Slashdot Mirror


Zune — $249.99 On Nov. 14

Cubricon writes, "As expected, Microsoft has dropped their price on the Zune in response to Apple's recent iPod updates. Ars Technica has an article that discusses the Zune's use of Microsoft's prepaid 'points' system for songs. Will the masses notice the difference between an iPod and a Zune? Will they want the FM and wireless capabilities?" The Zune lists for $0.99 more than the comparable iPod and songs from the Zune Marketplace will cost just under $0.99.

42 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. Not buying it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wireless. Same amount of space as an iPod. Lame.

  2. FM... by Kaenneth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Everyone should have a battery powered radio receiver. Hurricanes, Earthquakes, Flooding, Volcanos (like Mt. St. Helens) happen, and you need a way to receive emergency information about which way to run.

    1. Re:FM... by Frosty+Piss · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Everyone should have a battery powered radio receiver.

      Yes, but FM? I think AM will be more useful.

      --
      If you want news from today, you have to come back tomorrow.
    2. Re:FM... by michrech · · Score: 5, Funny

      Fuck running, i'm stealing a Hummer H1 with a radio and killing 2 birds with one stone (and anyone who won't move out of my way)!

      What happens 6 miles down the road after you run out of fuel? :)

      --
      bork bork bork!
    3. Re:FM... by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously, what's the deal with people hating FM radio? I spend my whole day at work listening to BBC Radio 1. Sure, their daytime playlist is quite limited, but they do play some new music in the evenings, but I mainly tune in for the DJs. If anyone in the US has Sirius(?), tune into Radio 1 and give Chris Moyles a listen.

    4. Re:FM... by mTor · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, the FM radio band is abslutely the worst choice for an emergency broadcast. The range of FM is short and the radio waves don't bounce off the ionosphere. If there's some kind of a catastrophic event, there's a very good chance that local FM transmitter will be affected by it as well. SW and AM are much better since their waves bounce off the ionosphere and are long range.

      Also, relying on Zune for emergency signal is silly (and I'm being nice) since it has a short battery life and no AM/SW bands. Also, what will you listen to after 5hrs have passed?!

      If you want an emergency radio, get one with three bands and get one that has a hand crank.

    5. Re:FM... by ruiner13 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "What happens 6 miles down the road after you run out of fuel?"

      That's still 5.5 more miles than I would have gotten running!

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    6. Re:FM... by Grishnakh · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Seriously, what's the deal with people hating FM radio? I spend my whole day at work listening to BBC Radio 1. Sure, their daytime playlist is quite limited, but they do play some new music in the evenings, but I mainly tune in for the DJs.

      You're obviously not an American, and haven't listened to FM radio much in America if you've ever visited here.

      Let me educate you a little. Here in America, where we talk a lot about businesses and competition and capitalism, we're actually not much different from the Soviets: all the FM radio stations in the country, except for those playing NPR (National Public Radio--like an extremely watered-down BBC), are owned by a single company: ClearChannel. This company decides what we all listen to, and plays the exact same thing on every station across the country. So they'll have a couple of country music stations, a rock station, etc., in each metro area, but it's playing the same crap that every other station of that format is playing, whether you're in Florida or California or North Dakota. Even worse, each station only plays about 10 songs, in a continuous loop; the only time you'll hear something new is when ClearChannel is working with the RIAA to brainwash us into buying some new album, and they have to update their loop with the one song they'll ever play on that album. Lastly, while a lot of your media is controlled by the BBC, it seems to actually care about producing quality media, or at least trying to. BBC News is world-renowned for being one of the best news outlets (you'll never find that reputation among any American news sources). Here, there's no such pursuit of quality at all. You can forget about any good DJs on the radio, since the DJs don't decide which songs to play anyway (that's decided by the upper management).

      As for Sirius and XM, I'm surprised ClearChannel hasn't lobbied our politicians to make that stuff illegal.

