Real to Offer Open Source Windows Media for Linux
cpugeniusmv writes to tell us News.com is reporting that RealNetworks plans to release an open source method to allow Linux users to play Windows Media files. Currently Linux users are able to play the two main Windows Media formats (wmv and wma) but only if they install closed-source modules. The ability to launch this initiative comes from a recent licensing deal between RealNetworks and Microsoft and the antitrust settlement against Microsoft.
This comes right on the heels of having a fairly complete wmv9 decoder functioning in ffmpeg.
Bastards... I don't want their crap anyway
Is this god news or not... It could be a trojan horse ...(in the Greeks bearing gifts sense...not script kiddie sense)
Among other things, does this mean that Real Alternative will soon be legitimate?
For 20 minutes before Microsoft break the spec.
(You need 4 years of engineering graduate school to acquire this level of cynicism folks.)
I've been very impressed with Real's approach of late (ever since Helix, really, although they did some good things before then). They are showing a very cooperative attitude - enough to overcome any ill will I might have felt towards them - and I hope that they get a warm reception for this contribution that encourages them to embrace the open source/free software community further.
I do wonder though if any of this open source love is being pushed by the BBC? They are after all proabbly one of the biggest single drivers of Real installations and have demonstrated in the past their ability to push Real to change their stance.
I'm thinking particuarly of the fact that the BBC cancelled it's Ogg testing aboiut the same time that the whole Helix thing started - could Real opening up a bit in return for no migration to open source or free software codecs have been the price?
Think of the Children; Sleep with your Sister
On a file format??? And I thought the patent on "method of swinging on a swing" was bad.
Presumably they feel that the anti-trust settlement gives them all the rights they need, including patent licensing if applicable.
Does this (or any other open source stuff such as mplayer) cover whatever protocol is used by the microsoft server for streaming windows media cotent? (whatever it is)
Being able to play windows media streams is just as usefull as being able to play windows media files on a disk or web url or etc.
I'm really curious at how they are going to do so and still remain compatible with the GPLv3draft2 as it currently reads.
It is obvious that they don't control the downstream propagation of MS's patten rights. Or do they?
The possibility of a cheap publicity stunt notwithstanding, we're still blessed with an open source WMV decoder. It will improve the quality of A/V on Linux, and I can't help but think that's a good thing(TM). For those not knowing what the hell I'm talking about, check out this blog entry about it.
Did you know subscribers can see articles in the future? Holy shit!
The mov extension is typically used by Apple Quicktime video files.
Thus your beef is with Apple and not Microsoft.
What I really lack is a way / program to move a video stream from one container format to another without transcoding the video stream. For example, the Ogg format hosts MPEG4 steams fairly well, so why can't I simply "lift" Microsoft MPEG4 or Apple MPEG4 videos from their respective proprietary containers to the open Ogg container?
In a society that believes in nothing, fear becomes the only agenda ~ Bill Durodié
in version "":
http://ffmpeg.mplayerhq.hu/changelog.html
I asumme that you mean "download Windows Media Player" from Microsoft, and extract the CoDec DLLs from it. Would you please list which DLLs you get from this download, and where you put them on your GNU/Linux machine for your media plyaer to use? Thanks.
ffmpeg -i infile.mov -vcodec copy -acodec copy outfile.ogg
Untested, but something like that should work. See the friendly man page for more info.
Spine World
Please open up your own format first before going and opening up other peoples' formats.
They have, AFAIK.
Helix Community offers the open source Helix Player which supports encoding and transcoding of RM along with a bunch of other formats.
Based on upvotes, Ageism is the only "-ism" Slashdotters care about and think isn't SJW
My understanding is that any algorithm can be patented, so it would be up to the patent holder to decide whether to restrict decoding, encoding, or both. From a commercial standpoint, it seems to make sense most often to enforce the patent only on the writing side of the equation (if at all). That way free readers abound, but people developing the software to create content have to pay a license fee.