AOL Subscribers Sue Over Release Of Search Data
An anonymous reader points out an AP story indicating that AOL hasn't seen the end of its own public embarrassment after airing some dirty laundry on behalf of its customers. Excerpted from the story: "Three AOL subscribers who suddenly found records of their Internet searches widely distributed online are suing the company under privacy laws and are seeking an end to its retention of search-related data ... The lawsuit is believed to be the first in the wake of AOL's intentional release of some 19 million search requests made over a three-month period by more than 650,000 subscribers. ... Filed Friday in U.S. District Court in Oakland, Calif., the lawsuit seeks class-action status. It does not specify the amount of damages being sought."
1) Scaring other ISPs and related companies into better privacy safeguards
2) Hastening the timely demise of AOL
They must have been the only 3 AOLers who met both of these conditions:
a) They weren't searching for "hot kiddie lolita horse love" and were consequently unafraid of that search rearing its ugly head in open court.
b) They were aware enough of the wider internet to know their data had been released in the first place and the implications thereof.
Three? Yeah, that sounds about right.
1000 free hours of AOL!
http://www.aolsearchdatabase.com/search.php?page=1 &textfield=&textfield2=cancel%20aol
Hm. Now that you mentioned it, it got me curious so I tried it.
I entered my SSN into Google.
It replied with "-1635"
If the masses can keep you down, you're not the Ubermensch.
It's the company that makes Winamp. They used to be in the free backup diskette business.
3) making people aware of what their ISP / anyone with (or even without) a search warrant, can find out about them by just combining their non-anonymous search history.
molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling