Slashdot Mirror


Ultra HDTV on Display for the First Time

fdiskne1 writes "According to a story by the BBC, the successor to HDTV is already out there. The resolution? 7680 x 4320 pixels. Despite the 'wow' factor, the only screens capable of using Ultra High Definition Television are large movie screens, and no television channel has the bandwidth needed for this image. Some experts, in fact, say the technology is only a novelty. Until the rest of the necessary technology catches up, the only foreseen use for Ultra HDTV is in movie theatres and museum video archives." From the article: "Dr. Masaru Kanazawa, one of NHK's senior research engineers, helped develop the technology. He told the BBC News website: 'When we designed HDTV 40 years ago our target was to make people feel like they were watching the real object. Our target now is to make people feel that they are in the scene.' As well as the higher picture resolution, the Ultra HD standard incorporates an advanced version of surround sound that uses 24 loudspeakers. "

20 of 314 comments (clear)

  1. Goddamnit... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    And i just bought an HDTV last week.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Goddamnit... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      That's amazing. What's next? Super UHDTV followed by Hyper SUHDTV and Extra HSUHDTV?

  2. The device by also-rr · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also required blood to be sampled and only one life form to be detected in the room before it allows you to play your DNA proteced version of "Stars Wars IV - Remix 92 - The Jedi Beat The Terrorists (2020 release)".

    1. Re:The device by operagost · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unlimited free viewings will be allowed if it detects a high level of midichlorians in the viewer's blood.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
    2. Re:The device by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Unlimited free viewings will be allowed if it detects a high level of midichlorians in the viewer's blood."

      [Spoken to the RIAA at the door]: "These are not the pirated copies of Star Wars you are looking for...(waves hand)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  3. Anyone have a video link of the demonstration? by phpWebber · · Score: 5, Funny

    I want to see if it looks better than my computer monitor resolution.

    1. Re:Anyone have a video link of the demonstration? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I see what you did there.

  4. 640 by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 1, Funny

    640 (by 480) ought to be enough for anyone...

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  5. hrmph! by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Funny

    The inventors were overheard as saying; "Big deal. IT'S THE CONTENT STUPID!"

    Atleast books will always have a higher (mental) resolution, it's to bad nobody reads anymore.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
    1. Re:hrmph! by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 4, Funny

      ...it's to bad nobody reads anymore.

      It's a shame that writing skills are on the decline, too.

      --
      This guy's the limit!
    2. Re:hrmph! by Gospodin · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would but I couldn't find any videos about it.

      --
      ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
  6. Typical by Yahweh+Doesn't+Exist · · Score: 3, Funny

    you wait 40 years to upgrade and a week later you're obsolete.

    what I hate about TV is how the specs are so hardware-dependent. all kinds of numbers and letters and if it differs by 1 character your thousands of dollars might have been wasted.

    imo it should be more like computers: you basically have a processor that determines your data processing and a display device that determines your viewable resolution. almost everything else is software and thus improvements are continuous and ongoing. it's a much better model than upgrading every couple of decades, with a half-decade period when your TV is too good for the signal.

    once TV is based on more internet-like digital technologies this will hopefully happen.

  7. Re:Great... by darkitecture · · Score: 5, Funny

    Seriously people, if you want REAL, then go OUTSIDE. That is true reality, you smell, taste, and see it all, with a unlimited resolution.

    No, see you're missing the point. I don't want REAL LIFE. I want LIFELIKE. Because let's face it, no matter what happens in real life, I doubt I'm ever gonna have the opportunity to bend Elisha Cuthbert over the closest piece of furniture and give her the worst 30 seconds of her life.

    But if we can make screens mimic reality, then we're one step closer to every twisted geek's fantasy - the Holodeck. And I guarantee you, Holodeck-Elisha is more open to experimentation. One just has to hope that Real-Holographic-Simulated-Evil-Lincoln doesn't spring to life and goes on a rampage, wrecking the ambience.

  8. Sony vs Microsoft by mcai8rw2 · · Score: 3, Funny
    Haha! That resoultion sounds flippin great...but I can see it now:

    "Ken Kutaragis' head announces that the "playstation 14" ships WITHOUT the foot wide ultra-ultra-ultra-HDMI cable."


    Meanwhile, CMDR Taco [deceased] writes on how playstations "neural implant connect-kinetic extremity dongle [N.I.C.K.E.D]...was 'actually just a rehash of the Wiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiis controller.
    --
    >>>Scanning for I.D.I.O.T.S. >>>
    >>>I.D.I.O.T.S. FOUND! >>>
  9. Also... by Kirin+Fenrir · · Score: 2, Funny

    The $3000 version of the PS4 is built specifically for Ultra HDTV! Pre-order now!

    --
    Caffeine is my anti-drug!

    Duranin - A NWN2 Roleplaying Persistent World
  10. Re:Backlash? There's a cycle for this stuff by mcmonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

    So fie on your 'fringe' technology PCs were 'fringe' when I was soldering together and wire-wrapping motherboards in the pre-IBM and pre-Kaypro days. What we did, goofy as it sounds, is the reason you can post on /. to begin with.

    Can I get off your lawn now?

    k thanx

  11. Re:"ultra" high def has been around for a while... by Kawolski · · Score: 2, Funny

    They should've called it "Very HD" and saved "Ultra HD" for the next one.

  12. Re:Great... by suv4x4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, see you're missing the point. I don't want REAL LIFE. I want LIFELIKE.

    You remind of something local journalists in my country started using way too much in news reports, odd given it's a nonsense.

    They like to say that some actual event that happened in our actual world is "like a real reality show"...
    "Driving on the roads with your car is like a real reality show".

    There should honestly be minimal intelligence requirements for one to be a reporter, I think.

  13. Re:Replacing IMAX? by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Does it replace IMAX? I am not sure. I would like to see it show footage scanned from the original "North of Superior" footage. I have seen a strike from the original negative of that, and I remember the image being so impressive that you felt the tilt when the aeroplane cornered: you believed your eyes over your inner ear"

    You think that is something. I'd like to see if they could transfer over the "Stones at the MAX" they did of the Rolling Stones concert (Steel Wheels?) in IMAX. I swear, they did a couple shots, and you could swear you were falling down through one of the cracks in Keith Richards' face...scary realistic.

    :-)

    Ah Keith...God bless him...the human riff. And to think, after the nuclear wars all that will be left is him and cockroaches.....

    :-)

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  14. Re:The final resolution jump? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Funny

    it is not possible to resolve individual pixels in an 8x10 photo printed at VGA resolution held 10 meters away

    This is Slashdot, where a legitimate reply involves the word "binoculars."

    --
    StoneCypher is Full of BS