Slashdot Mirror


Paypal Agrees to Consumer Protections

davidwr writes "Paypal settled a suit with Maryland and 27 states. Among other things, they'll conspicuously advertise a contact phone number and staff it 14 hours a day and be much more forthcoming about when they will debit your bank account. For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less."

136 comments

  1. finally by petermgreen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The US is clamping down on thier branch of paypal, those who provide bank like services should be treated like banks.

    --
    note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    1. Re:finally by TykeClone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But that's still not the case. If they were "being treated as a bank" the regulators would have said "thou shalt follow Reg E and all of it's consumer protections" instead of reaching an agreement.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    2. Re:finally by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 1
      The US is clamping down on thier branch of paypal, those who provide bank like services should be treated like banks.


      Yes! It's about time this clamp-down happened. I'm glad that PayPal will now be forced skin me alive according to the best principles.
      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    3. Re:finally by MikeFM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hell no! PayPal has gotten worse and worse since it's been trying to be more like a bank. I'm constantly being annoyed with calls 'Did you make this purchase - it doesn't fit your profile.' and constantly having to dig up information to prove my account is being accessed by myself and not someone else. This is freaking annoying. I move $120,000+/yr through my account and I'm not stupid enough to lose my card or use a weak password. Leave me the hell alone with your stupid consumer protection schemes. I don't want to spend a couple hours a week (sometimes a lot more) jumping through hoops. Now and then I have to spend a couple days filling out faxes and calling PayPal to get things worked out. On top of that things like cash back bonus have gotten worse since PayPal has been moving to being more bank-like. All downhill since eBay bought it.

      If you want a bank then use a bank. Leave PayPal alone for those of us who liked it the way it was.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
  2. Suckage by internewt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    "For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less."

    Do people really think that when a corporation gets ordered by a court to behave in a different way, that the organisation will really change? At best, the screwing over and offensive behaviour will become more subtle, or "accepted" (by their customers) screwings from other finance houses will be done by PP but "enhanced". Shit like them taking x days to transfer money about, for example.

    But they still suck, I am still not prepared to do business with them. If I need to use the 'bay, then I buy from sellers who take direct bank transfers. Friends can PP for me, but I'd rather not encourage the use of PP in anyway.

    --
    Car analogies break down.
    1. Re:Suckage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      So you trust some unknown person with your banking information, but not a company. Do you realized that everytime you give out that information you are risking being taken for all that you have in the bank. One of the Nigerian scams involves getting you banking information and then poof you account is dry. Getting the money back is next to impossible.

      If you would like you can give me your banking information and for the small fee of $1 I will send you detailed information on why what you are doing is dangerous.

    2. Re:Suckage by internewt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If I pay someone on ebay by a bank transfer, they give me their details, not the other way round (so my privacy is actually maintained, of course they get an address to post the goods to). I don't use ebay much, but from my recent use it appears that a reasonable amount of (power?) sellers openly publish their bank details for payers' convienience. To transfer money I need the accounts name, sort code and account number, and with that info I can only put money into the account, not remove any. The ebay seller would get my bank details on their statement probably.

      Do you realized that everytime you give out that information you are risking being taken for all that you have in the bank. One of the Nigerian scams involves getting you banking information and then poof you account is dry

      Of course I'm aware of the 419'ers, but no (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name, number and sort code, AFAIK! I have heard the senario you have described above before, and always taken it with a pinch of salt, but that doesn't mean I'm blazé with my bank info. Also, that bank info is nothing more than can be shoulder surfed from my card anyway, or from the bottom edge of a cheque - i.e. the info is essentially in the open anyway. If I am a fraud victim and I haven't disclosed anything stupid (like my PIN), then my bank should be receptive to giving me a refund (they should refund fraud victims no matter what, but I digress). If I have allowed a corporate entity to drain my account because I didn't read terms and conditions correctly, then I'm a bit fucked.

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    3. Re:Suckage by Cederic · · Score: 1

      no (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name, number and sort code

      The obvious exception here being the Direct Debit scheme, although that does require specific written approval and carries significant consumer protections of its own.

    4. Re:Suckage by jfengel · · Score: 3, Informative

      The 419 scam is usually more work for them than that. The scam usually runs like "Hey, I have all this money, and I'll give you some if you front me the money to get it out of the country". All they steal is the money you send, though frequently they get even more when they ask for money for "additional unexpected circumstances". Once they've found somebody sufficiently greedy or gullible, they milk them, not the account.

      Occasionally it's been known to turn to kidnaping and ransom when people visit Nigeria to try to get their money back or even follow an invitation to "help".

      It's also called "Advance Fee Fraud". I still don't know why it's the Nigerians who make it so famous, since the scam has been played for centuries, even without bank transfers. They just seem to have turned it into a national industry.

    5. Re:Suckage by lixee · · Score: 1

      I wish Google would step in ...

      --
      Res publica non dominetur
    6. Re:Suckage by Dystopian+Rebel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From TFA:
      "Under terms of the settlement agreement, PayPal said it is not admitting any liability for the allegations in the dispute."

      From the actual court transcript: "Your Honor, my client PayPal is sorry, but not sorry for what the plaintiffs thought we should be sorry for. I mean sorry in a general yet noble way. My client will keep doing what they were doing but with a much more cautious unscrupulousness.

      At the same time, Your Honor, PayPal recognizes that people were genuinely angry and my client is sincere in their wish for the plaintiff to shut the hell up before more people can smell the stink.

      Oops! Gotta run... Would Your Honor please give the plaintiff this bag of cash? Thanks!"

      --
      Rich And Stupid is not so bad as Working For Rich And Stupid.
    7. Re:Suckage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Of course I'm aware of the 419'ers, but no (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name, number and sort code,
      British banks most probably allow this, just like most banks in the EC do. To charge any account you know, you can enter a contract with your bank that makes you liable for any charges that you make that have not been authorized. Usually this requires written authorization, which is not verified by the bank. However, the holder of the account can revert any such charges within 6 weeks without giving any reason, and his bank has to refund him immediately.
    8. Re:Suckage by rsilvergun · · Score: 1

      I think what made Nigeria famous was the reams of spam comming out of the country using the scam, and the fact that "419 scam" is catchy. As for the spam, the country's dirt poor, and got a huge influx of free computers and infrastructure from charities in the 90's (the optimist in me calls those charities dumb, they cynic thinks they were developing the next India).

      --
      Hi! I make Firefox Plug-ins. Check 'em out @ https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/youtube-mp3-podcaster/
    9. Re:Suckage by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      You can't empty someone's bank account just with their account number. The nigerian scam involves them asking you to send them money on various pretexes. Giving them your bank account number has nothing to do with it.

    10. Re:Suckage by justasecond · · Score: 1

      no (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name

      Happened to my (as in I own it) company: We've been taken for over $20,000 on the basis of the bank wire transfer details we (used to) post to our web site for the convenience of foreign customers. Scammer opened an E-trade account, linked to our bank account, then siphoned the funds over to E-trade.

      Off-topic, but, speaking of scammers, we've also been taken by someone who took one of our checks, cut out the routing #s off the bottom, scanned them and pasted them in Photoshop to blank check images and when on a spree.

