Slashdot Mirror


China and Russia to Launch Joint Mars Mission

The Interfacer writes "China and Russia are planning a joint mission to Mars that will bring back samples to earth and land on one of the red planet's tiny moons, state media quoted a Chinese scientist as saying Wednesday." From the article: "Russia will launch the spacecraft, while China will provide the survey equipment to carry out the unmanned exploration, Ye Peijian, a senior scientist at the Chinese Academy of Space Technology, told a meeting in Beijing, according to the official Xinhua news agency."

14 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. or is it civ4? by legoburner · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Isaac Asimov: There is a single light of science, and to brighten it anywhere is to brighten it everywhere.

    Any space program is good news in my mind.

  2. Why would they land on the moon?!?! by brunes69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would they go to all that trouble of making such a huge trip and not land on the planet???

    I know maybe it has larger risks but COME ON, it's not like you go to Mars every week.

    1. Re:Why would they land on the moon?!?! by loose+electron · · Score: 4, Insightful

      IMHO ? Gravity.

      Getting on and off of a moon with a very low level of gravity is easier and cheaper than landing on something where you need to land and launch,while fighting the planets gravitational pull.

      --
      www.effectiveelectrons.com "chips that work" Analog, RF, Mixed Signal
  3. Space Race?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Hopefully this will kick off another space race and we can get NASA's butt back in gear to get a man on Mars first.

    1. Re:Space Race?? by sheridan3003 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I wouldn't count on it until we get more people interested in space again. Too many people think other things are more important that science and research for it's own sake. Now if we could find gold or oil on something out there that we could get back on terra firma easily, that would be a space race!

      --
      http://www.linkedin.com/in/dougneedham
  4. Capricorn 2 by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The day has arrived when a Russian/Chinese announcement of a Mars mission is believable, while the American president's announcement is mere political propaganda.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  5. Joking aside, this is interesting politically by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    China and Russia have rarely gotten along. In decades past, they had a good chunk of their nukes pointed at each other, large armies stationed at their border, and their politics didn't always match dispite their supposed shared Communism.

    These days, you'd be hard pressed to call either country Communist. I think of both as sort of Wild-West capitalist societies. Now they seem to be forming an economic alliance against the other growing political powers - mostly Europe and the US. It's been interesting watching how similar their replies are in the current Iran negotiations.

    I think they're both interested in developing their high tech sectors, and see it as a natural partnership. Russia has lots of experience, while China has a very well-developed industrial base.

  6. Politically interesting in the US, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This has very interesting political consequences in the US, as well. What we're seeing is the first massive event of the end of the American domination of the scientific and engineering fields.

    We can't deny that the various religious fundamentalists are somewhat responsible. They have successfully lobbied the US government to reduce its financial support to NASA and other scientific bodies. They have even taken the "battle" to the classroom.

    Unfortunately for all American citizens, this group of fundamentalists is far too powerful and numerous. They attempt to make up for their own lack of education by forcing their twisted ideas about the world on others, including people and organizations who wish to improve our understanding of nature via the scientific method.

    But these fundamentalists don't realize that the American economy desperately needs innovation and scientific pursuit in order to remain on top. Their shunning of science for peculiar religious reasons harms just themselves. When they go out in force and demand that funding be cut to scientific organizations, they're hurting the economic prospects of all Americans. A nation cannot remain a leader in today's technological world if it will not maximize its scientific potential.

    What we're seeing now is other nations becoming on par with America. And we will likely see them vastly overshoot American capabilities within a relatively short period of time. Notice that nations like Russia and China don't have religious fundamentalists participating in organized attacks against science and scientific discovery. We are seeing them become the leaders in highly scientific areas such as space exploration. If America wants to remain competitive, it will need to do something about its religious fundamentalists.

    1. Re:Politically interesting in the US, too. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      >What we're seeing is the first massive event of the end of the American domination of the scientific and engineering fields.

      That's the same thing they said in the 1950s when the Reds orbited and artifical moon. And still the US managed to stay in the lead for another 50 years.

