Slashdot Mirror


Creating Water from Thin Air

Iphtashu Fitz writes "In order to provide the U.S. Military with water in places like Iraq, the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency gave millions of dollars in research funding to companies like LexCarb and Sciperio to try to extract water from the air. Amazingly, a company that DARPA didn't fund, Aqua Sciences, beat them all to the punch by developing a machine that can extract up to 600 gallons of water a day from thin air even in locations like arid deserts. The 20 foot machine does this without using or producing toxic materials or byproducts. The CEO of Aqua Sciences declined to elaborate on how the machine works, but said it is based on the natural process by which salt absorbs water."

26 of 348 comments (clear)

  1. They did this in ancient times in the middle east by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    I recall reading an article about ancient rock mounds, where the rocks were loosely lumped with plenty of space in between. Air filtered through and encountered the cool rock faces of the interior of the mound. Water condensed on the interior rock faces and trickled out the bottom. I'll see if I can find a link.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  2. hm by inKubus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Sounds like they probably use a hydroscopic compound such as calcium chloride and then you some type of ion replacement to recover the water (precipitate calcium metal and some other non-soluable salt, such as Fe(III)Cl.

    --
    Cool! Amazing Toys.
    1. Re:hm by c4miles · · Score: 5, Informative
      The word you're looking for is Hygroscopic. From the article you linked to:

      The similar sounding but unrelated word hydroscopic is sometimes used in error for hygroscopic. A hydroscope is an optical device used for making observations deep under water.

      A related word, deliquescent, refers to substances so hygroscopic they will dissolve themselves using water absorbed from the air.
    2. Re:hm by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 5, Informative
      Calcium bromide (CaBr2) is slightly more hygroscopic, absorbing moisture down to 16% RH (Handbook of Chemistry and Physics); it's also a hexahydrate- it sponges up a lot of moisture. Right below that is lithium chloride, which continues to absorb down to 11% RH.

      Most likely it's a system where prilled or powdered salt is tumbled through dry air to absorb moisture; it's then roasted to release the moisture, captured under reduced pressure to reduce the amount of energy required, and returned to its anhydrous state. It'll be clumpy and chunky, so it'll have to be re-ground into a fine powder before reuse.

      The $.30 a gallon is probably largely from the amount required in the removal of the water from the hydrate; distillation of water runs ~$.25 a gallon (assuming no recycling of the waste heat from condensation to pre-heat water going into the boiler) at $.10/kwh. Using gasoline or diesel would be considerably more expensive- thus the reduced pressure.

      Distilled water from air- not too shabby. I've thought about trying the same here in the desert (where it's routinely ~10% RH in Phoenix), but it's just not worth it.

    3. Re:hm by merphant · · Score: 2, Informative

      I worked for a place that was working on this too. They used lithium bromide to suck the water out of the air, and then extracted the water by reverse osmosis. Presumably you could do power the RO unit with solar panels.

  3. Linky link by spun · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here we are, as promised. About a third of the way down the page. Ignore the Reichian weirdness, the wells were built near the ancient Byzantine city of Feodosiya. There were 13 large conical tumuli of stones, each about 10,000 feet square and 30-40 feet tall, on hilltops. Russian engineer Friedrich Zibold calculated they would each produce more than 500 gallons daily. These theories have been disputed by some archeologists (who don't seem to like it when engineers discover cool archeological stuff and make up theories about it) but the mounds do all have numerous terra-cotta pipes around the base, presumeably to collect the run off

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  4. not surprising by z3d4r · · Score: 2, Informative

    this is coming from an australian company, seeing as australia is both the most arid continent and largest desert island in the world.

    --
    You shall know him by his Sig
    1. Re:not surprising by MostAwesomeDude · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, if we're going by humidity as an indicator of available water, Antartica's far more desert-like. It's also bigger.

      --
      ~ C.
    2. Re:not surprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      The company is based in Miami Beach, Florida, USA.

      http://www.aquasciences.com/

  5. Re:I have one of these in my car... by Yartrebo · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's pretty much a reusable desiccant - and in the best case (probably using reverse osmosis) the energy cost will be about an order of magnitude worse than desalinization plants. It even says in the article that the cost is 30 cents a gallon (which is probably highly optimistic and certainly cannot be verified without full disclosure from the company). At 30 cents a gallon (or perhaps 3 dollars a gallon when you're operating it in field conditions) you could forget about serving any sort of civilian market, and even for military use it would be quite expensive.