      In both instances our bank simply refunded the money to us and took the loss. Seems like it just isn't worth it to them to institute proper security measures, so as long as you are in the posession of a couple of magic numbers, the account's yours. This is, of course, also the case when it comes to individual identity theft. Have a social security number and some kind of an ID (supermarket loyalty card is A-OK with us!)? Sure, we'll let you drain this account!

    11. Re:Suckage by Hurricane78 · · Score: 1

      In fact it's the third largest industry down there.
      And i think they do a good job.

      Why? Easy to answer:
      They support natural selection: Remove power (cash) from stupid poeple, and gile it to the better ones. (In that case them because they were able to trick them into doing it.)
      It may sound like *wrong* to say doing this is good in any way. But stay logical and open for a minute...
      If you consider that the game of life is all about getting your genetics and your will out into the world as much as possible, because everyone not doing it will go extinct y the laws of nature,
      and if you then look at them getting their kids fed and becoming a bit more powerful (rich) by doing it...

      Then it's clearly a good idea.
      AS LONG as you can andle the consequences.

      So it's easy: It's not them doirg wrong stuff (trying to win the game of life - their good right),
      but stupid poeple giving them the ability to do so.

      This is EXACTLY what made bill gates, and many other poeple and their organizations rich.
      And that's why i can't really hate bill.
      He donates the cash to places where the thinks it's good for humanity (meaning: for him ultimately of course).

      And OF COURSE i still try to win the game myself by beating them all out of the world, gaining respect and power,... and fuck... whenever i can. *gg*

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced intelligence is indistinguishable from stupidity.
    12. Re:Suckage by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      The scam was run via snail-mail before the Internet. It's Nigerian because it originally involved the cooperation of officials of the Nigerian central bank. It's 419 because that number is in some way associated with the Nigerian law the scammers are violating.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    13. Re:Suckage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you consider that the game of life is all about getting your genetics and your will out into the world as much as possible, because everyone not doing it will go extinct y(sic) the laws of nature,


      Here's another person who doesn't fully understand natural selection. Stupidity will not be selected out if these people reproduce. You can't assume that they haven't any offspring, because many of these people do, in fact, have offspring.
  3. Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by duguk · · Score: 5, Informative

    Nope, they'll still suck if they continue to:

    - locking out accounts for 'attempted signing in from another country' - yeah, without even getting a correct password
    - only use a password to secure accounts
    - only provide a national rate number in the UK, although you can get them on 0800 358 7929 for free
    - expect you to send absolutely everything by fax yet they won't talk to you except by email
    - not allow you to speak to anyone in the dispute or resolution centre, leaving you arguing with sales staff who don't have a clue
    - make it impossible to close your account if it is locked, even after providing all the information you can and no money left in there

    I'm disgusting with Paypal and going through the process of deleting my account. It's not easy, but I'll keep trying. Paypal will always suck in the UK it seems... :(

    Dug

    1. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
      You forgot blaming eBay for problems and vice versa when they are both the same company.

      If there's a payment problem on eBay, eBay will say "No, it's Payal's problem."

      You go and contact Paypal, they say "No, it's eBay's problem."

      See here

    2. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      My favourite - sending you an email, dated "day 1". Saying that for whatever reason, they'll action a direct debit on your account in "5 working days, so please ensure sufficient funds". The very next day, you get a call from your bank manager. "A direct debit from PayPal has been dishonoured and you've been charged a fee". Wow, that 5 working days went fast. And of course PayPal bills you for the dishonour fee. And when you ask why, when you eventually get an answer, "Well, we could bill it at any time. We send that email as a courtesy. We chose to do so before then, as is our right."

      Bleh. Asshats.

    3. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Laxitive · · Score: 1


      Tell me something.. how the hell do you delete a paypal account? I've had one for a while and not used it. So where the hell are the interface options for killing the account? I don't feel comfortable having an idle paypal account linked to my bank account. It's asking for trouble. But I can't find any clear method in their user interface for deleting your account, or requesting to have it removed. Their UI is so horrible.. it's just awful.

      How are you "going about deleting" it?

    4. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by ericlondaits · · Score: 1

      Well, being the devil's advocate here but... do they say they'll charge IN 5 working days or WITHIN 5 working days?

      --
      As a Slashdot discussion grows longer, the probability of an analogy involving cars approaches one.
    5. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      To be fair, that's often the case with any large organisation. While it certainly shouldn't be the response that a customer gets, internally that'll almost certainly be exactly how things are set up. Certainly it is where I work, and my company was bought by its current owners about 5 years ago.

    6. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Achromatic1978 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "This is a notice to inform you we will process a direct debit from your account five days from now, so please ensure there are sufficient funds..."

    7. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1
      I don't feel comfortable having an idle paypal account linked to my bank account.

      It's very easy to simply de-link the bank account from your PayPal account. It's not a perfect solution, but it's at least a good immediate patch.

    8. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by shawngarringer · · Score: 5, Informative

      Except they still keep the bank account info. I deleted an account from my PayPal account, then for some reason (stupid me) tried to use it on a different account I set up later. So I registered the account and then wham I couldn't use that debt-card because it was tied to the old account.

      I went into the old account and apparently someone had complained that the printer I sold on ebay and advertised as "broken, parts only, as-is" didn't work upon recipt. So they charged me back the $20. So now, 4 years later, I have a PayPal account with a -120 balance, an "open collections" account on my credit history, and will never ever EVER use PayPal again.

      The worst part is, even after I deleted that checking account, they tried to withdraw the 20 dollars for the charge-back from it. They tried four times! I was broke at the time, didn't even have 20 dollars in the account, so I got charged 25 dollar "insufficent funds" from them also. They can rot for all I care I will not pay that. I would have paid the $20 originally because it was my mistake for using eBay... but I will not pay the additonal fees. I filed a complaint against PayPal at my bank, and they told me that "they hear that a lot about them" and that they've blocked PayPal from ever touching my account...

    9. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was able to close my account by clicking on Profile. Over to the left there is a link to "Close Account". 37 Continue clicks later, my account is closed! Woohoo!

    10. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by asuffield · · Score: 4, Informative
      I'm disgusting with Paypal and going through the process of deleting my account. It's not easy, but I'll keep trying. Paypal will always suck in the UK it seems...


      They will continue to suck, but you don't have to let them get away with it over here. Unlike in the US, the UK holds Paypal responsible for nonsense like this. Screw their "customer support" lines, go directly to the Financial Ombudsman - Paypal is permitted 8 weeks from the time you initially state your complaint, and then the Ombudsman can take over. This is a tax-funded service that is free to you as a consumer; Paypal is obliged to cooperate with them as a condition of doing business in the UK at all. Any decision made by the Ombudsman is binding on Paypal in the same manner as a court judgement would be.

      Having taken care of that, feel free to report the whole affair to the Financial Services Authority. Where the Ombudsman takes care of your case, the FSA shakes the company by the neck until they stop creating more cases. This one in particular:

      not allow you to speak to anyone in the dispute or resolution centre, leaving you arguing with sales staff who don't have a clue


      is an offence that already carries a hefty fine if proven. A company regulated by the FSA is not allowed to create barriers like this; they are required to have a clear and efficient complaints procedure and follow it precisely.

      Lastly, the Office of Fair Trading can also weigh in when any company doing business in the UK fails to handle complaints in a reasonable manner or generally tramples on their customers for profit, in the unlikely event that the FSA is not interested.
    11. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by EVil+Lawyer · · Score: 1

      That all sucks, big time. But once you've de-linked the bank account, at least you can relax about someone gaining access to your account and making withdrawals from that bank account.

    12. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      to actually delete it send them a certified letter askig them to delete you accoutn and any of your perosn information from any server which is currently resides. Tell them you hereby refuse to accept the Terms of Service, you here by unauthorize Pay Pal from any furthe retention of your personal information. Tell this that the letter is hereby considered personl notification of the revocation rights of Pay pal to represent you in any further financial transaction.

      They will ignore you (other then delete your account ) but if future fraud happens at least you have a leg to stand on.

    13. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm disgusting with Paypal

      Yeah, well, maybe it wouldn't hurt to cut down on the belching and farting next time you login.

    14. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      While IANAL it would seem that that statement does not in any way indicate they will debit it sooner than 5 days and as such you might have legal action against them for the resulting additional fees it caused from them doing it sooner.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    15. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      I think a good rule of thumb is to never spend money you don't have. "Floating" checks isn't a good idea, so why would you want to make a payment you can't honor with actual money?

      I think the wording of their e-mail was a bit misleading, but still ...

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
    16. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      It is my understanding that it is best to leave no more money than absolutely necessary with the reach of PayPal.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    17. Re:Nope, they'll still suck (0800 358 7929) by PhxBlue · · Score: 1

      Also very true.

      --
      !#@%*)anks for hanging up the phone, dear.
  4. Personally, I'm underwhelmed by NickFortune · · Score: 5, Funny
    For those of you who think Paypal Sucks, well, starting soon it sucks just a little less.

    In fact it sucks less by precisely the minimum decrement of suckage allowed under law, and only then when compelled by the court. Way to go, paypal.

    This doesn't make them any more honest, it just stops one of their unfair practices. I'm sure they can think of others.

    --
    Don't let THEM immanentize the Eschaton!
    1. Re:Personally, I'm underwhelmed by neoform · · Score: 1

      I was thinking the same thing, it's like "golly, now they'll almost be as bad as a bank!" what an amazing improvement.

      I suppose this means that paypal is going to have to set new hours of operation for their website, something like 11am till 3:30pm. I'd expect a "Down for Maintenence" page any other time of day..

      --
      MABASPLOOM!
  5. Consumer Suspicions by infestedsenses · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm more interested in when they will be sued for blocking accounts based on "terrorist" last names.

    Human rights, anyone?

    1. Re:Consumer Suspicions by corbettw · · Score: 1

      Yes, that is horrible. In fact, you should petition the UN Human Rights Council about this atrocity. Get one of the council member states to back your case. Maybe Syria could, since they have such a spectacular history of protecting human rights.

      Though you might have to wait for the UN to act on things like the genocide in Darfur, religious intolerance and persecution in Saudi Arabia, political prisoners in Cuba and Venezuela, and other human rights problems around the world, before they get to yours. I know not being able to have a PayPal account is far more important than any of those, but, hey, they got on the agenda first. So you'll just have to wait.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    2. Re:Consumer Suspicions by infestedsenses · · Score: 1

      Funny, I thought the word "equal" in the manifest meant, well, you know, "equal". You people need to start caring more about your rights instead of watching them slowly trickle away.

      Either way, yes, I agree they are doing a farce of a job protecting our rights.

  6. Re:PayPal Will Still Censors Political Dissent by mustafap · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    You posted as an Anonymous Coward. Thats quite fitting really, in this case. You are just some little minded bigot.

    --
    Open Source Drum Kit, LPLC deve board - mjhdesigns.com
  7. simply not a good idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get about five "notifications" a week that someone has tried to accesss my paypal account -- and that was after I had canceled my account. There's too much phishing to ever have anything like paypal

  8. PayPal not sucking? by Life700MB · · Score: 5, Funny


    Does it mean that PayPal will stop blocking accounts (and the money in them) for peregrine reasons like, in my case, your name sounding similar to Al Qaeda's terrorists? And I'm not even in the same continent nor religion as them!

    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, php, mysql, ssh, $7.95

    1. Re:PayPal not sucking? by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 0, Flamebait
      Your name sounds like an Al Q`aida member? To the spooks who grew up in America speaking English? With their idea of what an Arabic names sounds like, given a string of English alphabet characters with random quotes and back quotes thrown in, and without a "u" following the "q"? Then you must be an enemy combatant. Get ready to ship out to Camp X-Ray at the gitmo, pal.

      BTW, it is so easy to change your name in that part of the world, middle-east south Asia. Why dont you get new documents with a different name that does not sound like Abu Nidal al-Tikriti? Or Qamal Hassan? That is what all the Al Q`aida members have done.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    2. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Aladrin · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is modded Funny, but he's absolutely serious. Paypal can and will block your account and SEIZE all of the money in it for any reason whatsoever. Not liking your name is a new one for me, but I've seen plenty of hardship on the web. Newzbin.com, a usenet indexing site, regularly lost thousands of dollars at a time to this practice. They would petition and be re-instated, but lose all their money. It was their main payment method, and most of their customers preferred it, so they kept dealing with it... Until it happened like 3 times in 3 months. They finally called it quits and use other payment methods now.

      Paypal DOES suck. And they SHOULD be regulated like a bank. I suspect their business model might have issues if they do, though.

      --
      "If you make people think they're thinking, they'll love you; But if you really make them think, they'll hate you." - DM
    3. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Avumede · · Score: 1

      Since they are legally obligated to shut down accounts that match terrorist names, I wouldn't bet on it stopping (or being substantially different with other services).

    4. Re:PayPal not sucking? by compro01 · · Score: 1

      Since they are legally obligated to shut down accounts that match terrorist names, I wouldn't bet on it stopping (or being substantially different with other services).

      referance please? though i really wouldn't be suprised if it actually is true.

      --
      upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
    5. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check out the OFAC and BOE lists. They're lists maintained by governments of names you have to watch for. It's retarded, but it's true.

    6. Re:PayPal not sucking? by jandrese · · Score: 1

      What do you think it means when the Government says their "freezing the assets of the terrorists"?

      The worst part is that unless you can prove to both Paypal and Homeland Security that you're not who they think you are, you're up a creek, and neither Paypal nor Homeland Security are any fun to deal with.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:PayPal not sucking? by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm wondering why some bank doesn't step in and offer a viable PayPal competitor? They have the knowledge and the resources to create one, and they have the funds to provide the safety nets and bank-required measures that an only PayPal-type service should be force to have. What barriers are in the way of this?

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    8. Re:PayPal not sucking? by TykeClone · · Score: 1

      The Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC). Failure to comply will send you to the federal prison featured in Office Space.

      --
      A fine is a tax you pay for doing wrong and a tax is a fine you pay for doing all right.
    9. Re:PayPal not sucking? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Natwest used to offer a similar service in the UK called Fastpay. But they stopped it because they couldn't make money out of it.

  9. Re: PayPal Will Still Censor Political Dissent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, how much would you want to bet that if Malcom X had a bookstore, PayPal would be just fine with him using its service??? You know, it's funny how some little minded bigots get better treatment than other little minded bigots.

    AC

  10. i've had no trouble with paypal by araczynski · · Score: 0

    ... during the 4 or so years i've been using paypal i've have nothing but 'good' to say about them. my account was compromised about a month ago. i caught the issue within a day, and they stopped all the charges on my checking account immediately (i had to call the bank as well just to make sure they didn't go through). Then when it was cleared up a week later they even went back and paid me the different in the euro conversion rate the pube used when sending out payments to rapidshare.de. no hassles nothing. anyway, i may not like having to pay twice when i deal with ebay/paypal, but this one episode more then made it all up for me.

    --
    sigs suck
    1. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by ShannaraFan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Up until 2 weeks ago, I would have said the same thing. I've used Paypal for about 4 years, bought/sold hundreds of items on eBay, paying exclusively through Paypal. I even had the debit card, which I used to take advantage of their cash-back for Visa purchases.

      In July, I sold an item on eBay, got paid for it, life went on. Second week of September, I get an email from Paypal saying that they had reason to believe this item was paid for with fraudulent funds, and asked me to provide tracking info, etc., for the item sold. I did, gave them everything they asked for.

      Two weeks later, I get another email from them, stating:
      "We have conducted a review of a payment that you received. In this case, returning the funds to the sender was determined to be the appropriate action, and we have completed a reversal of the payment. Good selling practices, like trackable shipping, prompt shipment, and communication between buyer and seller help prevent disputes."

      Huh? I provided them with a tracking number, delivery was confirmed, item was shipped the same day payment was received. I contacted the buyer (this person has purchased multiple items from me, I have no reason to not trust them), asked them if they knew anything more than I did. They have not received any refund from Paypal, and in fact didn't even know there was a problem.

      So, who was my money "returned" to? Repeated emails to Paypal have been ignored, so I've closed my account, I'll never use Paypal again.

    2. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by araczynski · · Score: 0

      forget email, call them on the phone, they just now got an 800 number. they were very helpfull to me when i explained to them what happened. never made me feel like i was trying to pull a fast one of them or anything.

      --
      sigs suck
    3. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      No point. For the $30 that they stole from me, it's not worth my time to spend an hour or more talking to some drone who can't help me anyway. Getting that money back wouldn't change the fact that they decided to stomp on a long-time customer with no explanation whatsoever. I understand fraud happens and disputes come up, but they asked me for specific pieces of information, information which I freely provided to them. The delivery of the merchandise was confirmed, the buyer says he is satisfied and did not initiate a dispute, nor did he receive this supposed refund that Paypal claims to have made. I fulfilled my obligations as the seller, and yet they took it upon themselves to decide that fraud had occurred, and took my money. I was given no explanation as to why that decision was made, or exactly what the problem might have been, they simply acted as judge, jury, and executioner, sorry Mr. Customer, but screw you. There's simply no way Paypal is going to keep me as a customer now.

    4. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Huh, how did you close your Paypal account? Nobody else on Slashdot seems to be able to figure that out.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    5. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by araczynski · · Score: 0

      when sh*t happen you have to call people on it, otherwise it will continue to happen to others. but your choice, perhaps $30 isn't worth the hassle to you. personally i'd bi*ch up a storm for even a dime. not that i'd care for the dime, but i'd care for the principal of the matter.

      --
      sigs suck
    6. Re:i've had no trouble with paypal by ShannaraFan · · Score: 1

      I had to transfer funds into the Paypal account to bring the balance up to zero. When that cleared, I just removed all of the credit card and bank accounts that were linked. On the profile page, there is a link to "Close Account". It wouldn't let me close it until the balance was zero and there were no pending transactions.

  11. Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by deviceb · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I sold some information (nothing exotic). It was only $125 and i delivered my end. -a clean deal. A few months go by and i log into my account and see -125 So i say, "WTF why do i have a chargeback & why was i not contacted seeing how you have all my personal info" (acurate info)

    They say i did not suppy tracking information when asked. I had 3 days to send this info before my account was jacked by some little twerp. (zabasearch gave me his home address) I did not check this email because it is only used for paypal, & with no business going on.. why check it?

    So not only did i loose the data i sold,.. but i ended up paying somebody to take it for me.
    So if you sell something as a "service" how are you to provide a tracking number? Any graphic or website payment can be charged back
    -another loophole & it seems that paypal does not give a shat about the person who has been using the service from the beginning.

    now i have to deal with the twerp & waste more time.

    /end rant

    --
    Kill your TV
    1. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by Tim+C · · Score: 1

      why was i not contacted... I did not check this email because it is only used for paypal

      So, you were in fact contacted. I'm not arguing that what they did was right, but your anger at not being contacted is misplaced.

    2. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Is there anyway you could close your account and just say 'suck it, youre not getting the 125?'

    3. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Yup, by not having an active credit card at the time you receive the chargeback. I suppose it lands you in legally hot water, though.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    4. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by tonyray · · Score: 1

      The same thing can happen to you if you have a credit card merchant account (we do) and you can not prove the delivery of goods or services. This is not unique to PayPal. However, the banks do send you written notice and give you more than three days - so I agree, that does suck.

    5. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      It would but at the same time no company is going to take you to court of $125. They aren't a bank, after all.

    6. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by deviceb · · Score: 1

      they made an attempt to contact me sure.. buTT. paypal has 2 email addys on file, and my cell number + home number. In a chargeback case they should take the time to call the person about to get jacked. -like a normal bank or respectable business.
      I have not had any quams untill now with PP.. but that was before i lost money.

      /shrug...

      --
      Kill your TV
    7. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by tiocsti · · Score: 1

      I believe your agreement specifies that disputes are to be handled in the court of their locality, so they can just file a small claims case, you wont show up, they win by default. Relatively inexpensive for them to handle.

    8. Re:Here is why they sucked 4 me.. . by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Again, you are technically correct, but court filling fee can be anywhere from $25 to $100.

      Also, you're not going to be dragged to their locality if you don't obey the court order. I don't know of any cases where this has happened.

  12. protection? don't need any!!! by populair · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Protection? Who needs it!!! Mr. Populair. populair@xs4all.nl

  13. Happy Days! by giafly · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "We hope this agreement with an industry leader will set standard best practices for Internet businesses across the country to follow," said Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott ... PayPal must also establish a conspicuous "Contact Us" link on its Web pages and provide a toll-free customer support number that operates at least 14 hours daily, according to the attorney general's office. - Star-Telegram Austin
    Standard best practices??? 14x7 and a toll-free number that probably only works within the continental USA? Welcome to 1950.
    --
    Reduce, reuse, cycle
    1. Re:Happy Days! by sethstorm · · Score: 1

      It's better if it works, and if it helps the US economy by not having a call centre outside the Continental 48.

      --
      Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
    2. Re:Happy Days! by Cederic · · Score: 1


      Having a US toll-free number places no restriction on call centre location.

      It's pretty easy to route calls to places like India, China, Indonesia, Vietnam or Australia.

    3. Re:Happy Days! by Yer+Mom · · Score: 1
      a toll-free number that probably only works within the continental USA?

      If that toll-free number works within the continental USA, you'll be able to get at it through Skype, at least.

      --
      Never mind Spamassassin. When's Spammerassassin coming out?
  14. Wah? by Life700MB · · Score: 1, Offtopic


    PayPal not sucking is as improbable as Slashdot not duping.

    Thanks, thanks, I'll be here all week.

    --
    Superb hosting 20GB Storage, 1_TB_ bandwidth, php, mysql, ssh, $7.95

  15. SCUMMVM by Rik+Sweeney · · Score: 2

    well, starting soon it sucks just a little less.

    It'd suck even less if they'd allow donations for SCUMMVM again...

  16. Just a little less by varmittang · · Score: 1

    But the golf ball though a garden hose still applies.

    --
    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    12345
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
  17. Re:PayPal Will Still Censors Political Dissent by jcr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    An English racialist

    Do you nazi pukes actually think you're fooling anyone by saying "racialist"? FOAD.

    -jcr

    --
    The only title of honor that a tyrant can grant is "Enemy of the State."
  18. Not to play the devil's advocate... by whoisearth · · Score: 1

    But to all those people using PayPal what do you really expect? Here you have a company that is acting very much like a bank. It allows you to hold a balance. It allows you to perform wire transfers. It allows you to debit and credit your accounts. The difference is, that it's not a bank. It's not mandated by the same rules that the government has imposed on banks. Hence, you're gonna get screwed. Why? There's not rules and regulations to stop them from breaking laws that in any other financial institution are... well... laws. If you're using PayPal you have no one but yourself to blame. Sure, everything may be hunky dory now, but you're really playing with fire until they get locked down with rules.

    1. Re:Not to play the devil's advocate... by rfunches · · Score: 1
      But to all those people using PayPal what do you really expect? [...] There's not rules and regulations to stop them from breaking laws that in any other financial institution are... well... laws.

      I expect Paypal (and any other company that functions like them, offering bank-like services) to not only attempt to make money but also give its customers a sense of security when using their services. A company in that line of business based in the U.S. is only going to go so far before the government does something, especially when their business is linked to regulated financial institutions.

    2. Re:Not to play the devil's advocate... by famewolf · · Score: 1

      I always pay via credit card and remove any fund deposited right away. If paypal decides to be idiots they can fight it out with my credit card company.

  19. Re: PayPal Will Still Censor Political Dissent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Extermination of an entire race is a little different that fighting back at being oppressed. If you are not Jewish and did not live through the holocost then you don't know what you are talking about. Were you starved, were you beaten, were your friends and loved ones gassed, were MILLIONS of your kind wiped out deliberately because of someones hate for your race. I'm a white christian and I can't even begin to full understand what it is like to be so hated by soneone simple because I exsist, but I can try and so can you.

    Many people have suffered in this world for stupid reasons. I not just speaking of the Jews, but also the Blacks, the Asians, Native Americans, and many other groups. If any of this is going to stop we must realized that we are all people and we have to work together if this world is going to get any better. Stop the fighting, stop the hating, stop the bigotry. That goes for everyone including those who feel they have be oppressed because if descrimiation is ever going to end it must end on both sides. Forgive each other for what ever you feel they have done against you and move on.

  20. Re:You know how this goes... by fracai · · Score: 2, Funny

    Almost...

    In Soviet Russia, YOU take money from PayPal!

    --
    -- i am jack's amusing sig file
  21. Alternatives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What choice do we have other than paypal ?

    Are there payment facilitators with better business practices (preferably backed by a reputable financial institution) ?

  22. I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by adzoox · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It is run and sponsored by the competition. The webmaster tries to deny that saying he's just advertising alternatives, but the alternatives advertised on paypalsucks.com are FAR WORSE and just fronts for laundering and identity theft.

    StormPay
    iKobo
    YowCow

    --
    Yell & scream & rant & rave... it's no use... you need a shaaaave ~ Bugs Bunny
    1. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by AceJohnny · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm just an innocent bystander here, but do you have proof for your claims? Or at least a little more development?

      --
      Misleading titles? Inflammatory blurbs? Keep in mind that Slashdot is a tabloid.
    2. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by carpeweb · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if this qualifies as "proof", but if you just look at the web site, it immediately presents links to another merchant processor at 995MerchantAccounts. I tried to WHOIS both paypalsucks.com and this other site and found they both don't identify the people or organizations behind them in their register.com info. PayPalSucks uses a WhoIs Privacy Protection, Inc. registrant identity, and 995MerchantAccounts identifies their admin as Administrator.

      Why are they so anxious to hide their identities? Is it more than one person or organization? I don't know, and I'm too lazy to go beyond this for proof. The links on PayPalSucks are enough to convince me that this is just an attempt to "compete" with PayPal.

      IMHO, the rate structure for 995MerchantAccounts is probably not favorable to smaller merchants. They charge $10/month for a "statement fee" and $19.95/month for an "internet gateway fee". PayPal does not have fixed fees for account maintenance. 995MerchantAccounts probably has a lower transaction discount fee (2.39% vs. 2.9% for PayPal, which has a sliding scale that goes down to 1.9% but only for high-volume sellers), and has a flat transaction fee of $0.25 vs. $0.30 for PayPal. Assuming a merchant has less than $3,000/month in charge volume, it seems like PayPal would be a cheaper way to process:

      Assume 60 sales transactions @ $50/transaction

      PayPal Fees
      60 x $0.30 = $18.00
      2.9% x $3,000.00 = $87.00

      Total Fees = $105.00

      995MerchantAccounts Fees
      60 x $0.25 = $15.00
      2.39% x $3,000.00 = $71.70
      Statement Fee = $10
      Internet Gateway Fee = $19.95

      Total Fees = $126.65

      BTW, at $3,000.01/month, PayPal's transaction discount falls to 2.5%. It falls to 1.9% above $100,000/month. At higher volumes, their discount rate is clearly lower than 995MerchantAccount's, and at lower volumes, the fixed fees for 995MerchantAccounts start to outweigh the "savings" from the 2.39% discount rate.

    3. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by flonker · · Score: 1

      That looks like a pretty standard merchant account. Authorize.net is nearly identical.

      Merchant accounts are their own particular brand of evil, but less evil than Paypal, as they have their own particular rules that they follow.

    4. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by carpeweb · · Score: 1

      So what's so evil?

      I've never had a problem with PayPal, but I admit I don't really use them as a merchant processor. I just use them for the occasional payment. However, their pricing seems pretty good, regardless of whether it's the best. In addition, I recall having one problem with a purchase several years ago (before eBay bought them), and I got a full refund. (The merchant didn't deliver.)

      How is PayPal evil but not the competitor that's posing as some kind of consumer activist site?

      I'm not a PayPal evangelist. I signed up years ago just to get the "free" $5 (which I think has been earning compound interest, making it by far my best retirement investment to date). But I just don't see the problem; it's pretty unremarkable, in fact.

    5. Re:I hate when websites advertise paypalsucks.com by flonker · · Score: 1

      I was disputing the "evidence" that paypalsucks.com is run by a competitor. I don't know if it is or not, but "anonymous" domain registrations are extremely common, and 995merchantaccounts.com looks like just like a standard commercial merchant account. Identification of your contact as "Administrator" is common in that typically in a large organization, a role is responsible for the domain rather than a person. So, the Administrator is responsible rather than George in IT.

      Paypal is evil in that they act like a bank yet don't obey the banking rules. One example is if there is a dispute, they hold on to the money from both ends, but there are other issues I've heard about.

      Merchant processors are evil in that they charge both ends, and if there is any dispute, they almost always side with the consumer rather than the merchant. Even if the dispute is resolved in the merchant's favour, they are still charged a hefty sum simply because the dispute occured. That's from the merchant's point of few. The evils of credit cards from the consumer's point of view should be readily apparent.

      Finally, a real merchant account may be more expensive than a paypal account for processing credit cards, but considering Paypal's track record, I sleep better at night with the real thing. And that's one of the prime decision making factors for many small business owners, considering how easy it is to make a mistake and go under.

  23. Re:PayPal Will Still Censors Political Dissent by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

    Excuse me but, he has a point (if said censorship has actually taken place, of course).

    --
    Global warming is a cube.
  24. Is that the UN with Cuba on its Human Rights body? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or maybe China? Or Saudi Arabia?

    Or that recently had Syria?

    Anyone who thinks the UN is good for anything other than a forum for tin-pot despots to bang their own damn drums is a fucking moron.

  25. UK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why is everyone here complaining about paypal in europe? Odd

    1. Re:UK ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article was posted at 11.12AM UK time, 12.12 for the continent. It'd be too early for most Americans to be in the office (or up generally), so us old-worlders are posting, and we obviously have European based anecdotes.

  26. Oh the idiocy... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... of believing a PayPal account is a "right". Grow up.

    Did you actually read what you posted or not? The guy's name was on a watch list, unless he proved he wasn't the other person with the same name, why should they realistically do business with him? They gave him simple chance and he left the service.

    1. Re:Oh the idiocy... by infestedsenses · · Score: 1

      Human Rights don't stop where business begins. Human Rights apply everywhere at anytime. The point is not about having the right to a paypal account, the point is that filtering out customers based on name associations is in violation of the Human Rights (and of the constitution of the country in which paypal resides, by the way), as it would be if you were to base it on religion, gender, nationality, or anything else written down in the manifest. And as for providing "proof", everyone is innocent until proven guilty. How nice of them to provide this "chance" of further undermining the validity of the Human Rights. C'mon, use some common sense.

  27. Meet Mansoor by Rogerborg · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Mansoor lives in Mumbai. He'll be staffing that line, 14 hours a day. Good luck getting through to him.

    The devil, as always, is in the details.

    --
    If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  28. Re: PayPal Will Still Censor Political Dissent by aplusjimages · · Score: 1

    I thought Malcom X was dead.

    I thought a company still had a right to determine who their clients were as long as it wasn't based on race. If a company wants to ban a group because they promote hate, isn't that their right. Imagine is a Jewish guy owned Paypal and had to put up with people selling Holocaust lamp shades and wallets. Should he have to take that kind of crap?

    Sure Malcom X was a racist. He hated white people. Look where he grew up and the time period. I'm not saying racism is good, but I can see how he got there.

    --
    Can I bum a sig?
  29. Wouldn't have believed it... by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    Didn't PayPal (supposedly) increase their customer service efforts a year or so ago? There's an old story which needs to be dug up.

    The mode of the customer service isn't the problem, it's the quality. Even if there are live operators, that won't make any difference if they keep locking accounts for no apparent reason, or for reasons the customer isn't at fault for, or if the operators can't take reasonable action without customer acrobatics. The attitude and practices at PayPal are what need to be changed.

    Of course, instead of lawsuits, websites and complaints, the easiest solution is to stop using PayPal. By the time I had made three Paypal transactions my account had been locked twice and I gave up on it; why use (and pay for) something if it offers no convenience?

  30. PayPal are a private institution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    PayPal are a private institution; They may refuse to do business with anyone they please. Banks are able to do the same.

    This is nothing to do with freedom of expression or censoring political dissentors, it's about not wanting to do business (and therefore be linked) with someone whom large swathes of decent society deem a racist bigot.

    1. Re:PayPal are a private institution... by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      That's fine and all, except it's false. In your so-called "land of the free", private institutions are NOT allowed to refuse to do business with anyone they please. There's a whole slew of anti-discrimination laws that deal with that. I would guess it is forbidden to discriminate against someone for their political beliefs.
      Besides, I though your party found Jews bashing to be cool, nowadays.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    2. Re:PayPal are a private institution... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      There's a whole slew of anti-discrimination laws

      If by whole slew you mean the decision can't be based on race, religion or sex, sure there's a "slew". Keep in mind employment law is different.

      I would guess it is forbidden to discriminate against someone for their political beliefs.

      You would be wrong.

    3. Re:PayPal are a private institution... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      No, you *can* refuse to do business with anyone you please. You just *can't* do it because they're part of a particular group, i.e. female, over 50, white, christian etc. Refusing to do business because they're being rude to your staff is fine be they black, white or tie-dye pink.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
    4. Re:PayPal are a private institution... by giorgiofr · · Score: 1

      Someday, someone will have to explain to me how A and NOT A can be both true at the same time.

      --
      Global warming is a cube.
    5. Re:PayPal are a private institution... by jacksonj04 · · Score: 1

      You can refuse to serve a person based on their own individual activities, but can't refuse to serve them based on their race/age/gender/whatever.

      --
      How many people can read hex if only you and dead people can read hex?
  31. re: What do I expect from PayPal? by King_TJ · · Score: 1

    First of all, PayPal does not act "like a bank" in all respects. Last I checked, it wasn't possible to get any type of business or even personal loan from them. That's a *huge* function of a "bank". They also don't seem to offer any types of "savings accounts" ... merely a variation of a "checking account with interest" that foregoes usage of paper checks.

    I'm not so sure that people would like the results if they got what they clamor for when they beg govt. to regular PayPal as though they're just another FDIC insured financial institution. It's certainly arguable that current banks never developed any of the handy features that made PayPal popular, precisely *because* they're too tied up with the "red tape" of govt. regulations to attempt to tackle it.

    I know where I live, some of our major banks still can't even process direct deposit of employee payroll checks without the business dialing in at 9600 BPS with a modem! They haven't even gotten that whole system onto the Internet yet!

    I think PayPal certainly deserves a few lawsuits to "force their hand" when they start playing games with freezing people's accounts without warning or good reason. But that can and *is* happening. With some of that straightened out, I think they perform a generally useful service that my bank has still failed to provide after all these years - so I'm reasonably ok with them.

    Would I trust them with a large sum of money kept in their account? No way! But that's sort of like pre-paying one of your monthly bills a year or two in advance, and then freaking out if they go bankrupt and you never get it back. Use your FDIC regulated bank for money *storage*, and keep PayPal for money *transfer* when it's a convenient alternative.

