Slashdot Mirror


RTS Halo Mod Stopped by Microsoft

Headcase88 writes "Microsoft has officially asked the creators of Halogen to stop development at once. Halogen was an RTS mod being developed by Halo fans for the past three years. From the website: ' I was going to write a big sappy letter here, but what's the point. So..that's it then, I guess. The forums, site, and Moddb profile will all be shut down within the week. I can't say it hasn't been fun. It's a shame it has to end like this, but I suppose that's how it goes. Thanks, guys, for all the time you've spent supporting us. It's been a pleasure. We hate this as much as you do.' "

5 of 182 comments (clear)

  1. Too bad... by SirTalon42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Too bad Valve didn't do this with Counter Strike, if they did maybe they would still be in business now...

  2. Re:Hmmm by aichpvee · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, can't have competition for the "official" half-assed games.

    --
    The Farewell Tour II
  3. At Microsoft... by Kamineko · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hey... what's that Jake?
      These guys are making an RTS Halo Mod, sir.
    Gosh... isn't that..?
      Yes sir, it's what we call 'a good idea'.
    Jake, call the lawyers. This must be stopped at all costs.
      They're already on their way, sir.

  4. Re:This Stuff Bothers Me by KDR_11k · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is evident in their initial response to the growing open-source movement, which they have now come full circle to "embrace" (not really but they claim to) after failing to squash it's rise.

    Of course MS embraces opensource software. Embrace, extend, exterminate. Though I don't think they've got screeching, laser-shooting pepperpots for that last bit...

    --
    Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
  5. Re:This Stuff Bothers Me by tgibbs · · Score: 2, Funny
    Yet these companies squash the project. If I were in their positions, I would be flattered that people enjoyed their product so much they decided to make a tribute to it.


    You aren't thinking like a corporate lawyer:

    "It's our IP. If somebody wants to use it, they should pay us for a license. A lot. If we let somebody use our IP for free, then why should anybody pay us for it? Maybe somebody, someday, would have wanted to pay us to do this, but they won't because we let somebody else do it for free! Or maybe we might want to do it ourselves, but nobody will buy it because it's already been done (probably not, but why risk it when we aren't getting paid?)"