Slashdot Mirror


London Gamers Shoot It Out In The Streets

ChocLinux writes "Gamers that take part in the Streetwars watergun assassination tournament in London could face arrest if they stalk their target in the tube. CNET has spoken to one gamer who has taken part in the tournament and disagreed that waterguns could be mistaken for firearms, as all contestants are using brightly-coloured super-soakers. He admitted that he narrowly missed being eliminated. 'Some guy tried to get me outside work, but he missed and fell off his bike,' he said. If the game isn't over by midnight on August 15, the remaining contestants will take part in a one week sudden death tournament." From the article: "You can hunt your target down any way you see fit; you can pose as a delivery person and jack them when they open the door, disguise yourself and take them out on the street, etc. If you are successful in your assassination attempt, the person you killed will give you their envelope and the person they were supposed to kill becomes your new target."

9 of 108 comments (clear)

  1. Sorry, but... by Evro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is going to make me sound like quite the old curmudgeon, but...

    Playing games with water pistols in a public place, with other people around (who more than likely don't want to be wet by you), is childish and rude. If you want to play with water guns, do it in your back yard or in a field somewhere.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Sorry, but... by SatanicPuppy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Great, now yell, "You damn kids get off my lawn!" and your journey to Curmudgeonhood will be complete.

      Our society has enough points of suckitude, and enough ridiculous rules. Sure, sometimes it's annoying, sure, sometimes we take an ill-aimed blast of water in the ear canal, but that's life, and most of us already take ourselves too seriously. Hell, there are people in the US that'd probably sue for getting squirted.

      --
      ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.
  2. Wasn't there a movie like this? by PFI_Optix · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Called "Tag" or something like that. They used suction darts fired from real guns (not sure how that works) but it was pretty much the same concept. Hunt someone down, kill them, get their target. Play on until you're the last man standing.

    (of course in the movie one guy started actually killing everyone else, and much stupidity ensued)

    --
    120 characters for a sig? That's bloody useless.
  3. Re:Timing? by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What better possible way is there to fight "terror" than to openly have fun and enjoy life? If playing with brightly colored toy water squirters in Summer has become a punishable offense, all is finally lost.

  4. Re:As a player in the London Streetwars... by Nursie · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It should mean exactly that. It's set up so that the 100-150 players are in a ring, each has the next as a target, so by the time you get to someone that has you, you really should be the last man standing.

  5. You make the fear. by Lave · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'm replying to the first post to get this near the top of the page (which is a dastardly thing to do, and I apologise).

    But to those that are about to read this thread, please remember that people below this post who think that with the "current political climate" this will get you shot are wrong. I live in London, I was hung over and woke up late missing the tube on the first bombings. and then got stuck at work the second time. And these are my experiences.

    Firstly, I suspect it is mainly Americans posting - or at least I hope so - and I truly do not want to be mean, but Britain's culture is quiet different to yours. Our parents grew up in the blitz. And I grew up with the IRA bombings. Attacks on Civilians aren't new. They are a consequence of getting to live free. Just because people die - does not mean you give up your life and your freedoms.

    The point I'm trying to make is that after the bombing attempt I had to walk across london to get home. Before I left we flipped from the (relatively) informative and calm BBC 24 news to CNN - and watched the presenters talk of the ""chaos" and "panic" as "millions of londoners" have "no possible way to get home".

    As I crossed most of central london through most of the effected areas what did I see? I saw a roaring Taxi trade, and I saw hundreds of people standing around every pub I walkied past - drinking, laughing, talking.

    CNN, by it's comments created fear across the country and the globe. But where it happened - there was no such thing. And the tubes were full the next day.

    This is people playing with water pistols in one of the hottest summers London's ever had for fucks sake. It's more important than ever they play this stupid little game - rather than sit around in fear listening to the News as it lies to them.

    Dislcaimer - I'm not talking about the Blitz spirit - or any of that crap, nor am I suggesting London would have handled 11/9 better. What I am saying is ignore the fear filled retoric spewing from the news. As I know first hand how accurate that is.

    --
    http://skeptobot.blogspot.com/ - A site for the Renaissance man and woman
    1. Re:You make the fear. by Shaper_pmp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here. Fucking. Here!

      As a fellow Brit, thank you beyond words.

      USAians and paranoiacs, please take note - this is not an isolated incident, we are not living in denial, Brits who refuse to be traumatised into acting differently by 7/7 are not isolated freaks, and (despite both our governments' and your media's best efforts) we are not the kind of people to fearmonger, lock ourselves in our cellars and let the terrorists win.

      You would not believe how many times I've been accused of any or all of the above by (mostly American) /. readers, simply for stating that most British people took 7/7 on the chin and got on with their lives.

      It's just a difference in culture, dig? We've been shot at, bombed, hijacked and had full passenger aircraft brought down on villages more or less ever since the end of the second world war (if not longer).

      You're still more likely to get hit by lightning than even injured in a terrorist attack, so we're not even blasé about it. We're simply reacting in proportion.

      (Lest anyone get the wrong idea, this post is not intended to be anti-American - just anti-hysteria.)

      --
      Everything in moderation, including moderation itself
    2. Re:You make the fear. by Charcharodon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I stand corrected. The beer buddy lawyers (aka the yahoos I work with) don't have their facts straight. Now that I poke around a bit more online I see what you are talking about.

      Suffolk is very nice so far. I'm enjoying scaring the locals with my truck and my dyslexic (right side bad, left side good) American driving skills. Luckily everything is nice and close together so I don't endanger the public for more than 10-15min at a time, and it doesn't hurt that all the local pubs are within a few minute walk from my door.

  6. Kudos by mjwx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Nice to hear someone not advocating fear.

    Londeners still ride the tube, Bali is still one of Australia's most visited holiday destination. I cant speak for everyone but I am quiet happy not living my life in fear.

    In case anyone hasnt caught on to this already, its called terrorism for a reason. The point of it is to make you afraid. Live in fear and hand them a victory.

    --
    Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.