Slashdot Mirror


British Man Trades Frequent Flyer Miles for Space Shot

lvmoon writes "Start saving up your airline miles. Alan Watts, a British businessman, was able to use his 2,000,000 frequent flyer miles for a space flight, a ticket aboard a 2009 Virgin Galactic space flight." From the article: "Electrician Alan Watts said he flew to and from the United States on Virgin Atlantic flights more than 40 times in the past six years, earning him enough miles to take the trip into space with Virgin's space wing, London's The Sun newspaper reported Friday. The trip cost 2 million frequent flier miles, compared to the 90,000 miles required for a first-class flight from London to New York." Besides being funny, does this say anything about space travel in the 21st century? Is space is no longer the final frontier? I'm pretty sure Roddenberry didn't have frequent flier miles in mind when he came up with the Enterprise.

130 comments

  1. Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Ckwop · · Score: 5, Interesting

    He's lucky too because he's got this free ticket in before the much expected hyperinflation in the air-miles currency.

    This surprises some people but in fact, air-miles are a form of currency. They can be exchanged for real world goods and services and therefore have an intrinsic real world value. The problem is that the vast majority of air-miles go unspent. Since a constantly increasing amount of currency is chasing a limited amount of goods the value of the currency is constantly falling.

    The fact that this guy was able to accrue two million air-miles doing a normal job tells you that inflation has already crippled the currency. I soon expect air-miles to be practically worthless.

    Simon

    1. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Now if only there were a conversion from EVE's ISK, to Air Miles!

    2. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by tgd · · Score: 4, Informative

      An interesting theory... however, twelve years ago I was investigating various ways of doing product promotions and had looked quite a bit at frequent flyer promotions. At the time I could buy frequent flyer miles at eight cents a piece (with substantial discounts for VERY large purchases), and generally they applied towards tickets in the ten cent per mile price. (25,000 frequent flier miles for a round trip ticket of approximately $2500 peak value -- the average seat cost being based on the highest available fare for that seat type)

      At two million frequent flier miles for a $200k ticket, they gave him ten cents value a piece today, as well. I haven't looked, but I would guess the cost to buy miles hasn't changed either (or even kept pace with inflation). What has changed is discount airlines pulling prices down, so the disconnect between the price you're "paying" for FF miles and the vlaue you get back isn't as good since its trivial to find non-peak price seats on flights.

    3. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by advocate_one · · Score: 1

      he wasn't doing an ordinary job... he's the managing director of a small electronics firm...

      --
      Donald 'Duck' Dunn: We had a band powerful enough to turn goat piss into gasoline.
    4. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by mythras · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but I bet they still will black out Christmas and New Years, bastards.

    5. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      I don't consider any job that requires 40 transatlantic flights in 6 years to be "normal."

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    6. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Since a constantly increasing amount of currency is chasing a limited amount of goods the value of the currency is constantly falling.


      I disagree. Once a mile is spent, it ceases to circulate in the system.

      Similarly, miles are created only when money is spent on a ticket, roughly on scale with the value of the ticket. One would expect that the price of the ticket includes a profit margin that can be applied towards any miles which are redeemed.

      Further, the cost of goods sold (at least for profitable companies) is lower than the price. Although the profit margin for airfares is low, many airfare rewards programs (and pretty much all non-airfare rewards programs) have a very wide array of lower-price consumer goods which can be redeemed. These things are produced for pennies on the dollar.

      Lastly, for rewards programs such as the "Air Miles" rewards programs and store rewards cards, every item you purchase can be tracked to your account. Maybe this should have been posted on YRO instead.

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    7. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Ucklak · · Score: 0, Troll
      I soon expect air-miles to be practically worthless.


      Aren't they already worthless?

      At least for the states, you can only use them within the continental US, you can only use them when it's not busy or overbooked, you can't reserve seats with them and have to use them on no-shows. You may be lucky and be able to use them internationally only on certain dates.

      To me at least, it's far better to spend $50-$600 on a ticket than to deal with the hassle of those rules.

      I friend and I were meeting in Hawaii a couple of years ago. He used his miles to fly to Los Angeles but had to wait 2 days to get a seat after in LA.

      I travel and have just about every account with miles on most of the airlines and still haven't racked up enough to get a 'free' flight. Add all my miles up for a single card and I do but I'm not going to pay more to fly in airline A to rack up `miles` when airline B has the cheaper rate.
      1 airline dumped my miles because I haven't flown with them in 3 years. Yeah, that's worth it.

      I have a family member that visits us often and he sticks with 1 airline and has racked up miles to get a few free trips. He's single, and is able to hang out at the airport. A lot of us don't have that luxury.

      It seems that miles are worth more when you add them on top of a paying fare like upgrade to first class.
      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    8. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by MightyYar · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's only like 7 a year. If you were in the semiconductor industry, you'd probably do that number of visits to Asia, where the best trip time you can hope for is the 18-hour Newark to Singapore flight on Singapore Airlines. When I started my job with that kind of travel, it only paid about $40,000/year, and the techs (who travel more) made even less... we certainly considered the job to be "normal" :)

      --
      W..w..W - Willy Waterloo washes Warren Wiggins who is washing Waldo Woo.
    9. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      I have yet to spend any miles and one airline that I had miles with removed them as I haven't had any travel with them for 3 years.

      Furthermore, miles don't have a 100% return rate just like retail/restaurant gift cards don't have a 100% return rate.

      Someone I consult with owns a few restaurants and offer gift cards. The return rate is 65-70%.

      Some of the /.ers would then list:

      1. Open Restaurant
      2. ??????
      3. Sell gift cards
      4. Profit!!!

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
    10. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      What are you talking about? Most frequent flier accounts now don't have any restrictions like that. You don't need to fly standby. What a wierdo.

    11. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Is0m0rph · · Score: 1

      That's a lot but not that huge of an amount either. I made 10 transatlantic flights in 2 years as a software engineer. If you work in the semiconductor industry in the US there's a lot of travel to Japan, Singapore, Korea, China, most of Europe where the fabs are. Management could easily surpass 40 in 6 years.

