Slashdot Mirror


The UK's Total Surveillance

Budenny writes "The Register has a story in its ongoing coverage of the UK ID Card story. This one suggests, with links to a weekend news story, that the Prime Minister in waiting has bought the idea that all electronic transactions in the UK should be linked to a central government/police database. Every cash withdrawal, every credit card purchase, ever loyalty card use ... And that data should flow back from the police database to (eg) a loyalty card use. So, for example, not only would the government know what books you were buying, but the bookstore would also know if you had an outstanding speeding ticket!"

19 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Only those who have something to hide need fear by BrentRJones · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And we ALL have many things to hide.

    Abuse of the info will happen, so let it never be allowed, anywhere!

    "I have a right to buy those, but please officer don't tell my boss or my wife or my kids!"

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
    1. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by iainl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Actually, I'd put it more cynically.

      Only those who honestly believe that this Government could organise an IT project in a datacenter need fear. The insane rantings of Blair and his Home Secretary Of The Month would be pretty damn terrifying, if I ever thought they will manage to build it and make it work. But there's very little evidence they will suddenly develop this ability.

      Blair likes gigantic IT projects because they sound shiny and tough, and send taxpayers' money to Crapita by the billion. At which point a nice big chunk goes straight into Labour Party coffers. There's no real expectation that they'll need to do any real _work_ to continue being funded, thank God.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "And we ALL have many things to hide."

      Not all of them morally wrong. Past examples of 'things to hide' included race, religion and political affiliation. Putting the power to determine what is hide-worthy and infinite surveillance in the same hands effectively gives a small group complete control of a population. Control is not the foundation of a democratic government.

    3. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by mOdQuArK! · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not exactly good planning to assume that typical government incompetence will save your civil rights from governmental abuse.

      People like this Minister will keep trying (and spending taxpayer money) until they get something that works "good enough".

      The pretty & shiny ability of being able to get information on anyone anytime is just too attractive to control freaks like these types of guys.

    4. Re:Only those who have something to hide need fear by clickclickdrone · · Score: 5, Insightful

      There was a story in todays UK press about some poor guy who has the CSA (govt department that tries to make fathers pay for their kids - laudable enough if it weren't for them being idiots and about to be shut down) taking GBP300 out of his pay packet each month. Some woman he has never heard of gave them his name and DOB and now he's GBP1300 worse off pending a DNA test (with a six month lead time) to prove he's not the father. This is the governments quality data in action. Just to add insult to injury the CSA told his partner he'd refused to have the test. OK, the lady that supplied the original data may be a crook/grudge bearer but either way, this shows how hard and time consuming it is to prove the errors in something the government believe to be true. Once the Big Database is up and running, it's going to be a lot worse.
      It wouldn't surprise me to see people being locked up because the system thinks they're escaped crims or terrorists because they have a similar name. OK, you get out again in a few months but try rebuilding yor life/career after that and keep smiling.

      --
      I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  2. Terrorists by KiloByte · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And who's guilty of this all?

    Terrorists!

    And I do mean it. They're bad, bad folks who use scare tactics and incite the fear of getting blown up to control the population into obeying their demands.

    Yeah, that's right. Your beloved government fills all the requirements for the word "terrorists". Just like the other side of the pond.

    --
    The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    1. Re:Terrorists by oldave · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Y'know what's really so bad about all this? It's exactly what the terrorists want. They've got the masses so scared that they'll go along with anything under the guise of "protection from terrorists."

      And no, government is no better than the idiots scrabbling around in caves hiding out. Both use fear to get what they want.

  3. I smell FUD by Daevid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The bookstore would know you had an outstanding parking ticket" - how and why? The current bank card we use in a bookshop links to all our bank details but a bookshop cannot access them - no system would let retail outlets interrogate a database for that information or any other info that didn't directly refer to them - that would be a serious design flaw and would never be accepted.

  4. The Truman show by MECC · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Kinda makes me feel like I'm on the Truman show - all famous and special and such.

    Oh wait - its a bad thing, not having a life of my own...

    --
    "We are all geniuses when we dream"
    - E.M. Cioran
  5. Oh dear by tygerstripes · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Can you say "Police State"?

    Anyone remember the scare about the NSA commissioning programs that could pull together information on individuals from all over t'interweb and produce coherent, intelligent reports on behaviour patterns etc? The idea being that all of this data is available, but it's so massive and disparate that it would be almost futile to draw anything useful from it.

    Seems kind of obsolete now, doesn't it.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  6. You should worry about bad bookeeping by gelfling · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I myself am living through the hell of a family member's minor criminal infraction being repeatedly mishandled and miscoded by the 2 courts and 3 police departments that have some jurisdiction. Now on a daily basis there are cops at my house with one kind of arrest warrant or another for a charge that was dropped months ago.

    So yeah let's give the cops more power and more data to peer into and let's give them more of an excuse to wave a piece of paper in my face and tell me "I don't care what you say, this piece of paper says I'm right and you're going to jail.." Yeah let's do that.

  7. Tin foil hat brigade? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When I first heard about the 9/11 attacks, I thought "Was this a CIA plan to get a law passed to elimnate all are civil right?" Of couse not, but then they passed the Patriot act. Only terrorists and criminals would have anything to hide, only a terrorist would say, "They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."

