Google Relents, Publishes Belgian Ruling
gambit3 writes "Google on Saturday published on its Belgian website a court order which forbids the Internet search engine to reproduce snippets of Belgian press on its news amalgamation service. The move constituted a u-turn as Google had said on Friday that it would not comply with the court order despite facing a fine of 500,000 euros ($640,900) daily if it did not publish the ruling." From the article: "Google said its service is lawful and drives traffic to newspaper sites because people need to click through to the original publisher to read the full story. It now displays stories from news agencies, foreign newspapers and Internet sites belonging to local television stations."
But I'm petty like that. I mean how much ad revenue can Belgium possibly add to their bottom line? Kill Google.be and news.google.be, block all known IP ranges from Belgium and throw them to a redirect that says "No google for you!"
"Where quality is like a dead stinking rat - you just can't miss it."
Indexing would be fine and fair use. But that isn't what Google does. It copies wholesale and republishes what it copied (via it's cache feature). While the world+dog may think Google is a great and super useful tool, it doesn't change the fact that it is also is based on the assumption that they can do any damn thing they want with other people's content. But as always, free content is more important than protecting the content's owners rights to commercially exploit it, at least on Slashdot.
Go Google. King of evil.
If only Google would have made an equally strong stand when China ordered it to apply political censorship.