Slashdot Mirror


Blue Crab Nanosensor to Fight Terrorism

Roland Piquepaille writes "A substance found in crab shells called chitosan has very useful properties. For example, it has been used in bandages to stop bleeding. But now, researchers at the University of Maryland have used the chitosan from blue crabs living in Chesapeake Bay as a component of a nanoscale sensor system which could save many lives in the future. These blue crab nanosensors will be used to improve security in airports, hospitals and other public locations by detecting tiny amounts of explosives or chemicals in air and water. Read on for additional references and pictures of these blue crab nanosensors."

106 comments

  1. Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Oh, good, we've got nanosensors. Now we can stop overreacting maniacally to attacks, the wildfire of uncontrolled fear that destroys our freedom more than any bomb ever could. I can't wait to see our leaders appear on TV to tell us we can calm down.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by plasmacutter · · Score: 1

      Don't worry, the chesapeake has been fished so dry theyre unlikely to find enough of any indigenous species to meaningful quantities out of this crab..

      --
      VLC FOR MAC IS DYING! IF YOU DEVELOP, PLEASE SAVE IT!!
    2. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by kfg · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Hey, those nano bombs can sting!

      What do you bet the end result of this is going to be nothing more than a shitload of innocent people getting put on "The List" because of false positives?

      There's such a thing as over measurement.

      KFG

    3. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      "I can't wait to see our leaders appear on TV to tell us we can calm down."

      Um, yeah, well.. anyway... I'm all for better bomb-detecting sensors.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    4. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by kassemi · · Score: 1

      I think the issue here is that we're dumping our money into researching a threat that's simply placed into the mind of the public. Frankly, I'd rather see my money going somewhere useful, be it stem cell research or better schooling.

      --
      What the hell's a "gewie?"
    5. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by QuantumFTL · · Score: 3, Insightful

      While I do agree that we, as a nation, have overreacted quite a bit to terrorist actions, that doesn't mean we shouldn't work on security precautions. Prevention and mitigation are two of our strongest weapons that can help people avoid the need to worry.

      On the other hand, I'm not all that convinced that these new security measures are really doing that much to make things like air travel safer. I know someone who accidentally took firecrackers in his pocket on an flight across the US once (after 9/11). The security people x-rayed and felt through all of his on-person possessions, but so much junk had accumulated in his pockets that they did not notice the presence of explosives.

    6. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Frankly, I'd rather see my money going somewhere useful, be it stem cell research or better schooling.

      Better schooling = more intelligent population = questionning the government = bad = not gonna happen in "The New USA".
    7. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Walt+Dismal · · Score: 0
      Please step out of line, citizen. Our nanosensors have detected carbon, hydrogen, oxygen, and nitrogen on you. These are components of known explosives. We'll have to put you on the no-fly list, although without telling you. Please step over to the officer putting on the rubber gloves...

      Only the guilty have anything to fear, this is for your own good. What? Yes, that is a 55-gallon barrel of anal grease. If you're a patriotic American, you should have no complaint. Besides, you should overcome your petty selfishness, this is for the protection of your fellow citizens. Do you have a problem with that?

    8. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh sure, calm down if you want to simply detect attacks. I would rather fight terrorism so that there is not anything to detect in the first place. I guess that I am a warmonger.

      The more we prevent the government from fighting this outward the more we ask for a police state. that will fight it inward

    9. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or the US could deal with the root cause of most terrorism and stop proping up that sacred cow, Israel. We couldn't have that now, could we? Far better to keep bombing the shit out of various parts of the Middle East. If the US was serious about dealing with terrorism it would have been on the ground in Southtern Lebonon four years ago working with the Lebonese government to help root out Hezbollah on the ground.

    10. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by montyzooooma · · Score: 1

      Cars kill more people than bombs do but a sensor to detect bombs is a good thing but speed cameras are evil. Guess which potentially saves more lives? And hey yeah they do both make life more difficult for innocent people but a quit-stuffing-your-face-with-shit sensor is going to save the most lives every year so where's the research for that?

    11. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd give you a million to one odds that things like this won't protect you against any bombs. They will, however, be used to catch many people carrying dangerous, dangerous plant leaves. God bless the protectors of our precious bodily fluids.

    12. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Cars kill more people than bombs do but a sensor to detect bombs is a good thing but speed cameras are evil. Guess which potentially saves more lives?"

      Ever wonder why they call it terrorism instead of mass-murder? 9-11 did a lot more damage than car crashes. The gubment's handling of terrorism is questionable, but the prioritization of it over car crashes is not nearly as black and white. Anti-terrorism (The intent, I mean, not 'The War Against Terror'...) is about more than just the saving of lives. Think about what the first week after 9-11 was like, then think about the year that followed. The fear, paranoia, and hardships that followed were incalcuable. There's a reason it's not swept under the rug until car crashes are dealt with. Think about it.

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    13. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Paua+Fritter · · Score: 1
      The more we prevent the government from fighting this outward the more we ask for a police state. that will fight it inward

      On the contrary, the more power you allow your militaristic rulers to assume the more they will use it against you. Have you been living in a cave for the last 5 years? You haven't noticed that Bush has used his self-proclaimed "war powers" to encroach on the civil rights on US citizens?

      Also, your "fuck the world but leave us Americans alone please" attitude is not just naive, it actually helps to give America the bad name that it has around the world, as a danger to peace and international security. Perhaps if American citizens could cut their rulers down a peg or several they might find the rest of the world didn't give them such shit anyway.

      PS nice troll

    14. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by greenhide · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Mod this guy up. This was my first impression on reading the post (IHNRTFA). Unless there's been some recent resurgence in the bay depending on crabs from the Chesepeake for any kind of solution is not really sustainable.

      On the other hand, maybe this is the only way to get the government interested in saving the Chesepeake Bay ecosystem. :-)

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    15. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by greenhide · · Score: 1

      I'll see your firecrackers and raise you smoke bombs. Although, to be fair, they were in my backpack, not my jacket.

      Date of the flight? 9/14/01.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    16. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by vadim_t · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And whose fault was the paranoia?

      Look, I travelled every day to go to class on one of the lines where a train blew up in Madrid, only fortunately in the afternoon instead of the morning. I had a friend personally present there, and a classmate of mine died there.

      But you know what I did next day? I went to class just like everybody else. I certainly wasn't demanding useless measures to be taken to protect me against something against which no protection is possible, and neither was most of the country.

      As a matter of fact, to go to work I have to cross a dangerous road where sometimes the traffic lights *aren't working*. I'm much more likely to be killed by a truck on that road than by a bomb. There you have one place where spending some money would be actually useful.

    17. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Xyrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      There were no bombs involved in 9-11. This device would not have prevented those attacks.

      ~X~

      --
      ~X~
    18. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by ip_fired · · Score: 1

      As I flew through the Salt Lake City International Airport last time, they had new GE explosive detectors, which puff air on you and then spend a few seconds analyzing it for any explosives. It adds about 20 more seconds per person to the security screening process. I wonder if it would detect firecrackers or smoke bombs.

      http://www.geindustrial.com/cwc/products/ge-interl ogix?pnlid=9&famid=5131&catid=562&id=end_wt&lang=e n_US

      Hmm, I didn't realize it also detected drugs. They never mentioned that when I was walking through it.

      --
      Don't count your messages before they ACK.
    19. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, we don't have enough fear in the people...

      I want to scream "praise Ala" and watch everyone hit the ground...

      I want to run around the airport in a turbin and watch children cry....

      I really really want the American people to abandon all their rights with only the hope of "safety."

      Well, at least I got the last one.

    20. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Profane+MuthaFucka · · Score: 1

      It's probably scanning for nitrogen compounds, so if it can detect firecrackers, it'd detect the potassium nitrate in the gunpowder.

      --
      Fascism trolls keeping me up every night. When I starts a preachin', he HITS ME WITH HIS REICH!
    21. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by theshowmecanuck · · Score: 1

      Speed cameras have not been proven to reduce speed and prevent crashes (except perhaps initially in the short term), they just make money for the local government... a cash cow. Having real police or traffic enforcement out there to enforce the speed limit does. Also, in every place I have lived (four provinces in Canada and three states in the U.S.A., you didn't loose points on your license for photo radar tickets (since they can't prove you were driving your car), only for tickets issued when an enforcement officer tickets you. Also, your auto/motorbike insurance was not affected by photo radar tickets for the same reason... at least in the U.S. and anywhere with private insurance (not sure how over-priced government monopoly insurance like in British Columbia works). I think insurance rate increases have more of an effect on deterring speeding (or the threat of a ticket causing a rate increase) than does anything.

      An interesting note: in Missouri, you can often get a "moving violation" (e.g. a speeding ticket) reduced to a non-moving violation (equivalent to a parking ticket) if you pay a lawyer to argue some 'thing' and also pay the fine. The lawyer usually charge $75 or $100 dollars. The cost more than offsets the insurance rate increase you would get for the "moving violation". Don't ask me the details of how or why it works, I just know that it does. No I never got caught so didn't need the service, but I had several friends who did. It is also why lawyers and some businesses advertise their services so much for these kind of traffic offences. It explains the formula one speeds on the highways there!

      --
      -- I ignore anonymous replies to my comments and postings.
    22. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by dominion · · Score: 1

      There's a reason it's not swept under the rug until car crashes are dealt with. Think about it.

      Because it serves a much greater political purpose for the people in power than car crashes ever could?

    23. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by cayenne8 · · Score: 1
      "Unless there's been some recent resurgence in the bay depending on crabs from the Chesepeake for any kind of solution is not really sustainable."

      Don't worry...we've got TONS of blue crabs down here around the Gulf in Louisiana!!

      See? Good reason to help us get our coast back into shape which were sacrificed in large part to the immense oil and gas pipelines cut from the gulf into our marshlands to shore.

      We not only help the country out with aobut 1/3 of its fuel...but, also, our crabs can help fight terrorism....and are mighty tasty to boot!!

      :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    24. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by soupforare · · Score: 1

      "bombs", probably not. "Explosives", surely.
      You have seen video of the collapses, right?
      [/conspiracy]

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    25. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by orangesquid · · Score: 1

      I'm foreseeing drug detection systems installed in schools... and administrators walking past all the lockers with super-sensitive hand-held sniffers (much easier than bringin in dogs!).

      Why do I keep remembering statistics about how many dollar bills have traces of cocaine...

      --
      --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
    26. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by idontgno · · Score: 1
      Yes. We need blue crab gravity detectors.

      If gravity can make mortally wounded, wildfire-weakened skyscrapers collapse, the terrorists have already won.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    27. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by ate50eggs · · Score: 1

      What do you bet the end result of this is going to be nothing more than a shitload of innocent people getting put on "The List" because of false positives?

      considering the origin of the information, I wonder if they'll call it "The Crab List". Nobody deserves that.

      --
      not everything is a science experiment!
    28. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by soupforare · · Score: 1

      Indeed. Too bad building seven was neither mortally wounded nor weakened with wildfires.
      THE ZIONISTS HAVE ALREADY WON.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    29. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      There's no fine control over whether the government fights actual terrorism "outwards", or turns "inwards" into a police state. Fighting terrorism with war does both, while creating terrorism both outward and inward. That's why warmongers are terrorists, whether you're competing with other terrorists or not.

      The more you fight terrorists with war, the more terror you make. And the more police state you make from the opportunists in our government who need terrorism to justify the police state that warmongers hand them.

      Snap out of it. Don't get so excited at every military counterterrorist offering that just spirals the terrorism and police state out of control. That levelheadedness is the only way to defeat the terrorism, making the actual capture and even killing of actual terrorists more a cleanup operation than a perpetual war.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    30. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Thank you, officer, for delivering my personal Rapture on time. Light me up!

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    31. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      You mean the zionists who wrote the protocols? That would be the antisemitic Russian secret police, and the sickos like you who carry their torch.

      We've had enough of you bigots winning for a while. Try redirecting your quivering antennae at the Bush government that is actually killing people every day, and try to earn back some humanity and respect.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    32. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      I think those false positives are just a means to an end. Along with counting them as "intercepted/suspected terrorists" (counted twice, no doubt). The ends are all the money to military contractors, namely Halliburton and the Carlyle Group. The Binladen construction company will probably get some subcontracts, likely in a joint venture with Dubai Ports World.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    33. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by kfg · · Score: 1

      Go read Crystallizing Public Opinion; Edward L. Bernays, copyright 1928.

      KFG

    34. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Bernays' biography is illuminating.

      More light can be found in The Mass Psychology of Fascism", by Wilhelm Reich in 1933.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    35. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by soupforare · · Score: 1

      While I was "doing it for the lulz", I'd like to remind everyone that anti-zionists are not necessarily anti-semitic. More importantly, not all Jews are zionists. Certainly many jews are not. Small j.