  8. Re:*gasp* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    every day there is an artical about rights being oppressed in countries and anti-terror campaigns, but this is ridiculious.

    Dear UK people, it would be a good idea to invest in somthing like anonet today since soon your msn/skype/aim/yim/gmail/email/computers/routers/an d anything else thats digital and has information will be also tied into this database *if* they get it together, also the government will be the least of your worries, just wait for the employers start getting access... lets just say, i'd trust a drug dealer with this information more than i would trust a . not only that, think about when you sign up for health insurance, they'll be like `dear sir, we know you lied on your application, we have seen you have purchased excessive tobacoo and alcholic substances in the last year`.

    laugh at me if you must, it will be abused, hacked, sold, stolen, exposed at some point

  9. Not entirely sure the story is correct though.. by clickclickdrone · · Score: 3, Insightful

    One of the underlying goals of the whole ID card fiasco isn't the card but the database it is intending to use that is designed to integrate all the other government owned databases in a way that allows a single view of a person. As things stand, if you want to search the driving licence data, address, voting info, criminal records etc you haven't to search different databases.
    Nowhere have I seen anything that suggested this data will be available to 3rd parties such as shops but for sure, they want the data from shops.
    Anyway, the UK government have a terrible record for producing big systems either to time, budget or function so we'll have nothing to worry about for ten years by which time it will have bankrupted us and will use kit no longer available and crash out with errors and timeouts all over the place. It will probably be a doddle to hack too so at least the crims will get something useful out of it.

    --
    I want a list of atrocities done in your name - Recoil
  10. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by IAmTheDave · · Score: 5, Insightful
    What can I say? Information wants to be free.

    I know you're being sarcastic, but it's not information being free - it's information being collected to control the masses - thus being a complete solution for the removal of freedoms.

    A total surveillance society is a mere 10-20 years away. Every traffic light I approach I am taped. My face is scanned every time I go to a baseball game. The SCOTUS already upheld that I do indeed have to provide ID to a police officer even if I am not suspected of any wrong doing, at their whim.

    Biometrics are the rage. Biometrics and RFID will be on my passport, in my license. The REAL ID act officially creates a national ID in the US. And so on...

    While the US is behind the UK in terms of true overall survellance, it's not that far. 20 years from now, when facial recognition is perfected - or some new technology that can ready our DNA from a small distance exists - you won't need customer loyalty cards anymore.

    And people will accept it all - because it will all happen slowly, over time, and add seeming convenience to everything. Why carry an ID or a credit card? The police car will instantly recognize you, know exactly where you've been in public in the past few days, weeks, months... Everywhere your car travels, RFID tags or your cell phone will give away your location and be recorded.

    See, aside from the DNA sniffer... all of this is reality now. 1984 was a little ambitious - we needed a few more years to totally accept living in a police state, but that's because there was no MySpace back then to distract us from the realities of government total awareness.

    Yeah, lable me a tin foil hat person, but I'm going to hold out as long as I can - no EZPass, no customer loyalty cards, a new non-RFID passport, etc., etc. I may go down, but not without some degree of a fight.

    --
    Excuse my speling.
    Making The Bar Project
  11. This has all the hallmarks of......... by mormop · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The oft used trick in the UK for getting the population to swallow whatever crap the government wants to hurl their way, i.e.

    1) Announce insanely over the top version of whatever it is you want to do

    2) Sit back while the population freaks out for a while and make a token defence of it

    3) Back off to the point you originally intended and watch the population sigh in relief your "capitulation" in the face of their protests.

    Generally, if there's one thing to realise about New Labour it's that things don't leak from a source close to anyone in the government unless there's an agenda behind it.

    --
    Hmmmmmm..... Deep fried and look like Squirrel.
  12. Re:Tuesday morning sarcasm by TobascoKid · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let people know your country's moving into fascism.

    And then be shocked to discover that most of your countrymen think moving into fascism is a good idea. At best, they will say that they do not support fascism - unfortuantly what they do support will look and act like fascism - just without the historical baggage associated with the term.

    Instead of jumping right in organizing a rebellion (which, let's face it, is a lot of hard work and unlikely to succeed, at least in the the short to medium term), it's a lot easier to see if leaving the country is an option (assuming you can find somwhere on the planet to go) and if it is an option, take it.

    --
    At some point, somewhere, the entire internet will be found to be illegal.
  13. A poem comes to mind.... by LordPhantom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Remember, Remember, the 5th of November,
    of gunpowder treason and plot.
    For I see no reason that gunpowder, treason,
    should ever be forgot.

  14. Cardinal Richleu's quote by ferin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    'Give me six lines penned by the hand of an innocent man, and I will find in them somethign to have him hanged.'

    We all do, say, buy, or otherwise involve ourselves in things that might not put us on everyone's best person of the year list. If you have access to enough information about somebody, simply through selective presentation one can create a danmning image of an otherwise innocent and decent indivual.

    "And I see you bought drain cleaner, fertilizer, and firecrackers sir, clearly you are trying to build a bomb"

    This is definately a serious potential for massive abuse.