Slashdot Mirror


New Data Transmission Record — 14 Tbps

deejne writes to alert us to a new bandwidth record: Nippon Telegraph and Telephone has announced data transmission at a rate of 14 terabits per second over a single optical fiber. The paper claims the previous record was "about 10 Tbps." In the new experiment, NTT sent data over 160 kilometers (nearly 100 miles) of optical fiber, in 140 channels of 111 Gbps each.

29 of 193 comments (clear)

  1. 140 channels of 111 Gbps each by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And still nothing worth watching.

    1. Re:140 channels of 111 Gbps each by CodeMasterPhilzar · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately what they failed to mention in the article was that 12.7 Tbps of that was spam and viruses...

      --
      --- Just another Code-Monkey
  2. Preparing? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    vista.windowsupdate.com?

  3. Misread title by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 5, Funny

    I thought it meant 14 ThePirateBays per second...

    --
    liqbase :: faster than paper
    1. Re:Misread title by doofusclam · · Score: 4, Funny
      I thought it meant 14 ThePirateBays per second...


      Given an hour with that link it's exactly what i'd use it for.
    2. Re:Misread title by Wass+Ammattayou · · Score: 3, Funny

      "Tbps" could also be misread as "Tbsp" and therefore refer intead to the unit soon to be used for 3D printing (we wish...).

    3. Re:Misread title by x2A · · Score: 2, Funny

      You use tablespoons as a measurement in 3D printing?

      --
      The revolution will not be televised... but it will have a page on Wikipedia
  4. land speed record by tverbeek · · Score: 5, Funny

    That's still nothing compared to a semi loaded with DVDs traveling at 70mph.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
    1. Re:land speed record by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 4, Funny

      The internet isn't a truck you can't just keep dumping things on it and expect it to go. It's a series of tubes and they are getting filled up!

      --
      Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
    2. Re:land speed record by bcat24 · · Score: 4, Funny

      And believe me, the ping times for IP-over-semi SUCK!

    3. Re:land speed record by ziggamon2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... or pigeons carrying hard drives...

  5. download speeds by KG6 · · Score: 4, Funny

    and yet I'm still downloading at a measly 300 kbs.

    1. Re:download speeds by timeOday · · Score: 2, Funny

      Ignore what you read in the news! - bandwidth is a PRECIOUS, SCARCE resource that we must carefully ration and provision by the byte. That's why the Internet is in grave peril from network neutrality proposals, there won't be any bandwidth left over for our innovative new business models!

  6. Pays to be frugal. by Night+Goat · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good thing I didn't buy that eSATA card I was looking at today. 3Gb/second? What a piece of crap!

  7. We're talking about tubes by CrazyJim1 · · Score: 4, Funny

    This is the internet, not the interstate.

    1. Re:We're talking about tubes by krisp · · Score: 4, Funny

      but if every vehicle was filled with dvds and hard drives, wouldn't that make the interstate another information super-highway?!

  8. Re:Okay, its about time... by EnderWigginsXenocide · · Score: 4, Funny

    Quote:

    Well, I remember back on my 14.4 modem... those text pages loaded like the wind. I was on top of the world... Then those damned pictures started cropping up on websites. Pictures on the internet? Ha! Then came the 56.6k modem which showed those pictures who were boss. No problems. Oh wait, online gaming?
    File sharing ? Cable and DSL save the day. More than adequate

    Reply:
    I beg to differ. I have [cough] friends that download movi^H^H^H^H^H content from the internet, and some dvd rips^H^H^H^H^H^H^H database files can be larger than 4GB! Even at a good (cheap) DSL line of 1KBPS it still takes quite alot longer to download content than it would take to go to blockbuster^H^H^H^H^H^H^H the office and pick up physical media with the data on it.

    --
    Blessed are the pessimists, for they have made backups. -- 0 1 My two bits
  9. Put into perspective... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Consider a cargo ship loaded with a thousand cargo containers full of bootleg DVDs. Assume each container cah hold about 200,000 DVDs. Assume it takes a month to steam from Korea to LA or Seattle. That's 9.4GB/DVD x 200,000,000 DVDs / 2,592,000 seconds = 725 GB/sec, or only about 1/20 of the bandwidth of this optical fiber.

    This new technology could really be a boon to the bootlegging business!!! :)

  10. Convert to standard units please by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many DVD movies per second was this?

    Also, they failed to provide a conversion from terabyte to Libraries of Congress.

  11. Re:If this test was 30 seconds by flooey · · Score: 2, Funny

    where did they get all those Terabytes to send?

    I'm pretty sure somewhere like that gets them directly from the manufacturer.

  12. Ha! That is nothing! by Tamerlan · · Score: 5, Funny

    One of the russian computer trading companies easily topped that. The box with 20 400GB HDDs fell from the shelf 2m high. Total data transmission rate was

    20*4*10^11*8/sqrt(2*2/9.8)~=10^14 bps or 100 Tbps

    As you see if you have enough money to burn you may easily scale that number.

  13. Re:Okay, its about time... by Firehed · · Score: 3, Funny

    1KBPS? How cheap _IS_ your DSL line?

    --
    How are sites slashdotted when nobody reads TFAs?
  14. Re:swallows by Dolly_Llama · · Score: 4, Funny

    African or European hard drives?

    --

    Somewhere, something incredible is waiting to be known. -- Carl Sagan

  15. Re:If this test was 30 seconds by SeaFox · · Score: 3, Funny
    where did they get all those Terabytes to send?

    1. Start supercomputer

    2. 10 PRINT "Hello, world!"
      20 GOTO 10

    3. Then they just have the video buffer piped over the network
  16. Disputed record by kd3bj · · Score: 4, Funny

    I once threw a box of 120 Gig tapes into a dumpster. I think there were about 200 tapes in the box.
    I admit the distance wasn't far, but the burst rate was 24 TBytes/sec.

  17. Re:Okay, its about time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's a shame to see Linux still hasn't managed to implement a functioning "Delete" key.

  18. Future means faster speeds by chrisinsocalif · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someday our kids will look back at us and wonder how the hell we surfed porn so slow.

  19. Re:Okay, its about time... by cp.tar · · Score: 3, Funny
    It's a shame to see Linux still hasn't managed to implement a functioning "Delete" key.
    Backspace, surely.
    --
    Ignore this signature. By order.
  20. Yeah, but... by CrimsonScythe · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...you can watch it much faster!!!

    --
    The view was horrible and the smell was even worse; Julie severely regretted becoming a proctologist.