Slashdot Mirror


RSS Feed Feed — Ultimate News Portal?

Rod Peterson writes, "I came across SiliconNews.net, a news portal that pulls RSS feeds from many of the top computer enthusiast, gaming, and nerd websites. Obviously, they've included Slashdot! They have an RSS feed of everyone else's RSS feeds, so you always have all the news."

102 comments

  1. Is this really a news story? Or just an ad? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's an RSS aggregator! Wow! That's so cool and innovative. Oh wait, I just realized it's 2006, not 1997.

  2. So you get dupes of dupes... by Max+Threshold · · Score: 1

    ...of digg articles?

    1. Re:So you get dupes of dupes... by Klaidas · · Score: 1

      And those articles also reposted on Slashdot too!

  3. Just what the world needs. by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Funny

    This sounds like just what the world needs: an easier way to become so indunated with news that you never have time for anything else.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
    1. Re:Just what the world needs. by flight_master · · Score: 1

      Indeed...
      Adding that /. Live bookmark to FF's bookmarks tab was the worst thing I ever did... Now I spend two hours a day reading silly stub articles. Well, at least I learn something!
      /me heads of to sleep

      --
      "Free software" is a matter of liberty, not price.
    2. Re:Just what the world needs. by poolmeister · · Score: 2, Insightful

      DailyRotation is a good example of this, just set it up to display ALL feeds and you won't know where to start...
      I'm hopelessly addicted.

      --
      CN=poolmeister.OU=lurkers.CN=slashdot
    3. Re:Just what the world needs. by Jules+Mercuri · · Score: 1

      "Stub"?! This is Slashdot, not Wikipedia!

  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. My Google start page ... by nead · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... has better sources, a more appealing layout and no advertising.

    Thanks for comin' out.

  6. FOTM by achacha · · Score: 5, Interesting

    This is the flavor of the moment, there are a bunch of there floating around. RSS aggregators are all the rage now. I don't see why someone would want a slow site to maintain them when you can just create a folder of LiveBookmarks in Firefox and get all the aggregation you need. For more dedicated aggregation there is Thunderbird and lots of native clients with lots of features.

    I am sure there is a use for these, but this feels like the .com boom time, money put into ideas with questionable innovations and no viable way to profit. These companies then patent all the prior art around and horribly retard the innovation process of the space. Oh well, it's bound to happen, the clueless always feel their idea is new and unique and patentable.

    1. Re:FOTM by hpavc · · Score: 1

      As I scroll down from your post, you can see its true. Everyone has their little XML::RSS factory humming along griding off the same feeds ... oh Ajax too.

      But as of yet your right, there isn't a need for google.com/ig (or someone else) to do all this for me. But I think most people really like that 'start/home page'. I wonder how many people still have http://www.apple.com/startpage or whatever the oem is for their homepage. If that number is big, then switching that page to google.com/ig (they might lack a thunderbird and use yahooMail or gMail instead from from their portal page). That doesn't seem too awful. I cannot account why we need a the insane number of home brew ones though.

      However the homebrew version of news.google.com for your own portal (the 911source thing) is interesting. Where you for the lack of a better word 'value add' your content with someone else's is 'interesting', sort of like 'content rich ads' are interesting.

      --
      members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
    2. Re:FOTM by Overloadplanetunreal · · Score: 1

      While analyzing the data I captured from my A Random Number experiment, I found TONS of sites just like the one this story is about. My project hit the front page of Digg and Delicious, but a lot of the referrers were from sites that just aggregated the RSS feed from either Digg or Delicious, and often times they were sites that just had a billion feeds from all over the web.

    3. Re:FOTM by shokk · · Score: 1

      One single reason. Accessing the same reader from multiple locations: home, office, PDA.
      Keep your RSS feeds in Firefox and I guarantee that as the list of feeds grows you won't be able to remember which articles you have and have no read. A lot of the online readers are too damn slow and don't support all the features I want. That's why I use MonkeyChow. Tons of features, keeps articles around as long as I want, and open source PHP.

