Microsoft Bracing for Worm Attack
10010010 writes "A network worm attack targeting a critical Microsoft Windows vulnerability appears inevitable. The flaw is easy to exploit, as evidenced by the quick release of an exploit module for HD Moore's Metasploit Framework. Within hours of the Patch Day release Tuesday, two pen testing companies (Immunity and Core) created and released 'reliable exploits' for the flaw, which was deemed wormable on all Windows versions, including Windows XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 SP1."
I'm confused and I'd like to know if my building's Window's administrator needs to be put on suicide watch. He was up all night last night. From what it sounds like, he spent all that time trying to increase the security of our machines when he was really just altering the application so that the virus that came out 24 hours later would be able to attack the machines
No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
This should remind Windows users about complacency.
the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
OK, maybe I'm just missing an acronym/typo somewhere, but "pen testing?" Will the worms come through my Mont Blanc?
What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
"Pen" is a commonly used short term for "penetration" so you could interchange "pen testing" with "penetration testing."
Or, in your case, you would request full pen videos when you go to video rental store.
"The Cyber Gnome here. Denouncer of computer myths. Who needs to download security patches? I don't, and I've never had any prob%$#@@@@#^_@_#@ NO CARRIER"
Where were you when the voynix came?
From TFA:
<blockquote>A spokesperson for Microsoft said it is difficult to predict the motives and actions of attackers but insisted the company is "watching round-the-clock" and actively encouraging customers to download the update immediately.
"We will mobilize if something does happen," the spokesperson said.
</blockquote>
They'll mobilize? Mobilize? As in "get the heck out of here"? Or are they calling the [GI]Joes?
As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
I have a red shield and X in my systray so I'm safe. I think it's a warning symbol for anyone trying to hack my box, like a medieaval coat of arms or something saying my computer is stronger than them.
I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
Tell your "neighbor" that if he doesn't want to pay for an OS, that he shouldn't be using Windows.
But if he's too fucking cheap to get an OEM copy or something and too fucking stupid to bypass the WGA, he should be prepared to have his ass handed to him when this shit hits.
I'd recommend him going to ubuntu.com, though.
which was deemed wormable on all Windows versions, including Windows XP SP2 and Windows Server 2003 SP1
HD Moore posted a followup to the Daily Dave mailing list admitting defeat on those two platforms:
Time to eat my words. The wcscpy() destination pointer trick doesn't seem
doable on XP SP2 or 2003 SP1. I don't believe you can exploit this bug
for more than a DoS on 2003 SP2/XP SP1. If you have information to the
contrary, please share.
All other Windows platforms remain easily exploitable, though.
Your pirate neighbor should be ok. I'm pretty sure the green parrot on his shoulder will eat any worms. If not, the patch over his right eye is probably the most current out there.
I hope, when they die, cartoon characters have to answer for their sins.
Here's my suggestion for a new Microsoft Windows mascot. She's old enough to be public domain, she's tanned, she's rested, she's ready, and she's all patched to hell. All the better that Redmond is located in the vicinity of America's "Emerald City". Please, pay no attention to the borg behind the curtain.
Where were you when the voynix came?
Your pirate neighbor (what, do you live on a WHARF???) should be able to get around this by launching his Windows in pirate mode. He has to boot to the command line, and then enter WIN.EXE -R -R -R. Also, has he considered the eyepatched system? It might be more useful to him than the "unpatched system" you mentioned.
Where were you when the voynix came?
So companies like Immunity reverse-engineer an identified Microsoft patched vulnerability, release an exploit and expect kudos? Impressive as it may sound, I would be more interested to hear of a company discovering a vulnerability and releasing it to Microsoft so it can be patched. If I can't create a virus/worm to wreak havoc on Windows machines, what makes these companies able to reverse-engineer and release the "0-day" exploit? It almost seems unethical. Also, it seems like Immunity and others are trying to make a name for themselves rather than being interested in user security.
The "pen test" is to see whether it much easier, faster, safer, and cheaper to create a document using a pen and paper compared to booting up the computer and doing it there.
Where were you when the voynix came?