    12. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by thesandtiger · · Score: 1

      Interesting! I think I'll avoid working in the semiconductor industry then :) I don't mind travel, but last summer I spent 21 hours in the air in a 24 hour period and just couldn't imagine doing that more than once every few years.

      Thanks for the expanded perspective on frequent flyers.

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    13. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by generic-man · · Score: 1

      You could have pulled a David Phillips and found a way to get tons of miles for a mere $0.0018 per mile (after a tax deduction; $0.0025/mile before).

      --
      For more information, click here.
    14. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by IainMH · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Branson is a master publicist.

      I bet he asked his airline team 'who has the most airmiles?' and set the tarrif at that price point.

    15. Re:Hyperinflation in the Airmiles currency by Ucklak · · Score: 1

      Delta:

      Starting December 31, 2006, we're modifying the above policy and miles will expire after two years of account inactivity. Mileage balances of members who have had no SkyMiles activity within the last two calendar years (2005 and 2006) will expire on Dec. 31, 2006.

      And Delta was the airline that wouldn't let my friend use miles to fly to Hawaii.

      American Airlines:
        As of January 1, 2000, if your account has no qualifying activity in any 36-month period, all mileage credit in the account will expire except for those miles earned prior to July 1, 1989, in accounts established prior to January 1, 1989, whose mileage credit will not expire. Each qualifying activity on or after January 1, 2000 extends the expiration date of all unexpired mileage credit in your account for 36 months from the date of the qualifying activity.

      I'm not going to copy and paste from every single airline but you get the idea.
      They also do have blackout dates with US-Thanksgiving to Christmas being one of the dates for US travel not allowing free travel.

      --
      if you steal from one source, that is plagiarism, if you steal from many, well, that's just research.
  2. The REAL Question: by NexFlamma · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Kosher or regular?

    1. Re:The REAL Question: by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Kosher or regular?

      No, the REAL question is:

      When can I exchange my Frequent Flyer Miles for a MONEY shot?

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    2. Re:The REAL Question: by NexFlamma · · Score: 1

      *points to parent*

      And I'm off topic?

    3. Re:The REAL Question: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      *points to parent*

      And I'm off topic?


      Mods, mod parent offtopic.

  3. Is space the final frontier? by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 0, Troll
    No. Space travel is a temporary situation. It will cost too much and become unfeasible in the next 50 - 100 years.

    It's industrial civilisation's equivalent of the pyramids. Valuable at the time. But in the far distant future, they won't remember the asteroid we deflected in 2044. A weird result of a massive excess in resources, funds, and exuberance.

    It's NOT the end of the world. It's just different.

    Really. Different.

    RS

    Of the set of people who ever will travel in space, most of them already have.

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
    1. Re:Is space the final frontier? by biscon · · Score: 1

      thank you for shattering my vision of the future, oh great oracle of slashdot. Wanna elaborate on how you arrived at that conclusion?

    2. Re:Is space the final frontier? by cyber-vandal · · Score: 0, Troll

      Trolls *sigh*

    3. Re:Is space the final frontier? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Hubbert peak. The end of the era of cheap energy. Oil won't run out, it'll just get more and more expensive to produce, taking up a larger and larger proportion of the economy.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peak_oil

      There will have to be something very valuable in space to justify the energy required to get there. Probably the military domination required to ensure access to the remaining oil supplies. The Outer Space Treaty? Not worth the paper it's written on.

      --
      Deleted
    4. Re:Is space the final frontier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone want to explain how this is a troll?

      It's a troll because it makes an emotive, debate-triggering negative statement without being based on anything factual.

      All of the reasons why space travel is currently hard, dangerous, and costly have been examined in enormous detail for decades, and for every one of them there are *MANY* not only proposed but actually developing solutions that are within normal engineering grasp (ie. no warp drives).

      So the parent was just trolling, either by intent or through ignorance.

    5. Re:Is space the final frontier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Er, we are all travelling in Space, right now, quite fast (around, orbitally, and around the galactic centre etc). Enjoy the ride on a starry night, folks! And even if we weren't, going up rather high and then coasting back down again is hardly 'escape-velocity' stuff. What a waste of time and imagination.

    6. Re:Is space the final frontier? by vertinox · · Score: 1

      No. Space travel is a temporary situation. It will cost too much and become unfeasible in the next 50 - 100 years.

      Really, what happens when the sun dies out? Or the earth's core cools off resulting in no magnetic field which will lead to the atmosphere evaporating into space?

      Won't be anyone around if we haven't traveled into space...

      But I suppose it would be a moot point if no one was around to care that all the humans died off.

      --
      "I am the king of the Romans, and am superior to rules of grammar!"
      -Sigismund, Holy Roman Emperor (1368-1437)
    7. Re:Is space the final frontier? by coldfarnorth · · Score: 1

      I disagree, I'd say that there is an enormous initial investment required to a) get to space in the first place, and b) develop the technology needed to sustain life indefinitely in space, but the potential payout is huge, once we've figured it out. I predict instead that the number of living people who have traveled in space will always be greater than 50% of the set of all people who have traveled in space.

      --
      Lets start refering to The War Against Terror by it's initials. . .
    8. Re:Is space the final frontier? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Bzzzt. False. If this were true, 1/3 of all the messages on Slashdot would have to be modded to negative one. Simple fact: it got modded down because Slashdot has this "we will eventuall colonize the galaxy religous belief". Go against the Slashdot religion, get modded down. It is the equivilent of the inquisition, but with folks too cowardly to actually go and physically confront someone.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    9. Re:Is space the final frontier? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 1

      Really, what happens when the sun dies out? Or the earth's core cools off resulting in no magnetic field which will lead to the atmosphere evaporating into space?

      Not sure about the accuracy of the second part of your statement. However, it is not going to happen for hundreds of millions or even billions of years. We can't even make policy based on things we know will help us in twenty years, much less worry about millions of years.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    10. Re:Is space the final frontier? by deficite · · Score: 1

      You modded parent as troll? I think it's a valid assessment of the (possible) future. Don't mod somebody down just because he says something you don't want to hear.

    11. Re:Is space the final frontier? by ultranova · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Hubbert peak. The end of the era of cheap energy. Oil won't run out, it'll just get more and more expensive to produce, taking up a larger and larger proportion of the economy.

      Switch to nuclear and run vechiles with hydrogen, batteries or vegetable oil. The anti-nuclear morons will complain, but they will anyway no matter what you do. Or drill a deep hole in the ground, drop some water there and watch geothermal heat turn it to steam. Or build tidal or wave harnesses in coastal regions to harness said water motions. And so on.

      The whole peak oil hysteria is caused because we humans are lazy and haven't bothered improving our energy production technology significantly in a century or so. Maybe it will give the long-needed kick in the rear to start making rational, rather than just money-making, choices in energy policy.

      There will have to be something very valuable in space to justify the energy required to get there.

      How about endless amount of sunlight that can be harnessed and beamed back to Earth or used to power factories in orbit or in Moon) ?

      --

      Forget magic. Any technology distinguishable from divine power is insufficiently advanced.

    12. Re:Is space the final frontier? by krnpimpsta · · Score: 1

      Oh come on guys, his slashdot name is "Ralph Spoilsport."

      "SPOILSPORT!" I think that explains much. :)

      --

      New webcomic updated on Sundays: HERE

    13. Re:Is space the final frontier? by jthill · · Score: 1

      Gee, you're right. Humans aren't curious, or adventurous. They have no sense of wonder, no desire for experience, no appreciation of the sublime, no desire to go anywhere just because it's there, no ability to achieve greatness just to express their appreciation of the divine. And to whatever extent they do have those things, they're just children's dreams, and everyone knows how worthless *those* are.

      You wouldn't be worth a sneer if children weren't reading.

      --
      As always, all IMO. Insert "I think" everywhere grammatically possible.
    14. Re:Is space the final frontier? by theLOUDroom · · Score: 1

      "they're the modern day catastrophists they've got practical solutions (know all the right equations) they're the self-appointed righteous pragmatists and they know 50 ways to save the world"


      To put it another way:

      You don't have any proof that peak oil is going to happen. It's just the standard catastrophist call of "you better do what I say or something very bad will happen."

      For all you know, we'll get fusion worked out in five years and we'll have tons of cheap, clean energy causing a massive DROP in oil prices.

      IMO, I think neither case is likely. As oil prices rise, we will gradually shift towards other sources of energy and materials. (At least, that's how it will happen if we can manage to get the Texas oilmen out the Whitehouse.)

      --
      Life is too short to proofread.
    15. Re:Is space the final frontier? by khallow · · Score: 1

      What make it "valid"? This is standard trolling technique 101. Drop in a controversial topic without explaining why you hold that opinion. Pick up 10+ replies and giggle as people like you and me debate whether it was a troll or not.

    16. Re:Is space the final frontier? by khallow · · Score: 1

      OTOH, does he act like someone who would troll?

    17. Re:Is space the final frontier? by Colin+Smith · · Score: 1
      The whole peak oil hysteria is caused because we humans are lazy and haven't bothered improving our energy production technology significantly in a century or so.


      Um, it's because oil is much much cheaper than the alternatives. Said alternatives will come online as oil gets more expensive. However, they will still take up a significantly larger proportion of the economy than oil has over the last century.

      Btw, money making, is the rational choice.
      --
      Deleted
    18. Re:Is space the final frontier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes, that is precisely what is going on here. we had hope'd to keep this all a secret, but you've figured it out. darnitt.

  4. Heh by ribo-bailey · · Score: 0

    Electrician... Watts...

    heh.

  5. Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by freedom_india · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Priceless ! Without spending a single cent, he is flying off to Space: A frontier am sure ALL of us slashdotters have seen only on TV.

    Now, instead of making fun of his name, his parents, his loong nose and cribbing about Virgin, let us behave like adults and congratulate him for being the first tourist to exchange miles for space. (literally).

    Way to go Watts !

    --
    "Doing what i can, with what i have." ~ Burt Gummer
    1. Re:Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know, but Mark Shuttlewort maybe reads slashdot? :)

    2. Re:Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1

      I want to know if they will give him frequent flyer points for the Virgin Galactic flight.

      Calculated vertically, of course.

    3. Re:Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by Dorceon · · Score: 1

      You don't earn miles on award flights.

      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
    4. Re:Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by el+americano · · Score: 1

      Calculated vertically, of course.

      50 vertical miles or so? That wouldn't count for much.

      --
      Those are my principles. If you don't like them I have others. -Groucho Marx
    5. Re:Chance to shoot for a ride to space??? by not_a_bot · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It's terrific and way beyond cool. As a former frequent flier, I'm thrilled that somebody has actually gotten something useful for their frequent flier miles besides more travel. Let's be real here. After the first couple of flights, the glamour of frequent travel wears off.

      The last thing you want after spending 50 weeks a year out of town is to be more out of town. No matter how cool the place that you are going to is. Midnight flights, the disruption of your home life, the fact you don't actually get paid for having your butt on a plane, only for being there...

      Richard Branson has scored a marketing coup with the translation of air flight miles to a space flight chance of a lifetime. Bravo to him, and to the people who step up and take it.

  6. Well by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 0

    Is it just me, or do a huge number of people claimed to have purchase flights on the Virgin Galactic flight. For the last three years or so there have been sporadic news stories about celebrities, businessmen and just generally wealthy people getting their place on there, it makes you wonder if it isn't just PR on some of their accounts. What worries me more is about their preparations for the journey, astronauts spend years preparing to go into space and now it is being treated like a long-haul flight for some, I'm sure they will have some training but are they sure it is enough for the kind of forces that their body is going to experience while taking off?

    As much as I hail Richard Branson for his innovation (as one of the few successful British entrepreneurs), I must add my view that for something like this, we really should leave it to the professionals before we are sure of what can and can't be done on commercial levels (after all, Columbia and the launches after that have only served to remind us of what a dangerous feat it really is).

