Slashdot Mirror


Regulation That Could Stifle Video Over the Net?

bb writes to tell us that recent comments made by the FCC could be cause for concern for proponents of internet video. Being considered under the guise of a push against child pornography on the internet, VoN founder Jeff Pulver stated that this is just a warning shot. From the article: "He drew a parallel between this potential regulation and an attempt to ban or restrict Internet voice in 1996, and predicted a long battle and offered to help advocates of rights of IP video innovators. 'The VoN coalition will take people through the stages of what's going to happen,' he said."

7 of 155 comments (clear)

  1. Just say no... by HatchedEggs · · Score: 3, Informative

    I would be very disappointed if the government allowed actions that had a negative impact on internet video.

    My wife is from Sweden and she uses it to communicate with her parents regularily. Without that we'd be limited in our ability to spend quality time with them... even a continent apart. I know there are tons of people just like us that find internet video to be incredibly important in their lives.

    I certainly support the government in doing what it can in dealing with child pornography and other things along those lines... but trying to apply a tax or stifle innovation in regards to technological advance would have alot of societal negatives.

    --
    Justin - Don't be afraid of my blog, it won't bite.
  2. So it becomes illegal in the US by arthurpaliden · · Score: 1, Informative

    Who cares, the internet is more than the US.

  3. Re:Pipe dreams by deadryk · · Score: 3, Informative

    Mornin'

    Actually, Media100 came out with this several years ago, http://www.creativemac.com/HTM/News/07_00/media100 i.htm
    . It was QT based and not that difficult to define and use. It did add to the post production, but you could do some swanky interactive stuff with online video. Too bad it never really took off. Twas fun stuff.

    oh yeah, almost forgot, "But think of the children..."

  4. banning stuff under the name of child pornography by Arwing · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this the same excuse China gave for regulating internet? So FCC is taking a page out of China's playbook of how to restrict information? Well, at least they are learning from one of the biggest censor in the world. I am so tired of all these "Why won't you think about the children?" crap, if we let these people run things, next thing we know, the children will watch nothing but Barney on PBS.

  5. There are places like that already. by InThane · · Score: 3, Informative

    They're called "bars" or "taverns", and nobody under the age of 21 is allowed in them, at least in the United States. Mind you, many of the patrons of such establishments have problems acting better than the kids somebody would go to such a place to escape...

    --
    InThane
    1. Re:There are places like that already. by futuresheep · · Score: 2, Informative

      Washington is one. Minors are not allowed in bars, taverns, or the lounge area of restaurants.

  6. Re:More government regulations? by Jewfro_Macabbi · · Score: 2, Informative

    --Ronald Reagan You left out that part