      --
      "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  7. Original Signal is better by bstadil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Have a look at OriginalSignal same system but Ajaxified as you can just hover over a story to read a summary.

    --
    Help fight continental drift.
    1. Re:Original Signal is better by Overloadplanetunreal · · Score: 1

      I couldn't find any AJAX on that site. It just uses Javascript to hide and show certain parts of the page, and display tooltips. However, you're right that it's better than TFA.

    2. Re:Original Signal is better by jbdaem · · Score: 1

      thanks for the link. Like this site. gives me a another excuse to gie to my employer as to why i spend so much time reading all the postings in slashdot.

    3. Re:Original Signal is better by Millenniumman · · Score: 1

      n00b. Every web technology which allows interactive web pages is AJAX. And Web 2.0 .

      --
      Stupidity is like nuclear power, it can be used for good or evil. And you don't want to get any on you.
  8. If ever there was a slashvertisement by t0qer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This would be one. Since it's a slashvertisement article, i'm gonna join in the slashvertising fun. Click Here if you have winamp, watch some hot karaoke action on my live video stream from the 7 Bamboo karaoke lounge in San Jose California.

  9. hmmm.... by macadamia_harold · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is just like popurls.com, only not as good.

    1. Re:hmmm.... by deda1us · · Score: 4, Informative

      I prefer and recommend http://www.spoonfeed.org/ - faster and easier to read. And it has category-tabs too.

  10. I got a sight exactly like that by HaMMeReD3 · · Score: 1

    Check my sig, it does the EXACT same thing.

    Isn't that the point of syndication though.

  11. There is another website? by sporkme · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I thought that Slashdot was the only website on the interweb tubes.

    The site seems to provide too much information in too small of a space. I choose to visit a website based on what I feel like seeing at the moment. While a clear effort is made to categorize articles and news, the site lacks direction and provides little to no new information. What you want is lost in the static. Many of the covered websites will have dupes and when big news happens, I can see that RSS feed being completely filled with the same news.

    I think the point is being missed about the value of RSS and what has been accomplished. Websites of this type are no longer necessary because we get to choose our own sources, layout and priority for news. Google's home page service has more value than this RSS feed compilation website.

    This feels like a shameless plug or a blatent ad.

  12. A better use of RSS... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    I like using RSS to monitor websites that are infrequently updated. Or as one wag recently said, RSS stands for "Rarely Seen Websites".

    1. Re:A better use of RSS... by Kamineko · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's... the worst acronym I've ever read.

    2. Re:A better use of RSS... by John+Nowak · · Score: 1

      Ah, you beat me to it...

    3. Re:A better use of RSS... by MojaveHigh · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't that be RSW?

    4. Re:A better use of RSS... by Umbral+Blot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You must have meant Rarely Seen Sites since Rarely Seen Websites is RSW not RSS

    5. Re:A better use of RSS... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      Only on Slashdot would a post explaining that the word 'Websites' starts with a 'w' not an 's' be moderated 'interesting.'

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
    6. Re:A better use of RSS... by honor,+not+armor · · Score: 1
      RSS stands for "Rarely Seen (Web)sites"

      Fixed.
  13. When more of these appear: by Kamineko · · Score: 2, Funny

    When more of these type of programs are available, Slashdot will list them all, and will become an RSS Feed Feed Feed.

  14. Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know how when a non-main-page story gets a bunch of comments, it gets 'promoted' to the front page? Maybe if no one comments on this story, it'll get removed.

    A man can dream... A man can dream.

  15. information overload by qw0ntum · · Score: 1

    There is a point at which information overload takes over. The optimal news portal doesn't include every single story, but just the important ones. That's what makes it so hard to develop the 'ultimate' news portal--there's a bit of an art to it.

    --
    'Every story, if continued long enough, ends in death.' --Ernest Hemingway
  16. If it was smart enough, it could be useful. by Animats · · Score: 1

    Not interested until somebody figures out a way to unduplicate articles, and where the article is some blog regurgitating some other source, track back to the original source and give you that.

  17. Not useful by teratogenicbenzene · · Score: 1

    Meh. It's little better than a link aggregator.

