MySpace CoFounder Says Purchase Was A Scam
Jonathan writes "Brad Greenspan says he's the real founder of MySpace, not Tom, and the sale of MySpace to News Corp. was a criminal act. In a nine-chapter report, he describes how this was accomplished by hiding the value of the site from Intermix Media's shareholders." From the article: "How was News Corp able to turn $327 million into $20 billion or more of value within a year? The Myspace/Intermix transaction was so low compared to other internet transactions that it is raising eyebrows by analysts and media everywhere. Everyone seems to be asking how News Corp. got such a good deal. It seems too good to be true! After signing the transaction to buy Myspace & Intermix (but prior to the closing), News Corp. itself even showed how strangely little it had paid for Myspace by immediately paying $3.99 per monthly page view for slow growing comparable IGN. News Corp. paid only .03 cents per monthly page view for the hyper fast growing Myspace. Therefore, we can conclude that the fair value of Myspace was 100x or more what News Corp. paid! "
How can you illegally sell a company? Surely both parties had to agree, right? If I agree to sell you my house for $20, I can't come back later and claim fraud. How, if both Tom, and this guys company agreed to the sale, can it now be fraud?
But this is slashdot. A slashdoter who didn't build his own computer is like a Jedi who didn't build his own lightsaber!
Really? I was under the impression that corporate governance was a serious problem. Management has considerable authority to run shareholders meetings, and it's very difficult for even majority shareholders to remove members of the board of directors.
My source for a lot of this is an article from The Economist back in May (link, but you'll probably have to pay to read it.) Basically, it says that although shareholders have considerable rights in theory, in practice the rules are set up to favor management. This is considered a good thing in some circles, who believe that professional management should trump non-expert shareholders, but in at least some cases it makes accountability difficult.
Why does that get rated insightful? You might as well start claiming Yahoo hit its peak and is only coasting on momentum too. Look at the alexa stats. I don't see any overall decline in myspace. It's had a solid year of growth. There's no way to conclude it's about to tumble into oblivion. In fact, the whole idea is that social networking IS about momentum -- once you have it, it's hard to lose it.
Myspace is already past the height of its popularity, its just coasting on momentum which will run out eventually
Can you please back that claim with.. anything? All I see is the ever increasing number of members on myspace, and now with the new multilangual versions of myspace it can only get worse. For example, hardly anyone knows MySpace in France, yet.. because so far it was all in english, but now the french section was launched just a few weeks ago..
You just got troll'd!
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/wst/sof/215471263 .html
Imagine if every time you successfully overclocked a CPU, Intel or AMD asked for more money! :-)