  32. Satisfied customer by GreedyCapitalist · · Score: 1

    For what it's worth, I have been using PayPal since the beginning and I've never had a problem. My PayPal money market account has a higher rate that any "normal" bank, and is much more convenient for online stuff. I use it to accept online payment and recommend it to all my web design clients. I feel for the users who had their accounts locked, but there's a balance between security, ease-of-use, and low costs, and personally, I'll take a little inconvenience for a higher interest rate and lower transaction costs.

    1. Re:Satisfied customer by jandrese · · Score: 1

      For what it's worth, I suspect about 75% of the horror stories about paypal are complete fabrications. I hear about all of these people online who supposedly lost thousands of dollars through Paypal, but I've never met anyone in person who has had much trouble with them at all. A lot of the horror stories have somewhat fishy details too, like why the other side wasn't saying anything and how they were able to just casually close their Paypal account. It doesn't help that websites that make a big deal about how Paypal sucks link to alternate sites that are extremely shady.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:Satisfied customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want a good account with a high rate, go grab an ING account. Totally done online, good customer support, and better interest rates than any other bank. Deposit or withdraw anytime you feel like, and you only have to wait a handful of days for transfers. Its also considered a bank, and has to follow laws, and is FDIC insured.
      You cannot say teh same about Paypal.
      As others have said, as long as they are not regulated, and are not considered a bank, they do not have to follow the same laws, or any laws.
      ING is very easy to use, very secure, and is low cost. I mean, you have no fees and no charges.
      They don't do payments like paypal, but for an inerest bearing account they CANNOT be beat.

    3. Re:Satisfied customer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I reccomend HSBC Direct over ING. It is the same setup as ING, but it give a better rate at 5.05%. And HSBC has been pretty consistent with this rate for a while.

      Still FDIC insured and all that jazz. And if you get an HSBC checking account (I have one, and I don't even live in a state that HSBC does business) it is extremely easy to handle all of your finances and get the best rate always (instant transfers instead of 3 day bank-to-bank transfers). Plus, who actually uses checks these days? I always pay with credit and then pay the credit card off electronically each month. This maximizes the points I earn!

    4. Re:Satisfied customer by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      I bet you approve of the war on turrer too.

  33. o (British) bank should let.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    o (British) bank should let funds be removed from an account with just the a/c name, number and sort code

    How do you think I setup all those direct debits on my girlfriends bank account then?

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by Kijori · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Direct debit - here in Britain - is subject to vigorous protection. It requires you to give permission to your bank, and if you contest any of the charges then your branch is obliged to immediately refund them. To use it to steal money you would have to find someone absolutely acalculic.

    2. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      I've been using my girlfriends bank details for online direct debits for ages (sometime they even put through my name on the direct debit request) , we've never had to sign anything and the money comes out every month.

      I do have her permission to setup direct debits but the bank doesn't know that and still lets me set them up, accasionally using my name instead of hers.

      All you have to do to setup a scam is setup a company and begin taking Direct debits over the internet.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by internewt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      OK, so it follows that the fewer places my bank details are, the less likely a direct debit could be set up to hoover my account. So by not using Paypal, by not even having an account (anymore), I cannot be phished, nor can PP be cracked (tech or social) and my details getting out.

      Though my bank details may be visible to other ebay users I buy from, and by extension their accounts could be hacked and my details obtained by a crook, but this is pretty unlikely. But by the sounds of it the DD scheme is very protected and thats the only real "attack vector" if you have my sort code, name and a/c number.

      But I found a file on my laptop earlier that I used as a notebook whilst I was constructing my rant to put in the box when closing the Paypal account I had (in error...). I feel I need to share this with the world, and you can give Paypal this amount of abuse and they don't do anything! :) This chunk is over 2000 chars, but the 1000 character limit was enforced with javascript IIRC (can I get a shout out to NoScript?).

      1000 characters is not enough. Why place a limit? Can't Paypal take criticism? Or more likely those beloved shareholders are more important than your customers?

      Paypal are greedy cunts, security is BS, you react in knee-jerk ways to sec issues (as long as paypal isn't ripped off, fraud isn't a problem from your point of view. So what if the customer get ripped off, what are they going to do, find another escrow service they can use on ebay?).

      But fat-cat execs can't ever see what is wrong with their greed (and that attitude filters throughout an organisation. Do you have wanker middle-mgmt types that will fuck over the peons for personal gain (like bonuses or cars)?). I bet the person who reads this (first, but I doubt even if this gets escalated no-one will give a shit) is paid an insulting salary and hates their job, or at least the office politics etc..

      At least in the UK you are regulated by the FSA, but elsewhere I understand you can do what you like, because your not a bank and are so able to avoid any regulation.

      PS It's trivial to by pass restrictions on a website, and only a retard would think that a JS limiter would be worth deploying into the production environment. But let me guess, the accountant types make the decisions, not the people who actually understand tech.

      (though if there is half a clue anywhere in your organisation, you'll have post submit checks to force the-limits) (Wow, you do on the 3 tick box rule. I also want to tick:

      No longer need / one time use
      Bank account verification
      PayPal's customer service was unprofessional
      Fees are too high
      Credit card verification
      PayPal's products do not meet my needs)

      I have entered the following into the "other" box, but it's over a number of characters so your shitty web site is choking:

      Spam. I signed up for policy notifs & transaction emails, but I started getting shit about paypal by text, or someother system that is screaming out as a fraud vector, and you added me to a fucking mailing list without my consent.

      And what the fuck? I have said to close this account multiple times, and I am repeatedly asked if I want to do something else. No, fucktards, I don't.

      Yeah, it turned into a foaming rant :)

      --
      Car analogies break down.
    4. Re:o (British) bank should let.... by Kijori · · Score: 1

      The problem with this is that the moment she gets her statement she can repudiate the charge, which will be refunded to her within 24 hours. Any fees from this will be passed on to you. All companies in the UK that are allowed to set up direct debits - and it's open only to companies here - have to be vetted and granted permission, and if more than a few people protest the charges they lose this permission. If you want to steal money, direct debit doesn't give you much scope to do that - you want them to initiate the transfers, or send you cheques. If you want to do it yourself, you want them to sign a power of attorney document, or similiar, to avoid the restrictions on direct debit.

  34. Re: What do I expect from PayPal? by whoisearth · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm not disagreeing that PayPal is far different from a bank as it doesn't allow Loans, Savings Accounts, etc. The thing is, that it still does provide the basics. It charges interest. It withholds money. It can hold money just like a chequing account. They can also transfer to and from PayPal accounts.

    The problem I'm saying is that it's very much a "wild west" situation with PayPal right now. Although one can risk them not taking advantage of you and your money one can't guarantee that it's not going to happen. Just like banks, Paypal is bound to be operating on a "profit before people" mode of business. Banks, luckily, are monitored by government agencies to make sure everything is on the "up and up". PayPal, however, is not.

  35. since we're trading anecdotes ... by cascadingstylesheet · · Score: 1

    ... I haven't had any problems. Yet. I send invoices through PayPal, people pay me, I transfer the money out, and everybody's happy.

    (whistles nervously, knocks wood ...)