  6. Simple Government-Economics by finkployd · · Score: 1, Informative

    The DARPA funded companies did not have the same motivation as the other one. It is in their best interest to keep making slow progress and asking for more money everytime they have a little breakthrough. The successful company had no such money train. It was in their best interest to actually PRODUCE RESULTS in order to patent, market, and sell the technolohy. Funny how that works huh?

    Finkployd

  7. Re:Frank Herbert was prescient by pete-classic · · Score: 2, Informative

    You recall incorrectly. Windtraps.

    -Peter

  8. Re:Wait... by boarder · · Score: 2, Informative

    The water will be consumed by soldiers who will breathe it out, sweat it out and urinate it out. The breath, sweat and urine will all evaporate the water back into the air. This is essentially a closed system with some losses which are overcome by adding energy into they system.

    --
    IANAL, but I play one on /.
  9. I know a SERE instructor... by rampant+mac · · Score: 5, Informative
    I hang out with a SERE instructor and do a lot of camping / hiking / ORV riding where I'm sometimes far away from reliable potable water. He gave me some pretty cool information about how to obtain water from your surroundings:

    1) Water from plants is always drinkable. I'm talking about water from the root system, not some stagnant water you could slurp out of a recess between branches. The easiest way is to take a large trash bag, grab a cluster of branches and put the bag around them (make sure the open end of the trash bag is tightly sealed to prevent air from going into the enclosed bunch). It forces the tree to "sweat" water from its root system. After about 24 hours you can slit the bottom of the bag and drain it into a nalgene bottle. You can only do one group of branches per 24 hour period, so you need to use different trees to gather water. I tried it out when I was in Eastern Oregon (which, for all intents and purposes, is an inland desert) and averaged about 1 liter of water per 24 hours. I had 6 trash bags that I normally have in my hiking ruck, so I could feasibly harvest 6 liters per day if I was SOL somewhere.

    2) A cluster of birch trees usually means there's water underground.

    3) Any multi-celled berry (ie: raspberry) is edible.

    Anyway, I thought it was pretty cool shit, and informative. :)

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  10. Re:Frank Herbert was prescient by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    That wouldn't work, sandtrout absorbs all water on the surface, that's why Fremen reservoirs were in rock caves, and why all their water came from the air. By the way, Arrakis wasn't all that dry, as Liet-Kynes remarks.
      Yeap, I love Dune. My dream is to get a stillsuit and move to the desert (ok, some huge worms roaming around would be cool, too).

  11. Solar Still by David+Off · · Score: 4, Informative

    A solar still produces water in the desert and uses no external energy source other than sunlight (there is plent of that in the desert)

    1. Re:Solar Still by jamesh · · Score: 2, Informative

      In central Victoria (South Eastern Australia), we're having a bit of a drought at the moment. I was listening to talkback radio show where a woman was talking about a fairly simple device to collect dew (basically just some fine mesh with a collector down the bottom) and how it could be used to keep a few plants alive without actively watering them.

      This got me thinking though, what is the effect going to be if this sort of thing is deployed in a really large scale? Does it reduce the moisture content of the air by any measurable amount? I guess in suburban areas if you just used the collected water to run evaporative air conditioning then it might even things out...

      On the other hand, one of the feared run-away effects of global warming is that higher temperatures will speed up evaporation, and the increased moisture content acts as a greenhouse gas. Maybe we should be sucking the moisture out of the air a bit more :)

  12. Re:Good! by Kpt+Kill · · Score: 3, Informative

    Did you read the article at all? The company was awarded the contract. The machine works. DARPA just never funded their research.

  13. Re:They did this in ancient times in the middle ea by N1ck0 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It sounds more like they created a substance that uses intermolecular forces to have a high attraction to water (like salt or any other desiccant). The secret is making it so that under a specific condition these water molecules can be released again (heat, pressure, etc). Then possibly combined it with standard evaporation methods through compression and cooling (standard dehumidifier).

    So in all they probably just found, or dynamically adjust, the 'sweet spot' between the two methods to produce the most amount of water with the least power.