      I'm speaking of the "Zionism" concept of an Israeli state. I've not read the protocols of the elders of zion nor do I care about one ethnic group's attacks on another. You all stink the same to me.

      Also, I am not a bigot, I am a misanthrope; the difference, in affection, may be subtle, and that's ok.

      While I do not have antennae, currently, I find the idea interesting and strangely arousing.

      The Bush government is actually, actively, killing people every day.
      Just as the Israeli government.
      Just as the Iranian government.
      Just as the *.
      People kill people. Entities kill people. Life feeds on life. It's not a big deal.

      Humanity?
      "the condition or quality of being human"
      Death is at the heart of the human condition.
      Killing is in the heart of all Man.

      Respect. From Humanity? For what? I place no value on such a thing.
      From an individual? Maybe. I might be so inclined, if I did find their company not displeasing. However, this is slashdot, and I've little to gain from practicing such politesse here.

      Good day, sir.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
    36. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

      Universal bigotry matches your nihilism. And your deep uptightness. How sad it must be to feel so alone. Go hug a teddybear or something.

      --

      --
      make install -not war

    37. Re:Fights Terrorists, Not Terrorism by soupforare · · Score: 1

      You get used to it.

      --
      --- Do you believe in the day?
  2. Not to mention tasty by antifoidulus · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    And forbidden by some muslim scholars

    Mmm...anti-terrorism

    1. Re:Not to mention tasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Crabs have terrorist sensors?

      If so, my crotch may be the safest place from terrorists that the world has ever seen!

    2. Re:Not to mention tasty by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about,
      if you are talking about craps, then I'll have to tell you that sea food is not prohibited in Islam, not even dead meat, which is normally prohibited.

      P.S: Don't talk about things you don't know shit about.

  3. Chitosan. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chitosan is also used for stitches that break up on their own. Cool, huh?

  4. No Pinch by DigiShaman · · Score: 4, Funny

    Speaking of Crabs, I'm reminded of this video.

    --
    Life is not for the lazy.
    1. Re:No Pinch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That CRAB had a LATINO accent!!! AYE AYe AyE I call racist!!!! Viva El Mexico!!

  5. but... by howhardcanitbetocrea · · Score: 3, Funny

    they wouldn't be allowed in airports with those sharp claws would they?

    --

    President ISES
    (International Society for Elimination of Sigs)
    1. Re:but... by nick_davison · · Score: 1

      As a reader wrote to Reader's Digest once:

      At the airport, I saw a guardsman reporting for duty. I was glad to see he had to go through the same procedures we do: He had to place all metal items in the X-Ray, remove his boots and step through. They even confiscated the pocket knife he was carrying... Then, on the secure side of the scanners, they handed him back his assault rifle.

  6. And another species goes extinct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But who cares... as the stupid jingle says

    "O Kani yorimo taisetsu no mono wa aru'

    1. Re:And another species goes extinct... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you kidding? This (and many other useful things crabs give us) will ensure their survival, just like cows, sheep, chickens, dogs, giant pandas, etc. usefulness ensures their survival.

    2. Re:And another species goes extinct... by Yaotzin · · Score: 1

      Mmm... Giant panda...

      --
      Error: No error occurred
  7. This will never work... by dhaines · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Terrorists will just attack the crabs' weak points for massive damage!

  8. Sure, we're safe... by ShadowSonic · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...until the terrorists learn to attack their weak points for MASSIVE DAMAGE.

    --
    "God is nothing but a public static final variable x." - my roommate
    1. Re:Sure, we're safe... by AndrewNeo · · Score: 1

      I was hoping someone would bring that up!

    2. Re:Sure, we're safe... by ESqVIP · · Score: 1

      Well, that has only been tested on giant enemy crabs. These ones are nano(sensor) good-doer crabs, so we're safe for now.

    3. Re:Sure, we're safe... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only reason I clicked on this story was to see how long it would take somebody to unleash the MASSIVE DAMAGE.

  9. No Entry! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Warning!

    Firearms, explosives, flammable liquids, radioactive materials, poisons, knives, and persons allergic to shellfish not allowed beyond this point.

  10. necessity is the mother of invention? by SuperBanana · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These blue crab nanosensors will be used to improve security in airports, hospitals and other public locations by detecting tiny amounts of explosives or chemicals in air and water.

    Because after all, we've had such a huge problem with explosives and "chemicals" in airports, hospitals, and "other public locations"...

