And it's also funny to see left wing apologists shit on the people who've had their shit together their whole lives and don't impose on others. A person who spends ~$5000/year on car payments and then claims to be broke is either disingenuous or simply stupid. There are plenty of people of similar means struggling by with a $1500 beater car, doing their own maintenance, and providing for their families without taking on excessive debt. Stories like this one spit in those people's face.
It's not your car until you pay for it. Until then, it's the bank's car. I question why a single mom with no job has a $389 monthly payment instead of buying a 8 year old used car she could actually afford.
Many incandescent lightbulbs aren't used for hours a day, which is what the break even price calculations are based on. My bedroom lights maybe get 45 minutes a day, and my guest bedroom perhaps 45 minutes a week. In my garage, it's 45 minutes a month. CFLs will never break even there.
Tme for all the hypocrites to come out against apple who is offering a free, perpetual license for the relevant patents, in favor of those who won't do the same, only because they have an irrational hatred of apple. Just look at the first post.
Why not just track us all, because it's not fair to anyone when people commit crimes? Once we lose an underlying presumption of innocence, any invasion of our privacy or erosion of personal liberties seems to make sense. It's not my job to help the government do theirs. They can catch tax cheats with good, old fashioned detective work. To presume that my heavy use of cash is somehow illegal or fraudulent is ridiculous.
The point is that the shareholders, to the extent that they have votes, control the company. There's no issue of "being held captive", because it is theirs. If you don't like that, you don't sell shares to the shareholders. Nobody forces that. Heck, you can take a public company private by buying it out if that's what you want. I don't understand all this angst towards shareholders - it's not like anyone forces a company to issue stock. That's real-life. Textbook is the fantasy that you take money from someone without them owning you.
The difference is that Bell Labs did pure research. While Google may be doing pure research, it isn't evident based upon the projects that are publicly visible. Pure research is what yields the long term society–changing breakthroughs, whereas R&D on fantasy projects often have higher capital expenses with nothing to show for it even if the project succeeds.
You can skew the number all you want. Facts are facts, and the fact is that the conditions at Foxconn are bad. So bad that this year 150 workers threatened mass suicide in protest. They where all fired and forcibly removed. To me, that does not sound like a content work force.
Nowadays, people don't seem to even understand the definition of a fact...
Re:Such systems have been proposed before
on
The Zuckerberg Tax
·
· Score: 1
They tax you on the difference of what you paid to Oregon ($0) and what you would pay to California (~10%, or $200k for the example).
He pays more than AMT. AMT caps at 28%, but he'll pay at 35%. The crossover point is somewhere around $400k.
Re:Such systems have been proposed before
on
The Zuckerberg Tax
·
· Score: 1
You pay state sales tax based upon where you garage or hangar your vehicle. When you buy a $2M aircraft and hangar it in California, the state sends you a bill. Of course, you can hangar it in a tax friendly state like Oregon, but then the aircraft isn't nearby.
Let's say you save 200w for 6 hours per day by using a more efficient lightbulb. That's 1.2 kw hr per day, or roughly 4mJ. Given that a gallon of gas weighs about 3 kg and therefore has about 120mJ of heating value, this saves the equivalent of about 4 oz of gasoline per day assuming 50% efficiency. Is legislation for is really warranted? If they would fix the awful public transit in the SF bay area, we'd be saving something significant instead. Or if we had diesel cars, or stopped drinking bottled tap water.
There is no substitute for ForeFlight on an iPad. I'm not carrying a laptop in the cockpit to view charts, and it saves me hundreds of dollars a year compared to paper charts. You go fly a plane with a smart phone and a netbook in your lap and tell me that it's better.
Many of which electric cars fail at too. They are poor at top speed (lower continuous peak power, typically limited by battery discharge rates and thermals) and cornering ability (heavy - look at a Tesla vs. Elise). They're way more costly, because batteries are expensive. And they're not going to get cheap, because lithium ion batteries already have economies of scale. EVs have great off the line acceleration and are quiet, but that's about all that's going for them.
So you're equating wealth itself with crime. If that's not class warfare. I don't know what is. N.b., there is always someone who has less than you who wants what you have. Be careful what you wish for.
The problem is that wealth redistribution requires at least some level of thuggish behavior. It might not be apparent in a large scale, where the IRS and threat of prison do the dirty work, but would quickly become apparent in a small scale, such as a town of 100. What if, in that town, 99 people went to a guy with an order of magnitude more money and said "give me your money, or we'll throw you in the jail"?
Slashdot Mirror
$25 or $100 is negligible even if you value your time well below minimum wage.
And it's also funny to see left wing apologists shit on the people who've had their shit together their whole lives and don't impose on others.
A person who spends ~$5000/year on car payments and then claims to be broke is either disingenuous or simply stupid. There are plenty of people of similar means struggling by with a $1500 beater car, doing their own maintenance, and providing for their families without taking on excessive debt. Stories like this one spit in those people's face.