    What makes it practically unusable is the fact that clicking on a headline doesn't actually take you to the story, it takes you to a siliconnews.net subpage that has the actual link. There are better solutions out there than this.

    --
    The Secret of Life: Proteins fold up and bind things.
  18. Google News by SniperClops · · Score: 1

    I prefer google news

    1. Re:Google News by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Personally, I prefer nakednews.com and their undReSS aggremagator.

  19. Re:One up! by ben+there... · · Score: 1

    This sounds a lot like something that Drupal has built in, called a news aggregator. You can set the same thing up yourself very easily by installing drupal and enabling that module.

    Here's an example of how it can look:
    http://911source.org/aggregator

    Or you can browse by category:
    http://911source.org/aggregator/categories

  20. ZOMG RSS Aggregator! by Kayamon · · Score: 1

    ZOMG RSS Aggregator!

    It's like the future, except now.

    --
    Kayamon
  21. Furball dicklicker! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is startingly irrelevant! Welcome to 1999!

    You know, the only way your "news" could be any more oxymoronic is if... shit. It just doesn't get any older than this.

  22. time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who has time to go through all that news?

  23. Re:One up! by BadMrMojo · · Score: 5, Funny

    How is this news?

    It's news because, by posting a news article on it, kdawson has finally achieved his ultimate goal of causing the universe to implode upon itself in a news paradox.

    Without news, there is no headline, without a headline, there can be no RSS feed, without the RSS feed, there can be no RSS Feed about RSS feeds and without a RSS feed about an RSS feed about RSS feeds, there can be no news. As soon as someone reads TFA, it's all over.

    Don't you see? We're screwed. Kdawson has will finally win and spread chaos across the face of the entire universe. Thank God people never RTFA. I'm guessing we have another 350-ish comments to go before some moron destroys all of creation by trying to view the information firsthand and make an informed comment. Fools.

  24. Re:One up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Haha, that was terrific.

  25. News agregator or spam site? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Not interesting. They get feeds from other sites, wrap ads around the "content" and that's it. Making money on someone else's content is a scam!

  26. Google wins by WrecklessSandwich · · Score: 1

    http://www.google.com/ig

    Add what you want and set it as your homepage, it's linked to your Google account so as long as you're logged in it works from anywhere. There's a very large list of widgets and RSS feeds to choose from, although I'm pretty sure you can add any RSS feed you want.

    1. Re:Google wins by lucas+teh+geek · · Score: 1

      The one thing I'd like to see on ig (or have someone tell me another way to go about doing) would be combining multiple feeds into one content box. I read a number of comics, most of which have feeds, but i really dont need a content box per comic; I'd much rather a "comics" content box which has all the different comic feeds mashed together in order of date

      --
      TIAEAE!
  27. Agregator, anyone? by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 1

    What exactly is newsworthy about an agregator site? "Planet" sites are nothing new. How is this news?

    Personally, I use Akregator, KDE's RSS reader, to pull in just the feeds I want anyway. (Yes, Slashdot is one of them. :-) ) So I get all my news pushed to me, I can read it whenever, and I don't need a 3rd party site to do it. You can do the same with a dozen services or applications.

    Again, what's so interesting here? (And yes, I did glance at the site. I still don't get it.)

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  28. Other sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lots of these RSS aggregators exist...for general search, there's http://www.tagfetch.com/TagFetch.com, and for deal sites, there's http://www.dealtuner.com/DealTuner.com. I guess adaptation of personal RSS readers has been slow?

  29. startingly irrelevant! by sporkme · · Score: 1

    Very well stated.

    Is there an AOL keyword for the website? Maybe a CompuServe one? Can I get this via my local ASCII dial-up BBS over 9600 baud? Shoot me if I am ever this desperate for a technology news source--this thing is like a stack of Hollywood tabloids for sale outside of a Hollywood studio. It is like a tech news website compiler posted to Slashdot. The only use is if you are paranoid that there may be SOMETHING out there that you did not read. How many article submitters have gotten their submissions from this kind of slag site?

