They should need no license to use the "public" airwaves. The airwaves should be privately owned and traded just like land. The immorality of the state owning the airwaves does not justify the state threatening to destroy a private business if they do not act in the public good as it is perceived by some bureaucrats.
The federal government gives money to (and takes money from) practically everyone. If that's your standard for judging if someone should be subject to force by the state, we'd all be slaves. The fact that the government gives out money to everyone makes it necessary to take that money whenever it is offered to you lest you lose out to a competitor that took it. If you don't want to be in this sort of moral quandary, have the state stop redistributing your wealth to everyone else.
If you don't like their terms, don't sign their contract. They're not your slaves and have no moral obligation to offer your favorite price structure. Use another service. I do.
An iMac isn't overpriced, it plays games fine, and it actually retains its value quite well so you can sell it to someone under Applecare and get a new system rather cheaply.
The upper bound though is a result of the PID limit, not because the scheduler itself has some incremental algorithm with clearly-defined time bounds. If the PID limit were to be increased, the maximum time taken by the scheduler would increase logarithmically. Claiming that some data structure will exhibit O(1) performance just because you artificially limit how many things can be stored in it doesn't make much sense. You may be right that this argument is not new, but if that's the case, it seems unfortunate.
If it's a red-black tree, it's O(2 ln(N)). The fact that N never gets too big has nothing to do with it. It is... disturbing... to hear this from someone like Ingo. I also have no idea where ~20-21 came from, as the maximum depth at four million is higher than that.
What? Why is this modded up? Building a kit car based on another isn't like copying a CD-R... the correct analogy would me making your own knockoff movie.
Start my own? But then I'd have to develop a business plan, work to get venture capital, and work 15 hours a day to get it off the ground! Can't someone else just come in and tell someone else that already did that what they're allowed to do with their business?
Why not test... you know... proper headphones? I've heard the Shure earbuds and honestly think they're crap. Even $300 Ultimate Ears are eaten by $100 Grados... which isn't saying much given my ambivalence towards Grado phones.
A very clear choice -- He has stated repeatedly that he does not want to regulate the internet in any way. (Most of his other views, immigration not withstanding, are sensible as well.)
Is there anyone here that would actually claim "improved cinematics" can make a game more fun? None of my favorite games (Fallout, STALKER, Civ) have anything approaching fantastic cinematics, yet they're still brilliant. This is an example of everything that's wrong with games nowadays.
Slashdot Mirror
They should need no license to use the "public" airwaves. The airwaves should be privately owned and traded just like land. The immorality of the state owning the airwaves does not justify the state threatening to destroy a private business if they do not act in the public good as it is perceived by some bureaucrats.
The federal government gives money to (and takes money from) practically everyone. If that's your standard for judging if someone should be subject to force by the state, we'd all be slaves. The fact that the government gives out money to everyone makes it necessary to take that money whenever it is offered to you lest you lose out to a competitor that took it. If you don't want to be in this sort of moral quandary, have the state stop redistributing your wealth to everyone else.
If you don't like their terms, don't sign their contract. They're not your slaves and have no moral obligation to offer your favorite price structure. Use another service. I do.
The FCC is completely out of line here.
Or just pick it up and throw it out the window.
I've thought "damn hippies" ever since seeing the hysteria they try to throw people into over nuclear power.
An iMac isn't overpriced, it plays games fine, and it actually retains its value quite well so you can sell it to someone under Applecare and get a new system rather cheaply.
*ahem* Carry on then!
Whatever happened to the word "oriented"? I'll have to conversate with someone about this.
VOOOOOOOOOOOOOSH
They are absolutely *the best* input device. I love my turbo mouse (or expert mouse as it is now). Their customer support is also amazing!
The upper bound though is a result of the PID limit, not because the scheduler itself has some incremental algorithm with clearly-defined time bounds. If the PID limit were to be increased, the maximum time taken by the scheduler would increase logarithmically. Claiming that some data structure will exhibit O(1) performance just because you artificially limit how many things can be stored in it doesn't make much sense. You may be right that this argument is not new, but if that's the case, it seems unfortunate.
If it's a red-black tree, it's O(2 ln(N)). The fact that N never gets too big has nothing to do with it. It is... disturbing... to hear this from someone like Ingo. I also have no idea where ~20-21 came from, as the maximum depth at four million is higher than that.
What? Why is this modded up? Building a kit car based on another isn't like copying a CD-R... the correct analogy would me making your own knockoff movie.
Start my own? But then I'd have to develop a business plan, work to get venture capital, and work 15 hours a day to get it off the ground! Can't someone else just come in and tell someone else that already did that what they're allowed to do with their business?
This is nice, thank you.
The difference, of course, is that naim is horrible. And it's console-based, not command-line.
If you want a very lightweight text-based IM client for *nix, try bsflite. I've been very happy with it.
You really are a miserable cunt! Reevaluate how you perceive the world.
You miserable cunt.
Aye. I have a pair of AKG 270s myself that I quite like.
Why not test... you know... proper headphones? I've heard the Shure earbuds and honestly think they're crap. Even $300 Ultimate Ears are eaten by $100 Grados... which isn't saying much given my ambivalence towards Grado phones.
A very clear choice -- He has stated repeatedly that he does not want to regulate the internet in any way. (Most of his other views, immigration not withstanding, are sensible as well.)
Correctly.
Good point.
Is there anyone here that would actually claim "improved cinematics" can make a game more fun? None of my favorite games (Fallout, STALKER, Civ) have anything approaching fantastic cinematics, yet they're still brilliant. This is an example of everything that's wrong with games nowadays.