Slashdot Mirror


Tomorrow's Cell Phones

bart_scriv writes "Businessweek looks at the future of the cell phone, starting with some existing button-free prototypes and moving on to more outlandish and whimsical designs. From the article: 'New technologies drive many of the new designs. One example: Synaptics ClearPad, a new type of touch screen that will become commercially available later this year. Unlike today's touch screens, which aren't entirely transparent and often not very sensitive — we've all had to endlessly tap one with a stylus to get a response — ClearPad is clear, so it can be used as a sensitive overlay to a cell-phone display. Another innovation likely to change the cell-phone's appearance: flexible displays. An electronic ink screen prototype, developed by Koninklijke Philips Electronics and startup E-Ink, is thin and flexible like paper so it can be worn wrapped around a cell phone. Users can unwrap it to view a map on a larger screen. Eventually, the display could be used to watch video.'"

20 of 301 comments (clear)

  1. What I really want by Phreakiture · · Score: 4, Insightful

    First?

    I don't want a touch screen. In fact, that is the precise antithesis of what I want.

    I want a cell phone that has few to no menus. I want to be able to operate it without looking, by feeling the keypad.

    I don't care if the screen is even in colour, because I'm not going to be looking at it if I don't have to.

    I also want to be able to connect it to my computer as a USB modem.

    I have been asking for this for upwards of four years. Can I have that, please?

    --
    www.wavefront-av.com
    1. Re:What I really want by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What I really want is to be able to hear the person I'm talking to.

    2. Re:What I really want by generic-man · · Score: 4, Insightful

      So buy a cheap Motorola phone with real keys, use a standard USB cable (with the mini plug on the phone end) and Google for instructions about using it as a modem.

      Here are search results pertaining to my old Motorola v180, which at the time I bought it was the second-cheapest phone T-Mobile sold.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    3. Re:What I really want by loose+electron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Except for the USB port modem, what you are describing is a cell phone from 5 years ago.

      The modern cell phone has gone thru gobs and gobs of feature creep. The market wants more gadgetry, and if that is what sells, it will be provided.

      I think the reason nobody has made (to my knowledge)the cell modem, is because they can cell (sell!) you a PCMCIA plug in and bill you for the modem service as an independent service. Verizon sucks $150 a month out of me instead of $70. You get the idea.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
    4. Re:What I really want by bunions · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thank you.

      Every time there's a cell phone thread, someone posts a variant of the grandparent post about how all they want is a simple phone that only makes calls and oh god why can't someone just make one. Apparently these people have never been to the damn cell phone store, because they make a jillion of those things and they're cheap as dirt.

      --
      there is no need to sign your posts. this isn't usenet. your username is right there above your post. stop it.
    5. Re:What I really want by anothy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      the problem is that all these folks say "i just want a phone that does X, Y, and Z, and i don't care about A-W", but everybody's X, Y, and Z is different. the phone manufacturers can only produce so many models, and the stores can only stock so many; the market drives them to hit averages and exclude the peripheral. for example, the grandparent wanted a USB modem. well, that's not on most peoples XYZ list; most folks who want a USB modem also want a camera phone, so they only (not literally "only", but the focus, still) build ones that bundle the two. there's no build-to-order market, clearly.
      i have a very small set of features i want, but i'm well outside the curve. actually what i want is very close to the firefly, except some form of data service (preferably bluetooth) is a must and it clearly should have some form of address book syncing via USB/bluetooth (programming it on that 5-key pad is stupid).

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
  2. Buttons are "out"? by The+Dalex · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What's wrong with buttons? How would replicating the function of buttons on an easily-dirtied touch screen be an improvement? It really does sound like they are trying to find applications for technologies that are not really needed when trying to make a phone call.

    1. Re:Buttons are "out"? by Abcd1234 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, one advantage of a touch screen is flexibility when presenting user interfaces, as you're no longer limited to a prearranged set of hardware buttons.

  3. Re:misfeature by rovingeyes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Call me an idiot but I'd expect that most important job of a cell phone is to make calls (and hopefully not drop them). I don't care if it can store roman numerals for crying out loud all I am asking is to let me make and receive calls, even indoors. Seems like that is a feature that no one is interested any more.

  4. Cue the oldies by BenjyD · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "I just want a phone to make phone calls" they will say. "Who wants all those other features? Kids these days...".

    It's OK, you don't need to keep telling us, we know and phones for you exist. There is also a large market which wants email, internet, calendar, notes, SMS, video playing, music playback, radio etc on their phone: I certainly do.

    1. Re:Cue the oldies by Belial6 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The problem these people have is that they precive the extra features as adding expense and more parts. This is largely not true. The phones already have a processor and a display. Radio requires extra parts (but the cost is virtually $0), and the video playing requires a better screen. The better screen just makes everything else more pleasent to use. Other than that the rest is basically software. These people complaining about phones getting more features are in the same category as people complining that computers are too fast and have too much memory. After all, the C-64 computed just fine, and that is what we should all stick with. Anything more is just making computers more complicated and expensive.