    1. Re:Well by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      It's just artificial preliminary publicity, don't think otherwise.

    2. Re:Well by Jussi+K.+Kojootti · · Score: 4, Informative
      What worries me more is about their preparations for the journey, astronauts spend years preparing to go into space and now it is being treated like a long-haul flight for some, I'm sure they will have some training but are they sure it is enough for the kind of forces that their body is going to experience while taking off?


      A) They won't be going to space in the sense that astronauts (and especially some cosmonauts) have been. It's just a few minutes of staying at a considerable height...

      B) The virgin spaceship is not a rocket. Takeoff should not be a bad experience.
    3. Re:Well by Inverted+Intellect · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I must add my view that for something like this, we really should leave it to the professionals before we are sure of what can and can't be done on commercial levels.

      Its hard to get professionals to do that if they're all stuck doing things at governmental levels.

      Besides, the comparison to Columbia is completely inapt. The shuttles' method of delivery has been compared to stacking TNT to the height of a street lamp pole just to launch a nut into space.

      The Virgin method is much closer to traditional aviation, which is a mature science with a much larger industry which has a large amount of experience in doing what they do. Ok, so they're sticking a rocket motor on what pretty much amounts to an aircraft, but at least it doesn't need fuel tanks which weigh multiple amounts as much as the craft.

    4. Re:Well by LS · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yes, but as has been said before by many Slashdot posters, getting to the edge of space and getting into orbit are as different as driving to the store and flying across the country. The Virgin craft will not get into orbit, and is thus useless for any sustained space flight or delivery. You are comparing apples and oranges sir. There is currently no other way to get a nut into orbit other than stacking TNT to the height of a street lamp.

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    5. Re:Well by LS · · Score: 1

      Yes, everyone seems to have forgotten that a number of issues including unexpected rolls occurred during flights 15p and 16p of SpaceShipOne, and while it never seemed that the flights were to end catastrophically, things were still very edgy. I suppose that many of those celebrities willing to risk their lives for 3 1/2 minutes of weightlessness must think one or more of the following:

      1 The experience is worth the risk
      2 They can brag about having gone to space
      3 Their lives are not worth living anymore and pushing the envelope is the only way to derive pleasure at this point
      4 They will get some type of immortality in history

      The second is pure ego, and may get a blowjob or two, the third reason is pathetic, and the fourth is unlikely, as some rich monkey will not go down in history for being the 7th guy to go on a commercial space flight. So that leaves the first. Is 3 1/2 minutes of weightlessness worth the risk? I'm not so sure. I believe you can get a number of equally rewarding experiences in life without such risk. There's also the Vomit Comit. It's only 30 seconds, but what's the big difference?

      LS

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
    6. Re:Well by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      he second is pure ego, and may get a blowjob or two,

      Dude. If you think this is any less reason to go to space than the other three, you are nuts!

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    7. Re:Well by RockyPersaud · · Score: 1

      Oh yes, because of course the government professionals are the ones who know how to do things commercially, cheaply and efficiently. Of course.

      Perhaps instead of voicing your ill-informed opinion you should leave it to the professionals to comment on it. Which they have, in spades, supporting the efforts of the commercial space tourism industry. Most of these outfits have ex-astronauts working for them.

      Finding out what can and can't be done on commercial levels requires doing it on commercial levels.

    8. Re:Well by khallow · · Score: 1

      They are different but not that different. What changes is the height of the pile of dynamite, that you can stay in orbit indefinitely, and the need for far more padding (something to dissipate about 20 times more heat) when you come down.

    9. Re:Well by khallow · · Score: 1

      I believe you can get a number of equally rewarding experiences in life without such risk.

      You are entitled to your opinion. But clearly a lot of people disagree with you on this. And that's really all there is to say.
    10. Re:Well by khallow · · Score: 1

      What worries me more is about their preparations for the journey, astronauts spend years preparing to go into space and now it is being treated like a long-haul flight for some, I'm sure they will have some training but are they sure it is enough for the kind of forces that their body is going to experience while taking off?

      I'm puzzled by what you think happens when someone is launched into space. They just experience more acceleration than normal. There are various ways to experience this on Earth. For example, a centrifuge can easily prepare someone for the higher acceleration of an actual launch. There are amusement park rides that expose for brief periods acceleration levels equivalent to what would probably be experienced in an early generation commercial ride.

      Just existing in Earth's gravitational field, as we do, subjects us to a one gee field. A launch and reentry probably would subject someone to 2 to 7 times as much acceleration with more than that possible in emergencies just like it is in Earth-based transportation emergencies. This is all quite mundane and pretty well understood.
    11. Re:Well by LS · · Score: 1

      In retrospect I didn't really believe in what I was saying when I typed it. Eh, momentum gets you sometimes...

      --
      There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  7. How can anything be a final frontier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    By definition a frontier is just beyond or at the edge of geographic or human knowledge. As far as space is concerned it's pretty damn huge and I'm guessing that it is also home to some very unique environments that will challenge humanity. It'll continue to be a frontier for quite some time.

  8. Uhm... he did more than fly... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    2M miles? 40 trips? US->UK? WTF?

    Considering a circumnavigation of the equator is only 25k miles and London->Los Angeles is only about 5500 miles, it would take a LAX-LHR round-trip every two weeks without fail for six years to truly earn all that in real air miles. Obviously dude got most of that mileage by racking up credit-card miles as no sane person, regardless of business requirement, would keep up a travel schedule that ridiculous for that long without a break.

    1. Re:Uhm... he did more than fly... by flithm · · Score: 1

      FF Miles, or Air Miles, or AeroMiles, etc, are not a one to one mapping between distance travelled and point earned. Nor are they redeemed for a one to one mapping between point miles and free travel miles. There is some relationship between the two, but in the end it's pretty arbitrary.

      There's things like bonus miles... you know fly right now and earn 10x the air miles! Plus yeah then there's ways to earn air miles by purchasing things.

