Slashdot Mirror


Apple and Windows Will Force Linux Underground

eastbayted writes "Tom Yager at InfoWorld predicts: 'At the end of the decade, we'll find that Apple UNIX has overtaken commercial Linux as the second most popular general client and server computing platform behind Windows.' That's not a gloom-and-doom omen for the ever-popular Linux kernel, though, he stresses. While Apple and Microsoft will grapple for dominance of client and server spaces, Linux will be 'the de facto choice for embedded solutions.' And by 'embedded,' Yager means 'specialized.' With a push of a button and a flip of switch, he predicts, you'll be able to create a configured database and a mated J2EE server — all thanks to Linux."

3 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Except for the fact by Erwos · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Slower than Linux or Windows? I'd like to see those numbers, please!"

    MacOS X has infamously bad threading, which makes it an absolute dog for many important server apps. Anandtech, what I regard as one of the most trustworthy hardware sites on the Internet, has an article outlining the problems:
    http://www.anandtech.com/mac/showdoc.aspx?i=2436&p =1

    Unless MacOS X for Intel has gotten miraculous improvements in this area, and I'm not aware it has, you'd be an absolute fool to use MacOS X for any server apps requiring high performance threading.

    -Erwos

    --
    Plausible conjecture should not be misrepresented as proof positive.
  2. Re:Except for the fact by hector_uk · · Score: 4, Informative

    yes, of cource i'm the flaimbait when the parent is the one with many outraged responces due to his FUD, and it's entirely my fault for pointing out that he's posting completely incorrect information http://www.barefeats.com/bootcamp.html OS X is faster than windows http://www.macworld.com/2006/08/opinion/dellmacpro followup/index.php Macs are in general cheaper or about the same price as equally configured pc's, though this is a hard thing to do if you put some work in to find a truly equally specced machine apples come out cheaper. and the argument about reliable hardware is moot, apple has not switched manufacturers, they still use asus and foxconn, they still use the same high quality pcb and they design all their own motherboards the same as before, the only difference is they order the cpu and chipset from intel instead of IBM/motorola. Some of those things may of been true of apple 10 years ago, but people need to open their eyes and quit with the blind faith, I run OS X windows and linux and each has their advantages, to label OS X a bloated toy thats not a real option is naive.

  3. Re:Except for the fact by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Wanna see those numbers? really easy.

    install linux on a G3 or G4. Massively faster than OSX on that hardware.
    On it's own hardware, ubuntu kicks OSX arse hard.

    Graned you dont get the nice-y OSX and I do like OSX. but it takes a killer machine to handle it.

    Dual G5 2.5ghz runs it nicely.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.