Slashdot Mirror


Iran Caps Net Access to Keep West Out

davidwr writes "The Guardian reports that Iran has banned high-speed internet access to attempt to curb the west's influence. In addition to seizing satellite dishes and filtering more websites than any country save China, Iran is now capping Internet speeds to 128kbps in order to keep out Western influences." From the article: "The latest step has drawn condemnation from MPs, internet service companies and academics, who say it will hamper Iran's progress. 'Every country in the world is moving towards modernization and a major element of this is high-speed internet access,' said Ramazan-ali Sedeghzadeh, chairman of the parliamentary telecommunications committee. 'The country needs it for development and access to contemporary science.'"

42 of 356 comments (clear)

  1. Can't stop the signal Mal... by IcyNeko · · Score: 5, Funny

    They can never stop the signal. Even if the signal is going at 128kbps

    1. Re:Can't stop the signal Mal... by Chosen+Reject · · Score: 5, Funny

      If this helps to slow (or even stop) the widespread use misuse of flash, I'm all for it.

      --
      Stop Global Warming!
      Just say no to irreversible processes!
    2. Re:Can't stop the signal Mal... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      They downgraded back to using Trucks of course.

    3. Re:Can't stop the signal Mal... by operagost · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Clearly the Iranian theocrats are even less technologically informed than Alaskan senators. I would think that information passed using highly-compressible, low bandwidth text would be much more of a subversive threat than bloated "Punch the monkey" flash ads and YouTube videos of sleepy kittens.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  2. Silly Iranians by suparjerk · · Score: 2, Funny

    Silly Iranians, high-speed Internet is for Westerners!

    But seriously, are they going to ban cars and television, too? We use those a lot in here in the west.

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
    1. Re:Silly Iranians by From+A+Far+Away+Land · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think we should beat Iran to the punch, and Ban TV here before it's too late. Join the Teleban too, and save the children.

      It's just a modest proposal to save the world!

    2. Re:Silly Iranians by Silver+Sloth · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The age of religious-controlled nations dominating information is coming to a close.
      I'm not sure how you justify this. The examples from the Middle East where religious control is rising are too numerous to mention and, closer to home, we're seeing the evangelical Christian right have a huge say in the current administration of the US of A.
      --
      init 11 - for when you need that edge.
    3. Re:Silly Iranians by truthsearch · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually the administration is merely pandering to the evangelicals. They aren't actually getting much of what they want. This group in office has their own agenda. They just convince the religious to support it.

      The evangelicals actually believe they're getting a lot of support. They have too much faith in the words of their leaders.

    4. Re:Silly Iranians by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Perhaps if they just banned oil exports, they could then stop that inflow of filthy, moral corrupting American money.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  3. Priorities by Kelson · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yes, cripple your country! Better to maintain strict control over a nation in poverty than be in charge of a prosperous one!

    (Interestingly, the same comparison can be made for overprotective parents, who would prefer keeping their children...well, children, rather than prepare them to become adults.)

    1. Re:Priorities by griffjon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I respect their desire to reduce the impact of Western cultural hegemony, but the better way to do this is to encourage your own culture to flourish, not to make others illicit. Does no one learn from US's prohibition attempts?

      --
      Returned Peace Corps IT Volunteer
    2. Re:Priorities by nizo · · Score: 4, Informative
      I don't think Iran is poverty stricken (see below); their education however appears to be pretty stunted (no surprise there). Heck I wouldn't mind being in control of the money from 2.5 million bbl/day of oil.


      Iran:
      Literacy: Definition Field Listing definition: age 15 and over can read and write
      total population: 79.4%
      male: 85.6%
      female: 73% (2003 est.)

      GDP (purchasing power parity):
              Definition Field Listing Rank Order
      $561.6 billion (2005 est.)

      United States:
      Literacy: Definition Field Listing definition: age 15 and over can read and write
      total population: 99%
      male: 99%
      female: 99% (2003 est.)

      GDP (purchasing power parity):
              Definition Field Listing Rank Order
      $12.36 trillion (2005 est.)

    3. Re:Priorities by Pharmboy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Pretty selective with your facts. How about these from the CIA World Factbook, where you got your info, comparing Iran and the US.

      GDP per capita
      US $41,800 (2005 est.)
      Iran $8,300 (2005 est.)

      Unemployment rate
      US 5.1% (now less then 5%)
      Iran 11.2%

      Population below the poverty level
      US 12%
      Iran 40%

      Inflation rate
      US 3.2%
      Iran 13.5%

      Many other numbers are not published, as Iran doesn't want them public. Iran sells lots of oil, but the citizens don't see much of the money. Too much is being sent to Siria, Iraq, Afghanistan and other places to support their biggest export, their religious philosophy.

      Make no mistake about it, Iran has more poverty than they want you to know about. Then again, if you live in Iran, what are you going to do, protest? BANG! One less person in poverty.

      --
      Tequila: It's not just for breakfast anymore!
    4. Re:Priorities by mi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      due to an illegal war

      The only thing, that could make an action between countries "illegal" is a UN Security Council's (or some other recognized international organization's) resolution condemning the action as such. Would you be able to refer me to a resolution condeming our resumption of hostilities against Iraq after 12 years of Iraq's violations of cease fire? Oh, wait, you were simply engaged in flamebaiting, never mind.

      deep into the bottom of the hurt locker real soon now

      Gee, start holding your breath now, then, would you, please? Please, please, please — with a strawberry on top?.. Thank you!

      Not only are you flamebaiting, you are also widely off-topic — whatever is going to happen to our wealth "real soon now", and whatever the reasons for it happening, is irrelevant.

      What matters is that we are rich now, which allows us to spend so much on entertnainment and, consequently, keeps so many different entertainers around and well fed — from Barbara Streissand to Sean Hanity.

      Again, whatever your hate-filled heart predicts for US, we are wealthy now and thus can afford "culture", that spills over much to the annoyance of those, who — unable to speed up themselves — are trying to slow us down.

      --
      In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
  4. Re:what an idiot! by bigkahunafish · · Score: 2, Funny

    oh no! you western infidels have slashdotted my blog running on a 128kbps connection!

    --
    Eat a Chicken, You know you want to.
  5. Priorities by evil+agent · · Score: 3, Funny

    They should probably be more worried about their roads than their pipes.

    --
    End transmission.
  6. Re:I wonder what the citizens think about this? by betterunixthanunix · · Score: 3, Informative
    Capping it at 128kbps slows down downloads of music and movies. Why would you want to download these things? To see a movie that your government doesn't want you to buy...

    Of course, the intelligent citizens will know that they can just split the downloads amongst themselves, essentially bandwidth-pooling. Maybe we need to educate the government.

    --
    Palm trees and 8
  7. Technical solutions? by infolib · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm sure it's possible to combine several 128K lines to get one single hi-speed line.

    Suppose you and 5 or 6 of your neighbours had 128K each. How would you go about it?

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  8. Bad Ping by Wiarumas · · Score: 5, Funny

    Note to self: Avoid Iran Counterstrike servers due to bad pings.

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
  9. Really scared by Rumagent · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Iran is run by a bunch of wackos... I can live with that. But what really scares me is what happens when the RIAA hears of this - they will go for this shit in an instant.

  10. Iran Is Trying To Improve Tech For the Rest of Us! by Doug+Dante · · Score: 4, Funny

    They will son become world experts in data compression, home construction of undetectable spread spectrum links, ad hoc very long range wireless data connections, and anonymous groupware! Thanks Iran!

    --
    The world will not get better through technology. We must seek to be better people.
  11. Re:Tell me again why China=Good but Iran=Bad? by Tweekster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It isnt that difficult of a concept. Iran does nothing for us, China is a major trade partner.
    That is why, it is pretty simple.

    --
    The phrase "more better" is acceptable English. suck it grammar Nazis
  12. Iran is not a nation that cares about its citizens by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Informative

    The country is effectively a theocracy. The country does conduct votes and such, but it ultimately doesn't matter as the Ayatollah have the final say on everything. It is a highly oppressive in many ways. For example in the 2004 election the hardliners won a major victory. You might think this was the people's wish, but in fact the simple matter was the Council of Guardians disqualified most reformist candidates, including many incumbents. As for information access, well I'll quote Freedom House:

    "Freedom of expression is limited. The government directly controls all television and radio broadcasting. Satellite dishes are illegal, though widely tolerated, and the authorities have had some success in jamming broadcasts by dissident overseas satellite stations. The Ministry of Culture must approve publication of all books and inspects foreign books prior to domestic distribution. The Press Court has extensive procedural and jurisdictional power in prosecuting journalists, editors, and publishers for such vaguely worded offenses as "insulting Islam" and "damaging the foundations of the Islamic Republic." The authorities frequently issue ad hoc gag orders banning media coverage of specific topics and events. The government systematically censors internet content by forcing internet service providers (ISPs) to block access to a growing list of "immoral sites and political sites that insult the country's political and religious leaders.""