    2. Re:Uhm... he did more than fly... by Dorceon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      no sane person, regardless of business requirement, would keep up a travel schedule that ridiculous for that long without a break.
      Try http://www.flyertalk.com/. Some of those people fly that much just to earn the miles.
      Considering a circumnavigation of the equator is only 25k miles and London->Los Angeles is only about 5500 miles, it would take a LAX-LHR round-trip every two weeks without fail for six years to truly earn all that in real air miles.
      By around the fifth round trip he'd earn elite status and start getting redeemable miles equal to double the miles flown, assuming Virgin has a sane FF program. Of course, the fact that you can redeem those miles for space travel suggests insanity. I'm sure credit card miles were part of the picture too, of course.
      --
      What sound do people on rollercoasters make? Hint: it's not Xbox 360.
  9. Electritian named Watts by dparnass · · Score: 1

    His last name is WATTs and he is a, fellow ELECTRICIAN. How awesome. I am an elctrician also. It looks like I need to start flying virgin air to get the 2 million frequent flyer mile electrician special. That is just awesome.

  10. "The Sun" is British gutter press by Toby+The+Economist · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This story is from "The Sun".

    That newspaper is the lowest of the low, the gutter press. Their normal faire consists of entirely fabricated stories and their conduct is entirely unethical. Do not place ANY credence to stories printed in this paper.

    1. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I also read the article in the Guardian and the Independent

      Much more dependable papers, but commonly read by pretenious middle class left wing wannabes who love the smell of their own farts.

    2. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by MosesJones · · Score: 1


      To put it into context, its owned by Murdoch (like the Times), so think of the Sun as a slightly more intellectual version of Fox News.

      --
      An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    3. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by ronanbear · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      the more they over-think the plumbing the easier it is to stop up the pipe
    4. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by RealGrouchy · · Score: 2, Funny
      To put it into context, its owned by Murdoch (like the Times), so think of the Sun as a slightly more intellectual version of Fox News.


      They're both Rupert Murdoch. Just because the Sun has a British accent doesn't mean that they're more intellectual. Do you fall for this one at parties, too?

      - RG>
      --
      Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
    5. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by eipgam · · Score: 4, Funny

      Reminds me of a quote from "Yes, (Prime) Minister":

      Jim Hacker: The Daily Mirror is read by people who think they run the country. The Guardian is read by people who think they ought to run the country. The Times is read by people who actually do run the country. The Daily Mirror is read by the wives of the people who run the country. The Financial Times is read by people who own the country. The Morning Star is read by people who think the country ought to be run by another country. The Daily Telegraph is read by people who think it is.

      Sir Humphrey: Prime Minister, what about people who read the Sun.

      Bernard: Sun readers don't care who runs the country as long as she's got big tits.

    6. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by drsquare · · Score: 1

      That second Daily Mirror should actually be the Daily M*il.

    7. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by IainMH · · Score: 1

      The sun is probably the most influential single newspaper on the entire planet.

      1. It got Tony Blair elected. 3 times. Why do you think Tony addresses the NewsCorp annual dinner?

      2. The markets move to what is mentioned on The Sun's city news page. Why? Because the barrow-boy traders who shift billions around the economy each day read it on the can before the day's trading starts.

    8. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You really think that they got Tony Blair elected??

      All they do is work out who is most likely to win and then back them.

      It was more likely to be the Tory sleaze and infighting that meant that Blair swept to power

    9. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by soliptic · · Score: 1

      Oh come on...

      Yes, it's gutter press (tabloid), yes (even worse) it's Murdoch, but "entirely fabricated"? "Do not place ANY credence"? I think you're confusing it with the Sport...

      The Sun may spin the news to a pro-Murdoch agenda, they may pander to the more distasteful aspects of its readership (xenophobia etc), they may deliver their news in little words of one syllable for the not-very-bright, and they may intersperse their news with boobies and tiresome "celebrity" friffery. But they don't "normally" make up stories altogether, and you can, by and large, assume the basic facts of what they print have a basis in reality.

    10. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They do however publish a good number of those EU scare stories about silly policies that will supposedly force you to do things like hand in used sex toys or that the "Made in Britain" labels will have to be replaced by "Made in EU".

    11. Re:"The Sun" is British gutter press by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, the first one, "think they run the country", should be the Daily Mail.

  11. In 21st Century by gopla · · Score: 1

    summary asks : does this say anything about space travel in the 21st century?

    In 21st century, one would accumulate frequent flier miles from 40 trips to space to earn a single trip from US to UK.

  12. Off the top of my head... by arcite · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Earth is increasingly short of fresh water.... space has unlimited comets with fresh water, just catch one

    Minerals? -- space has more than one can imagine

    Space.... has SPACE -- using automated robots and orbiting factories to process raw minerals we will construct floating cities that will rival the best on earth

    Why did Europeans colonise the Americas? I mean, look at the expense! :rolls eyes:

    1. Re:Off the top of my head... by Colin+Smith · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Earth is increasingly short of fresh water.... space has unlimited comets with fresh water, just catch one

      Minerals? -- space has more than one can imagine


      Sure, of course it has. The question though is would it be cheaper to kill a few million people in a neighbouring country or to go searching through space for water and minerals.

      --
      Deleted
    2. Re:Off the top of my head... by bobintetley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Earth is increasingly short of fresh water....

      Eh? The Earth has the same amount of fresh water it's always had and always will. It's a ">closed system and any water you see/drink/urinate now has been around pretty much doing it's thing since forever.

    3. Re:Off the top of my head... by bobintetley · · Score: 1

      Grrr.. broke my Link. That'll teach me to preview.

    4. Re:Off the top of my head... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the American military budget is so much larger than NASAs and the amount of debt America is in because of their recent wars in the middle east, it probably would be cheaper to fetch them from space.

    5. Re:Off the top of my head... by WilliamSChips · · Score: 1

      The operative word here is fresh.