    2. Re:Cue the oldies by deadhammer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's not a matter of "you old fogeys, stop whining about walking uphill in snow both ways!" It's entirely a matter of function. I'm 26, and my main consideration when buying anything, cell phones or no, is "What does it do, and how well does it do it?" If the new future phones make calls, have clear reception, and don't drop them every five minutes, I'm all for them. If they have a bunch of semi-functional feature bloat and suck as cell phones, I'm going elsewhere. There's still lots of people who want something to work well rather than be shiny.

      --
      I'll be honest, we're throwing science against the wall to see what sticks. -Cave Johnson
  5. Re:misfeature by Keruo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Making calls is assumed to work, atleast here in europe where we have basically 100% coverage.
    I can't remember when I couldn't have made a call because the service was unreachable, or I was dropped from call due bad signal.

    --
    There are no atheists when recovering from tape backup.
  6. Kids Cellphone by Bender0x7D1 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How about a simple cell phone for kids with around 6 buttons that can be pre-programmed with phone numbers.

    Button 1: Home

    Button 2: Parent's cell/work number

    Button 3: Other parent's cell/work number

    Button 4: Other relative

    Button 5: Neighbor

    Button 6: 911

    Now the kid can use it to call their parents in case of emergency or other problems, (or just need to be picked up after soccer practice). Can't use it to call their friends since it doesn't have a normal keypad. If you want to be paranoid, add some GPS tracking software so you know where your kid is.

    This type of thing may also be appropriate for younger children since it is hard to abuse - except by calling 911 when your mommy doesn't answer her phone. But if your child isn't old/smart enough to know that, they probably shouldn't be out of your sight.

    --
    Reading code is like reading the dictionary - you have to read half of it before you can go back and understand it.
  7. The number one feature they need... by maillemaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is price.

    I cancelled my family's cell phones because with the price of gasoline we couldn't afford an extra $80/month, Verizon's cheapest plan at the time, for two cell phones. So I cancelled them and we went back to a "land line" via Vonage for $27/month. Yes this is on top of our $50/month for broadband but I'll cancel everything before the broadband connection.

    It's amazing how little I miss having a cell phone. Of course I still keep the phones in the cars in case of emergencies - all cell phones will dial 911 for free.

    I won't consider cell phone service again until it's around $10/month.

    Keep the bells and whistles - give me Third World cell phone prices. If they can have it, so should I.

    Steve

    --
    A work that expires before its copyright never enters the public domain and thus enjoys eternal copyright protection.
  8. Re:video on the cell phone by castoridae · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Service contract.

    I'm counting down the days until mine expires on the same network; I think they have the fewest dropped calls, because they have the fewest even connect in the first place!

  9. Quantum leap by oz1cz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The article is called "A Quantum Leap for Cell Phones".

    It puzzles me that people use a "quantum leap" as a term for a large jump, when in reality it is the smallest jump possible.

    1. Re:Quantum leap by smoor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The term reflects the nature of the change - not the magnitude...

      In physics, a quantum leap or quantum jump is a change of an electron within an atom from one energy state to the next. This is a discontinuous change in which the electron goes from one energy level to another without passing through any intermediate levels. This phenomenon contradicted expectations set by theories older than quantum mechanics that energy should always change continuously.
      en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_leap

  10. Incentives not the same.... by Hap76 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think they sell the jazzy camera/music phones with lots of features because they are getting money on all of them. Want pictures? - they have them, and they will charge you to send them anywhere. Music and ringtones - same thing. The phones cost more at the front end (though more than they cost to make? I don't know) but they include the possibility of making more money with the services.

    The features you want, while useful, don't allow the cell phone company to make money except when they sell the phone. The lost phone GPS might be a chargeable service, but they might be able to do that now, without other security features. The other features don't let them make money, and I don't know that there are enough providers (because of coverage issues - it seems like only a few big companies have enough coverage to be useful, and others are only useful within a narrow range) to generate a market push to compel the cell phone companies to ask manufacturers to include them. In addition, the price of the phone (the only place they can recoup the cost) might be increased enough to make them uneconomic.

  11. "quantum" leap means "substantially different" by KWTm · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The article is called "A Quantum Leap for Cell Phones".

    It puzzles me that people use a "quantum leap" as a term for a large jump, when in reality it is the smallest jump possible.

    I think the idea is that it is the smallest jump possible that makes it different; in other words, there is a substantial change. I guess you can add as small an amount of energy to a radiating body as you want, but if you don't add a quantum of energy, it's not going to produce a photon.

    But you're right, too many people seem to take it to mean a large leap rather than a leap that ratchets up to the next notch.
    --
    404555974007725459910684486621289147856453481154 in hex is "You sank my Battleship?"
    [GPG key in journal]