Bad Password Allowed Swedish Watergate
fredr1k writes "The Swedish Watergate reported earlier this week was possible because of the usage of terrible weak passwords (Swedish) and a not functional IT policy. The Swedish newspaper Göterborgs-Posten reports the source of the password was a partymember who's account was "sigge" with password "sigge" and was "stolen" in march this year. Seasoned Slashdot readers would call it "a-not-so-hard-to-crack-password". "
Here is the real question.. Is it a USER problem or an ADMINISTRATOR problem. Sounds like they need to hire a new IT director with a since of security. If that IT director allows passwords like that he probably also is running a firewall hosted in a Windows XP Pro machine and ICS and no service packs or hot fixes. All of the internal IP addresses are 192.168.x.x because of ICS so I'm sure the server is .1.
Heck, the director might have even turned on Remote Desktop Administration on the box so he could manage it from home without a VPN and the administrator accounts password on that box is either blank, password, or god.
Well, best of luck to their director or whomever is in charge of their computer network.
Obama = Socialism.
You know, in my department we've found that a great way to introduce users to more complicated passwords is to introduce them as keyboard pattern passwords.
;)
Of course we have complexity requirements, but it's amazing how a user can find a way to simplify a complexity requirement. Think a user unknowledgeable, but never think a user unclever - I always say...well, actually that's the first time I've said that...back to my point.
While these patterned passwords may not be as hard to crack as truly random passwords, they are at least non-semantic.
for example 1al02sk93dj8 - I imagine this password is probably pretty common, but if it were scrawled on a stickynote on someones monitor it would discourage causual account browsing by a coworker.
Does anyone know if brute-force methods take into account keyboard patterning?
by the way 1al02sk93dj8 is not my accounts password - so don't even think about trying it!
My Computer Music Tutorial Videos
Incremental-number passwords are an inevitable side-effect of this sort of policy and, even where password policy is more carefully implemented, the fact that average-joe users have to change it monthly anyway is a chore that WILL lead to short-cuts and, ultimately, weak passwords (or rather, associative passwords that are easy to infer after a little observation).
Try just having a very strict policy on passwords, and scrapping the regular-change part of it. People can be imaginative and obscure once, but ask them to do it regularly and they get sloppy.
Meta will eat itself
Anyone else use the post-it-on-the-monitor as a booby trap? If anyone uses the post-it password on my monitor it sets off a series of security cascades that culminates with me getting a picture of them on my phone.
One day I hope to catch someone other than a janitor trying to surf porn. =P
ad logicam Claiming a proposition is false because it was presented as the conclusion of a fallacious argument.