  14. Not having read the article... by attemptedgoalie · · Score: 3, Informative

    Two things.

    1: Water does have a shelf life, which is why if you're storing it for long periods you have to add stabilizers.

    2: The bottles can leach into the water over time, and some plastic bottles are set up so that they will begin to bio-degrade in a couple years, hence the date stamped on each bottle when you buy them.

    --
    My mom says I'm cool.
  15. Re:Serious questions ... by sm62704 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Pheonix has an average daily humidity of about 55% IIRC

    You don't RC, it's more like 3%. Its 20% right now and they're predicting rain, which they usually don't get a whole lot of.

    The humidity is so low they don't use standard air conditioners there; they have "swamp coolers" which work by evaporating a stream of water. Very cheap and efficient where there's practically no humidity at all. At 50% humidity one wouldn't work.

    --
    mcgrew's razor: Never attribute to stupidity that which can be explained by greedy self-interest
  16. Re:And remember kids... by erice · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's only an issue if water is permanently removed from the environment, which it generally won't be. Water was in the air and in a few hours, it is back again.

    This is actually much better than trucking in water from afar or pulling it out of deep wells. In that case, you are altering the environment. Water not previously in the environment is being added.

  17. Re:They did this in ancient times in the middle ea by ozmanjusri · · Score: 2, Informative
    Having some old dude and a bunch of his fleeing kin at the exact right spot just as tsunami drains enough water to create a land bridge would be plenty magical I think.

    Yeah, that's why it's more likely to be the result of "wind setdown" and the resulting bore when the wind failed. The water being pushed back to expose a path would have been a reasonably common event. If you were a local, you'd know it would be a dangerous path to use, but if you were desperate to escape it might have seemed worth the risk.

    There's some interesting theories, including this one, here. http://www.europhysicsnews.com/full/33/article6.pd f#search=%22part%20the%20seas%20moses%20science%22

    --
    "I've got more toys than Teruhisa Kitahara."
  18. Re:Lucas - king of the rip-offs by tygt · · Score: 2, Informative
    No doubt; Asimov even had the Empire's last great general be named "Bel Riose", who worked tirelessly to win back as much of the old empire for his strong emperor, just as the Eastern Roman General Belisarius did for the emperor Justinian (who is echoed as "Cleon II" by Asimov).

    All roads, of course, led to Trantor (Rome). I don't think that Asimov hid his borrowing from history - note that any author generally freely borrows from history, past or present (reality). Borrowing so heavily from another author's works, on the other hand, is another matter IMHO.

  19. Re:It should work... by illegalcortex · · Score: 2, Informative

    That might have been the cover story, but I seem to remember at some point it being revealed to be a puppeteer machination.

  20. Daedalus of New Scientist got there first. by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have here a copy of a book entitled "The Inventions of Daedalus", which reprints the column of the same name by David E. H. Jones from New Scientist magazine. This column would propose unusual inventions, generally based upon sound scientific principles and seeming entirely reasonable except for their total absurdity. Previous proposals include a scheme for slaughter-free meat production by harvesting reptile tails which then regenerate; a weapon called "Shattergas" causing sudden and catastrophic corrosion of militarily important metals and plastics; and an addictive birth control pill which the user would never forget to take.

    Anyway, it includes a column dated May 25, 1978 entitled "The Desert Waterer" in which "Daedalus" proposes just such a device, whereby moisture is collected from the air by means of a hygroscopic liquid. The water can then be extruded through a semi-permeable membrane if the liquid is under sufficient pressure. This can be accomplished simply by placing the liquid in a tall column; moisture enters at the top and the hydrostatic pressure at the bottom allows recovery. Daedalus then considers some convenient liquids for the purpose. Sulfuric acid is readily available in industrial quantities but would need a column 2400 meters high, which is somewhat awkward. Invert sugar syrup has a higher molecular weight and would require a column merely 720 meters high, as well as being nontoxic, and even edible in case of an emergency. Best of all, he says, is a product called "Carbowax", for which a column of only 50 meters would suffice.

    The firm in charge of this present project has a suspiciously similar name, so perhaps they have just created a better Carbowax.

    Daedalus, in the book, cites a number of cases where an invention from the column has become the subject of serious research. So this is just one more example...