Slashdot Mirror


Java to be Open Sourced in October

thePowerOfGrayskull writes "Sun is now stating that the Hotspot JVM and javac will be open-sourced in October of this year, with the rest to follow by the end of 2007. There is still no word as to which license it will be released under. For those who haven't seen it yet, Sun has previously opened a public developer community site for soliciting feedback and providing updates about the process."

7 of 267 comments (clear)

  1. Big deal for OSS by andrewman327 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on the license that they choose, OSS purists can now utilize Java in their programs. OpenOffice.org ran into some issues when it began using Java to power some of its components. Hopefully the license under which this is released will be acceptable.

    --
    Information wants a fueled airplane waiting at the hangar and no one gets hurt.
  2. Okay, but what does "open source" mean? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Is this "open source" as in "open source"?

    Is this "open source" as in Apple's "public source" Darwin project, where they're basically going "you can see and compile all the code, but no way are you going to be redistributing this as any kind of commercial project"?

    Is this "open source" as in Microsoft's "shared source" projects, where it's totally not open source at all except in a PR sense?

    Is this "open source" as in Sun's Solaris "open sourcing", where it's open source in all technical senses, but it's under an unbelievably elaborate license which exists for no reason except to engender GPL incompatibility and keep Linux from benefiting from the source release, which effectively scares everyone away from the project?

    Cuz really, unless "Java to be Open Sourced" really means "Java to be Open Sourced", it won't make a difference, acceptance of Java will continue to be held back by the perceived closedness of the Java language and real linux-unfriendliness of the Java runtime, and languages like C#/Mono will continue to make inroads until Apache finishes their Harmony project.

  3. Re:Good by cryfreedomlove · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Do you have any data that shows that Mono deployment in the enterprise is increasing, relative to java deployment? Because, in my experience of 8 years of enterprise java, Mono is not making any strides. It's a backwater that a few people are toiling in.

  4. Re:eh? by squiggleslash · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's part of the easing of license restrictions that currently make it difficult to incorporate Java in certain types of Free Software project, and that cause hassle for companies like RedHat and Novell/SUSE who sincerely want to distribute Java but more than that want their operating systems to be 100% Free Software.

    It's funny. The prime difference between Open Source and Free Software is that OSS is married to a community based development model whereas Free Software is just the basic principle of it being Free. Everyone keeps using "Open Source" here, but Sun has, actually, been following the community based development model part of Open Source for years without making Java Free Software. If it's not Free Software, it's not Open Source, but Java's certainly proven you can have the advantages of Open Source without actually making your software open source.

    So why are they doing this? Well, like I said in my first paragraph, the current license and environment is too restrictive for many significant potential adopters. They're finally recognising people want the freedom, not just an open development model.

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  5. Re:Does it still matter? by John+Courtland · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apache seems to be banking pretty hard on it.

    --
    Slashdot is proof that Sturgeon's Law applies to mankind.
  6. Re:Big deal for OSS QWZX by VGR · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know, I shouldn't feed a troll....

    You are the reason they were reluctant to make it (fully) open source.

    You obviously are confident you know more about what makes a good language than the designers of Java do. Have you read even one paper at jcp.org? Have you looked at the people who make up the JCP? IBM, Apple, Cisco, Intel, HP, ATI, NVidia, Creative Labs, Google (!), Apache, Apogee, Namco ... you really think you're smarter than their combined intellect and months of discussion? Trust me, you're not.

    I'm sure you and a lot of others are already giddy with excitement over the idea of making a "better Java" with const and operator overloading.

    When you understand the "less is more" principle, you'll begin to understand why all your pet features don't belong in the language.

    --
    The Internet is full. Go away.
  7. Re:Big deal for OSS QWZX by Reverend528 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Have you looked at the people who make up the JCP? IBM, Apple, Cisco, Intel, HP, ATI, NVidia, Creative Labs, Google (!), Apache, Apogee, Namco ... you really think you're smarter than their combined intellect and months of discussion?

    Yeah. The individual usually is smarter than the group.