  13. OMG! Teh horror! by Klync · · Score: 2, Funny

    Somebody'd better go and liberate them, quick!

    --

    ----
    Not to be confused with Col.
  14. I guess Iran really is in the Axis of Evil! by fortinbras47 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... not only are they trying to develop nuclear weapons and "wipe Israel off the map," but they're capping bandwidth at 128kbps!

  15. And the consequences of this? by joe_cot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Short answer: Instead of quickly downloading western culture, the average Iranian will now be mildly inconvenienced by a cap on bandwidth speeds.

    Long answer: What makes this restriction really useful to the Iranian government is that it will help curb attempts to get around their filtering. Countries which censor (such as China) have had flourishing peer-to-peer anonymous darknets spring up as a result of technologies such as Tor and Freenet (link to wp article, as the site appears to be down currently). By capping the bandwidth at 128kbps, it's much more difficult to have faster supernodes on such networks, and fewer Iranians will be willing to dedicate bandwidth to running a p2p web server. Between a combination of web censorship, and an added (though not insurmountable) barrier to darknets, this will help Iran rather effectively cut off its citizens from what the government doesn't want them to see.

    The other main consequence is to servers; besides the comical bad ping for Iran counter-strike server which a commenter mentioned earlier, this will affect anyone trying to spread subversive material over their connection; on the other hand, this will cripple anyone trying to serve anything over their connection. I wouldn't be surprised if Iran soon gives exemptions to various research and commercial groups to help stem the latter conquences.

  16. Re:Beware Fundementalists of all Types by SupraTT+GOP · · Score: 3, Interesting

    What do you think about fundamentalist naturalists and secularists? They can be quite fanatical, you know.

  17. 128k isn't THAT slow... by loimprevisto · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From TFA:
    Parastoo Dokoohaki, a prominent Iranian blogger, said the move was designed to foil the government's opponents. "If you want to announce a gathering in advance, you won't see it mentioned on official websites and newspapers would announce it too late. Therefore, you upload it anonymously and put the information out. Banning high-speed links would limit that facility. Despite having the telecoms facilities, fibre-optic technology and internet infrastructure, the authorities want us to be undeveloped."
    How exactly will capping connection speeds at 128k per second stop someone from uploading 1k worth of text to 'put the information out' about a gathering? It's not like you need flashy banners and embedded movies... if someone wants to attend your protest rally (and you're serious about organizing one), waiting a few seconds instead of half of a second isn't really going to get in the way.
    --
    Much Madness is divinest Sense --
    To a discerning Eye --
    Much Sense -- the starkest Madness
  18. Re:Tell me again why China=Good but Iran=Bad? by fortinbras47 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    • China hasn't threatenned to "wipe Israel off the map."
    • China doesn't refer to the US as the "Great Satan."
    • China doesn't support Hizbullah, a terrorist group which killed 241 Americans in a bombing in Beirut.
    • China didn't ship thousands upon thousands of rockets to terrorist group Hizbullah.
    • China didn't storm the US embassy and hold 66 diplomats and US citizens hostage for over a year.
    • China didn't use terrorists to bomb the Israeli Embassy and the Jewish Cultural Center in Buenos Aires.
    • China doesn't try to actively sabotage the peace process in the Middle East.
    Oh.... but Iran did.

    China has nuclear weapons, but not many people are worried that China would provide a terrorist group with a nuclear weapon. There is great uncertainty over what Iran would do with nuclear weapons and nuclear technology.

    China is far from perfect, but the general direction they are moving is towards a more open society and a market economy.

  19. Re:Why do we trade with them? by StalinsNotDead · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What country has a larger per-capita incarceration rate?

    In the US, drug dealers end up incarcerated. In the others, I'm willing to bet drug trafficking has a much steeper penalty.

    --
    Thanks to the internet, we can now all die alone together! -SomeWoman
  20. Where does it go? by Kadin2048 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Looking at their total GDP isn't a good measure of poverty, because it doesn't say anything about the distribution of the resulting wealth that's being created. In the case of Iran, I have a feeling it's mostly concentrated in a small number of individuals.

    That said, based on some articles that I've read, life there for the average person isn't too bad in the physical sense; it's not poverty-stricken in the same way that parts of Africa or even South-east Asia are. The government uses oil revenues to heavily subsidize some consumer goods in order to keep the people happy (the price of gas there is ridiculous, I want to say around $0.30 a gallon), but there's very little investment in anything that's going to help them once the oil runs out, like education or scientific research (no, building a bomb-factory nuclear reactor that would have been obsolete in 1975 doesn't count) or communications infrastructure.

    The government's plan seems to be "hold on to as much as we can, for as long as we can, by any means necessary."

    --
    "Ladies and gentlemen, my killbot features Lotus Notes and a machine gun. It is the finest available."
  21. Re:Silly Iranians... ALWAYS! by patrixmyth · · Score: 5, Funny

    First, they came for the newspapers, and I did nothing
    because the Farsi Side comic was just re-prints now.

    Next, they came for the books, and I looked the other way
    because the Death to America Book of the Month Club
    was only recommending books to burn anyway.

    Then, they came for the Satellite Dishes, and I said nothing
    because I still had a year left on my Infidelphia Cable contract.

    Finally, they came for my Internet Service, and no one was left
    to hear my ululation!

    --
    "Don't you know you're going to shock the monkey?"- Peter Gabriel
  22. Sounds like David Kuo by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually the administration is merely pandering to the evangelicals. They aren't actually getting much of what they want. This group in office has their own agenda. They just convince the religious to support it.

    Sounds like someone else watched 60 Minutes over the weekend and listened to David Kuo lamenting the Bush administrations manipulation of the Christian Right, getting the backing they need for a few tokens and runs at legislation which would be unconstitutional anyway (some of the Faith-Based initiatives.)

    The Iranian government represents mostly the conservative rural people, not the more cosmopolitan city dwellers, same way most despotic regimes seize power (get the peasants behind you) and then maintain it through fear and intimidation.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  23. I'm iranian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hi all.

    First every US based company (virtually %90 of software companies) reject to work with us. Few weeks ago I just lost a $4000 consulting contract just because I'm Iranian (I'm a java programmer and $4000 is a big money here). Commonly I pretend I'm Turkish or other country just to use very basic things in internet like paypal or activating a web hosting. we say half of the web sites are blocked by USA (iee, sun download section, ...), half by mullahs. Now this problem. I don't know what the hell will happen next time.
    Regarding music and movie it's not a big problem as most of contents are either from satellite or cd or dvd. Sometimes I think western music groups will be surprised when they know how many fans they have in Islamic Iran and specially in Tehran (my favorites are dire straits and Shania twain among others). Here most of the people have dishes and I think it's between 70%-80%.
    Maybe you think we are happy with creating nuclear bomb and this government But I can say must of us are sick of these things. We just want to live a little better like any body else and have some kind of freedom, unlike what this government pretend, we have no kind of problem with outer world.
    In Iran young people call the "ali khameneii" (supreme leader) as "ali Galile" because like galile he look at stars (for creating Islamic rules).
    The biggest use of internet in Iran is for chatting with yahoo. Girls looking for boys and boys looking for girls (talking in public can result in prison or forced marriage if government arrests). So this will not affect the biggest use of internet in Iran. If you take a look at asia rooms in yahoo messenger and if you know farsi you will see almost every body is Iranian. Other things like orkut are already blocked. You may wonder but this fool (president) already forced coffeenets (small shops which let you connect to internet in the shop) in specified days don't let boys use internet and the same for girls meaning avoid both boys and girls be at the coffeenet at the same time. Some people wish USA drop a bomb and kill this government and if we die, it's not a big problem.
    It's funny but this kind of governments fear from virtually every thing. Like high speed internet, dishes, and even yahoo messenger.
    Also we are not Arab we are persian, some people hate arabs for what they have done to our country (including me).
    Some times I think life is a little tough with us but maybe it's our predecessors fault.

