Slashdot Mirror


Spaceballs Animated Series in Production

Keith Russell writes "CNN is reporting that production has started on Spaceballs: The Animated Series, which will start a 13-episode run on G4 next year. Brooks himself will provide the voices of 'two characters', although they don't mention Yogurt or President Skroob by name." From the article: "Like the 1987 movie, which parodied well-known science-fiction movies, 'Spaceballs: The Animated Series' will spoof current blockbusters as well as every genre of entertainment from movies and reality TV to culture and politics. It is set to debut on cable network G4 in fall 2007. Production has already started on an initial batch of 13 episodes."

32 of 176 comments (clear)

  1. KEWL! by $RANDOMLUSER · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now maybe we'll finally get to see "Jews in Outer Space".

    --
    No folly is more costly than the folly of intolerant idealism. - Winston Churchill
    1. Re:KEWL! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      We're jews!
      We're jews in space!
      We're zooming around defending the hebrew race!

  2. Further detail. by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Informative

    This version does specify Yogurt and Skroob.

  3. recursion by User+956 · · Score: 4, Funny

    'Spaceballs: The Animated Series' will spoof current blockbusters as well as every genre of entertainment from movies and reality TV to culture and politics.

    But will it spoof the spoof genre? Or is that like crossing the streams?

    --
    The theory of relativity doesn't work right in Arkansas.
    1. Re:recursion by da3dAlus · · Score: 3, Funny

      Right. That's bad. Okay. All right. Important safety tip. Thanks, Egon.

      --

      Sometimes I doubt your commitment to Sparkle Motion.
    2. Re:recursion by Mikya · · Score: 5, Funny

      But will it spoof the spoof genre? Or is that like crossing the streams?

      I would say it's more like jumping the shark.

  4. Finally a sequel... by RiskyChris · · Score: 5, Funny

    The search for more money?

    1. Re:Finally a sequel... by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Spaceballs III, the search for Spaceballs II.

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
  5. Animated series.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    That sucks... no wait, now it blows.

  6. ObQuote by Randolpho · · Score: 4, Funny

    SPACEBALLS??!?

    Oh, shit! There goes the planet.

    --
    "Times have not become more violent. They have just become more televised."
    -Marilyn Manson
  7. only if his schwartz is as big a smine. by Brigadier · · Score: 2, Insightful



    Thats a classic, figured it woudl ony be a matter a time given the star treck prequels. Think of all the bad acting that they can make fun of.

  8. Re:Poor Mel Brooks by Rob+T+Firefly · · Score: 4, Informative

    Yeah, that whole multiple-award-winning, multi-bazillion-dollar-earning "The Producers" musical must have really ruined the guy. He must be crying himself to sleep in his money bin.

  9. Hollywood needs to close for a few years by hsmith · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Till they can come up with a new idea.

    1. Re:Hollywood needs to close for a few years by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Hollywood needs to close for a few years Till they can come up with a new idea.

      You've got to remember that these are just simple actors, directors, producers and gaffers. These are people of the land. The common clay of the new West. You know... morons.

    2. Re:Hollywood needs to close for a few years by Myself · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The idiots who patronize Hollywood need to boycott them for a few years, until they come up with some new ideas, and a new profit model.

      Take the amount of money you spent on Hollywood movies during the last year (tickets, DVDs, rentals, merchandise) and divide it by the amount of money you gave to EFF and ACLU in the last year. This is your Hypocrisy Quotient.
      • If it's less than or equal to 1, thank you.
      • If it's between 1 and 3, your heart's in the right place but your wallet is weak.
      • If it's greater than 3, kindly wear a bright "I sponsored the DMCA!" t-shirt when you attend the Defcon Shoot.
  10. Merchandising! by bricklayer · · Score: 4, Funny

    Any news on Spaceballs: The Flamethrower?

  11. Whatever happened to Spaceballs sequel? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What ever happened to the Spaceballs sequel that was announced a couple years ago?

    Mel Brooks Writing Spaceballs Sequel
    Source: Ain't-It-Cool-News
    September 28, 2004


    In a Q&A with Playbill magazine, Mel Brooks says that he's currently working on a Spaceballs sequel. Here's the clip from the interview which starts off by talking about the big screen adaptation of The Producers.

    Playbill: Will you have a role in it?

    MB: It's doubtful, but I'm writing myself back into the Spaceballs sequel that I'm now writing, so you haven't seen the last of my face. Why another Spaceballs? It wouldn't feel right have anyone else play Yoghurt and the first one was the best experience I've had making a movie since Blazing Saddles.

    Playbill: When can we expect that?

    MB: Best case scenario: a week before the new Star Wars opens. Worst Case Scenario: a year after the new star wars opens.

