Slashdot Mirror


NASA STEREO Spacecraft Set to Launch

An anonymous reader writes "As first reported on last year, NASA's STEREO mission is set to launch tonight at 8:38pm EST. The two near-identical spacecraft will give us unprecedented stereoscopic views of the Sun-Earth system, hopefully leading to the creation of the first 3-D movies of the Sun! Launch can be watched live on NASA TV with coverage starting at 6:30pm EST."

22 of 82 comments (clear)

  1. No one has seen the sun in 3D before? by techmuse · · Score: 4, Funny

    I thought that when I look at the sun, since I see it with two eyes, I see it in 3D.

    Oh! My eyes! Well, so much for that...

    1. Re:No one has seen the sun in 3D before? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
      > > I thought that when I look at the sun, since I see it with two eyes, I see it in 3D.
      >
      > funny but you do know that stereoscopic vision does not work for things as far away as the Sun? There is like a 30m max for that.

      He's right. I tried switching between my left eye and my right eye to see if I could spot the parallax difference, and I couldn't see a goddamn thing after ten minutes, never mind 30 minutes.

      Nothing to see here, guess I'll move along.

    2. Re:No one has seen the sun in 3D before? by pato101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is like a 30m max for that.
      Nice, then all we must do is to place the spaceship at 30m from the sun and take a photo.

  2. Sound in space by ShaneThePain · · Score: 2, Funny

    Who says there is no sound in space?

    --
    Fascism is the greatest political ideology ever conceived. Sorry.
  3. A Space Stereo? by aarku · · Score: 4, Funny

    They do realize there isn't sound in space, right?

    1. Re:A Space Stereo? by egeorge · · Score: 2, Funny

      There is plenty of sound in space, it just doesn't move.

    2. Re:A Space Stereo? by windsurfer619 · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's just not true. No air means no transfer of energy therefore no sound is generated.

  4. Don't you think it's truly fantastic.... by pandrijeczko · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...how great inventions discovered while making pornography are now carried on space missions?

    --
    Gentoo Linux - another day, another USE flag.
  5. Gigantic 3D glasses being erected in desert . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    . . . for those who haven't figured out the trick of fusing images by crossing their eyes.

    * * *

    Funky fictional anecdote.

    Olaf Stapledon's science fiction "novel" (more like a future history) Last and First Men covers the evolution of humanity from us poor demi-apes to a hyper-evolved species living on a terraformed Neptune two billion years from now.

    These "last men" are not only telepathic (and have 96 genders and look like anthropomorphic animals), but they can communicate with themselves across time.

    Stapledon describes the "last men" astronomers staring at the sky, sending a telepathic impression of the sight one-half of a Neptune year in the future, where their future selves integrate it with their own observation of the sky to create a wide-baseline 3D parallax image of the heavens.

    No. I don't know what Stapledon smoked.

    Stefan

  6. Nearly identical? by subl33t · · Score: 5, Funny

    Which one uses metric?

  7. I can't wait to see the Sun in 3D by Centurix · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'll bask in its spherical glory.

    I can literally feel the vitamin D oozing from my pores, all I need now is a virtual sun burn.

    --
    Task Mangler
  8. Re:obligatory.. by R2.0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, now, let's not be too hasty. I'm sure the USSR and the Chinese have gone into space. It's only the US that lies about everything.

    --
    "As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly." A. Carlson
  9. Launch time... by NMThor · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hate to be pedantic, but the launch time is 8:38 p.m. EDT (Eastern Daylight Time), not EST (Eastern Standard Time).

  10. it IS research by SnoopJeDi · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm definitely not a scientist either, but let me help you logically think this through.

    You ask how the 3d view of the sun could be used in further research, implicitly in the pursuit of space colonization. Well, seeing as the sun is a pretty big deal in our solar system (I mean, it's the solar system), I think all of humanity would really benefit from understanding how and why it does the things it does.

    In relation to space colonization, the radiation given off by the sun (and other celestial bodies) is only one of a ridiculous multitude of environmental factors to deal with (nevermind the logistics) in any spaceflight, manned or unmanned.

    Besides, it's just frickin' cool to get a better look at the sun.

  11. planned holds by slarabee · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Can anyone explain the purpose of a preplanned hold of a predetermined time not being added into the 'T minus' countdown?