      --
      Please, for the good of Humanity, vote Obama.
    6. Re:Off the top of my head... by joto · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Earth is increasingly short of fresh water.... space has unlimited comets with fresh water, just catch one

      Minerals? -- space has more than one can imagine

      Huh? Short of fresh water? There's a whole ocean of it, and it covers 71% of the planet! Oh, you mean it's salty? So what, do you think we can just drink whatever we find in space, without cleaning it up first?

      Regarding minerals. Yes they are out there. But we are living on a pretty big rock ourselves. The minerals in space, are probably going to be most important for projects in space (if we ever get to that level of sophistication). Bringing them down to earth probably isn't worth the expense.

      Space.... has SPACE -- using automated robots and orbiting factories to process raw minerals we will construct floating cities that will rival the best on earth

      Unfortunately, at this time, automated robots are only useful for a very small minority of manufacturing tasks. And while orbiting factories sound like a neat idea, remember how much infrastructure is needed to keep just one factory running on earth. Given todays technology, we can't just build a factory in space. We would have to build thousands of factories, in order to make them support each other. Among the things that need to be produced, are: air, water, food, energy, fuel, space rockets, human habitats and clothing, as well as replacement parts for everything that's in orbit (which includes screws, plastic bags, pencils, ball bearings, microprocessors, aspirin, etc...)!

      Why did Europeans colonise the Americas? I mean, look at the expense! :rolls eyes:

      Sorry, that's just not compareable. America was fertile farm-land, just waiting to be colonized. Once you had paid your ticket for transportation, and brought enough money and supplies for surviving a year (worst estimate, many did well with less), you would be able to survive by farming your own land. People fled to America, just to get an opportunity to live there.

      In contrast; You can't just fly off to space and live off the land. In order to survive in space, you need a huge expensive infrastructure, and a constant reshipment of supplies, where supplies even consists of such elementary stuff as air, water, and food. It is possible to imagine that future technologies will make this easier, but as of now, we don't have such future technologies. People fled to America, but if someone started a colony in space, asked colonists to pay their own ticket, and to pay for all supplies that will be shipped in later, no sane people would move there.

      In any foreseeable future, space can only get colonized through massive government subsidies, and there's no payoff in sight. Which is probably the reason why we haven't colonized it yet.

    7. Re:Off the top of my head... by Aceticon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Eh? The Earth has the same amount of fresh water it's always had and always will. It's a ">closed system and any water you see/drink/urinate now has been around pretty much doing it's thing since forever.


      Not exactly. More preciselly "The Earth has the same amount of [word removed] water it's always had and always will".

      The water cycle is indeed a closed cycle, so no water is gained and no water is lost.

      However the closed water cycle does not in any way guarantee the availability of non-poluted, low salt-content, drinkable water (which is what the GGP meant with "fresh water").

      The fresh water problem that the GPP refers to is mostly due to 4 reasons:
      1. A lot of the water has become poluted with industrial/human/domestic-animal waste and is thus unsuitable for human consumption
      2. The distribution of human beings does not match the distribution of fresh water. In other words, there's plenty of fresh, clean water - just not where the people that need it are
      3. Some sources of fresh water have been drying up. Either due to increased temperatures or due to water overuse in agriculture, surface and underground water deposits have become (or are close to becoming) depleted in many places
      4. Water consumption due to population growth (and accompanying growth in agriculture and cattle numbers) has exceeded the capacity of the local water sources - this is a problem, for example, in some areas of Somalia and Ethiopia


      Sure, water is still evaporating and falling down from the sky as before - it's just that it's either missing the places where people need it the most or it's not enough (anymore) or it's getting poluted before it reaches those people.
    8. Re:Off the top of my head... by drsquare · · Score: 1
      Why did Europeans colonise the Americas? I mean, look at the expense!


      The Americas had gravity, water, oxygen and food. Space has none of that.

      It was also relatively cheap to set up in America, just build a hut and live off the local plants and animals. Even one person living in space requires a massive, expensive operation involving hundreds of people working constantly, and billions of dollars worth of technology.
  13. At last! by brown-eyed+slug · · Score: 1

    I been saving for over 10 years, waiting to find something good to spend my air miles on. So, Mr Branson, what can you offer me for my 2,537?

    1. Re:At last! by the+grace+of+R'hllor · · Score: 1

      For that amount, you can probably arrange to carry a bag to the plane.

      Someone else's bag, naturally.

  14. Near Earth Orbit? by Dr+Damage+I · · Score: 1

    I hardly think that using frequent flyer miles to paddle around in near earth orbit is cause to lose all sense of wonder at the vastness of space and the endless possibilities that it represents.

    --
    "Cursed is he who rises early in the morning..." Isiah 5:11
  15. Why is this a big deal? by Chineseyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Its cool and all but these are suborbital flights I don't know about you but when I first think of space flight I think of being in space for a hell of a lot more than a few minutes. Its a great first step but sounds more like an extended amusement park ride than actual tourism to me its as if you were to go on a cruise to the Caymans, they dropped you off on the coast for 5 minutes then you had to get back on and leave. If anything I am just happy that all these wealthy people are paying the first adopter fee so the rest of us can one day get a real space flight a lot cheaper, a lot longer, and probably a hell of a lot better.

    --
    I think the invisible hand of the market has its middle finger extended

    --A wise old fart named SC0RN
  16. The final frontier ... by slashdotmsiriv · · Score: 1

    "Besides being funny, does this say anything about space travel in the 21st century? Is space is no longer the final frontier? I'm pretty sure Roddenberry didn't have frequent flier miles in mind when he came up with the Enterprise."

    Perhaps not, but what he had in mind when he came up with Enterprise was space travel at speeds that take you to the stratosphere of a planet
    in a another quadrant of our galaxy within a few years, not flights to earth's stratosphere.

    I think your statement may be more suitable 300-2000 years from now (perhaps ...).

  17. Exact opposite is true: a great future in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Space travel is a temporary situation. It will cost too much and become unfeasible in the next 50 - 100 years.

    You have that back to front. The current difficulty of doing space travel is temporary, because it is the result of poor strength of materials and poor energy usage.

