Slashdot Mirror


No Virtual PC for Intel-based Macs

Techie writes "Microsoft has decided not to move forward with a version of Virtual PC for the Intel-based Macintosh. The amount of time it would take to bring Virtual PC to Intel would be roughly equivalent to creating the product from scratch, Scott Erickson, director of product management and marketing for Microsoft's Macintosh Business Unit, told eWEEK. The article says Microsoft will also be discontinuing support of Visual Basic scripting in the next version of Office for Mac." From the article: "As cross-platform compatibility remains a top priority at Microsoft, Erickson says that as the company develops the next version of Office for Mac, the files will continue to be compatible across platforms, including with the 2007 Microsoft Office System for Windows. VB macros within files will not be accessible and users will not be able to view or modify them. However, the files themselves can be edited without affecting or changing the macros. "

5 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. VPC isn't the only virtualization solution by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Fortunately, Parallels is still available for the Mac and later this year VMware will be as well. I don't think MS will be missed at this party.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  2. Competition? by alucinor · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Maybe Microsoft didn't like the "Hasta la vista, Vista" banners at the Mac show yesterday? Or especially "Redmond has a cat, too. A copycat." Perhaps they feel like they're being threatened?

    --
    random underscore blankspace at ya know hoo dot comedy.
  3. Now they've got Apple by the corones.. by OlivierB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure you can read and write compatible files with Ms Office. You can even run the "old" office under Rosetta with Support for VBA.
    But going forward, Office 2004 for Mac will no longer be availble and no IT manager in his right mind will go with an office suite that doesn't support scripting.

    VBA is slow enough as it is, nevermind under Rosetta emulation. Now if there is no more support for VBA, companies will shy away from Mac even more.
    Apple better get their "Tables" (aka their Excel equivalent to Pages) working asap. And it better be fully compatible with VBA too.

    --
    Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity
  4. Re:No problemo! by NormalVisual · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If VMware's Mac product is as good as Workstation is on the PC, then it's almost a given that my next machine will be a Mac - at that point, there really won't be anything of consequence that I won't be able to run on it.

    --
    Please stand clear of the doors, por favor mantenganse alejado de las puertas
  5. Re:Less software? by diersing · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I wouldn't have anticipated someone saying cross-platform compability is a top priority while dumping a cross-platform compability tool for reasons of it being too hard.