    2. Re:Politically interesting in the US, too. by ikandi · · Score: 1, Insightful

      I despair of some of the shite written on /. these days. Fundamentalism my backside. China has simply moved from zero off-planet science to basic off-planet science, with a putative Martian project that is so far just a press release. When the big dragon lands some bots on another planet, feel free to post again but until then, save your paranoia for someone who cares to read it. And you are rather overlooking tha fact that Russia is a mature, pioneering space nation whose program has given the best bang-for-buck in history. It was communist fundamentalism that put Yuri in orbit, not religious waffle.

    3. Re:Politically interesting in the US, too. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Insightful
      We can't deny that the various religious fundamentalists are somewhat responsible. They have successfully lobbied the US government to reduce its financial support to NASA and other scientific bodies. They have even taken the "battle" to the classroom.


      WTF is up with all the trolling on "religeous fundamentalism" lately? I mean, space travel is about as far away as you can get from a hot-button issue for the religious conservatives! If anything, perhaps you should be congratulating our "fundie supporting president" for raising NASA's budget rather than reducing it like our previous bleeding heart liberal president did.

      As far as I can figure it, the new troll is:

      1. Claim that the "religious fundies" are responsible for all the world's woes.
      2. Get modded up because the liberal Slashdotters immediately agree with the words "religeous fundamentalist", no matter how stupid.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      Fawking trolls.
    4. Re:Politically interesting in the US, too. by embracethenerdwithin · · Score: 1, Insightful
      "Notice that nations like Russia and China don't have religious fundamentalists participating in organized attacks against science and scientific discovery. "

      Thats because in China religion is pretty much illegal and they jail you, torture you or kill you for being a Christian especially if you speak out.

      http://www.persecution.org/newsite/countryinfodeta il.php?countrycode=16%5Bpersecution.org%5D
      http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2002/003/11.38 .html%5BChristianitytoday%5D
      "The largest number of testimonies comes from central Henan Province, where persecution has dramatically escalated since 1999. Li's group has also collected partial reports on 17,000 others, mostly Christians, persecuted for their religious beliefs.

      Li is also documenting the cases of 117 religious people who have died while in official custody, 700 who have been put in labor camps, and 550 who are wanted by the police but are in hiding. He is also investigating 300 police officers accused of being especially abusive."[christianitytoday]

      That sounds so much better than here were we let those fundies run rampant! Is this what you want and the example we should follow?

    5. Re:Politically interesting in the US, too. by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Here we go again!

      We can't deny that the various religious fundamentalists are somewhat responsible. They have successfully lobbied the US government to reduce its financial support to NASA and other scientific bodies. They have even taken the "battle" to the classroom.

      WTF is up with all the trolling on "religious fundamentalism" lately? I mean, space travel is about as far away as you can get from a hot-button issue for the religious conservatives! If anything, perhaps you should be congratulating our "fundie supporting president" for raising NASA's budget rather than reducing it like our previous bleeding heart liberal president did.

      As far as I can figure it, the new troll is:

      1. Claim that the "religious fundies" are responsible for all the world's woes.
      2. Get modded up because Slashdotters immediately agree with the words "religious fundamentalist", no matter how stupid.
      3. ???
      4. Profit!

      Don't let yourselves be played like this! While there are real issues relating to religion vs. evolution, THIS ISN'T ONE OF THEM. And I would challenge anyone to prove that it is. If we all apply critical thinking to these posts, it becomes quite easy to identify the valid opinions on issues from the troll posts.
  7. Re:Why no intercontinental cooperation? by RsG · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sure, the US could push for a multilateral approach to space exploration. Now, stop and think about the current state of affairs in the 'states and you'll see why this isn't likely to happen.

    Ths US has a massive deficit, and little actual interest in spaceflight. I have no doubt that NASA could get to Mars and back again, if they had both the budget and the full support of congress and the general public. But in the absence of either, there is little room for new spaceflight programs in their agenda. And even getting an unmanned probe there and back would be a challenge, since it essentially doubles all the costs associated with fuel (not just monetary costs, but weight considerations as well).

    This isn't about an adversarial approach to space exploration; China and Russia aren't competing with America. For there to be competition, the US would actually have to have a similar program in place. They might see it as a space race, or national pride, or what have you, but they aren't actually trying to beat anybody.

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.