Slashdot Mirror


Space Tourism, Now and to Come

bart_scriv writes, "BusinessWeek looks at the latest in space tourism, from a $20 million Soyuz trip to a $200,000 ride via Virgin Galactic. The article looks at existing and planned opportunities, with a slide show of photos and artist's conceptions of vehicles and facilities. From the article: 'Among the other wonders of space is the planned Bigelow Aerospace space hotel. Similar in design to the International Space Station (which has kept a constant human presence in space since 2000), the hotel has a modular design that will allow it easily to expand. The key difference is that the hotel's modules will be inflatable. Bigelow Aerospace launched the Genesis I test module into orbit on July, 2006, and plans to send Genesis II in early 2007.'"

26 of 123 comments (clear)

  1. I for one... by BlahMatt · · Score: 4, Funny

    am excited to be travelling through space in a large inflatable ball... what could go wrong?

    --
    To understand recursion, one must first understand recursion...
    1. Re:I for one... by WindBourne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      About the same as being in a metal can. In fact, it might be less. It should be self-sealing while the can is not as easy to do that with. In addition, the can makes LARGE amounts of noise and that is causing issues for the astronauts/cosmonauts.

      --
      I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  2. If this price comes down to 20,000 then I'm gone! by w33t · · Score: 4, Funny

    Of course, my friend asked me, "Are you worried about the rocket blowing up?"

    "Not really," I said. "After all, when I kick-it I plan on having my ashes and a sample of my DNA shot into space anyhow. As long as the rocket makes it to space first, I think it would actually be a pretty good deal."

  3. Space Ball! by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Funny

    Call me when they put a huge, inflatable arena in space, and start holding athletic events there. Somewhere between Ender's Game and Jocks In Space there's got to be a sweet spot of entertainment...

    1. Re:Space Ball! by TrippTDF · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're being funny, but I think you might have a point there. How much money does the US spend on sporting events in a year? How many possibilities are there for weightless sports? I think once you bring your cost of launch down, this could become a sigificant revenue stream, but it's still at least 40 years away.

    2. Re:Space Ball! by monopole · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great idea as long as we stipulate that we won't be bringing the jocks back.

  4. More junk to monitor by Cyphertube · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As if there wasn't enough junk to try to monitor in space and worry about falling to earth, now we're going to have private enterprise try to make a buck or two off of going to space.

    Government contractors worry me enough, but what happens to a space hotel when the business runs out of money? I can see this going through a boom and bust cycle like just about every new business, and I want to know. It's not like running lots of fiber optic cable and then going bankrupt. Who's going to take care of the degrading orbit of the hotel?

    --
    Linux - because it doesn't leave that Steve Ballmer aftertaste.
    1. Re:More junk to monitor by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
      > Government contractors worry me enough, but what happens to a space hotel when the business runs out of money? I can see this going through a boom and bust cycle like just about every new business, and I want to know. It's not like running lots of fiber optic cable and then going bankrupt. Who's going to take care of the degrading orbit of the hotel?

      Gravity.

      Interesting economic question: What's the salvage value of an abandoned ISS? If it costs $10000/lb to send something to orbit, the ISS is worth its weight in gold.

      But if you buy an abandoned space station for $1.00, and use its $10000/lb "value" to finance the building of rockets that cost $1000/lb to send fuel into orbit before your space station's orbit degrades, you've just cut the value of an abandoned hunk of metal by a factor of ten. Oops, those were also your company's assets! The bank calls your loan, and you're sunk.

      Then some other guy buys you out for pennies on the dollar, and flies your $1000/lb rockets to his space hotel, and makes a go of it.

      I suspect that much like wiring a nation with fiberoptics, the early bird gets the worm... but the second mouse gets the cheese.

    2. Re:More junk to monitor by 2gravey · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, since it's inflatable, if it's abandoned, shuttle astronauts could just make a quick detour past it and toss a dart at it.

    3. Re:More junk to monitor by J05H · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, I would buy a 5 ton ball of shit in orbit. Someday I want to grow trees in space, and that would make for some cheap fertilizer. Rednecks in Spaaaaaace!!

      On Grandparent post - every rocket launched and payload developed has specific debris-mitigation efforts. US commercial payloads must pass through AST's debris process. Debris is an issue, but it's a small step compared to regenerative life support or deep space radiation issues.

      Josh

      --
      gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  5. Inflatable != fragile by FleaPlus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Every time there's an article about Bigelow Aerospace here, there's a dozen or so commenters who are convinced that because the modules are self-expanding, they must therefore be delicate and vulnerable to space debris. In reality however, the walls of their modules are quite durable, probably even more so the aluminum walls of the International Space Station. The walls will be composed of multiple layers of materials like kevlar (the stuff used in bullet-proof vests) and vectran, resulting in a wall 16-inches thick. They've done a number of projectile tests, with results which compare favorably to NASA's.

    1. Re:Inflatable != fragile by AKAImBatman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In fact everyone can now see for themselves what the Bigelow station looks like. Surprisingly, it looks a lot like just another space station. Seeing it deployed like that, it looks a heck of a lot sturdier than Slashdot impressions would lead you to believe. :)

    2. Re:Inflatable != fragile by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Every time there's an article about Bigelow Aerospace here, there's a dozen or so commenters who are convinced that because the modules are self-expanding, they must therefore be delicate and vulnerable to space debris.

      They're probably confusing them with these guys.

      --
      mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
    3. Re:Inflatable != fragile by otter42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be specific, Bigelow Aerospace bought NASA's TransHab program. Apparently it's all siting out in a warehouse somewhere in Las Vegas. So it's no surprise that their technology compares favorably with NASA's-- it's based on it. (I know this only because I had a long conversation yesterday with a friend who works there, designing their robots and integrating the avionics package.)

      --
      www.eissq.com/BandP.html Ball and Plate System. Amuse your friends. Crush your enemies.
    4. Re:Inflatable != fragile by FleaPlus · · Score: 2, Informative

      As the anon coward said, by "NASA's technology" I was referring to aluminum walls, not NASA's technology in general (which includes Transhab). It's really too bad that Congress forced NASA to abandon Transhab, as it could've helped them to construct the International Space Station at a much lower cost, and probably with a larger size.

      For any readers who might be unfamiliar with Transhab, there's a rather nice history of the project, and its further development by Bigelow:

      A History of the Genesis I Private Space Module

  6. Space traveli by Reality+Master+101 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't considering suborbital trips to be space travel, so I'm glad they're talking about some of the real players trying to bring orbital travel to be affordable.

    My great fear is that the marketing machines are overselling suborbital "roller coasters", and when that is an abject failure, we'll see less investment in real orbital trips. Orbital is at least an order of magnitude harder than suborbital (if not more), so it's possible that some investors could be spooked away.

    --
    Sometimes it's best to just let stupid people be stupid.
  7. Armadillo Aerospace Test Hover Video by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    WMV or MPG video just posted by John Carmack of Armadillo Aerospace's test hover.

  8. How High is Space? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "The site's elevation 4,700 feet above sea level will also make for a shorter trip into space, saving on fuel costs."

    Isn't Earth's escape velocity constant, regardless of how far you travel to escape it? I don't see dropping off quicker with only 1 mile "head start" so much of the acceleration to escape velocity is against less weight, with constant mass requiring constant acceleration fuel.

    Wouldn't the Equator's 26 miles extra distance from the Earth's center (compared to the distance at the poles) make it an even cheaper launch site?

    Even if all these factors count, isn't Ecuador's low lattitude and high altitude the best combination? Forget a space elevator, how about just an escalator up the Andes?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:How High is Space? by paladinwannabe2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, escape velocity is dependent on distance from the Earth. Remember that gravity gets weaker the further you are away from its source. It is slightly easier to escape from the equator than it is at the pole, so you are right that the Andes would be one of the best places to put a space elevator (or just a launch pad).

      --
      You are reading a copy of my copyrighted post.
  9. 3 words by RsG · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Zero. G. Porn.

    There's your 21st centure business model :-)

    Although, cleaning up afterwards would be a challenge... ...and I don't even want to think about what would happen to the instruments if they tried zero-G Bukkake :-(

    --
    Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
  10. The ISS is worthless. by Colin+Smith · · Score: 3, Insightful
    If it costs $10000/lb to send something to orbit, the ISS is worth its weight in gold.


    Nope. A thing is only worth what someone is willing to pay, it's costs are irrelevant. There's no such thing as intrinsic value.

    That means you have to start with... What is someone willing to pay for a week in orbit? Then ask how many people can we get into the thing, how long will it last. Then you have an approximate measure of what the ISS might be worth to a space hotel operator.

    There are no space hotel operators at the moment and nobody else really knows what to do with the thing, which means that if the ISS were abandoned tomorrow, it would literally be worthless.
    --
    Deleted
  11. Re:The first thing that comes to mind is regulatio by badboy_tw2002 · · Score: 2, Informative

    There's a whole existing body of law around this - Oceanic law, naval law, whatever you call it. No one owns the ocean, and yet ships are represented by their respective countries, do business, have environmental impacts (oil spills come to mind) etc. Whats to stop private cruise ship companies from gouging the consumer? Fair market I guess, plus whatever regulating body the terrestrial company is owned by. And this thing will really get off the ground once Virgin, Amidillo, etc start getting craft into orbit. It will be a while, but once we get people into orbit using commercial vehicles then the government (and taxpayers) don't have to foot the bill.

  12. Re:20mil$ by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Insightful
    [...] Could have given it to me instead. Id have done something of value with it.
    True. If they'd given it to me, I'd've just spent it on blackjack and hookers.

    Actually, forget the blackjack.
  13. Re:Vacation on the moon! by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 2, Funny

    Damn right. Back in my day, we had to walk to the moon! Uphill! Both ways!
    (sorry. couldn't resist. :^)

  14. Note to Space Hotel Recreation Director: by Locke2005 · · Score: 2, Funny
    Please scratch archery off of the list of possible recreational activities that guests may indulge in.

    Thank you,

    Bigelow Aerospace Management

    --
    I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
  15. Interesting point by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any salvage laws yet? What is "abandoned" in space? Everything up there was at one point pretty darn valuable, just from the sheer launching costs let alone any tech it represents.

    I would imagine that once private industry is up there all the time, that "space junk" will become a valuable resource and won't be allowed to just de orbit and burn up. They'll do something with it.