    1. Re:I'm iranian by IMightB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      yeah, I am friends with a Syrian who recently went back to Syria to visit his family. He told me some interesting things when he got back: He basically said that he was "treated better by both the USA and England combined than by his own country" He also mentioned that he told his close friends and family this when he was in Syria and was being asked why he chose to live in the US rather than Syria. His friends and family are under the impression that the US and England are the great infidels that are trying to destroy Islam, and that this is an idea that is being promoted by the government over there. He evidently could have gotten into a lot of trouble had his comments become known by the Syrian officials.

    2. Re:I'm iranian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hope that government over there will pass soon, and you'll get back to where you're not under complete government control.

      I'm sorry to say that I seriously doubt the United States will be able to do anything to help you. There are too many people in this country that want to see things just as they are now, rather than going over there and freeing your people from the dictators you are under. It's very sad that the same people that complain about supposedly lack of freedom in the US don't want see others freed.

      My Iraqi friends are delighted that Saddam is out of power, and mad that terrorists are coming into Iraq just to stir up trouble. They hear the news reports coming out of the United States and constantly ask why so many people hate Iraq so much, and why those people wanted Saddam to stay.

  24. Re:Beware Fundementalists of all Types by compro01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm curious to know what a 'fundamentalist secularist' looks like.

    completely opposed to religion in any way, shape, or form. one of the basic idea is that belief in any form of religion is a sign of mental illness requiring treatment.

    --
    upon the advice of my lawyer, i have no sig at this time
  25. This has nothing to do with censorship by ayne · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh my god! I *can not* believe how such stupid rumors get started and even published in the media!!! Yes the ICT ministry has asked ADSL internet service providers to stop giving high speed (higher than 128kbps) to their users. However, being the totalitarian regime that they are, this one had nothing to do with censorship! The ICT ministry announced that this is a *temporary* limitation which will be removed *within 4 months* and that it has to do with the gradual implementation of the new structure for ISP companies (which are going to be divided into several different categories based on their type of activity and the amount of bandwidth that they are allowed to provide). And forget this post, didn't any of you think how stupid it sounds to *censor* the internet by just reducing the speed to 128kbps which is actually quite a fast connection for a home user in this part of the world (because of high price of internet bandwidth). It just doesn't make sense. source: http://www.iribnews.ir/MainContent.aspx?news_num=6 5777

  26. For those who marked this flamebait: by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful

    President Bush Jr. said on national television that he believes that God works through him. The bulk of our political figures regularly cite God as their motivation for their actions. The republican party, which is currently in control of our government, has been hijacked by the religious fundamentalists. If you don't think that this adds up to the US being a religiously-controlled nation, then I don't think you're thinking hard enough.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:For those who marked this flamebait: by Johnboi+Waltune · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For laughs when listening to a politician speak, try mentally replacing the word "God" with some other deity people have made up.

      "I don't believe atheists should be considered patriots, nor should they be considered citizens. This is one nation under Zeus" - George Bush Sr.

      "I believe that Poseidon has planted in every heart the desire to live in freedom." - George Bush Jr.

      "Freedom and fear, justice and cruelty, have always been at war, and we know that Mithra is not neutral between them." - George Bush Jr.

      "Neither death nor life nor angels nor principalities, nor powers nor things present nor things to come nor height nor depth can separate us from Odin's love." - George Bush Jr.

      --
      "The advanced societies of the future will be driven by competing systems of psychopathology." -JG Ballard
  27. Nukes by SQLz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Luckily, the PDF "How to Make a Nuke Out of Normal Household Items" is only 96k.

  28. Re:aaaaactually learn your history by xigxag · · Score: 2, Informative

    I don't consider myself pro-Israel, but honestly, check your facts*. There have been Jews in the Middle East pretty much continuously since there were Jews, admittedly in small numbers, but they never entirely went away. Western history as typically taught tends to follow the story of European Jewry, not unreasonably, since most Jews today are of course of European ancestry. But that doesn't mean Palestinian, Lebanese, Iranian and African Jews ceased to exist.

    *On this subject, particularly, I don't know if it's even possible to find factual information that is entirely free of political agenda, but this page seems to be fairly free of BS. Can't vouch for the rest of the website, just that particular page.

    --
    There are two kinds of people: 1) those who start arrays with one and 1) those who start them with zero.