Is Second Life the Paris Hilton of Virtual Worlds?
An anonymous reader writes "Second Life appears to be suffering a bit of a backlash from its PR efforts. Matt Mihaly over at The Forge, newly-returned muckracker Peter Ludlow at the Second Life Herald and Tony Walsh at Clickable Culture have all recently taken Linden Labs to task for their non-stop, arguably deceitful, PR machine and frequent downtime. Further, over on Terranova a veritable cornucopia of long-time, experienced virtual world developers, including Raph Koster, Mike Sellers, Randy Farmer, the aforementioned Matt Mihaly, and Daniel James, have piled on, calling into question the fundamental utility of Second Life.
Does Second Life have real utility, or is it simply an endless exercise in unsubstantiated public relations? What do Slashdot readers think?"
Does Second Life have real utility, or is it simply an endless exercise in unsubstantiated public relations?
Yes
Oh god, that woman is John Romero!
Do you want my opinion or my second life's?
In a world of acronyms, the words are the real victims.
... before you can have a second one?
Seriously, three second-life articles a day is a bit much, isn't it? Isn't it time to fork off secondlife.slashdot.org and leave the games section to deal with, you know, actual games.
Software patents delenda est.
unlike the real Paris Hilton, you cannot get an STD from second life....
Monstar L
You mean, Paris Hilton is for real? Nah, I don't believe it. On any real human with a head that empty, the skull would simply implode from the 1 atm pressure.
Generally, bash is superior to python in those environments where python is not installed.
Is Second Life the Paris Hilton of Virtual Worlds?
I dunno, how easy is Second Life?
(The summary already states that it's ubiquitous, apparently useless and is subject to frequent downtime...)
I've never seen Second Life's bush.
LK
"Hi. This is my friend, Jack Shit, and you don't know him." - Lord Kano