  3. Sweet by RetlawST · · Score: 5, Insightful

    As an Apple user, I'm all for this. A REAL competitor in the mp3 player market means that Apple has to "innovate" something cooler in order to stay on the top. I'd like to see a wide-screen iPod by the end of the year. :D

    1. Re:Sweet by ackthpt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As an Apple user, I'm all for this. A REAL competitor in the mp3 player market means that Apple has to "innovate" something cooler in order to stay on the top. I'd like to see a wide-screen iPod by the end of the year. :D

      Yeah, that's what we'll likely see, pointless innovation for the sake of innovation, the next gen will probably have

      • a color LED projector so we can watch videos on a sheet of paper, wall, etc.
      • a Swiss Army knife built in
      • a turnip twaddler built in
      • a keyboard
      • automated blood sugar/caffeine/cholesterol/heart-rate monitor
      • a weight of 2 lbs, including (non-exploding) battery
      • a wasabi dispenser

      Actaully... naw... well, maybe...

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  4. Zune vs Wii by 0xABADC0DA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So at around the same time for $250 you can either get an also-ran music player or a brand-new game console. Zounds to me like they are going to lose a lot of tech geek sales.

  5. Great advantage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Song downloads just under 99 cents? Would that make them 98 cents?

    I predict a flood of switchers.

  6. Re:Monday Morning Quarterbacking by LoudMusic · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, this thing is gonna bomb anyway, minus well lower the price and hope to make more money on the music-selling end of things.

    Isn't that supposed to be "might as well"? Or is there some kind of joke that I'm missing?

    --
    No sig for you. YOU GET NO SIG!
  7. What about the shitty brown color scheme ? by javaDragon · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most people are not "artist" enough to appreciate that "innovative" brown...

    --
    -- javaDragon is an instance of JavaDragon.
    1. Re:What about the shitty brown color scheme ? by microcars · · Score: 4, Funny
      It is the "UPS" version

      "U2" was already taken

      --
      I like microcars
  8. Fuzzy Math? by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Since when does "just under" mean "equals"?

    The Zune's companion music download service will charge users 99 cents per song, the same as Apple's iTunes Store pricing model.
    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    1. Re:Fuzzy Math? by ctr2sprt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Because songs aren't bought using money. You use money to buy Microsoft Points, or something with a similarly retarded name, and then use those points to buy songs. The current price is a buck for 80 points, and songs cost 79 points. So each point costs 1.25 cents, and 79 points works out to 98.75 cents. Due to rounding, if you buy 1 or 2 songs you pay the same as in ITMS, and past that you pay a very small amount less (if you buy 100 songs you save a whole quarter).

    2. Re:Fuzzy Math? by cuantar · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Because of this, Zune songs will actually be *more expensive* than songs from iTMS, because in order to buy just one, someone has to spend a full dollar. One of those points will go unused, sure, but what can you do with one point? Until you spend $79, you won't ever have actually paid $0.9875 for anything. With Apple, at least when you buy a song they only charge you for the price of the song.

      Very sneaky of them.

      --
      Legalize it.
  9. Lots of work to do... by moore.dustin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When people are asked what they want, they do not say an Mp3 player. They say, "I want an iPod." That alone puts the Zune at a large disadvantage, not to mention all the other things. iPods are trendy, well-known, and easy to see(Look at me!) - so until people start looking at what kind of Mp3 player to buy instead of what version of iPod to buy, the Zune will struggle to find its place in the market, just like everyone else.

  10. Planned obsolescence by chefmattrock · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How about one of the manufacturers come out with a user replacable battery. This was a major complaint for the first Ipods, and hasn't been fixed yet. A bigger screen means shorter playtime between charges. That's one feature that would make me choose one over the other. Besides that, they're all comparable.

    1. Re:Planned obsolescence by fodder69 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      While that may appeal to you, a lot of other people appreciate the quality "feel" of an ipod, part of which is no seams or panels. The first time you hold an ipod, it just feels like a quality piece of hardware and that impression is part of what has made it a success. There is no big label on the back that peels off, no panels that get worn out and loose, and it just flat out screams quality. Us tech geeks talk about various features we want and how itunes kinda sucks, but most people couldn't care less.

  11. DOA by Cr0w+T.+Trollbot · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This isn't a day late and a dollar short, it's at least three years too late and $100 short.

    "Hey, let's offer a player two months from now at the same price as Apple is already selling the iPod at today. Also, let's make sure that our new, unproven propriatary music DRM is completely incompatible with our previous propritary music DRM! That way we get to drive away consumers fearful of unknown technology and piss off our existing music partners to boot!"