  30. speaking of RSS feeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...it's great that Slashdot has one, and it's great that you guys started using em dashes a lot (like in the subject of this very article), but — isn't a valid RDF/RSS or XML character entity. So it shows up literally as "—" in feed readers.

    Use the numerical equivalent (—) instead, gracefully degrade it to "--", or simply include it as an unescaped multibyte character (yay UTF-8). But do something, it looks dumb.

    1. Re:speaking of RSS feeds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't mod you up sans account, but Hear, Hear!

      This annoys me every time- BBC Russia can give me an RSS feed in cyrillic, but slashdot can't give me a live bookmark without bizarre squiggles.

  31. similar sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Google Tabbed Homepage by Temujin_12 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I love the new tabbed personalized homepage feature Google has added. Now, when I go to Google (which is about 12,324 times a day) I get a quick snap shot of the information I commonly go to from RSS feeds I choose. They also have lots of nice little tools/games you can drag onto your homepage as well.

    Now when I want to do what I call "the rounds" and check what's new in the world and on sites I'm interested in, I just look at the links from the various RSS feeds on one tab, middle click on ones I'm interested in, go to the next tab, and do the same. At the end, I have around 1-2 dozen tabs open and whole process only takes about 1-2 minutes and I have all the latest information on the topics I care about. This is what RSS feeds are about. Fast and intuitive access to the data you want, when you want it.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    1. Re:Google Tabbed Homepage by The+Raven · · Score: 1

      Sweet... I hadn't even noticed the tabs yet. Thanks Temujin. :-)

      --
      "I will trust Google to 'do no evil' until the founders no longer run it." Hello Alphabet.
    2. Re:Google Tabbed Homepage by shiva+mantri · · Score: 1

      I prefer M$ Live (www.live.com). You cannot add more than 6 tabs to Google tabs (thats stupid). obviously for searches i prefer firefox and http://www.google.com/search?q=%25s&hl=en

  33. Dangerous by paaltio · · Score: 2, Funny

    You just created an infinite loop between the Slashdot front page and theirs. RUN!

  34. At least by Daas · · Score: 1

    They are using Joomla... Oh wait, doesn't it come with a RSS agregator by default ??? ;) Daas

  35. So.... by CountExtreme · · Score: 1

    What makes this any different from Google's Technology feed.....?

  36. Calm down, it didn't catch on until now by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

    Calm down, rss and aggregators didn't catch on until now. How many web-pages has had rss-feeds more than five years? Very few I guess.

    1. Re:Calm down, it didn't catch on until now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Calm down, rss and aggregators didn't catch on until now. How many web-pages has had rss-feeds more than five years? Very few I guess.
      If by "now" you mean over three years ago, then yes, RSS feeds didn't catch on until "now".
    2. Re:Calm down, it didn't catch on until now by The+Blow+Leprechaun · · Score: 1

      On the web portal I built for my university way back in 2000, we had RSS feeds from various sites (I believe we ommitted slashdot, feeling it was overhyped).

      --
      - the Blow Leprechaun
  37. HackerMedia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    http://www.hackermedia.org/ is similar to this, but focuses on hacking radio shows, tv shows, and news. It is updated in the same way, using RSS feeds as both the input, and also the output.

  38. Similar sites by hpcanswers · · Score: 5, Informative

    There are plenty of other sites just like this. There's popurls, which lists feeds from user-contributed sites like Slashdot along with more formalized sites like Google and Yahoo News. There's Diggdot.us, for Digg, Slashdot, and del.icio.us. There is Xtreme News, which includes Fark and the BBC. And then there is DiggLicious, which has live views of updates from a couple of obvious sites.

  39. How many? by hackwrench · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been using http://dailyrotation.com/ for quite a while now, and they've had lots of sites for quite a while as well. "Quite a while" in this case seems to be years. Does anyone else have any recollections?

    1. Re:How many? by Redlazer · · Score: 1
      I've been using Google's personalized home.

      Its very handy : )

      -Red

      --
      Guns don't kill people, "with glowing hearts" kills people.
  40. Wayback Machine Re:How many? by hackwrench · · Score: 2
    1. Re:Wayback Machine Re:How many? by G3ckoG33k · · Score: 1

      Thanks, it was quite a lot! Proof indeed.

      I note it is full of website names like: Codestyle, Ms. Geek, Robots Net, Geeknik, Geek Press, Hack In The Box, Hacker News, Slashdot, Segfault etc. They are perhaps expected to be early adopters? Still, it is a long list.

  41. Could be better by a55clown · · Score: 1

    If their links actually went to the original news story instead of a "buffer" page with a link to the full story, it would make life a bit easier. One less click to deal with. None of the news items I've clicked on actually had any pertinent information on them... only a short rewrite of the title it seems.

  42. I got a feeling this is yet another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashvertisment

  43. Well... by Sir+Unimaginative · · Score: 1

    Well, sorry I got you all killed.

    --
    The problem with your idea is that it makes sense.
    1. Re:Well... by jZnat · · Score: 1

      That's alright; hell has a great unfiltered 10GigE connection for every user. Too bad your upload is rate-limited to 64k... :(

      --
      'Yes, firefox is indeed greater than women. Can women block pops up for you? No. Can Firefox show you naked women? Yes.'
    2. Re:Well... by kirun · · Score: 1
      I'm quite sure hell uses ntl: access, a company notable for getting itself lower customer satisfaction ratings than BT, a paradox which would destroy the universe, except, as Douglas Adams once wrote:

      The officer's next point was that I wasn't in the universe, I was in England, a point that has been made to me before.
      --
      I'm scared of numbers that can't be written as a fraction. It's an irrational fear.
  44. There is some uses... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 1

    I use http://www.bloglines.com/, and have been for a while now. I pull in stuff from all sorts of differnt sources, into one page. Yep, same thing that you can do with Firefox.

    But - I can access Bloglines anywhere, on any machine, and I have access to my already customized list of news feeds and the stuff that I've marked for further reading later, etc. For some reason I keep finding myself needing the ability to access my stuff from multiple machines, so it works great for me. Especially nice since my Mac isn't very portable at the moment, and when my co-host and I set down at the local coffee shop (WiFi access and long island iced teas :-) and start going through news to see what's going to be on the show this week, we can both pull up our list of stuff that we've marked in Bloglines, and discuss it. Very nice.

    How many people actually need that sort of functionality? Eh. Not very many, really, since most people only have one machine to deal with (not talking about the /. crowd, people in general :-) where they would read thier RSS feeds anyway. So you're partially right - it's a bit of a business fad. It's got it's uses, but as a couple of sites that do it get popular, there's gonna end up being a whole bunch of sites, then the nitch market gets crowded, and 2/3rds of them just die. The rest will continue to exist for people like me who find a good use for it :-)

    (And, yeah, there's a bunch of other ways I could do it, including setting up setup for pulling all the RSS feeds down on my own server, and reading that. I might do that some day, when I have enough spare time. Bleh - got a lack of that.)

    Oh heck, and since I'm here and mentioned the show, here's a link - http://www.worldofgamerzone.com/. Only the first three episodes are up at the moment, which puts me 5 episodes behind the broadcasts. Need to find more hours in the day... :-)

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  45. The next big Slashdot joke? by Dachannien · · Score: 1

    When more of these type of programs are available, Slashdot will list them all, and will become an RSS Feed Feed Feed.

    Imagine an RSS feed of those!

    1. Re:The next big Slashdot joke? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wish I had mod points, that's actually quite funny

    2. Re:The next big Slashdot joke? by Kamineko · · Score: 1
  46. one of the million? by ens0niq · · Score: 1

    one of the million?

  47. www.vexocide.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I ran across www.vexocide.org some time ago. It's obviously still in a beta stage, but working nicely as an online rss reader

  48. How is this better than tabs? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What I don't get about RSS is that it doesn't seem to be any better than, say, just setting up the sites I want to get news from on a bookmark folder in Firefox and middle clicking to open them all in new tabs.