    1. Re:necessity is the mother of invention? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      Don't know about you, but here in israel we HAD had problems with explosives in public locations.
      We have security guards checking the bags of every person entering almost any store, restaurant or other public facility.
      If you could mount one of those sensors at the door of a bus, it would probably make a big difference.

    2. Re:necessity is the mother of invention? by MrShaggy · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, none of this while do much to help. If there are sensors in a building, and Joe Terrorist wants to bomb it. They either throw a bag full of bombs into a room, then set them off, or he will do it with a suicide run, which there isn't much you can do about that. If he walks into store.. the alarms will go off, and so will he. Or a car-bomb next to the building all-together. The point of terrorism is striking fear. If they strike in a market or in the middle of the street, that is all they need. If they can manage to get a building, then thats just 'icing on the cake' as it were.

      --
      I have mod points and I am not afraid to use them.
    3. Re:necessity is the mother of invention? by EnsilZah · · Score: 1

      I don't think you quite understand how it works around here.
      You don't just walk into a store around here.
      There's a scurity guard between you and the door.
      If the suicide bomber trys to run in he's likely to be shot, or the guard might block him and risk death (which has happened).

      The most common scenario is of a suicide bomber entering a restaurant or getting on a bus and exploding, and i think in those cases this sensor could help, if only by making the security guard's check of people's bags more thorough.

  11. RIIIIIDGE RACER by fo0bar · · Score: 1, Funny

    You know, I once used giant enemy crab nanosensors to attack its weak point for massive damage. True story.

    1. Re:RIIIIIDGE RACER by LordVader717 · · Score: 1

      For more information on giant enemy crabs, read this article.

      You can also visit the no. 1 GEC music site, or watch a brief documentary on their importance in japanese history.

    2. Re:RIIIIIDGE RACER by Frightening · · Score: 1

      Are there too many anti-sony youtube vids being posted recently, or am I imagining things?

      Alright, I get it. I'm imagining things.

  12. "Could" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    ...which could save many lives in the future. These blue crab nanosensors will be used to improve security...

    Ah yes, "could" - what a wonderful word. It "could" be that bad people will be tortured for all eternity after they die. Or, it "could" be that good people will be tortured for all eternity after they die.

    "Could" is a word of so many possibilities. It is totaly unlike its lesser cousin, the word "will", - as in "Thousands of people will die of poverty in the next few hours". Yes, let's focus on what could happen rather than what is happening.

    1. Re:"Could" by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      "Could" is a word of so many possibilities. It is totaly unlike its lesser cousin, the word "will"

      Have faith.

      KFG

    2. Re:"Could" by tsa · · Score: 1

      No.

      Use common sense.

      --

      -- Cheers!

    3. Re:"Could" by kfg · · Score: 1

      Use common sense.

      I'm not that stupid.

      KFG

  13. Recognizes chemicals by DemonThing · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I'm detecting trace amounts of dear aunt, let's set so double the killer delete select all

    1. Re:Recognizes chemicals by SimplyI · · Score: 1

      He speaks in code... Terrorist!

  14. Nanosensors? by rmadhuram · · Score: 2, Funny

    I first read it as "Blue Crab Nonsense to Fight Terrorism"

  15. diet supplement by Xtravar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Chitosan is also considered to be a miracle diet supplement which absorbs fat and suppresses hunger... ... take that with a grain of salt.

    http://drumlib.com/dp/000026.htm

    Someday, we'll have really fat terrorists because of this.

    --
    Buckle your ROFL belt, we're in for some LOLs.
    1. Re:diet supplement by Lissajous · · Score: 1

      I would love to take it with a grain of salt - unfortunately I had some chitosan earlier and I'm not really hungry at the moment.

  16. Funny Story by aXis100 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No matter how good the sensor technology is, you still have humans driving the system.

    A funny example is an industrial town I fly to on a regular basis. Most of the people work in the mines, where explosives can be a common part of many poeples jobs. When explosives traces are regularly detected at the airport explosives scan, their first question is "Have you been on a mine site recently?" Obviously 99% of people say yes, and are let through without question.

    What is the point? We're running around banning knitting needles and letter openers and it makes no fucking difference.

    1. Re:Funny Story by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're running around banning knitting needles . . .

      Sweaters can cause itch and afghans kill.

      KFG

    2. Re:Funny Story by kbielefe · · Score: 1
      If you think the population of mine workers is large, I set off the alarm once after shooting off a bunch of fireworks on new year's eve. All I had to do was sign a paper. They inspected my bags more closely, and made me check the bag that set off the alarm even though I was going to carry it on.

      Does anyone know when the last time explosives were actually set off on a plane?

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
  17. Coming soon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Terrorists fighting terrorists!

    You know it will happen. Apparently they're the only ones not fighting terrorists yet.

  18. Hmmm by IlliniECE · · Score: 0

    Something smells fishy about this.

  19. All for terrorism! by mano_k · · Score: 1

    Somehow it seems every scientist doing research in the us has to find a use for his research in "fighting terrorism" when he wants to get money.
    Even the ones researching crabs and other small animals!

    1. Re:All for terrorism! by GrubInCan · · Score: 1

      And here's where you get it.... http://www.hsarpasbir.com/

  20. Spice is life by greg1104 · · Score: 1

    As a long-time Maryland resident, there's only one question I want answered: will the nanosensors work better with some Old Bay on them?

    1. Re:Spice is life by Mike_ya · · Score: 1

      Maybe the question should be when will Homeland Security proclaim crabs essential for homeland defense thus becoming protected leading to higher prices or severe rationing of crabbing. Overreaching security procedures fine, but I'd be PISSED if they mess with my crabs.

  21. Save us from what?? by lostngone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will ths magic substance stop people from highjacking a phine with a box cutter and flying the plane into a building? I'm getting sick and tired of the these people telling us it will make us safer as they take more and more of our rights away. I know, if they lock all of us up in prison the Government can make sure we are safe 100% of the time.

  22. Cool... by aadvancedGIR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Many exhausts of explosive or dangerous chemicals can also be generated by normal activities of janitors, construction workers, farmers, or anyone smoking. I wish them good luck spending millions investigating all those false positives.

  23. Isn't exactly a new idea.... by jokeyjon · · Score: 1

    This company (http://www.biosensor.se/) has been producing a similar product for a couple of years now. It's used by the German and Australian customs officials for the detection not only of explosives, but also drugs (oh well). The existing tech as used in US airports has a dismal detection rate and also throws out several false positives. If you're going to have a system, then you might at least have one that works.

  24. And the magicians will catch hell... by misterhypno · · Score: 1

    Yep! Anyone who has ever had a pad of flash paper in their bag will get hauled out and strip searched.

    Been there. Had it happen to ME.

    After MacWorld a couple of years ago, in New York, the crack TSA troops manning the perimeter didn't understand the cards and nerf balls in my carry on were part of a MAGIC ACT and I wound up splattered up against a wall with a National Guardsman's M-16 shoved up my left nostril, with the Safety OFF!

    I am SO not looking forward to this!

    Lee Darrow, C.H.
    Magician and Hypnotist
    Chicago, IL

  25. In related news: radioactive spiders by Seiruu · · Score: 1

    have been seen biting humans in suspicious labs.

  26. IBM Onboard by gilberry · · Score: 1, Funny

    With IBM on board, using their tastiest, fastest computer for crimefighting, we can't lose. These IBM researchers amaze me. First they crafted the chart conquering pop music supercomputer Deep Blue Something. Now, the top 40 reduced to jetsam in their wake, they have set their sights on terrorism. You know, we can talk about how there's no pure research anymore, but IBM is as freewheeling and boundless as ever.

  27. I hope this will end all terrorism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I hope this will end all terrorism, including the one is being committed in Lebanon by Israel using US bombs, killing more than 34 children.

  28. Nothing fights terrorism like Justice by vandan · · Score: 0, Troll

    Of course it's been said before, but investing in all these whiz-bang anti-terrorism devices is missing the point. You can't fight a social phenomenon such as terrorism with technology. You have to address its root cause(s). Right now, the root cause of terrorism is overwhelmingly the massive injustices thrust upon the people of the Middle East in the name of grabbing their oil. It would be a lot cheaper for the US to forget this bullshit 'war on terrorism' and relocate all the Israelis to Washington. After all, the US is Israel's closest ally. Why shouldn't such friends live so close together.

  29. Easy hack to defeat... by 47F0 · · Score: 1

    There's already an easy hack against these crab nano-sensors. Seems they go into panic mode when they detect lemon-garlic butter. Shuts 'em down every time.