    Here I am, minutes before I have to head out to work listening to the webcast and being happy that the T minus time for launch is less than my T minus time for work. Then their talking head mentions being a couple minutes away from a planned twenty minute hold. If they are planning on pausing for twenty minutes, why not just add twenty minutes to the clock and keep it counting?

    1. Re:planned holds by scapermoya · · Score: 5, Informative

      google is your friend:

      From http://www.nasa.gov/multimedia/podcasting/115_askm ission_leinbach_transcript.html :
      "Barrett: Why are there holds in the countdown and what is happening in the firing room during those holds?

      Leinbach: Well the holds were put in -- designed in the countdowns from the very beginning of the manned spaceflight program. And they are intended to be points in the countdown where the team can take a breather, essentially. There's not supposed to be much work going on during a hold. Again, it's a point where if work leading up to that built-in hold has run behind schedule for some reason, we can continue to work into the hold and then take the hold itself and then when we pick up the clock again, get back into work. So, really they are points in the timeline that allow catch-up time and also time for the team to take a breather and think about what's coming up next in the count. The last built-in hold we have is at T minus 9 minutes and for the current missions those are 40 minute long holds so that we can make sure that the vehicle is ready to pick up the clock at T minus 9 minutes and counting, because for 9 minutes on down is when the vehicle really starts to come to life. And so we want the team to be focused having just taken a short break as it were. We don't leave the control room, but we look forward to what's about to happen and we concentrate on our jobs. And so, it's really a time of reflection. It's a time to catch your breath and to think about what we're about to go do."

      --
      Beware the Jubjub bird, and shun the frumious Bandersnatch.
  12. Allow for Checks by rwade · · Score: 2, Informative

    The planned holds allow launch personnel an opportunity to ensure that the vehicle's status is nominal. NASA does not expect staff to evaluate information as complex as rocket science with a time contstraint; that is, scientists cannot work with a ticking clock in front of them as would be required if it were kept running.

    At the end of holds often comes the "Go, no-go" sequence immortalized by Apollo 13. Or at least an implicit "Go, no-go" indication.

  13. Re:While it is great... by GreggBz · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your tax dollars also pay for the publication of volumes of information available at NASA's website.

    Here is some very relevant information on the science instraments attached to the STEREO probe.

    You'll notice that each of the vehicle's instruments has it's own page, and some pretty good information on what it is supposed to do and why. It sounds pretty relevent to me. NASA's website is pretty great actually. You paid for it, go check it out.

  14. Re:While it is great... by bogdan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why not read up a bit:

    http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/stereo/mission/i ndex.html
    http://secchi.nrl.navy.mil/

    For example, this mission could be important for understanding how to protect humans out in the solar system.

  15. Re:It launched, nicely by Spiked_Three · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not entirely hitch less, they had a delay while they moved some people out of harms way of potential poisonous chemical release upon a mishap. Also had an under temperature condition in one of the fueling components. The delay allowed them to straighten both issues out and then it was hitch less.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  16. Re:While it is great... by Spiked_Three · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Some manager talked about 7-4-2 during the launch.
    Let me try and remember what the numbers meant;
    7 - was the tons of helium converted (burned) into hydrogen every second.
    4 was the 4 reasons why we care; 1) solar winds and how it effects things/us 2) communications and how it was affected 3) was the impact on astronauts (and thus your point about colonization) 4) was the affect on airplanes in our atmosphere (apparently an issue large enough to currently cause restriction of flights near the poles)
    2 was for stereo views

    He said there is a need to better understand how the sun affects us currently and for future space travel and these experiments will help in that understanding.

    For the paranoid types, the air force is also involved in the project - one can only guess how 'stereo' eyes in orbit can be tested and developed as new surveillance technologies.

    --
    slashdot troll = you make a compelling argument I do not like the implications of.
  17. Re:While it is great... by rk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For reference, the fusion works the other way: hydrogen is fused to produce helium. I'm also pretty certain that the sun fuses a LOT more than 7 tons of hydrogen every second. Wikipedia claims it's 3.6e38 protons a second, which my back of the envelope calculation (3.6e38 / 6.02e23) says is basically 6e14 grams, or six hundred million metric tonnes per second, most of which becomes helium... there's some other fusion reactions that make traces of heavier elements, and some of that mass is converted into energy.

    My favorite stat is that 99% of the mass of the solar system is the Sun, with the other 1% being Jupiter. Our wonderful planet, with all it's enormity and majesty, and all most of us will ever know personally, is lost in the underflow of the total mass. :-)