    Actually, tabs might be better since you usually get article summaries on most sites, rather than just headlines. And in the end, you probably need a browser to read the stories anyway. AdBlock cleans the page up for you too.

    Seriously, why is RSS better? For mobile phones? Do I want to read news on a tiny screen? Maybe if I commuted by public transport, but it's impossible where I live unfortunately.

    --
    const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
    SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    1. Re:How is this better than tabs? by MulluskO · · Score: 1

      yeah. I don't get it either. I have news and webcomics folders in my bookmarks, and I open the group as tabs each day.

      Then again, I never understood why people thought they wanted stuff emailed to them each day. Doesn't seem at all convenient to me.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    2. Re:How is this better than tabs? by ydrol · · Score: 1
      RSS in Firefox is not very exciting. However I've recently migrated from Firefox to Opera and it handles RSS much better
      • RSS headlines appear in a subject window similar to a mail/news reader.
      • Clicking on a RSS subject shows you the overview of the story without having to go to the website. Some sites even give the whole story. eg Daily WTF, although I dont know how this helps them with their ad-revenue!
      • Opera will notify you when new news has arrived on a particular feed, without having to keep looking at changing menus ala firefox. For example you can get automatic notifications when "stories" change on - ahem - vcdquality
      • Opera tracks which ones you've already read and shows a summary of unread news (ala any mail client)
      • Opera holds a history of stories until you delete them. (useful but also need an autoexpire feature unless I missed it somewhere)
      I've probably missed some other features, but the default Firefox RSS handling seems to do the whole concept a disservice.
    3. Re:How is this better than tabs? by jsled · · Score: 1
      What I don't get about RSS is that it doesn't seem to be any better than, say, just setting up the sites I want to get news from on a bookmark folder in Firefox and middle clicking to open them all in new tabs.

      I did that too, about 4 years ago. Then it grew to opening up 30 tabs, and having to a) recall what the previous web-page state was and b) identify if anything changed in a mix of differing, sometimes slow-to-load layouts. It was in competition with my slashboxes, which were quite novel and useful at the time. It was great, but then I discovered RSS.

      My current (bloglines) subscription list is 327 feeds. They range far and wide: tech commentary, comics, raw news, politics, beer/homebrewing, trashy entertinment, meta, gadget-pr0n, Vermont bloggers (both tech and not), new-music blogs... Not all of them change daily, but many do, so I usually spend about 1..2 hours a day reading stuff. For instance, while the BBC news feeds are pretty much constantly updating, the Netflix new-releases feed will dump about 100 new items every couple of weeks; I can scan through, add the few I want and be on my way.

      RSS is better because it's a change delivery mechanism, rather than a static content delivery mechanism (HTML). With an aggregator, it is far more efficient than doing change detection manually if the goal is to stay "current" with published content. Note that it has little to do with mobile devices, and many feeds are full-content (not just headline) feeds.

      Sites like that from TFA stopped being interesting a long time ago; the thing we need now is editors. Digg, /., Boing Boing, &c. work because they are actively filtered. They may have different strategies for editorial prioritization of stories. Planet aggregators (Planet GNOME, Planet Apache, ...) are still interesting as well because they're naturally filtered to a single topic. Simple feeds (of feeds)^N aren't interesting.

    4. Re:How is this better than tabs? by DavidTC · · Score: 1

      RSS feeds do make sense, but not the way a lot of people use them.

      I use them in two ways...I have them in Google, which is my start page, so a quick glance will tell me if anything interesting is happening. I don't actually even know if those are RSS, they're just the boxes Google provides. But I think I can put my own custom feeds in there, assuming I had one I wanted that Google didn't have.

      Then I have an RSS reader, that I use, basically, like a Usenet reader. It collects articles on a bunch of different feeds, and I go through and read them, or don't.

      Lots of epople seem to use RSS feeds in utterly weird ways that I don't understand what they're doing.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    5. Re:How is this better than tabs? by cecil_turtle · · Score: 1

      I don't like mail-style RSS reading like Opera has. If you do like Opera's RSS capability then you would be better off using Thunderbird's RSS features instead of Firefox - it's very similar to Opera's. There are however extensions for Firefox that load RSS into the browser's sidebar, which I prefer over all other methods (including Opera's). Check out the Sage and WizzRSS extensions.