    Materials technology is improving at an extraordinary pace, and there is now a whole industry dedicated to manufacturing nanotubes of one form or another, despite this being only the beginning of work on nanoscale materials. Much greater things are on the way. And with stronger, lighter materials you can build much better space-worthy craft, not only hugely safer in the hostile medium but also able to withstand greater dynamic forces more safely. And more cheaply!

    Then we come to energy. Contrary to the daily propaganda of environmentalists, there is no shortage of energy on the planet --- the surface of the Earth receives about 150 thousand times more energy from the sun than mankind is forecast to need by the year 2020. Our "energy problems" simply reflect our poor ability to harness that near-zero-cost energy, currently.

    But that can change, especially in the context of space flight.

    For a start, we can rise up through the bulk of the atmosphere almost without any energy cost at all, and many outfits are already experimenting with that, to the very edge of space.

    And secondly, once up there, solar energy is freely available, and as long as there is still residual atmosphere around you, this gives you matter which you can use for propulsion, slowly building up speed as you skip through the upper layers. A relatively small amount of extra reaction mass is needed to boost the orbit out the final few dozen miles once you have close to orbital speed.

    In due course then, on materials and energy grounds there is every reason to forecast a very bright and buoyant future for space travel. NASA-type costs are not required, as long as you're not in a hurry.

  18. Frequent flier miles and the "warp one club" .. by Entropy · · Score: 1
    I'm pretty sure Roddenberry didn't have frequent flier miles in mind when he came up with the Enterprise.


    No, but Kirk had plenty of "frequent flier miles" with every alien female he could get his hands on, if you know what I mean ..
    --
    The sea changes color, but the sea does not change.
  19. 90AU by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is space is no longer the final frontier?

    Near earth orbit is not space. The stratosphere is not space. You get me to terminal shock and I'll shell out some frequent flyer miles.

  20. 40 times in 6 years is not that much. by Toon+Moene · · Score: 1

    Since I joined the Fortran Standardisation Committee in 1999, I flew about 15 times to the continent on the Left Side of the Atlantic, and I consider myself an *in*frequent flyer.

    1. Re:40 times in 6 years is not that much. by Peter+Cooper · · Score: 1

      I learn something every day. There's a Fortran Standardisation Committee..? And it's still running? :) Respect!

  21. Easy by imsabbel · · Score: 1

    I was surprised myself, about the the whole miles-buissness.

    But than i looked into the papers of my airline, and there is TONS of stuff that boosts the miles.
    Going first class? ==miles*5
    Spending money for extra stuff(reservations, ect)? +xk miles bonus
    using a senator card? Getting miles shoved into your ass for sneezing (figurtively spoken. IIRC, the highest bonus multipliers were like 10 or 15 or so. Like a pinball machine)

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  22. Do the numbers add up? by TorKlingberg · · Score: 1

    So he got 2 million frequent flyer miles from 40 trips. He could get a first class trip for 90,000 miles. So he could have got 22 free flight. More than one free flight per two paid ones. Are the frequent flyer systems really that good?

    1. Re:Do the numbers add up? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      It depends where the round-trips are to/from and what class of service he purchases. A london-sydney roundtrip could concievably earn you around 40k miles if you purchase a first class ticket and maintain 'elite' status with the airline. Considering the cost of a trip like that, the free trip for 90k miles would be worth only a fraction of the paid trips...

    2. Re:Do the numbers add up? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      TFS says the purchased trips were london-new york... and the 90k miles are for a similar trip...

  23. Is space is no longer the final frontier? by SamSim · · Score: 1
    Is space is no longer the final frontier?

    Well, unless you found another frontier beyond space, I'm gonna say no.

  24. More importantly... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    who is going to be first to join the 60-mile-high club?

  25. keptin! by martin-boundary · · Score: 1
    The Rwomulans are powerwing up phaserws! They arwe saying they want ourw firwst class inflight mowie database!

    Scotty! I ... want you ... to ... prepare to beam up our ... 20th century ... comedy ... collection!

    Captain! I kinnae give 'em "The Waterboy"! She'll blow!

    Fascinating! Captain, I believe they are flying the new ultra high seat density birds of prey with 15% less legspace. I thought only Cherry Galactic had them!

    Dammit, don't do it, Jim! At least ask them for their sealed peanut bags. I'm running out of supplies in sick bay!

  26. Wrong by simrook · · Score: 1

    Besides being funny, does this say anything about space travel in the 21st century? Is space is no longer the final frontier? I'm pretty sure Roddenberry didn't have frequent flier miles in mind when he came up with the Enterprise.

    That is 100% wrong. This is exactly what Gene Roddenberry had in mind. For a common person to be able to expiernce the wonders of space. Give props to him, we wouldn't be here without his vision.

    Also... really slashdot...that comment is pure flamebait for this site.

    --
    'Truth' is linked in a circular relation with systems of power which produce and sustain it...
  27. Well call me Homer Simpson. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I can get a free trip to the Quickie Mart across the street for some donuts.

    Thaaaaank You! cumagehn...

  28. What a Long Strange Trip It Willam Haven Been by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    I can't wait to trade my frequent launcher parsecs for trips on Virgin Historic's time machines.

    I can show you pix of the trips now if you're improbable enough to stand it.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  29. British Man Trades Frequent Flyer Miles for Space by webdog314 · · Score: 1

    Of course, he'll only be able to go if he books it six months in advance and the flight is on a Tuesday after 8 PM. And he'll have to fly coach (ie: cargo).

  30. When they say upgrade... by Deadstick · · Score: 1

    ...they mean UP.

    rj

  31. uh? Frequent flies miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait, he flew 40 times, got 2 million miles, and it's only 90,000 for another flight? So for his 40 flights, he could get 22 free ones? What the hell frequent flier plan is this?

  32. Re:Exact opposite is true: a great future in space by mattkime · · Score: 1

    >>Our "energy problems" simply reflect our poor ability to harness that near-zero-cost energy, currently.

    My god, you're right! Energy is practically free!

    Harnessing free energy must be easy!