    Dead on Arrival.

    Crow T. Trollbot

  12. Busses are on the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny
    Everyone should have a battery powered radio receiver. Hurricanes...

    Yeah, hearing rhetoric, empty promises and outright lies live over the air while you're up to you ears in alligators would be a heckuva plus.
  13. ho hum by spirit_fingers · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I can't believe what a turkey the Zune is. Here are 2 reasons right off the bat:

    - It only lets you share one song at a time via wi-fi and then only with another Zune player. What's more, even if the song is not DRM'd, it infects that song with DRM so that the recipient can only play the song a maximum of 3 times or for a maximum of 3 days, whichever comes first. So much for Microsoft's wonderful social networking scheme.

    - It can't play songs you've already downloaded encoded with Microsoft's own Play For Sure DRM. Dumb. Just plain dumb.

    And if including an FM tuner didn't get people to flock to Creative's Zen video pod, why should it be such a hot feature in the Zune? And who the frack thought brown was cool?

  14. What are we, retarded? by voice_of_all_reason · · Score: 5, Interesting

    but in the US a point is currently 1.25 cents

    Um, yeah. I'm not buying into some funky dirka-dirka currency that can fluctuate at the company's sheer will.

  15. Can't wait for this to be verbed by TheWoozle · · Score: 4, Funny

    Just wait until some hapless teenager shares a song with his friend only to find out a couple days later he can't move it off his player. "Dude, I just got Zuned!"

    --
    Insisting on "correct" English is like saying that there is only one, definitive recipe for chili.
  16. MTP vs UMS by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Interesting
    > You can mount an iRiver, an iPod, (and I gotta believe a Zune) as a UMS device, working just fine on the "next generation of car stereos with USB."

    Read between the lines of this MS developer's post, in which he says "PlaysForSure does not require devices to support only MTP - UMS can be implemented too, but under certain conditions that prevent newbies from transferring content via MTP, switching to UMS and then calling tech support because they can't find/play their content"...

    Now re-read that sentence while pondering the notion that Zune will not support PlaysForSure.

    This is a Microsoft product. More so than Apple products, less so than Sony products, it's still all about vendor lock-in.

    I speculate that Zune will be an MTP (Media Transfer Protocol)-only device. UMS (USB Mass Storage) cannot be supported, because only by eliminating UMS can Microsoft mandate the use of WMP10/11 and the accompanying XP/Vista DRM platform.

  17. Radios in general by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 3, Interesting

    People think I'm a bit odd... I have a TON of gadgets, but still don't own an iPod or "popular" MP3 player. The reason: Nobody makes one with both an AM/FM tuner in it. So I still use my Panasonic CD player with MP3 capabilities... as it has an AM/FM tuner in it. I enjoy listening to live baseball (and occasionally other sports) games on AM radio, which is why it's of key importance to me. I realize radio is a secondary feature for a music player, but my stance is simple:

    If I'm paying several hundred dollars for a portable player, it should damn well have an FM *AND* AM tuner in it.

    Simple as that. Until then, the CD/MP3 player that cost me $50 3 years ago will do just fine.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  18. For the young slashdot whipper snappers by Jesterboy · · Score: 5, Informative
  19. Re:MOD PARENT UP by -kertrats- · · Score: 4, Informative
    --
    The Braying and Neighing of Barnyard Animals Follows.
  20. To get me to buy one you'd have to ... by OverDrive33 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ... remove the DRM. That's it. I'd buy one in an instant.
    I like the Zune, from what I've read and the pictures I've seen it seems pretty cool! Especially the wireless sharing of files - that's really cool. However, the DRM that the wireless transfers forces on your media is unacceptable.
    Any takers on how long it will take to crack the DRM?
    Or
    Any takers on how long it will take to get Linux running - doing the same things - minus the DRM?

  21. Much Worse than PlaysforSure by MBraynard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have a Sandisk player with Yahoo Unlimited and an FM transmitter. Totally content to have everything and owe nothing for $10 a month.

    This is worse because if I actually wanted to BUY a song (own forever, burn to CD, etc.) then it only costs $0.79.