    6. Re:How is this better than tabs? by AmiMoJo · · Score: 1

      I guess maybe this is the keep - you have to be a total news junkie to really want RSS. Reading the other replies suggests the same thing. I need to read BBC News once a day, Slashdot once a day etc. I have maybe six sites I want to check every day, and every day there is new content.

      Quite how anyone could care enough to need over 300 feeds is beyond me. I'm not having a go at you, I just don't understand. Even if each one only produced 1 headline per day, I wouldn't have time to check them all. For me, it's about finding the info I want quickly, not trawling millions of sites just to get a few tid-bits.

      I suppose maybe that's my biggest issue with RSS. It's a blunderbus for news. Maybe if it could somehow be inteligently filtered, but so far nothing I have seen is good enough.

      --
      const int one = 65536; (Silvermoon, Texture.cs)
      SJW, n: "Someone I don't like, and by the way I'm a fuckwit" - AC
    7. Re:How is this better than tabs? by jsled · · Score: 1

      True, there's something about both:

      a/ wanting a lot of new, varied information
      b/ not caring about skimming through a bunch of noise to pick out some signal.

      A good aggregator makes the second point simpler, but the *varied* part of the former is interesting. It's not about "news" necessarily. I gave the Netflix new releases example, and I just now added the Project Gutenberg newly-available ebooks feed. Some from the forums for a couple of hobbies. A couple of my feeds are new software updates. Multiple feeds of the recent changes of wiki articles: either wikipedia pages I want to make sure maintain correctness, or the GnuCash wiki where I want to see if *anything* changes. Some are (semi-)personal blogs of friends where I just want to see what changes in their lives. Gentoo Linux News, CERT Advisories, new RFCs, ...

      We can easily see the day when common devices -- refridgerators, washing machines, tivo, &c. will have a feed for status. That gets into the filtering and intelligent aggregation aspect, and into The Future, but it's the direction we're headed.

      328 is a lot of feeds, granted. But I think the tipping point of "just open them in a bunch of tabs" vs. "aggregator" is around 30 sites. If only because at that point, the tab widths are too small to see which site is which. :) Also, the time wasted in checking the sites that didn't have any changes becomes too great (depending, of course, on how often Your Favorite Sites change).

    8. Re:How is this better than tabs? by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      In Safari RSS you can set up a group of RSS feeds, show them all by date, by title, by keyword or just filter them with a search... so say you have 40 science feeds and you want to see if there's anything new in nano tech... (given that you've created a bookmark folder and put all the feeds in it) you can just click on 'show all feeds' in this folder... then use the search box to filter it on 'nano' or some other keyword... then adjust what you want to see with the content length slider (let's you see title, short summary, long summary or anything in between) and if there's a photo it shows as well. You can also set it to see today's feeds, all week or all feeds...

      This is a quick way to look for something to read, get up to date on news headlines or whatever... in any case it is much faster and better than tabs or some other method of viewing 40 website news listings at once, sorted by date, categorized prior and filtered by a keyword.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  49. Whats so special by Krishna+Dagli · · Score: 2, Informative

    I fail to see whats so special about the site? Have a look at http://www.newsonfeeds.com/faq/aggregators

  50. ...And there's one for the Swedes too (Ichigo.se) by zalt · · Score: 1

    For those of us who understand the Swedish language there's always http://www.ichigo.se/ (it's been around for a couple of years now).

    It does the same thing as SiliconNews but along with feeds from Slashdot/OSNews/Digg/Del.icio.us and such there's quite a bunch of Swedish feeds. And it looks pretty too.

  51. Little Site of Horrors by bdwoolman · · Score: 1

    Feed me...... Feeeeeeeeeeeed me. I'm hungry. I want NEWS. Aaaaaaaaaaaagh!

    --
    "No fear. No envy. No meanness." Liam Clancy
  52. Have you seen Daily Rotation? by MadJim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Daily Rotation is a headline site. It can also be customized.

