Slashdot Mirror


Helping Surfers Sidestep Site Registration

netbuzz writes, "PrefPass, a startup debuting at DEMO today, is looking to do for the onerous Web site registration process what Amazon has done for shopping: one click and you get the goods. If it catches on, sites requiring full registration may feel the heat." Looks like sites will have an incentive to implement PrefPass; it's not antagonistic to their interests in the way Bugmenot is.

16 of 91 comments (clear)

  1. Attempted before? by daveschroeder · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Hasn't this been attempted before, with the likes of PassPort, and other numerous "universal" single-signon type things that have attempted to partner with commercial sites, and so on?

    It says it's different from PassPort, and I agree, but I fail to see why this would have any more success.

    1. Re:Attempted before? by MBCook · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you read the article it explains the difference. While Passport is a full login (that can hold things like Credit Card numbers and such) this just holds information about what you like and your name, stuff like that. For all intents and purposes you are still anonymous, but they can customize content so that you are more likely to read it using the information you provide.

      Compare that to Passport who is basically giving a site a biography on your if you use it.

      --
      Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
    2. Re:Attempted before? by KillerCow · · Score: 4, Funny

      this just holds information about what you like and your name, stuff like that. For all intents and purposes you are still anonymous

      I think that your definition of "anonymous" is different from most people's.

    3. Re:Attempted before? by John+Hasler · · Score: 3, Insightful

      anonymous@example.com is a member. His "fav" site is www.example.com

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  2. Don't the sites want the demographic info? by khasim · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I thought (correct me if I'm wrong) that the reason those sites want your age / sex / location was for demographics (for marketing and such).

    If they just want to personalize your page, a cookie should be sufficient.

    So, if this tool allows me to login to multiple sites, but with faked info, I don't see the sites going for it.

  3. Registration for what? by TheWoozle · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I hate sites that require registration to access "free" content. Either publish your content to your "free" website, or charge me for it. I shouldn't have to tell you anything about myself to get access.

    I know I'm jaded and cynical, but how much of the information that is entered into web site registration pages is genuine, anyway?

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
    1. Re:Registration for what? by windowpain · · Score: 3, Funny

      When the checkout chick at Linens 'n Things asks me for my phone number I always answer, "What's the use? You'll never call me. You never do. I wait by the phone night after night hoping and praying but it never rings. Stop teasing me."

      --
      Insert witty sig here.
  4. PrefPass for PrefPass by MojaveHigh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can I use PrefPass to avoid registration for PrefPass?

    1. Re:PrefPass for PrefPass by WoLpH · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They invented BugMeNot for that ;)

  5. Re:passport? by jjeffries · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know it's weird, but...

    I love the way you say "passport".

    C'mon, won't you say it again?

    mmmmmm.... passport... it's just such a beautiful word...

    passport...

    passport!

  6. No password? by CurbyKirby · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A Web-based service, the PrefPass registration itself requires only two pieces of information from a user: an e-mail address and the URL of a first Web site or feed in which the user is interested.

    So if you're only identified by an already public identifier (that being your email address), what's to prevent people from messing around with other people's preferences? Cookies can be lost by the legitimiate user and spoofed by an attacker. IP-based filering doesn't work for different users behind a common firewall. I wonder how they can get by without some sort of password. I wish they had a technical FAQ to go along with their press release.

    --

    --
    "Extra Anus Kills Four-Legged Chick" -- Headline
  7. No surprises here by rts008 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just another vehicle to serve up even more advertising.

    FTA: "In exchange, users agree to let PrefPass sites access their pref lists, thus allowing them to customize the experience, as well target advertising to the user."

    I'll stick with BugMeNot, thank you.

    --
    Down With Slashdot BETA!!! I've been around the corner and seen the oliphant; you can only abuse me from your perspecti
  8. Wrong Name for it! by misterhypno · · Score: 3, Insightful

    PrefPass should be something like PassTheInfo, HandItOverToHackers or, maybe TARGET.

    Because that's what it's going to become if the public and the corporations actually start using this thing.

    One Big Target. Hackers start your engines...!

    Lee Darrow, C.H.

  9. You may wish to RTFA... by Penguinisto · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Umm, unless your email addy and bookmarks list is enough for someone to take out credit in your name, I sincerely doubt that...

    I honestly don't see an easy way for spammers to cull this thing (unless they bust into the PrefPass servers, I suppose).

    /P

    --
    Quo usque tandem abutere, Nimbus, patientia nostra?
  10. To Hell with What They Want by PopeRatzo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I could not care much less for what sites want when they try to collect my demographic information. More often then not, it is directly the opposite of my own desires and preferences. I go to a site to read an article, check a price, or a score, or the day's news. I will look at an advertisement under protest, but I will not willingly give them ammunition to bother me outside of my interaction with their site.

    When a site asks for my personal information just so I can see their advertisements on my way to reading the morning's news, I have no problem at all about lying to them. I give a fake name, a fake zip code and a fake email.

    If they require an email authorization, I use a spamcatcher account that is created with fake information.

    Since when are we required to acquiesce to the wishes of the corporate world just for the privelege of purchasing and using their products? Since when do I have to provide correct personal information just to get the day's weather forecast?

    It's the same thing when I go to a Best Buy or Radio Shack and they ask for my zip code or last name. Maybe down the line if they figure out that people are lying to them they'll stop asking.

    I'm starting to believe that the next few decades will be marked by the traditional business/customer relationship being replaced by a much more combative, adversarial interaction between the individual and the corporation. It will be to nobody's benefit, but it seems that there are few ways to discourage real assholes. I'm sure those of us who still believe in the primacy of the individual and privacy in general will become inventive in coming up with more ways to thwart these "business" people who believe they have ownership rights over our lives. It's time to balance the scales a bit, I think.

    --
    You are welcome on my lawn.
  11. My Thought... by Kaenneth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There could be a standard HTTP header field defined.

    Call it 'X-Demographics'

    Contents would be of the form

    "X-Demographics: Age/28, Location/Seattle, Sex/Male, Occupation/Programmer"

    All free-form and user selected, with browsers offering a dialog where users can set common information, and choose when/where to send it.

    Servers must not require the info, and must accept invalid data without dying ( "Age -1/Location The Moon/Sex Yes Please" ) but if provided, they can customize their content/advertising.

    Sure, users might deliberatly provide false data, but they would do that anyway with a 'log on' form; and if you don't want to provide it, you don't (default in a browsers should be nothing sent without user approval) and browsers should be able to control which sites get sent what data. Even a simple mechanism, such as the first time you visit a site, do not send data, but if you return to the site later, then send it.

    Details of parsing are trivial (I know, not really), once a standard basic layout and header field name is chosen, I'm going for something like the 'Accept:' field format.

    I don't mind reasonable advertisments, but as an example, as a guy, I really have no interest in tampon ads, and I doubt the tampon companies want to spend their advertising dollars on me.