Slashdot Mirror


The Ad-Supported Operating System

An anonymous reader writes "The appearance of an ad-supported operating system is probably not that far off. This article takes a look at some of the finer points behind an OS which is financed with ad views, and more specifically the logic behind a free version of Windows which could make this a reality. There are a few issues which must be resolved first, but with Microsoft refining Windows Live and shifting some of their focus to advertising, many of the pieces seem to be falling into place."

7 of 330 comments (clear)

  1. I can't wait by grammar+fascist · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't wait to have Explorer force me to view an ad for ten seconds before I can access the hard drive.

    Or play "Punch the Monkey!!!" on my task bar.

    No thanks. I've been sticking with Free Software lately because I like it better for research, but if this advertising crap ever happens, I might just become a convert to the philosophy.

    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    1. Re:I can't wait by landattack · · Score: 3, Funny

      I think I have already seen one of these ad supported machines at a friends house.

  2. Re:Never in a million years by Jugalator · · Score: 4, Funny

    So you are just going to make Bonzi starve like that? :-(

    --
    Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
  3. In The Future... by mac.convert · · Score: 5, Funny

    This Blue Screen of "Life" is sponsored by Blue Shield Health Insurance.

    --
    "Every time a bell rings, a Dell laptop bursts into flame."
    1. Re:In The Future... by kolme · · Score: 3, Funny

      A critical error has happened: unknown

      352ff7: 00000 00000 0000 0000 0000

      Enlarge your pennis!

      --
      $ whoami
  4. Ads in Linux by jandersen · · Score: 4, Funny

    $ ls -l

    Dear Sir/Madam,

    I am the wife of Dr. Mabunga, the former minister for internal affairs in Nigeria, ...
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3409 2005-12-13 14:35 cpuload.c
    -rw------- 1 root root 614363 2005-08-17 19:16 culturalgrammar.pdf
    drwxr-xr-x 5 root root 456 2006-03-23 17:17 cv
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 27136 2006-02-03 12:08 cv+cover.doc
    drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 48 2006-08-01 15:56 Desktop
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 33995 2006-03-30 10:26 dilbert2006610630330.gif
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 49672 2006-03-30 10:35 dilbert.gif
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 245760 2006-03-16 15:57 djpenguin.zip
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 0 2005-11-16 17:44 dlmgr_.pro
    drwxr-xr-- 2 root root 336 2005-08-19 15:55 download
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 223 2006-07-13 15:23 DVconfig.ini
    -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 6461758 2006-06-13 15:07 E1.wma
    -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 10583 2005-07-19 10:49 endian

  5. Windows already is just what TFA speaks about by kripkenstein · · Score: 3, Funny

    Never in a million years [...] would I consider an ad-supported OS. Linux is free, and ad-free. Why bother?

    Ok, you wouldn't. But the vast majority of people use Windows, which in actuality already is an ad-supported OS. Many (most?) installations of Windows are (1) pirated, hence 'free', and (2) infected with adware, hence 'ad-supported'...

    TFA even hints that the point would be to move the ad revenue from the adware companies to Microsoft:

    This is no doubt why there was news about MSFT buying a adware company, probably so the operating system could essentially be infected with the most permanent adware possible, though at this point the term "adware" would not really be appropriate.

    So, Windows would remain free and ad-supported, as it essentially is right now, but MS would get paid and not the adware companies. An interesting thought, but it's just speculation on TFA's part. MS will probably want both kinds of revenue, licenses (enforced by WGA), and integrated ads.