  12. Development by Enderandrew · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Brooks has said for years he wanted to do a Spaceballs sequel, and incorporate the prequels. Studios have been pushing for a TV show so they could spoof other fandoms and pull in more people. Specifically they kept demanding a LotR spoof, which I'm not sure how well that fits in the Spaceballs universe. But LotR makes huge money, and Lords of the G-Strings is a very weak parody (and porn for that matter). So someone has to do it.

    Given budget limitations and Brook's age, a cartoon seems like the best way to cut back on the costs of all the new locations, space sequences, etc.

    --
    http://blindscribblings.com - Tasty pop-culture in conceptual fashion.
    1. Re:Development by StumpMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I remember hearing once that the movie's name was to be Spaceballs 3: The Search for Spaceballs 2. At the time the big movie in theaters was Kevin Costners "Prince of Theives". Brooks dropped the script and wrote "Men in Tights" instead.

  13. Re:Poor Mel Brooks The Producers LOST MONEY by sinner6 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.boxofficemojo.com/movies/?id=producers. htm Made $38,054,424 Cost $45 million Net loss $7 Million I wish I had 7 million to lose. I assume the play is doing better, but how much of cut of that is he getting? I don't think playwrites get very much in the way of royalties.

  14. Packaging for the DVDs by SecretAsianMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is wonderful news. I have long held that Spaceballs is one of mankind's greatest comedic achievements. Finally, there will be new material! This fanboy is excited.

    ...

    And when they release the DVD box set, it better come in Spaceballs: The Lunchbox!

    --

    Washington, DC: It's like Hollywood for ugly people.

  15. A quote from Spaceballs comes to mind..... by 8127972 · · Score: 4, Funny

    .... As I read this:

    Barf: I know we need the money, but...

    Lone Starr: Listen! We're not just doing this for money... We're doing it for a SHIT LOAD of money!

    Barf: Oh, you're right. And when you're right, you're right. And you - you're always right.

    --
    This is my opinion. To make sure you don't steal it, it's covered by the DMCA.
  16. Step up by nedwidek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually compared to what is on G4, this may be a step up in quality.

    --
    Post anonymously - For when your opinion embarrasses even you!
  17. She's gone from suck to blow by tokki · · Score: 2, Funny

    Fuck! Even in the future nothing works!

  18. Is the sequel dead? by BobSutan · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    "On a scale from 1 to 10, people are stupid"
  19. Or proudly command... by ab0mb88 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep firing, assholes!

    That seems to be the plan currently.

  20. Re:Poor Mel Brooks The Producers LOST MONEY by lucabrasi999 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The problem with the producers movie: What works in theatre *DOES NOT* work on film. Repeat it with me, WHAT WORKS IN THEATRE DOES NOT WORK ON FILM!!! The producers movie was a fairly accurate recreation of the producers brodway production. Matthew Broderick's sniveling character just did't work on film.

    You are forgetting that the Broadway Play was simply an accurate recreation of the 1968 ORIGINAL Movie (starring Zero Mostel and Gene Wilder). And, Gene Wilder's sniveling character did work on film.

    For the record, I thought the 2005 version of the movie was pretty good. Mel had to update some of the jokes for 2005, (but he kept the 'blonde bombshell'). Very funny. He also wrote a couple of pretty good new songs.

  21. You're obviously lost by RLiegh · · Score: 2, Funny

    The "googling for ATM passwords" article is further down the page.

  22. Had enough quotes yet? by ArcherB · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ludicrus speed!

    When?
    Now.
    Now-Now?

    Comb the desert...

    It's gone from suck to blow...

    Mog...Half man, half dog. I'm my own best friend.

    --
    There is no "I disagree" mod for a reason. Flamebait, Troll, and Overrated are not substitutes.
  23. Re:Poor Mel Brooks The Producers LOST MONEY by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Go rent the 1968 original version -- which was not an adaptation of a stage play, but was written specifically for the screen.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  24. Merchandising question by cyberfunkr · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's a little known bit of trivia, but when Mel Brooks went to George Lucas asking permission to make the parody (not required but all the cool guys do it) George said sure, on one condition: You can't make any Spaceballs merchandise. Why? Because as pointed out in the movie, "Merchandising, merchandising, where the real money from the movie is made." George didn't want to lose out on a Star Wars lightsaber sale for a Spaceballs-the lightsaber sale.

    That's why it's so heavily referenced in the movie; Spaceballs-the T-shirt, Spaceballs-the Coloring Book, Spaceballs-the flame thrower, Spaceballs-the towel, Spaceballs-the etc. Because they can't (couldn't) actually make a single item.

    So does that same limitation exist? Could "Spaceballs-the animated series" be considered merchandising? Or did they get a new deal for parodying "Star Wars, the animated series" without limitations?

    1. Re:Merchandising question by geekoid · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Or maybe they told George to blow himself.

      You go to someone out of Curtesy and they start putting limitations on you.

      Screw 'em.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect