Slashdot Mirror


Old Methods Used to Detect Liquid Explosives

Bain writes "According to Wired News, the UK fear of terrorists using liquid explosives could be dramatically reduced by the use of some very old tech. Recent events have seen passengers forced to pack only the barest of essentials into clear plastic bags and the restriction on all liquids force even mothers with young children to have to test bottled milk to prove that it isn't a dangerous liquid." From the article: "For a machine to detect explosives in liquid or solid form, it bombards an object with energy -- such as radio waves or neutrons -- and in seconds measures the reaction, a response that differs depending on the material's chemical properties. Software in the machine is programmed to alert screeners if it detects chemical signatures known to match those of dangerous materials. A key question, though, is whether this kind of detection system can realistically block terrorists from bringing seemingly innocuous liquids past security and combining them later to deadly effect."

9 of 545 comments (clear)

  1. The oldest method of all by kpainter · · Score: 1, Funny

    "What the hell was that bang?!!!"

  2. detecting the wrong thing by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    There's only one thing we need to remove from air travel: terrorists. It's not the gel explosive that blows up the plane, it's the nutcase that hits the detonator. If a person is hell-bent on destroying life, they will find a way, no matter what you ban in terms of physical objects. We just need to ban terrorists from flying on airplanes, and that would have the desired effect. Personally, I think detecting terrorists is a lot cheaper than detecting explosives anyhow.
    1. You stop every person that has access to the plane, every person getting on the plane for any reason, etc. (already almost doing that)
    2. Determine if they're a terrorist somehow. (??? step)
    3. Success! No more plane bombings.

    --
    stuff |
  3. X rated rays by eclectro · · Score: 3, Funny

    FTA A major problem is that the view is so powerful that an individual's private parts can be seen

    So the x-ray glasses advertised in comic magazines really do work. I was always wondering about that. How is this a problem?

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  4. Mixed it all together... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A key question, though, is whether this kind of detection system can realistically block terrorists from bringing seemingly innocuous liquids past security and combining them later to deadly effect.

    It's simple. Have them mixed all the stuff together. If it goes BOOM, that's bad. If it doesn't, no problem.

  5. No Mentos Either by tralfaz2001 · · Score: 2, Funny

    If I'm a terrorist I'm not bringing any liquid on board. Just a carryon full of Mentos(you know the fresh maker). Then I'm ordering diet coke after diet coke. There is going to be lots of sticky passengers. FEAR ME!

  6. Did you know... by tyler.willard · · Score: 3, Funny

    "...with enough soap you can blow up just about anything."

  7. I'm glad you guys aren't the terrorists! by theStorminMormon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Seriously.

    --
    The Southern Baptist Convention has creationism. On Slashdot, we have porn.
  8. Plastic Surgery... by rmallico · · Score: 2, Funny

    what is stopping them from having a breast/butt implant that is full of explosives instead of silicone??? detonating with a timer or remotely... (heh, thinking a titty twister would set it off?)

    --
    sig goes here!
  9. Re:One problem solved, an infinite amount remains by RollingThunder · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody who pitches a hissy fit over the term "redneck".