispense of their income in any way that they choose.

      Poker is a little different -- although from observation it appears that most people would stand a better chance playing slots than to sit down at table full of skilled players.

  20. This is NOT a gambling case by ChrisA90278 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Everyone seems to be complainning the the FBI is cracking down on GAMBLING. No, it is fraud and non-payment of taxes. The actuall gambling is being done overseas where it is legal but they are ripping off customers here in the US. Come on now, how many of you really believe those on-line gamming site really pay out all the winning and don't seriously cheat their customers. That is fraud. Even if they don't cheat they still own taxes on their US operations. Yes even Honda, a japanees car company has to pay US taxs on the money they make in the US and likewise do on-line gabling companies. The IRS sais that even drug dealers are required to pay taxes on their dealling (of couse they'd be stupid to claim such income on a signed government form) but still if they don't pay that is one more charge added when they are caught.

    Apearently there IS NO LAW against on-line gambling possably there are some state laws but the FBI does not enforce state laws. These guys could have been sell shoes buti f they cheated customers and didn't pay taxes they be shut down just the same --- well likey not the FBI does not waste time with small scale crimes and I doubt they'd be selling $3 billion in shoes

    Even the Porn industry is mostly above board and gets the required permits, pays resonable wadges, takes out payroll and income tax withholdings and keeps books and pays taxes. on-line gambling could do the same but apearently these guys didn't. This is NOT a big deal.

    1. Re:This is NOT a gambling case by jtownatpunk.net · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I can't believe this post has an "informative" rating. Of course the places pay out. If they didn't, it would be all over the entarwebs. There's no way an online gaming site could weather the storm of negative publicity that would arise from failure to pay out. Just ask Dutch Boyd http://www.pokertips.org/history/online-poker.php/ .

      As for taxes on US operations...um...What US operations? Costa Rica is not in the US. Gibralter is not in the US. Antigua is not in the US.

      The porn industry can get required permits because the required permits exist. Online gaming companies can't request a permit that doesn't exist. What kind of nonsense is that?

      The fact is the US government wants to get a cut of any transaction of any kind that takes place anywhere in the world. There's no way that can happen with transactions that take place across international boundaries. So they'll just grab the people in charge under whatever pretext they can, hold them by the ankles, and shake them until the money stops falling out.

  21. Re:Yes, Amazing by Gonarat · · Score: 2

    What does "bread and circuses" have to do with D and D? Bread and circuses was the Roman Empire's way of keeping the masses in check by keeping their minds off of the real issues. As long as the every day Roman had plenty of bread (food) and plenty of cheap entertainment (circuses), they were happy. Of course, eventually the Empire collapsed and feudalism took over. Thus began the so called "dark ages" in Europe. The Eastern (Constantinople) Roman Empire lasted another 1000 years, but Western Europe ruled by Kings and the Roman Catholic Church.


    That said, gambling is a form of "circuses" (entertainment) in our time. The Government is attempting ban Internet gambling, yet still allow track wagering online. This means that I cannot (legally) play Texas hold-em (for money) online, but I can bet on the Kentucky Derby at my computer instead of driving the 10 miles or so to Churchill Downs (yes, I live in Louisville).

    --
    Beware of Sleestak
  22. The US is different, it requires immigration... by blorg · · Score: 2, Informative

    ...for all connecting passengers. Many (most?) countries, such as France, don't require immigration if you are just connecting. Makes sense, you would think, as for countries that don't require immigation it helps promote their airports as hubs with all the attendant economic benefits. Much faster transfers, no visa hassles, etc. I guess the US is a big enough landmass with few alternative hubs nearby.

    This fact is how Canadian Mahar Arar was extraordinarily renditioned by the US to Syria coming home to Canada from holiday in Tunisia - he had the misfortune to connect in New York.

  23. This applies to sports betting, not casino games by RxScram · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the posts I have read seem to imply that this applies to all casino games, including poker, blackjack, etc. From the research I have done, current federal law only prohibits betting on sporting events. This is part of the Wire act, of which the applicable portion is: "Whoever being engaged in the business of betting or wagering knowingly uses a wire communication facility for the transmission in interstate or foreign commerce of bets or wagers or information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers on any sporting event or contest, or for the transmission of a wire communication which entitles the recipient to receive money or credit as a result of bets or wagers, or for information assisting in the placing of bets or wagers, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."