  53. Re:Is this really a news story? Or just an ad? by shokk · · Score: 1

    Woohoo. You can aggregate feeds with a number of readers like MonkeyChow (http://www.monkeychow.org).
    If you really want to see RSS feeds from too many web sites, just load it up and watch yourself be overloaded by the "River of Information". Or just be sane and pick the few you really want to read.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  54. Re:One up! by shokk · · Score: 1

    Wow, that tool sucks. Go for the MonkeyChow, dude.

    --
    "Beware of he who would deny you access to information, for in his heart, he dreams himself your master."
  55. Really no comparison, or "Try it, you'll like it." by MisterSquid · · Score: 1

    An RSS reader is better if you want to automate the checking of those sites you're interested in. You don't have to keep refreshing; the RSS aggregator does it for you and, depending on your client, can alert you if there is new content.

    This saves you the trouble of loading a new set of tabs and finding no new content. RSS readers are very good with infrequently updated pages. RSS readers also keep you up to date on frequently updated pages because you will be notified of new content once your reader discovers it. RSS readers also are easier to scan content with. I find myself not getting sucked in by story summaries. For many types of news, the headline is enough. In my case, using an RSS reader has cut my surfing time by 75% (as near as I can tell and without exaggeration.)

    Finally, some RSS feeds include summaries, others excerpts, and some even the entire article. The amount of information you get depends on the level of detail the feed publisher chooses to provide.

    I myself was scratching my own head about RSS readers and so decided to make an effort to see what the hoopdehaw was all about. I blogged about two Mac-based RSS readers (one of them free like beer) and haven't looked back. In fact, I so much prefer surfing by feed that I don't surf without access to an RSS reader. Just thinking about sifting through all the articles, say, on the front page of the NYTimes is fatiguing.

    That mental fatigue is the result of the facts that, unlike RSS readers, web pages do not expire older articles as quickly as most RSS feed readers (with their default settings) and that most sites provide no way for you to flag an article for later attention or to mark an article as read.

    The short version is try an RSS reader (I mention a few Windows-based clients at the bottom of the above-mentioned blog entry) and see for yourself if loading up Firefox tabs gives you comparable functionality. An RSS reader is one of those things like chat. Trying to explain why chat is in some ways preferable to email gets nowhere fast. You have to try it to understand what is so great about it.

    --
    blog
  56. The real purpose of aggregators -- people you know by ClioCJS · · Score: 1
    My parents are not too savvy and can't really handle RSS subscriptions. But I could go to their house and set up Google Reader for them manually. But, I have many RSS feeds (flickr, blog, blog comments, flickr comments, youtube, del.icio.us, wife's blog, wife's blog comments, wife's flickr, wife's flickr comments, wife's youtube, etc).

    I would much rather give my parents a single feed that encapsulates everything my wife & I do.

    When I add a new source or remove an existing source, my parents (and any other disciples) now have to edit their descriptions. But if they had used an aggregated feed, I would simply modify that feed, and everyone down the tube would automatically have the information I want.

    This is what RSS aggregation is actually useful for.

    Now the question is, which do I use? I experimented with several ( http://del.icio.us/ClintJCL/RSS+aggregator ) and didn't like any of them. Could someone suggest a better one for my purposes? thanks

    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  57. erm... and? by Mike+Peel · · Score: 1

    erm... and? My site, KickRSS, has been doing something similar for over a year now. It's far from alone - there's at least a dozen that I've come across (although none did quite what I wanted - merging multiple feeds, and outputting them as both an aggregated RSS feed and as a webpage that doesn't need a login).

  58. popurls by okravetz · · Score: 1

    another site that does the same thing, but, I think, looks better is popurls.com. That's actually where I linked to this article from.

  59. There are some reason to do this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This makes sense for sites that change often and you might want to filter the feed content. This site filters deal posting forums rss feeds for content you want and creates a single rss feed: http://www.dealwatcher.biz/

  60. Rss Mashups by sigma3dz · · Score: 0

    There are many mashups re-mixing RSS. Look at this one http://www.rss-channel.com/