Slashdot Mirror


Intel Pledges 80 Core Processor in 5 Years

ZonkerWilliam writes "Intel has developed an 80 core processor with claims 'that can perform a trillion floating point operations per second.'" From the article: "CEO Paul Otellini held up a silicon wafer with the prototype chips before several thousand attendees at the Intel Developer Forum here on Tuesday. The chips are capable of exchanging data at a terabyte a second, Otellini said during a keynote speech. The company hopes to have these chips ready for commercial production within a five-year window."

24 of 439 comments (clear)

  1. Ok, it HAS to be said... by Daniel_Staal · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...Imagine a Beowolf cluster of those!

    (Runs in shame.)

    --
    'Sensible' is a curse word.
    1. Re:Ok, it HAS to be said... by diersing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Finally, a platform that will run Vista.... RTM Bill, RTM!

    2. Re:Ok, it HAS to be said... by NiceRoundNumber · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...Imagine a Beowolf cluster of those!

      I never petaflop I didn't like.

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of letting other people have your way.
    3. Re:Ok, it HAS to be said... by ePhil_One · · Score: 3, Funny
      Only maniacs are going to wait five years to buy a new computer because of this announcement.

      Personally I'm going to wait for 2013 when the 160 core CPU's are finally out. Only a fool will be in 5 years

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    4. Re:Ok, it HAS to be said... by Korin43 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pfft.. 2003. I'm gonna wait until 2020 when they finally merge them all back into one fast core.

    5. Re:Ok, it HAS to be said... by Poltras · · Score: 2, Funny
      "This Trojan necessitates DirectX 12. Want me to install it, Skipper?"

      no thanks....

  2. OH SHI- by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But it still can't tell me 1/0.

    1. Re:OH SHI- by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Funny

      It can give you 1000 trillion arithmetic exceptions per second.

      --
      My other first post is car post.
  3. So... by dark_15 · · Score: 3, Funny

    This will finally run Vista, right??? Maybe? Hopefully?

    --
    Unto the upright there arises light in the darkness...
    1. Re:So... by kfg · · Score: 5, Funny

      This will finally run Vista, right?

      And get here ahead of it, so we'll be ready.

      KFG

  4. 80 cores processor by Refelian · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's hot!

    (/ducks)

  5. Gillette Razor Joke.. by SevenHands · · Score: 5, Funny

    In other news, Gillette pledges a razor with 81 micro blades. 80 blades are individually controlled via Intel's new 80 core processor. The 81st blade is available just because..

  6. ...in the next 5 years. by pjludlow · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just in time for Vista!

  7. Re:Shame BeOS Died... by mindsuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    This 80-core processor would probably also benefit from the is_computer_on_fire() syscall available on BeOS.

    --
    --- I w00t, therefore I'm l33t.
  8. I guess the new saying will be... by GreatBunzinni · · Score: 2, Funny

    640 cores ought to be enough for everybody

    --
    Slashdot, fix your code or at least hire someone who is competent at it to do it for you.
    1. Re:I guess the new saying will be... by Prof.Phreak · · Score: 2, Funny

      640 cores ought to be enough for everybody

      Wait till per-core licensing becomes popular :-)

      --

      "If anything can go wrong, it will." - Murphy

  9. Re:Hey now... by myurr · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wicked... hmmm.... a castle full of nubile virgins all asking me to spank them?

  10. Re:Hey now... by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2, Funny

    like a bus architecture that can actually keep up with present performance levels?

    There's nothing wrong with bus architecture in my opinion.

    I stand at the stop, the digital sign says the bus will be along in 4 minutes.

    4 minutes later the bus turns up.

    I don't see what the problem is.

  11. $$$ for Oracle by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 5, Funny

    You fools! Do you have any clue how much Oracle licenses will cost for this thing?

  12. In other news.. by loconet · · Score: 2, Funny

    WASHINGTON (Reuters) In lights of Intel's 80 Core Processor pledge in 5 Years, scientists are worried that Richard Branson's pledge is now too little too late.

    --
    [alk]
  13. Re:History repeats itself by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Actually, you forgot one crucial thing.

    The Intel 80 core chip won't actually be 80 cores, but rather 20 quad cores duct taped together.

  14. I Ernie by tritium6 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Smart voice recognition? Anyone tried it lately? Anyone tried to write pretty standard letters with it? Desastrous.

    lol

  15. Re:Shame BeOS Died... by tpv · · Score: 2, Funny
    They were jokes in the actual libraries.

    As was: typedef enum {
    B_BEBOX_PLATFORM = 0, B_MAC_PLATFORM, B_AT_CLONE_PLATFORM,
    B_ENIAC_PLATFORM, B_APPLE_II_PLATFORM, B_CRAY_PLATFORM, B_LISA_PLATFORM,
    B_TI_994A_PLATFORM, B_TIMEX_SINCLAIR_PLATFORM, B_ORAC_1_PLATFORM, B_HAL_PLATFORM

    } platform_type;

    --
    Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  16. The More Things Change.... by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 3, Funny
    I'm gonna wait until 2020 when they finally merge them all back into one fast core.
    They'll call it a "Bose-Wintel condensate". Instructions will be sent to the single core, but there will be no way of distinguishing which of the merged cell cores the instructions was run on. This will play havoc with floating point precision, but as Intel commented, "most users don't need that kind of precision anyway".

    The condensated core will also be subject to the laws of quantum mechanics in that, before a program has finished running, there will be no way to know if it will crash or not. Microsoft plans to leverage this to further stablise their latest version of Windows. Security experts worried about the onboard "Quantum-Threading" technology redirecting portions of thread output randomly to other threads, were dismissed as not being "forward looking".

    Meanwhile, AMDs new 1W, 128 core, 4098bit chip with 1GB L2 cache retails for almost 50% higher than Intel's Bose-Wintel chips, and has seen sluggish sales since the arrival of the new technology, despite its lower running cost that the 5MW Intel chip. When asked for comment, AMD's spokesman added; "Ch@#&t!! What the f**k is wrong with you people!??! Our chips save you money!! F@#*&^g cheapskates!!!"

    Upon hearing the news, Linux founder and lead developer Linus Torvalds(51) said: "We're not rewriting the kernel for that monstrosity." Intel representative declared that the company was "dissapointed" in Torvald's remarks. Apple cofounder Steve Jobs(65), when asked whether Apple intended to release a the new Mac based on the chipset, declined to comment as he went about his daily 5km morning run. Apple pundits widely believe that the new Mac will run on a quad core Bose-Wintel Condensate, and to complement this will sport a blazing white, ultra smooth case made out of Bose-Einstien condensate, the fifth phase of matter.

    In a related story, Microsoft cofounder Bill Gates(65), assaulted a technology reporter at a company press conference disccusing the new chip. Details are sketchy, but reports mention that one of Mr Gates older quotes about appropriate amounts of computer memory was brought up. Remond police have declined to comment on the case.
    --
    May the Maths Be with you!