    In February 2001, Judge Stanwood Duval of the US District Court in New Orleans ruled "'in plain language' [the Wire Act] does not prohibit Internet gambling 'on a game of chance.'"

    On November 21, 2002, the US Fifth Circuit Federal Appeals Court upheld Duval's ruling, stating: "The district court concluded that the Wire Act concerns gambling on sporting events or contests... We agree with the district court's statutory interpretation, its reading of the relevant case law, its summary of the relevant legislative history, and its conclusion."

    The Appeals Court further states: "Because we find neither the Wire Act nor the mail and wire fraud statutes may serve as predicates here, we need not consider the other federal statutes identified by the Plaintiffs... As the district court correctly explained, these sections may not serve as predicates here because the Defendants did not violate any applicable federal or state law."

    The Appeals Court specifically cites Duval's statement: "[A] plain reading of the statutory language [of the Wire Act] clearly requires that the object of the gambling be a sporting event or contest." This is very explicit language. You would have to jump through a lot of mental hoops to consider the playing of online poker to be "a sporting event".

    Finally, in November 2004, the Caribbean island nation of Antigua and Barbuda won a World Trade Organization ruling that United States legislation criminalizing online betting violates global laws. In April 2005, the WTO Appellate Body affirmed the principal conclusions involved. What effect this will have on the U.S. morality police has yet to be seen, probably none, but at least it gives the online poker players and gamblers some glimpse of hope.

    Personally, I don't really care about sports betting and related things being illegal, as that isn't my area of interest. But I do see a long slippery slope ahead if things like this continue.

    Source: http://www.playwinningpoker.com/online/poker/legal /

  24. In that case..... by blang · · Score: 2, Funny

    The bible is an open endorsement for gambling.

    If getting rich quick and love of money are sins, then certainly gambling,
    which in the long run makes you poorer, is a Good Thing.

    In fact the state lotteries, indian Casonos, and the online gambling sites, perform the valuable public service of sinning on our behalf, so that we all can become poorer and go to heaven.

    --
    -- Another senseless waste of fine bytes.
  25. Wow... by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I bet he didn't see that coming.

    It's not the first time something like this has happened though. I seem to recall the FBI arresting a bunch of USAians who'd set up offshore gambling sites a while back. And if you ever had anything to do with helping to break copyright protection encryption you'd best steer clear of this country. If you've ever worked on an OSS encryption product you might want to avoid the USA, too. Never know when our guys might get a bug up their ass and arrest you as an international arms distributor or something like that.

    As for the US Citizens, you ARE registering to vote and voting against the incumbent, right? Chances are the guy you're voting against is retarded. Chances are the guy you're voting for is too, but it'll be a few years before he establishes the ties to do much damage and by then you can help vote him out again.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  26. Here's The Truth by Chagatai · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The real reason they were arrested was because Uncle Sam was unable to tax them. Think about it. Americans are spending $4.5 billion per year towards online gambling sites like these that are located overseas. The government would like a slice of that pie, but they are unable to tax that revenue because the foreign companies don't fall under the jurisdiction of the IRS. Consequently, Congress brings up a whole bunch of warnings and laws about being unable to gamble online. And what better way to cut it off than to arrest CEOs who step foot on American soil?

    Control. That's what it's all about.

    --
    --Chag
  27. Hmmm by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Interesting details on his arrest:
    * NO bail
    * feds are seeking over $4 billion in unpaid taxes
    * Carruthers was targeted as part of a larger investigation
    * Carruthers was held incommunicado until appearing at trial
    * FULL TEXT of the fed press release announcing the indictment details

    The news from the past few days made it seem like they were just leaning on Carruthers to help with the Kaplan investigation. But some of this stuff is very broad... "equipment used to place bets" is probably just a server. Sounds like he will be away for quite a while.