Slashdot Mirror


Slackware 11.0 Almost Done

linuxbeta writes "DistroWatch reports that the development process for Slackware Linux 11.0 is almost over. OSDir has some sweet shots of Slackware 11.0 RC1 in the Slackware 11.0 RC1 Screenshot Tour." From the article: "'There are still a few changes yet to happen, but let's call this Slackware 11.0 release candidate 1.' Other recent changes include upgrade to stable kernel 2.4.33; upgrade to udev 097, and rebuild of glibc 2.3.6 for both 2.4.33 and 2.6.16.27 kernels. The new release will ship with X.Org 6.9.0 and KDE 3.5.4, and will provide SeaMonkey instead of Mozilla."

7 of 190 comments (clear)

  1. Stone Age by Jacek+Poplawski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I was using Slackware for few years before I switched to Arch Linux.

    I don't understand why it still uses xorg 6.9. Maybe the reason is that nobody has the time to make so many packages for xorg7? IIRC that was the reason why there is no full GNOME in Slackware.

    Kernel 2.4 - OK, as long as it is 2.6 ready (and it is).

    But guys... what's the point to use so old software? If you don't want to put new desktop stuff, then just remove all desktop packages from distro.

  2. All hail... by Ransak · · Score: 4, Insightful
    --
    "Powers. I have them."
  3. Re:2.4 kernel? WTF by farrellj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because it's considered more stable, and supports things that haven't been up-ported to the 2.6 kernels.

    Patrick aims at the most stable distro...not the latest, flashiest distro. That is why it is used on a large variety of servers...in fact, it has the probably more server installs than any other Distro still built by one person, and his wife. Debian is probably closest, but it is now a large team that works on it.

    Slackware just works...and works...and works...it's sort of the Energizer Bunny of Distros!

    ttyl
              Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  4. Re:Seamonkey vs. Mozilla? by IHSW · · Score: 4, Insightful

    SeaMonkey, the code name to the Mozilla Application Suite, an internet suite maintained by the Seamonkey Council. It is no longer maintained by the Mozilla Foundation.

    source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seamonkey

  5. Many Kudos! by farrellj · · Score: 5, Insightful

    To Patrick Volkerding, his wife and Volkerding 2.0!

    This is the oldest existing Linux Distro! Possibly one of the most stable as well. It retains the Unix philosophy that it does a few things really, really well, and gives you the tools to add on to it. It's tanj simple to maintain and update, no "RPM Hell". And it's one person's vision, which gives it a consistancy that is lacking in other "art by committee" Distros.

    And I am biased...I moved to Slackware from Soft Landing Systems (SLS) Linux, and although I have tried many different Distros over the years, I keep on comming back to Slackware...and not just for religious reasons, either!

    Thanx you Patrick and Co for keeping the vision!

    ttyl
              Farrell

    --
    CAN-CON 2019 - Ottawa's only book oriented Science Fiction Convention! October 18-20, Sheraton Hotel, Ottawa, Canada h
  6. Re:Patrick, maybe the time's come by freshman_a · · Score: 4, Insightful

    No.

    I'm a long-time Slack user. One of the reasons I love Slack and use it everywhere I can is because of it's versitility. I can have a super stable server and a super stable desktop with the same version of the same OS. As it stands, Slack is quick to install, lean, stable, and it just works. Patrick's whole philosophy is Keep It Simple Stupid. Moving in the direction of enterprise-class servers would not be KISS. Also, the people behind Slack consist of Patrick and... well, pretty much just Patrick. How would one person maintain a distro aimed at the enterprise market? I like the fact that one person is behind the distro. Patrick makes the decisions, and that's it. There's no need to fear a split with the maintainers or delays in releases due to arguments about what should or shouldn't be included. I fully agree that Slackware makes a great server OS, but I would be really sad if Patrick re-focused Slack's direction and made it a pure server OS aimed at the enterprise market.

    That's my $0.02

  7. Re:2.4 kernel? WTF by legojenn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't you mean 2001? Anyhow, what difference does it make what kernel they ship with (within reason)? If the hardware and software does not require a newer kernel, wouldn't it be more prudent in an environment where reliability is important to have the most reliable kernel out there?

    --
    I make a reasonable middle-class wage by going to work and not spamming blogs with scams.