    1. Re:Easy hack to defeat... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Blue crabs only get frightened from Old Bay seasoning.

      --
      /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
  30. Macro Sensors by davetv · · Score: 1

    I need a macro sensor to find me women to keep me occupied late at night instead of reading slashdot

  31. Forbidden by Christians? by dunc78 · · Score: 1

    I had a Christian friend tell me that they are forbidden in Christianity because they are bottom dwellers. I imagine that would be something in the Old Testament, so maybe they are forbidden in Judaism as well.

    1. Re:Forbidden by Christians? by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

      I had a Christian friend tell me that they are forbidden in Christianity because they are bottom dwellers.

      Crabs and other shellfish, as well as fish without scales, are not kosher as defined in Leviticus, which is a book in the Old Testament and thus the Bible. Christians generally don't follow the rules of Leviticus, but Jews do to varying degrees.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
    2. Re:Forbidden by Christians? by jeksted · · Score: 1

      Maybe we need a kosher version for Jewish home land security agents.

    3. Re:Forbidden by Christians? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That wouldn't be necessary, unless they're actually eating the sensors, in which case I'd think the kosher-ness of the bomb detectors is probably the least of their problems...

  32. So crabs will be used... by NoseBag · · Score: 1

    ...to (possibly) reduce traveler crabbiness?

    --
    Cloned foods give the statement "We had that last week!" a whole new meaning.
  33. Blah blah terrorism blah by Rogerborg · · Score: 1

    They can detect organic compounds? Then the major use of this technology will be to detect THC. It'll be used in airports, then by cops in traffic stops, then in schools, then in your workplace.

    The only place you'll never, ever see it being used for that purpose is a government building housing elected members.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  34. False Positives by curtvdh · · Score: 1

    But can they detect the individual components of 2-component explosives? Like, say, Potassium Perchlorate carried by one passenger and Aluminum or Magnesium powder carried by another? When mixed together in the correct proportions (no, I'm not going to tell you what they are), they will produce a crude but quite deadly explosive. Problem is that there are a thousand reasons why a person might legitimately be carrying traces of these components. Suddenly, you're going to have miners, janitors, gardeners, chemical factory workers, even senior citizens with dietary supplements being hauled out of line and searched for no good reason...

  35. TSA is a mindset we don't want by ianscot · · Score: 4, Informative

    I used to take my dog -- a Newfoundland -- in to the airport to pick people up. The baggage claim at our local airport basically lets people get dogs off their leashes after a flight, and according to the local cops it was okay. Never had a cross word from anyone; I wasn't inflicting too many more allergens on anyone, I hoped, and mostly we got a lot of good socialization when she was a puppy. At least some people seemed to get a wake-up in the middle of their exhausting travel day.

    One day a TSA employee caught sight of us. A squad of four of them surrounded me, quietly preventing me from moving away as one lectured me on all the potential dreadful consequences should they decide to enforce their vaguely-defined regulations. I tried to ask after the specific laws or airport restrictions involved. There probably were some -- I'd always assumed the cops were just being smart about what to enforce and what not to -- but it was clear that the TSA guys were entirely motivated by that obnoxious self-righteousness I recognize from birding near power plants. You know, the one that comes with private security agencies taking themselves too seriously and not having clear "boundaries," so that they end up thinking their job is to harass people. Said people are to be presumed guilty, of course.

    End result was me feeling intimidated, which seemed to be the goal. Those guys were a hybrid between hallway monitors and the bullies from your middle school.

    Somehow the local cops had always managed to keep me in line, and to prevent potential terrorist attacks by Newfoundland drool and shedding, without any ill will. If one of them had brought this up with me I'd have taken it a lot differently...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  36. Chemicals? by swelke · · Score: 1

    ...by detecting tiny amounts of explosives or chemicals in air and water.

    Oh no! Not chemicals! Protect the children!

    I'm just kind of reactionary when people talk about "chemicals" as if they were always a bad thing. I know in this case they're probably referring to particularly nasty chemicals like nerve gas etc. but it still bugs me. And, of course, I can't be bothered to rtfa.

    --
    Have you ever wondered How to Take Over
  37. Chemicals! by StoatBringer · · Score: 1

    Oh my god, there are chemicals all around me! The terrorists have won!

    --
    Cress, cress, lovely lovely cress
  38. Great! Now "I've got crabs"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    takes on a whole new meaning!