  22. Microsoft points == Itchy and Scratchy Money by grouchomarxist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Ticket booth woman: Would you like to buy some Itchy and Scratchy Money?
    Homer: What's that?
    Woman: Well it's money that's made just for the park. It works just like regular money, but it's, er ... 'fun.'
    Bart: Do it, Dad.
    Homer: Well, OK, if it's fun...let's see, uh...I'll take $1,100 worth.
    Homer walks in to see signs advertising that Itchy & Scratchy money is non-negotiable at various booths (e.g., "No I&S money," "We don't take Itchy and Scratchy money," etc).
    Homer: "Aw!"

  23. Re:MOD PARENT UP by jb.hl.com · · Score: 3, Funny
    I quite like this comment from that story:


    Raise your hand if you have iTunes ...

    Raise your hand if you have a FireWire port ...

    Raise your hand if you have both ...

    Raise your hand if you have $400 to spend on a cute Apple device ...

    There is Apple's market. Pretty slim, eh? I don't see many sales in the future of iPod.


    Talk about hindsight being 20/20...
    --
    By summer it was all gone...now shesmovedon. --
  24. Who want s a dollar? by PHanT0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I won't pay 99 for a DRM-riddled piece of music... I will pay a full dollar for a DRM-free piece of music though.

  25. Re:Zune for $249.99? by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 4, Funny
    Hang on,

    the Zune is $249.99. The iPod is $249.00, with $0.99 left over to buy a song with.


    Ahh, but you'll make than up after you buy your 397th song from the Zune Store.

    249.99+397*0.9875=642.0275 (Zune)
    249.00+397*0.9900=642.0300
    --
    I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
  26. Re:Monday Morning Quarterbacking by roscivs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the original poster just made a mistake. He's not the only one.

    --
    ~ roscivs
  27. Re:Monday Morning Quarterbacking by protohiro1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, Loudmusic, just for old times sake, can you make a prediction on the sales of the zune?

    --
    Sig removed because it was obnoxious
  28. The Fatal Flaw, that will kill zune by goombah99 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Zune is not Family freindly. For the single person it's okay, as long as they are the normal sort who is not religious about DRM issues or "ownership" of their music. The DRM seems to have only modest and tolerable consequences for single people.

    For famliles it may be unattractive.

    As I understand the Zune sales model, if you buy a song it's locked to play only on your computer and your Zune is also locked to your computer.

    The problem is then families that have multiple computers or multiple zunes. If both sis and bro and mom like the latest snoop-dog tune, they can't buy it once and share it o all their computer's and Zunes. They have to buy one copy per machine/zune. That's freakin' nuts.

    Or did I get it wrong. Sorry if I did, since Im itunes for the long haul and don't really care about Zune.

    --
    Some drink at the fountain of knowledge. Others just gargle.
  29. Re:MOD PARENT UP by geekoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    they sold over a million units before adding windows, so yes it was a success under those conditions.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  30. Re:Monday Morning Quarterbacking by gEvil+(beta) · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a mute point anyways, since what he said is, for all intensive purposes, correct. It's a doggy dog world out there, so they might as well keep the price low.

    --
    This guy's the limit!
  31. Re:Walmart.com offers its songs for 88 cents by fermion · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Which is exactly why MS is screwing all of it's business partners by abandoning play for sure. If Zune worked with play for sure, there would be no reason for an MS music store, and without an MS music store, the whole MS portal strategy is doomed to failure.

    Look at it this way. Even though MS controls the desktop, controls IE, and forces everyone to MSN, MSN is still not a real player in any market. They cannot win the the market on quality, or even controlling the software. So the hope is to take another page out of the Apple book and try make inroads into the music business by controlling the software and hardware, and locking consumers into the format.

    I have a feeling that the lack of play for sure support is going to be a detriment, as those same people that buy the player form wal mart are going to want to download songs from wal mart, or whoever. Also, at some point MS is going to want to raise the subscription fee, and at that point owning a Zune will be more expensive than owning another device. Recall that one thing that makes a non-iPod device desirable is the play for sure market is somewhat completive, while the iTunes and alleged MS Music market is not.

    As always MS makes the entire thing way too complex, and so will only appeal to those that want the MS name. Otherwise a Zen will be a better choice, unless MS is going to start giving music away, say a free three month subscription with purchase.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black