An 'Ethical Hacker' On Protecting Your Identity
qwqwss writes "Canada.com is running an article by Terry Cutler, a 'certified Ethical Hacker', who wants to get the word out to people on protecting their identities from a growing number of risks. The piece covers shopping online, keeping your personal information contained, and avenues of inquiry if your identity is stolen."
...was there really anything mentioned in that article that your typical /. reader didn't already know?
"I'd rather be a lightning rod than a seismometer." -Ken Kesey
Does anyone else think that online identity theft is exaggerated? I mean, I have seen stats for identity theft in general, but not specifically for online identity theft. It strikes me as an insurance company/bank/credit card company ploy to make money. They take the internet, something a lot people don't understand, paint it as a major source of fraud, and ask you to pay $10/mo for their 'identity protection' services.
I have a feeling that the mjaority involvement of the internet in these crimes is as a vehicle for the transmission or cracking or databases made available by poor security practices.
I can't really understand why /. always has these news about protecting one's identity, but when someone wants to post a comment and remain anonymous they call him a "coward"...
Last week, I tasked myself with determining ways to contact 72 Slashdot users. (People who'd responded to a subset of my journals in the past.) I found email addresses for fifty of them, instant messenger IDs for three others, profiles in other communities for five of them, and other ways to contact all the rest but four. That's a success rate of 94%. Oh, and I didn't spend a cent on acces to databases. Google and WHOIS was sufficient for most of them.
My recommendations to those in the Slashdot community who want to keep their lives private:
For those of you who've failed any of those three tests already, well, it's likely to be a long, uphill battle if you want to regain your privacy.
tasks(723) drafts(105) languages(484) examples(29106)
I love how they make him seem qualitifed because he's a "CERTIFED ETHICAL HACKER". This is equivalent to A+ Certification in the generic IT space.
Apparently, 'certifed ethical hacker' is an actual cert one can get. But I don't think I would the term 'hacker' to appear anywhere on my resume. Unless I was trying to get a job with some black hat pseudo legal firm...that'd been sweet.
I've never heard of any certification for ethical hackers before reading this article. What organization issues the cert? Once upon a tyme I read about the Model Railroad Club at MIT, the WOZ, and others and I wanted to be a hacker like them. Alas back then adjective "ethical" wasn't needed, but reporters and the mass media has bastardized the word. When I read where a reporter goes on about how hackers are bad I want to ask "so why are you a hacker?" Many people may not recall or know it but "hackers" is what reporters were once called. Though I'm not sure I think they are referred to as hackers in "Citizen Kane" made in 1941.
FalconShould there be a Law?
Companies that do direct marketing send their lists in, and get them back without those persons who have opted out. They learn nothing new about you in the process, other than the fact that you've opted out.
For electronic marketing (email, sms, fax) it's opt-in rather than opt-out. In other words, they cannot legally do it unless you've given prior, informed consent to that. The logic is that this in this type of marketing, the recipient typically pays a large part of the cost. Marketers are less likely to abuse say paper-based marketing as that actually costs them to print and distribute. (compare the quality of the marketing in the average paper-based marketing and the average spam you receive to see what I mean..)
For unadressed "distributed to all" marketing there's a small sticker you can put on your mailbox, and you won't get any.
In short, you can eliminate receiving any marketing by following 3 simple steps:
Something like: has a knowable standard of behavior and lives by it.
It's about predictability. I have friends with a different standard of ethics than I do, but that's ok, if I know what it is, I can know what to trust them with.
Not a conclusive definition, but that's a fair part of how I assess ethics.
http://marriedmansexlife.com/