    --
    Know what I like about atheists? I've yet to meet one that believes God is on their side.
  33. step 3: profit twice by Scrameustache · · Score: 1

    The question though is would it be cheaper to kill a few million people in a neighbouring country or to go searching through space for water and minerals.

    Find a big chunk of minerals and drop it on your neighbours.

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  34. Space: The final frontier by dodobh · · Score: 1

    Is space is no longer the final frontier?

    Space is big. You just won't believe how vastly, hugely, mind- bogglingly big it is. I mean, you may think it's a long way up to suborbital flight, but that's just peanuts to space.

      -- with apologies to Douglas Adams

    --
    I can throw myself at the ground, and miss.
  35. Don't be so pessimistic by Ignorant+Aardvark · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Don't be pessimistic. The use of frequent flier miles to get a ticket into space means that spaceflight is finally here in a real sense. It's not just for governments anymore.

  36. Using miles is a wise choice by btempleton · · Score: 1

    Since if you pay for this flight, and it only goes up 63 miles and back down, it would only accrue the typical minimum 500 mile most airlines give on short flights.

    Now if you were going into orbit, it would be worth paying for because you would earn enough miles for another trip right there. You go a lot of miles on any orbital flight.

    (In fact, it is amusing to point out that while the airline industry likes to point out that air travel is far safer than car travel in terms of deaths per passenger mile, the space shuttle is even better -- even though it's killed one out of every 15 people to go up in it.)

    --
    Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
  37. commercial space travel? by zmollusc · · Score: 1

    While you are waiting to travel into space with virgin galactic, why not try my similar ocean voyages?
    You are put into a canoe and pushed 20 feet into the atlantic on the end of a rope, then pulled back after a few minutes. It is far cheaper and simpler than those crazily over-complex 'ocean liners'.

    --
    They whose government reduces their essential liberties for temporary security, receive neither liberty nor security.
  38. So... by Net_fiend · · Score: 0

    ...what happens to the entertainment industry when half of the celeberties all board a ship and it goes into orbit and something crazy happens and it blows up?

    --
    "When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. When the government fears the people, there is liberty."
    1. Re:So... by funwithBSD · · Score: 1

      Wonderous things will happen.

      For one, hopefully this: http://www.darkhorizons.com/news06/060921b.php will not come to pass.

      Spicoli as Einstein? The HORROR!

      --
      Never answer an anonymous letter. - Yogi Berra
  39. I disagree by RockyMountain · · Score: 1

    ... generally they applied towards tickets in the ten cent per mile price. (25,000 frequent flier miles for a round trip ticket of approximately $2500 peak value -- the average seat cost being based on the highest available fare for that seat type

    But that's a bogus comparision: Frequent flyer miles can't be redeemed to get the equivalent of the highest avavilable fare for that
    seat type. They can only be redeemed to get the junk seats that are left over on the unpopular schedules, usually on an indirect route
    with multiple stops. (For comparison: If you are really prepared to pay the highest available fare for your seat type, you'll usually get
    on the most direct flight, at the time you want, on the day you want, by the most direct route possible, and with the minimum of
    restrictions about cancellation and alteration.)

    At best, FF redemption tickets are barely better in convenience, availability, and service than the cheapest bargain tickets you can
    buy for the route. When you use that number in your comparison, you'll see that FF miles have already suffered significant inflation.

    On a side note: Frequent-flyer-redemption tickets aren't exactly free. You still pay the fees and taxes, and they are a significant
    percentage of the cost of your ticket. I recently paid over $60 to redeem FF miles for DEN-ATL, where the normal discount price (think
    lowest thing on Travelocity booked weeks in advance) would be about $225 (both figures include all taxes and fees, and both are for
    internet-booked tickets). The out-of-pocket portion of a FF-redemption trip has increased over the years, and this is another
    form of FF-currency inflation.

  40. You heard it here first by Municipa · · Score: 1

    Space no longer the final frontier?

    Has the United States finally collapsed?

    End times?

    Is your mother a whore?

    What, I'm just asking.

  41. He won the miles in a competition by Andy+Davies · · Score: 1

    Damn I'm in the Virgin frequent flyer club and I must have missed it!

    http://www.breakingtravelnews.com/article/20060928 174443458

  42. well well by YesIAmAScript · · Score: 1

    A) They won't be going to space in the sense that astronauts (and especially some cosmonauts) have been. It's just a few minutes of staying at a considerable height...

    B) The virgin spaceship is not a rocket. Takeoff should not be a bad experience.


    A) At the considerable height they will be at, they're in space. No, they will not be there long and they will not orbit.

    B) The Virgin spaceship is a rocket. It is rocket-powered. It has significant thrust on takeoff, and the thrust is unmodulated, so it will be many Gs pushing them in to their seats. At ignition, it is horizontal, not vertical, so they save one 1G pushing them back against their seat. But since they are trying to reach space, the pilot pulls back on the stick and goes vertical very rapidly, at which point the experience is no different than being in any other rocket.
    --
    http://lkml.org/lkml/2005/8/20/95
  43. Beware of complimentary clothing by SEWilco · · Score: 1

    Don't accept any red shirt offered before the trip.

  44. Moo by Chacham · · Score: 2, Funny

    I wonder what 12 million pepsi points would get.

  45. Is literary prudence no longer a frontier? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Is space is no longer the final frontier?"

    Shouldn't it be: "Is space no longer the final frontier?" - one too many ises there =P.

  46. The fine print: by LMariachi · · Score: 1

    It's not a round-trip ticket.

  47. the new final frontier by L33t+Windozer · · Score: 1

    is the human brain

  48. Re:Exact opposite is true: a great future in space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Harnessing free energy must be easy!

    Whether it's easy or not doesn't alter the basic equation.

    Just like all other sources of energy, harnessing solar entails a fixed equipment cost, a system maintenance cost, and an energy source cost.

    For solar, the energy source cost is zero, regardless of how difficult and costly it is to harness, and irrespective of how much our equipment costs and how much we have to spend on system maintainance.

    That is, until the galactic overlords turn up and say that we're using their star's energy and must pay for it.