  36. Why use Paypal in the UK? by grouse · · Score: 1

    Most banks let you do BACS transfers free of charge.

  37. Re: PayPal Will Still Censor Political Dissent by SirLars · · Score: 1

    what a crock.

    Someone does not have to be jewish, black, injun or purple to understand and hate oppression and those that support it.

    The SAME right those people utilize to talk their 'crap' (whether it be black power, white power or "kill the white people" by tyrone green and his reggae band) is the right that PAYPAL utilizes to NOT DEAL WITH THEM.

    If some skinhead with a swastika on his shirt walks into my shop cussing up "this that or the other", I'm going to send him right out again. I don't care if he's got money falling out of his pockets. It's MY RIGHT as a business person to limit who I want to deal with.

  38. SUE their pants out of their arse, then by unity100 · · Score: 1

    Do it.

  39. Kind of weak by dtfinch · · Score: 1

    "Under terms of the settlement agreement, PayPal said it is not admitting any liability for the allegations in the dispute."

    Basically, PayPal pays states' legal fees and the lawsuit goes away.

  40. Re:PayPal Will Still Censors Political Dissent by symes · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I think an issue here is *who* should be bashing the bigot. If corporations do this on our behalf then we (or our community) lose the capacity to fight bigotry. It's up to us, not faceless corporations, to challege these people. And it is through the process of open discussion that we come to understand what is right - lest we end up in some Orwellian void where PayPal et al do all the thinking for us.

  41. Offtopic - comment on signature by billstewart · · Score: 1

    I liked the old Pope - the old Pope smoked dope. This new pope don't smoke no dope....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  42. Paypal loves that arguement by phorm · · Score: 1

    Perhaps, and a lot of companies love an arguement like that. It's not worth your time to fight over $30, but when 500 people find it not worth their time then that comes to:
    $30
    x 500
    =
    $15,000 (profit)


    I'm fairly sure that phone companies use a similar tactic. Locally, Bell is one of the worst. My previous co-worker, with astounding dedication, would usually end up donating about two lunch-hours a day on the phone fixing his bill. He would go over it monthly, and discovered that (during about a 7 month period, I no longer work there) that he was being billed for calling his "companion phone" (two phones on the same plan are supposed to be able to call each other for free), or for minutes during his free time. Usually it came out between $3-8.
    Now that takes a lot of work, and really it's not a large amount for most people. But as the problem was entirely consistent and recurring, I would assume that it happened to more people than just him. The company would be pocketing the profits, and not bothering with the expense in fixing any computer "issues" that caused it (assuming it was a bug, and not an intentional 'issue').

    With the numbers that is:
    $3/month
    x 12 months
    x (perhaps) 100,000 customers
    =
    $3,600,000

    If you go with $7/month it's $8,400,000


    So yeah, it might not be worth the $3 to most people, or even $30 to you... but it's really quite lucrative for the company and when you don't complain (and when I say complain, I also mean lodging BBB, FTC, etc, complaints) it's worth a whole lot of cash to them to keep on screwing the 'customer'

  43. I am won of the winners of this lawsuit by RaigetheFury · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Like many of you we all had issues with Paypal. My story is a bit different in the fact that I was part of every bit of this lawsuit. When i was in college I sold things through ebay and I made a good bit of money doing it. One time I had a particularly large order ($3500) and like each of my orders I require that the mailto address AND phone number matched the paypal information. I would call the number, speak with that person and then begin the order. I would also get confirmation on shipping, tracking and insurance. So not only did they have to sign for it but I knew when and who! What more could paypal need right? I billed them for $3500 and shortly after recieved it via paypal. As usually I immediately move the money to my bank account. Two days later I get an email from paypal stating that this was a disputed order and that the money would be held until it was resolved. I immediately call my bank and put a block on my account for any agency called Paypal or with Paypal in the name to withdraw any money. I even specified the amount it would try to withdraw I email back paypal every possible bit of information they could need, address, phone number, tracking number, when it was signed for, the number to contact UPS about who signed for it etc. They responded "the credit card was illegally charged. You have 7 days to remit the funds". "So let me get this straight" I responded. Not only did the credit card address match the paypal address, that matched the billing address, that matched the mailto address, but the phone number is registered to the card holder AND the package was sighed for by the card holder? Insert canned reply and "remit payment or else". So I consulted a student legal at NCSU (love those guys), and they explained that since Paypal was not technically a bank I was not "technically liable for their fuckups". So I didn't pay. My account was locked of course and it had .14 cents in it! Paypal continued to email me about owed money until I sent them a formal letter explaining in no uncertain terms that it would be a "cold day in hell before they got a penny from me". The emails stopped. However, I'm a very careful person when it comes to money and my credit history. You guessed it, Paypal tried to put an unpaid debt of $4000 on my credit history. I contested it and included all of my information. It took 3 months but it was removed and paypal was fined (undisclosed amount). Then I saw this class action lawsuit happening. I really wanted to make sure I had covered all my bases legally and so I joined. I was contacted directly by the lawyers involved and I was added to the "long form" group. There were 2, a quick settlement group and a "take your chances at getting any money back" group. I heard we won and recieved a package in the mail that included a legal statement I do not owe them a single penny and a check for $395. Paypal is STILL just as bad. It's NOT a bank, it is not subject to the laws of a bank, they can hold your money for ANY reason they want to and screw you out of it. It took me 3 YEARS to get this settlement. THREE YEARS. And you know what happened to paypal? Record profits... Good job legal system.

    1. Re:I am won of the winners of this lawsuit by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      and those bastards took your enter key too.

  44. Two points by phorm · · Score: 1

    First of all, this is a royal pain in the ass, but there are ways to make it work:

    Have a server that contains your files, with a validation code or password protected directory. Send the validation code by mail. Being that I've seen people listing $5.00 shipping for web-only or non-tangible items, it should be pretty to list a $2.00 postage fee or whatever it is to send the thing by registered make.

    Again, it's a pain in the ass, but it's a good method of verification.

    Secondly, make a small claims case. Unless paypal wants to send a lawyer to meet you in your jurisdiction, you'll probably win by default.

  45. Re:Is that the UN with Cuba on its Human Rights bo by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, it also doesn't help that their biggest Security Council member refuses to submit to any multilateral decisions or authorities like the World Court.. guess which nation I'm talking about. The tinpot dictators are the least of the UN's problems.

  46. Sucky job by kreyg · · Score: 1
    they'll conspicuously advertise a contact phone number and staff it 14 hours a day

    Why do I get the image of a single employee sitting in a room with a single phone line and phone, answering calls from irate people who have been getting a busy signal for the last 14 hours?

    --
    sig fault
    1. Re:Sucky job by Gyromancer · · Score: 1

      The agreement stipulates that calls have to be answered promptly, defined as within 5 minutes. Of course there's a buttload of fine print to cover things like the time callers spend working their way through the automated menu trying to get to talk to a real person, and all the usual things beyond their control...acts of god, acts of war, acts of terrorism (didn't mention acts of war on terrorism), strikes, riots, floods, fires, etc.

  47. MOD PARENT UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spent all my mod points before I saw this; someone hook it up!