Slashdot Mirror


New Video Venture from Skype Creators

bart_scriv writes "BusinessWeek reports that Niklas Zennstrom and Janus Friis (creators of Kazaa and Skype) are at work on a new project: 'software for distributing TV shows and other forms of video over the Web.' Calling the work 'The Venice Project,' Zennstrom and Friis have assembled teams of developers to tackle the problem. The developers are already in negotiations with TV networks to use the system.'" From the article: "This time around, Zennstrom and Friis are inviting the cooperation of TV producers and networks. While the exact nature of their business model isn't clear, they are talking to every TV network in town, according to one person familiar with the matter. The idea is to become a dominant TV distribution company for the Internet era, just as companies such as Comcast (CMSCA) have dominated TV distribution in the cable era."

2 of 45 comments (clear)

  1. TV is okay vs. Movies & Music is not by digitaldc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The evolution of TV on the Web isn't likely to look like a rerun of the legal battles over film and music on the Web.

    What's the difference, anyway?
    They are both media being distributed on the internet, you can buy TV shows in stores and online just like movies and music DVDs/CDs.
    So all media should be treated the same and the lawsuits should stop, correct?

    --
    He who knows best knows how little he knows. - Thomas Jefferson
  2. thoughts by Tony+Tez · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I think the twins are onto somthing good here if you've been watching the progression of break.com and youtube.com . Since the videos will be coming from the tv stations, it's just a simple distribution system.

    Hosted from a single site I could see bandwidth being an issue, but I think the draw of a p2p system isn't there. People used (still use, somewhat) p2p systems because of the draw of getting music/videos for free that someone didn't want them to. This is a legit system, and people are going to want a simple download. I imagine part of working it out is using multiple servers to split the load.

    One other issue if they did use p2p would be licensing, namedly that BDE/Altnet Inc. own the patent of using a file hash on a p2p-type system. Stupid, but it exists and has technically held up in court. Granted easy to design a new system around it, but a con on the side of using p2p.

    So, my bet is that it'll be on a multiple-server setup. That's my take at least as of now.

    So, what I expect to see in reality is a setup like break.com where the videos only come from the tv stations(likely paying the venice project), and a fairly uninventive download method, riddled with advertisements. Oh, and DRM will definitely be in there, no doubt about it.

    I think it'll work and people will visit often, but I don't think it'll be ground-breaking.