I judge people only when they don't meet their obligations to others and then want sympathy.
It's not your car until you pay for it. Until then, it's the bank's car.
I question why a single mom with no job has a $389 monthly payment instead of buying a 8 year old used car she could actually afford.
Many incandescent lightbulbs aren't used for hours a day, which is what the break even price calculations are based on. My bedroom lights maybe get 45 minutes a day, and my guest bedroom perhaps 45 minutes a week. In my garage, it's 45 minutes a month. CFLs will never break even there.
Tme for all the hypocrites to come out against apple who is offering a free, perpetual license for the relevant patents, in favor of those who won't do the same, only because they have an irrational hatred of apple. Just look at the first post.
Why not just track us all, because it's not fair to anyone when people commit crimes? Once we lose an underlying presumption of innocence, any invasion of our privacy or erosion of personal liberties seems to make sense.
It's not my job to help the government do theirs. They can catch tax cheats with good, old fashioned detective work. To presume that my heavy use of cash is somehow illegal or fraudulent is ridiculous.
The point is that the shareholders, to the extent that they have votes, control the company. There's no issue of "being held captive", because it is theirs. If you don't like that, you don't sell shares to the shareholders. Nobody forces that. Heck, you can take a public company private by buying it out if that's what you want.
I don't understand all this angst towards shareholders - it's not like anyone forces a company to issue stock.
That's real-life. Textbook is the fantasy that you take money from someone without them owning you.
At $38B total revenue, that's less than $1.5B in total non-ad revenue, which is pretty much chump change.
The difference is that Bell Labs did pure research. While Google may be doing pure research, it isn't evident based upon the projects that are publicly visible. Pure research is what yields the long term society–changing breakthroughs, whereas R&D on fantasy projects often have higher capital expenses with nothing to show for it even if the project succeeds.
Some people don't want their living room to look like a scene from Brazil. $100 is a small price to pay.
You can skew the number all you want. Facts are facts, and the fact is that the conditions at Foxconn are bad. So bad that this year 150 workers threatened mass suicide in protest. They where all fired and forcibly removed. To me, that does not sound like a content work force.
Nowadays, people don't seem to even understand the definition of a fact...
They tax you on the difference of what you paid to Oregon ($0) and what you would pay to California (~10%, or $200k for the example).
He pays more than AMT. AMT caps at 28%, but he'll pay at 35%. The crossover point is somewhere around $400k.
You pay state sales tax based upon where you garage or hangar your vehicle. When you buy a $2M aircraft and hangar it in California, the state sends you a bill.
Of course, you can hangar it in a tax friendly state like Oregon, but then the aircraft isn't nearby.
Let's say you save 200w for 6 hours per day by using a more efficient lightbulb. That's 1.2 kw hr per day, or roughly 4mJ.
Given that a gallon of gas weighs about 3 kg and therefore has about 120mJ of heating value, this saves the equivalent of about 4 oz of gasoline per day assuming 50% efficiency. Is legislation for is really warranted?
If they would fix the awful public transit in the SF bay area, we'd be saving something significant instead. Or if we had diesel cars, or stopped drinking bottled tap water.
Foxconn is Taiwanese.
There is no substitute for ForeFlight on an iPad. I'm not carrying a laptop in the cockpit to view charts, and it saves me hundreds of dollars a year compared to paper charts. You go fly a plane with a smart phone and a netbook in your lap and tell me that it's better.
Another FUD article. Apple doesn't restrict open source apps from their app store.
For example:
http://maniacdev.com/2010/06/35-open-source-iphone-app-store-apps-updated-with-10-new-apps/
Many of which electric cars fail at too. They are poor at top speed (lower continuous peak power, typically limited by battery discharge rates and thermals) and cornering ability (heavy - look at a Tesla vs. Elise). They're way more costly, because batteries are expensive. And they're not going to get cheap, because lithium ion batteries already have economies of scale. EVs have great off the line acceleration and are quiet, but that's about all that's going for them.
A Tesla costs more than twice as much as the Elise on which it's based without the performance. Why is it the shit?
So you're equating wealth itself with crime. If that's not class warfare. I don't know what is.
N.b., there is always someone who has less than you who wants what you have. Be careful what you wish for.
Evil bankers won't buy me a house. Boo hoo.
That just drives the cost of goods up, since they charge merchants the 1-2%. On large dollar items, sometimes you can negotiate a cash discount.
The problem is that wealth redistribution requires at least some level of thuggish behavior. It might not be apparent in a large scale, where the IRS and threat of prison do the dirty work, but would quickly become apparent in a small scale, such as a town of 100. What if, in that town, 99 people went to a guy with an order of magnitude more money and said "give me your money, or we'll throw you in the jail"?